Google reconsideration nightmare
-
Hello and thanks in advance
The website has had a penalty on it for a while now, around 10 months, it was worked on by an agency who bought bad links to it but before then it was worked on by other agencies that may have done the same.
I cleaned up as many bad link (according to many posts read) and filled for reconsideration and was told to get rid of a whole bunch of links which i did not know existed.
Downloaded WMT links as instructed by Google admin person and contacted a heap of people which took a lot of man hours and cost us a fortune.
Resubmitted and again was shown a handful of links by the Google admin person and told to contact and remove. The funny thing is that a few of them I disavowed in my list so they should not have pointed these out.
I emailed back and showed that everything I could do was done and am happy to disavow any other link which they though violated their terms.
This was not enough and I was told to show more efforts in removing links and then resubmit for reconsideration.
I have done as much as I can on the website, I cannot see any more links which show violation, if there are some I am happy to remove but am now at a stage where i need direction from others to tackle this matter.
Any advice would be helpful; I cannot start over from scratch as it's a brand and not a small website.
-
Good point to disavow the domain. I've also seen sites fail at reconsideration because their disavow file was improperly formatted. Be sure you're using a .txt file.
I'm of two minds about the popular idea of getting links from as many sources as possible. I think the thought process behind this came from a while back when WMT really only showed a small sample of your links. But, since WMT added the ability to download your links, the numbers have been much more inclusive. A few months ago John Mueller said in a webmaster forum thread (damned if I can't find it now) that in most cases it is ok to just use the links from WMT.
Lately, in some cases, when you fail at reconsideration you get an email from Google with a couple of sample links that they want to see removed. In every case where I have seen this the links are ones that are present on the WMT list.
What I have seen though is that if you spend a couple of months working on your request and then file for reconsideration, Google will often reject the request and show you as an example, new links that WMT has picked up. So, when I do my requests, I always go back and get the latest links and assess those as well.
I personally don't think that Google wants webmasters to have to pay for subscriptions to external tools in order to clean up their links.
I used to use a combo of ahrefs and WMT links and have always done well. For my current projects I am using just WMT. My theory is that they will do just fine, but we'll see!
-
I've had really good success, but it's hard to say whether it's because I'm so thorough. I bet you I could get away with doing a lot less and still pass.
-
Hi Ben, I think you got really good answers especially the Marie strategy is really a gold piece. However I'm adding my two cents here.
If you want to get rid of bad links you'll need to get more backlinks data not only relying on GWT, the same googlers said that you'll need to rely on more tools because doesn't show the whole data. Try the historical index from majestic SEO tool or the raw export of ahrefs or even here in seo moz you got good tools for that (although I recommend for this majestic historical which is the widest one, sorry mozzers ).
Then get those backlinks through a tool which may help you finding the toxic links which are poisoning your site (dtox tool is really popular this time) and disavow all the toxic and the more suspicious ones.
Be sure to disavow by domain not url because you may be missing other urls not indexed in the same domain which may get you in troubles in the future.
Add many attachments demonstrating your efforts to remove the links because google overstated that you should try to do everything to try remove the link before asking for a disavow
(here) -->"You should still make every effort to clean up unnatural links pointing to your site. Simply disavowing them isn't enough"
-
Hey Marie that was interesting, I've never attached all the emails I sent to google, I 'm sure that they won't see them all but it's definitely impressive to show how much work you did. HAve you got a better "consideration" from the web spam team making this process? Or it didn't get their attention?
-
The process is frustrating, isn't it?
"Resubmitted and again was shown a handful of links by the Google admin person and told to contact and remove. The funny thing is that a few of them I disavowed in my list so they should not have pointed these out."
