Inbound Spam Links
-
We've held Local listings at "A" for over a year.
2 weeks ago we dropped down to below the fold.
I ran several reports and our backlink report shows roughly over 10,000
and it's growing every day along with new domain referrals with
inbound spam links all using the same core anchor text term.
One domain is responsible for over 2,000. These sites
have Nothing to do with our industry and several in foreign
languages.
All these links are "NoFollow".
My question is. Although "nofollow" is known to protect you, I'm wondering with over 10,000 of them coming from 345 sites, ALL using our one core term as an anchor text has red flagged us? If so,I'm planning on using Google disavow at the "domain" level.
We are a local resort and until this happened we only had around 15 referral sites that are industry related. Hotels.com type sites and local tourist related sites.
These new inbound spam links are so blatant and yes they're "nofollow", but I'm starting to wonder IF this off the wall inbound spam link pattern IS indeed affecting us?
Any thoughts?
-
My gut reaction is the same as Marie's - it doesn't sound like a typical negative SEO approach. It seems more likely that a past SEO attempt by a 3rd party went farther then you thought or got spread/duplicated somehow. Unfortunately, there's virtually no way to tell who created a link (let alone why).
If many of these are coming from just a few domains, I'd also recommend using the disavow tool. I do agree with James that these links could potentially harm you, even no-followed.
I'd look for any common clues as to who might be leaving these comments, though. I'd just want to make absolutely sure it's not someone operating on your behalf. I've seen that way too many times in the past.
-
Hmmm. I don't know. Hopefully someone else can figure out why you would have so many nofollowed links from iffy domains. I'll be watching this thread.
-
I've been looking around the web and a couple of places it says that when google
disavows they apply a "nofollow". If indeed this is the case, we're already "nofollowed" up the yen yang.
Do they apply a "nofollow"?
-
Back in 08 or 09 I purchased 2 link wheels, a couple of months apart, but how would that keep producing forever backlinks? They're not backlink generators. The were for anchor text links.
I got reports back for each assignment and they were all English websites
with an article post for us with our anchor textI've been aware of backlink generators for years, but didn't go there.
So to answer your question build X number of links for $$...Nope
-
Listening to Matt Cutts, I would approach this by putting together a disavow file:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=HWJUU-g5U_I#!
You can also reach out to the Google Webmaster team:
https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/spamreport?hl=en
But, I wouldn't draw their attention if some of the spam links were self inflicted.
-
Thanks for sending me the url and the links. I don't have an answer as to what is going on, but I have a couple of theories.
I looked at a few of the spammy pages linking to you and they all seem to be nofollowed comment links. They are hidden by css. And they are there along with hundreds of other sites who have anchor texted links.
Are you absolutely sure you never purchased a "build x number of links for $100" type of package? That could populate links like that.
I wondered if it was some type of a malware thing where hackers place a script on your site and then link to it several times, but your site is clean according to sucuri and I don't see any strange script. Plus, it doesn't make sense that the hacker would link to you with anchor text. I see links for a couple of anchor texted terms.
If I were you I would disavow these links. I would use the domain: operator and hopefully you can get the majority of them. I personally wouldn't file for reconsideration given that you haven't been dealt a manual penalty. If you have suffered algorithmically because of the number of anchor texted links (which would surprise me because they are nofollowed) then this will resolve itself without you filing for reconsideration. It's not Penguin because you would have seen a dramatic drop October 5.
If the drop is indeed because of the links, then over the next couple of weeks as Google disavows them you should see a rise again. I'll be interested to hear if that happens.
-
I sent PM.
Looks like Google slowly started "discovering" these in Nov and started to peak in Dec
-
According to the report, these links started slowly this past Nov.
No problems with Panda or Penguin. We dropped 2 weeks ago.
Links aren't coming from directories, they'll all websites.
The only thing I've done as far as backlinks go was back in
2007 or 8 I published some articles and a couple of press releases and
yes it did use our core term as the anchor text
No email warning from Google in WMT, but from what I understand the only time
you get one is when the site is manually reviewed by a human as to an automatic algorithm adjustment. Don't know if this is actually true or not.
-
I'm curious about these links. Can you p.m. me your url? I'd love to have a look.
-
I'm going to respectfully disagree about this being a negative SEO campaign. If someone was going to go to the trouble to negative SEO you, why would they build 10,000 nofollow links?
When you disavow a link, what Google essentially does is add a nofollow to it in their algorithm.
Unnatural links issues and Penguin issues happen to sites that have built links in order to manipulate pagerank. That's not going to happen with nofollowed links.
But hey, you did lose rankings, so perhaps I could be wrong? Did your rankings start to drop on a Penguin day (last one was Oct 5)? Did you have a manual warning of unnatural links in WMT? If not, then I really guess that this is not any sort of negative SEO campaign.
