Question #1: Does Google index https:// pages? I thought they didn't because....
-
generally the difference between https:// and http:// is that the s (stands for secure I think) is usually reserved for payment pages, and other similar types of pages that search engines aren't supposed to index. (like any page where private data is stored)
My site that all of my questions are revolving around is built with Volusion (i'm used to wordpress) and I keep finding problems like this one.
The site was hardcoded to have all MENU internal links (which was 90% of our internal links) lead to **https://**www.example.com/example-page/
instead of
**http://**www.example.com/example-page/
To double check that this was causing a loss in Link Juice. I jumped over to OSE.
Sure enough, the internal links were not being indexed, only the links that were manually created and set to NOT include the httpS:// were being indexed.
So if OSE wasn't counting the links, and based on the general ideology behind secure http access, that would infer that no link juice is being passed...
Right??
Thanks for your time. Screens are available if necessary, but the OSE has already been updated since then and the new internal links ARE STILL NOT being indexed.
The problem is.. is this a volusion problem?
Should I switch to Wordpress?
here's the site URL (please excuse the design, it's pretty ugly considering how basic volusion is compared to wordpress)
-
Hi Tyler
Looks like the duplicate title tags are largely from empty pages like these:
http://www.uncommonthread.com/008-Pink-Ice-p/14410008.htm
http://www.uncommonthread.com/001-Gold-p/14410001.htm
http://www.uncommonthread.com/019-Copper-p/14410019.htm
http://www.uncommonthread.com/027-Electric-Blue-p/14410027.htm
Even though these pages are somewhat unique, the content is definitely "thin" and having a lot of pages like this typically isn't good for rankings.
Ideally, you would list small product variations on the same page, or even have several similar product pages canonical to a master page. Generally if you don't have a 200 words minimum of good editorial content, Google might consider it duplicate.
I don't see any reason why switching to http should cause too much problem if you passed everything through a 301 redirect. To be honest, it's typical for rankings to fluxuate frequently so it could be a million things.
If I look at the text-only cache of the page you sent: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://www.ontracparts.com&strip=1
... it looks pretty similar. If it were my page, I'd probably try to include more descriptive text on the page, richer descriptions, ets.
Hope this helps!
-
Wow. What an awesome answer.
I literally don't know if I can't thank you enough for taking the time to answer so wholesomely.
I decided to go ahead and fix the https:// and change it to http://
Weird results here.. Traffic went down by 5.5% compared to the month before I posted this thread.
I noticed an increase in duplicate title tags (about 700 - 1000 of them) in my seomoz account.
Could that be likely to be the reason for the decrease? Or is it just because I shouldn't have made such a drastic site-wide change like that?
I am attempting to give unique title tags, and html titles to all of those product pages that are causing the increases in duplicate titles
I also am in a slight predicament because she hired another company to do some "optimization" around October 23rd.
Since then, they have made some spammy changes in my opinion, but some results have shown up (20+% increase starting around Jan 1st, and capping on the day I made the https:// change), and I can't get her to agree with me that we should invest in building a Social following, making better content, and blogging more often, etc. I also think we should move the blog to be in a sub folder on the domain as well..
I compared the webcache you showed me to a wordpress site that i built and the difference really was pretty shocking
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://www.ontracparts.com
whats the difference as far as rankings and SEs are concerned?
-
Hi Tyler,
Great question! In fact, it's a common misconception that Google doesn't index https. In truth, these days they appear to index most https just fine.
If we do a site operator Google search for https on your site, we get something like this:
site:uncommonthread.com/ inurl:https (click to see results)
This returns 165 URLs on your site with the https protocol.
But.... these URLs don't show up in OSE because at this time, the Linkscape crawler can't crawl https. When it was originally built Google still didn't index https, so it wasn't needed. This should be fixed in just a few months and you should start seeing those https results in there. The good news is that OSE is completely separate from Google and doesn't influence your rankings in any way.
Now for the bad news....
Whenever you have https, you want to make sure you only have ONE version of the url, so that https either redirects (via 301) to the http version, or vice versa. Otherwise Google might index both versions. For example, both of these URLs resolve on your site:
https://www.uncommonthread.com/kb_results.asp?ID=5
http://www.uncommonthread.com/kb_results.asp?ID=5
The solution is to either 301 redirect one to the other, or have an absolute canonical tag on both pages that points to one or the other (an absolute canonical means it contains the full URL, including http or https)
That said, I don't see any evidence that Google has indexed both URL versions of your site (at least not like Dunkin Donuts
Should You Switch to Wordpress?
Based simply on the https issue, switching to Wordpress isn't necessary. But Wordpress does offer other advantages, and is generally a very SEO friendly platform.
There might be other considerations you may consider to switch away from your current CMS.
For example, consider Google's Text-only cache of your homepage: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://www.uncommonthread.com/default.asp&strip=1
See how barren it is? Without taking a deep dive, it's possible the structure and technology employed by your CMS is causing indexing/crawling issues, and considerable technical effort may be required to make it SEO friendly. I can't give you a definite answer either way, but it's something to think about.