This brings up two points for me:
-If a few of these were on your disavow list, this means that some of them were not. Google is showing you some links that needed to be addressed that are not. I am seeing quite often lately that site owners are saying, "I removed xx% of links and still failed." It is not the percentage that matters. Google wants to see that you have attempted removal for each type of link that they deem unnatural. "Unnatural" really means self made. So, let's say you had a link profile containing a bunch of blog comment spam and also a little bit of article spam. Let's say you removed almost all of the blog comment spam which accounted for 80% of your links but you didn't touch the article links. Even though you got 80% removed, Google wants to see that you have tried to get the article links taken down.
I've done a lot of consultation for site owners who have failed at reconsideration and by far the most common reason is that not enough kinds of links were deemed necessary to be removed.
-Next, it is not enough to just disavow. You've got to show that you've really tried to get the links removed. What I do is contact the webmaster via any available contact info I can find on the site, the whois contact and also contact forms. I show evidence by including a copy of the text of each email sent and screenshots of each contact form. Some may say that this is overkill. Perhaps this degree of work does not need to be done, but in my opinion it shows that I have REALLY tried to get links removed.
I hope that helps. The process is so darn time consuming.
-
From the comment "show more efforts", I'd say you'll want to show not just more success at removing links, but how many times you contacted each webmaster and how.
I've had experiences with a couple of clients where the kinds of links that kept getting pointed out by the Google spam team tended to be article marketing examples, where the pages linking to my client's site were not in the WMT links, not in OSE, etc.....far too weak. So you're not alone there.
I would advise looking at all the examples you can find of any article marketing that was done for your site, then try to find all related pages...i.e., don't JUST try to remove the examples they pointed out. In other words, if you find there's someone named "Andy Smith" authoring some of the article marketing posts they've pointed out, then do a Google search for "Andy Smith" and your brand name to try to find any other article this person wrote for you. In my case, I was able to find quite a collection of pages in the Google Index (not even supplemental...the regular index!) that weren't in the WMT links nor in OSE etc. Also, take a big block of text from the start of each article and search for that in double-quotes, to see if it was posted elsewhere under a different name.
Then, chase these down, try and get them taken down, ping the webmaster 3-4x each, then disavow them and submit your reinclusion request.
-
This is interesting, thanks for posting it. The more cases like these we as an SEO community hear about the more we learn on how to approach and deal with them.
At the moment I don't have any advice but I have a question -
Can you expand on the part where you "showed that everything you could do was done?" As in, did you take screenshots, list domains, post email text, spreadsheets, etc...? I'm wondering what exactly you gave Google in your reconsideration packet that they were simply not satisfied with.
Thanks and sorry to hear about all of this stress. It's not fun, I know.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What would the US traffic increase be for a website YoY if all Google SERP rankings remained the same?
This question has come up a few times with some of our clients and I've spent some time researching this question, but I can't find an answer online so hopefully, someone at MOZ has this data available to them with all the data they collect. The data points that would be needed to answer this question off the top of my head: Increase in the # of Google Searches in the US YoY The decrease in CTR for organic results "10 blue links" which take a searcher off of Google YoY, as Google continues to keep more searchers on Google.com with rich snippets, increased AdWords prominence, AdWords extensions, etc I'm sure this greatly varies per industry, but an average for all industries is all that is needed to answer this client question. Many thanks in advance and I've included a video which hopefully helps to better explain the search "plus/minus" that we can expect to see as SEOs in 2018. WF1yLlJC6LetnpbD3
Search Behavior | | WebpageFX1 -
Google site: search showing twice amount of indexed pages. why?
I have around 50k pages indexed on my site but when I do a google site: of my site it shows around 100k pages indexed. Why is it showing so much more? It is also only showing around 700 pages indexed in my web masters account for the site. Background: We have a custom site map being generated automatically. Let me know if you would like more info, Thanks.