So why do you have so many anchor texted links pointing to you? Have you ever used a backlinking service? Sometimes these can keep populating links. Have you ever used an auto directory submitter?
There's no harm in using the disavow tool on these new links just to be sure, but my guess is that it won't make a huge difference.
-
Don't think that - that thought hasn't cross my mind, but the "nofollow" doesn't make sense for negative SEO, useless, if this IS the case, they didn't get what they paid for to really crush us with "follow" links.
This started this past Dec and caught up to us 2 weeks ago.
I"m amazed we're not banished with this off the wall link/domain/anchor text ratio. Maybe the "nofollow" is saving us so far.
As mentioned, my plan is to do a Google disavow at the domain level.
We got 6 New domains since yesterday, so this is going to be an ongoing task, since it started 2 1/2 months ago, I don't see it stopping anytime soon
Forgot to mention. When I go to these links I can't find us ANYWHERE. Not for our term that's listed in report nor our domain
-
I think it may be hurting you b/c even though the links aren't passing link juice they are likely still messing up your anchor text distribution. This sounds like a case of negative SEO by a competitor.
What is your plan of action?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Link Audit
Reviewing a list of links from webmaster console for a client and there are links to their website which render a page but there' s no mention of the clients website on that page. Why does this happen? Why is Google thinking that there is a link to the clients website yet on the page there is no mention of that clients website. There's no comments etc. I don't understand this and if anyone can shed a light??
Link Building | | AL123al0 -
Spammy links
Hi I was reviewing a clients link profile and found a lot of the links they have pointed at their domain have the anchor text "Buy Viagra" or "buy viagra online" and similar. Now the website has absolutely nothing to do with this kind of business so no doubt these links are spammy. To my knowledge the website has not been penalised by Google so far. Is it best to disavow or just leave alone? Kind Regards
Link Building | | TheZenAgency0 -
Linking Etiquette
Hi Moz Community, Long time lurker, first time poster. I work for a real estate firm and have recently done some link analysis. I'm noticing that my company is not getting linked to as frequently as we should be. Several news outlets (including NYT & Bloomberg) have cited our reports, interviews with employees and other original content belonging to my company without linking back to our site (although they do mention us).Some publications are even linking back to our competitors for similar content but not ours. Is it appropriate to reach out and ask for links from these outlets after they've been published? Does anybody have tips on making others aware we want links shared for future articles? Thanks in advance!
Link Building | | rlaughlin0 -
Link building during link removal
We were advised by out outsourced link removal vendor not to build any links while they are removing links pointing to our site. I am worried that our site will lose significant traffic if we dont build any new links while waiting for them to remove links that caused our site to be penalized. What are your thoughts?
Link Building | | WizardOfMoz0 -
Total Links vs Ext. Followed Links
Hi I'm fairly new to SEO and SEOMOZ. I've created a campaign for my own site and I've added 3 competitor sites. There are 1,385 total links to my site and a massive 49,450 links to one of my competitor's site. However under "Ext. Followed Links", there are 1,045 to my site and only 911 to the same competitor site. Am I correct that it is the "Ext. Followed Links" which are more important from an SEO point of view as the other links have the "no follow" attribute set? Or have I got this wrong? Thanks James
Link Building | | avecsys0 -
NEW LINKS
Hi If you plan to add new links to a site which currently has very few inbound links what is the maximum amount you could add in any one day before it is deemed by Google to be suspicious and unatural. I am referring ot manually added links, not robotic. Thank you 🙂
Link Building | | PH2920 -
Links from any country?
My site is aimed primarily at the UK, 90% of the traffic is from the UK and most of my links are from other UK based and UK targetted websites. The content is actually fairly international (apart from certain terms like Plasterboard instead of Drywall, etc). My question is: Should I concentrate on gathering links from the UK, or should I widen my search and try to get links from US and European websites? Are there any particular advantages or disadvantages to keeping links "local"?
Link Building | | Jingo010 -
Free link on a Paid Link Blog
Hi there, I have been doing some outreaching, and managed to have a blog post accepted on a authority blog. They included links to my website, and I was very pleased with the placement. However, having browsed through the site, I was worried to see that they openly admit they allow 'reviews' of websites, with backlinks included, for $50 per review. I am worried I might be penalised without actually doing anything wrong. I did not pay for my link, but the link has been placed on a site which openly admits they accept payment for links. Should I be worried? Should I ask them to take it down? To date I have been told countless times by bloggers I am outreaching that if I pay $10, $50, $100 etc I can write a blog post. I have never accepted because of the risk of penalization. Now, unwittingly, I am linked to from a paid link site with a blog post that would look like I have paid for it because of the placement and style of back link. What do you think? Thanks,
Link Building | | giveacar0