Hope this helps!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Fetch data for users with ajax but show it without ajax for Google
Hi, We have a thematic footer which shows similar pages links relevant to the search criteria made on a page. We want to fetch those footer similar links through ajax when users search on site but the links will be shown without using ajax when Google fetches those pages. We want to do this to improve our page load time. The links content & count will be exactly same in both cases whether Google fetches the search pages or user fetches those pages. Will this be treated as negative by Google, Can this have any negative affect on our rankings or traffic. Regards,
Web Design | | vivekrathore0 -
SEO strategy for UK / US websites
Hi, We currently have a UK-focused site on www.palmatin.com ; We're now targeting the North American market as well, but the contents of the site need to be different from UK. One option was to create another domain for the NA market but I assume it would be easier to rank with palmatin.com though. What would you suggest to do, if a company is targeting two different countries in the same language? thanks, jaan
Web Design | | JaanMSonberg0 -
Does anyone know how to find functions/codes/etc in WordPress?
Right now, I'm working on solving a relatively easy WP issue (easy, because someone told me what to do. Thanks iNetSeo). I have to replace: <span class="post_date"></span class="post_date"> and replace it with <span class="post_date date="" updated"=""></span class="post_date> But, I can't find the "_<span class="post_date">"</span class="post_date">_For a number of my WP problems, the hardest part is just located the code/function/markup I need to replace. Does anyone know where this might usually be stored on a website? Also, does anyone know if there's any tool that would allowed to just put "various function" in a search box, and wordpress take you to where it was on the backend of your site, so you could edit it? I included a screenshot of our editors, but I already opened them all, pasted the code in Ctrl-F to no avail, but maybe I missed something. Thanks for helping with my frustrating scavenger hunt! Ruben ASTPPfA
Web Design | | KempRugeLawGroup0 -
Thoughts about Comment Luv?
What do you think about the Comment Luv pro plugin for your blog? My goal is this would help me get traffic and comments on my posts..... Make it easy to promote my own content.... the unlimited version is $97, I thought about purchasing this for my site and all my clients but wasn't sure if this was just one more tool that I spend money on and 6 months later I don't use it because I have learned about a better option (that is usually free). I am sure many of you can relate to doing that 🙂 Thank you very much for any suggestions!!! Have a superb week everybody! Matthew
Web Design | | Mrupp440 -
Relationship page to target
Hi guys and girls, looking for some help on the topic of links and the options I have before me in the content editor JCE for Joomla. Is this worth setting? Will it help? Please see the screen shot for the options I have and let me know if I should be creating links that are nofollow, help, or any of the other option I have? This is one of the pages I'm looking at for example.. http://www.a1gt.com.au/training-courses/certificate-iii-in-automotive-mechanical-technology In this case the site is linking to a gov training site and I feel the relationship is beneficial and started to wondering if the advanced options have any advantages today? Thank you for your help in advance 🙂 Ben. [](<a href=)" target="_blank">a>
Web Design | | yoonet0 -
Does google prefer expanded text to text that you have to mouse over to show?
Does a long scrolling page of text perform better than a page that has the content in sections that have to be moused over to be seen? Are there any articles or research on this?
Web Design | | SirSud0 -
How do I gain full SEO value from individual property pages?
A client of ours has a vacation rental business with rental locations all over the country. Their old sites were a messy assembly of black hat, broken links and htaccess files that were used over and over on each site. We are redoing everything for them, in one site, with multiple subdirectories for individual locations, like Aspen, Fort Meyers, etc. Anyhow, I'm putting together the SEO plan for the site and I have a problem. The individual rental properties have great SEO value (lots of text, indexable pictures, can create google/bing location pages), and are great for linking in social media (Look at this wonderful property, rental price just reduced!). However, I don't want individual properties, which will have very similar keywords, links, descriptions, etc, competing with each other when indexed. Truth be told, I don't really want search engines linking directly to the individual property pages at all. The intended browsing experience should allow a user to "narrow down" exactly what they're seeking using the site until the perfect rental appears. What I want is for searchers to be directed to the property listing index that most closely matches what they're seeking (Ft. Meyers Rental Condos or Breckenridge Rental Homes), and then allow them to narrow it down from there. This is ideal for the users, because it allows them to see all available properties that match what they want, and ideal for the customer, because it applies dozens of pages of SEO mojo to a single index, rather than dozens of pages. So I can't "noindex" or "nofollow", because I want all that good SEO mojo. I can't REL=CANONICAL, because the property pages aren't similar enough to the index. I can't 301 Redirect because I want the users to be able to see the property pages at some point. I'm stymied.
Web Design | | SpokeHQ0 -
What is the optimal URL Structure for Internal Pages
Is it more SEO friendly to have an internal page URL structure that reads like www.smithlawfirm.com/personal-injury/car-accidents or www.smithlawfirm.com/personal-injury-car-accidents? The former structure has the benefit of showing Google all the sub-categories under personal injury; the later the benefit of a flatter structure. Thanks
Web Design | | rarbel0