Search Behavior | | Nicktaylor10 -
Google Analytics: advanced segment for hour of day
Cioa from 17 Degrees C cloudy Wetherby UK 🙂 In Google analytics I want to report specifically on Blackberry Mobile traffic next to hour if the day. Whilst this customised report I ripped off did the job @ http://bit.ly/hourdays I only resorted to this after battling with advanced segments thinking I could do the same thing. So my question is please how can I get this report http://i216.photobucket.com/albums/cc53/zymurgy_bucket/hrs-day-examplecopy_zps4f15d4a1.jpg by building it via advanced segments and not ripping off via http://bit.ly/hourdays Grazie tanto,
Search Behavior | | Nightwing
David0 -
Are there better & inexpensive third party website analytics software over Google Analytics?
I've heard there are some third-party software that provide greater depth of information than Google Analytics, such as mouse tracking, heat mapping, video snapshots ect. Can anyone recommend a good program to use? I've tried a basic web-search but there seems to be a great variety of different ones.
Search Behavior | | Justin_hannan270 -
Google ranks our competitor above us on 1000's of branded queires!!!
Hi all, I have noticed a very bizarre phenomenon in Google SERPs. When I search for a branded keyworks [Product + our brand].
Search Behavior | | ref.price
Amazon.fr appear above us on thousands of results. Google even ranks Amazon above us for queries like [ PriceMinister google plus]. I have tried to ask Google about it but I can’t seem to get an answer. Here is the topic I posted on Google’s forum: http://productforums.google.com/forum/#!category-topic/webmasters/crawling-indexing--ranking/DFvTPr14o_o This seems like a mistake on Google’s side, some kind of semantic association with our two brands! Basically they are sending our customers to our main competitor even though they specifically searched for our brand (PriceMinister). I find the phenomenon quite interesting for the SEO community and frustrating for our company. Does anyone have ideas on this one? Do you think it's a bug from Google? Cheers Oliver0 -
Why are Google ranking changes so drastic?
Hi SEOmoz community I'm sure this question has been asked numerous times before. At the same time there must be plenty of people out there wondering about the same thing: Why are Google ranking changes so drastic? It's like the diva of search engines. When checking the SEOmoz ranking reports, sometimes lots of keywords improve, the next week it's vice versa. Mind though that the ranking changes are not in proportion. While improving keywords climb up by approx. 1 - 10 positions, declining keywords always get a smack with a 15 - 25 position drop, even though these very same keywords are being targeted onsite through new content. It seems to make no difference after all 😉 Is it possible, that keyword fluctuations are stronger for younger sites? The site I am talking about is about a year old. Is it possible that more competitive keywords see more drastic fluctuations? Would be interested to hear your thoughts. Thanks!!
Search Behavior | | Hermski0 -
Recovering from a Hack: How long until Google reindexes changes?
In a previous post I made, I was able to determine that one of my sites; http://pokeronamac.com/ was hacked and was feeding spam perscription drug content to search engines, then redirecting to another site when clicked on Google. I then contacted my web host, and, after they did a scan of our files, they determined that something within the wp-includes directory was compromised and malicious. They removed the file, though they weren't able to determine the source of the attack, or how they god in (should we be scared?). Anyway, its been several days now ~5 and if I do a site search the spam pages still show up, but the redirect is no longer working. At this point, I am at a standstill, because i'm loosing traffic on my site by about 90%, and google hasn't sent us any warnings of malaware or the like. I know I was recommended against this before, but should I attempt to submit a reconsideration request, or should I just wait it out? Thanks for your help, Zach
Search Behavior | | Zachary_Russell0 -
Dating Blog Posts & How Fast Google Picks up on New Pages
I had until a few months ago included the original post date of a new blog post on the site. I then removed it and none of my results in Google now include the blog post date, although for some (for articles written about events) Google includes the date of the event where you would usually see the post date. Since I did this, it seems like new blog posts are taking longer to rank on Google, some results are ranking well, and others declined relative to what I would have previously expected. What's the best thing to be doing? To include a date (considering a lot of my content is not time-relevant) or to keep it as it is now? The second thing, is I often go through and update my articles with new information and re-post it in my rss feed etc - ie the date becomes new again. How does Google treat this? Any ideas or comments would be great! Thanks
Search Behavior | | ben10001