How do sites manage to rank better with no fresh content
-
hi, trying to work out why there are lots of sites that are ranking better than me. Our site www.in2town.co.uk has always been on the first page and for a long time we were number one in google for the term lifestyle magazine as well as being on the first page for other keywords.
Our site is www.in2town.co.uk
We had a site upgrade a few months ago and since then we have seen our rankings have dropped like a lead balloon.
I do not understand why sites such as the following seem to rank better than me for the word lifestyle magazine
http://www.24sevenlifestyle.com/
http://www.lifestylesmagazine.com/website/
http://motabilitylifestyle.co.uk/
http://www.alifestylemagazine.com/
if anyone can help me understand what i am doing wrong and why my rankings have gone out of the window then it would be a huge help.
-
just wanted to let everyone know that since the help i received yesterday we have noticed our rankings improved, we have gone from page nine to page six, so thank you everyone
-
hi, i have now sorted out the www.in2town.co.uk and the in2town.co.uk and also the canonical tag, i hope i have done it right.
I am going to start a new post as i have come across a few problems since i have done this which includes the meta description not showing according to a seo tool even though i can see it.
many thanks for your help
-
That will help with the duplication issues in a temporary fashion but redirecting is the only true way to solve the issue we're talking about here. Mainly because canonicals don't pass link juice so if any links are pointed to the non-www they won't carry through.
If I were you I'd avoid adding that line until after the redirect is done just because.
-
thank you, will contact them now. can you let me know if this is what i should be putting in my head of my site to fix things or is this wrong
-
Yes contact your hosting company. The process depends on whether they are running an Apache or IIS server. I'm sure they will know how to handle it for you.
Good luck!
-
Excellent points Dana and I think you're absolutely partially correct. I strongly agree that there are a "whole lotta things all working together" that need to all be addressed. For sure!
As for the "how big of a deal is this redirect" discussion, I think it depends and differs case-by-case.
I also discovered this issue at the company I'm currently working at when I started there 8 months ago. I also discovered a ton of other weird issues related (like 2 index pages.. !?!?!) that I literally had to argue with the engineers over for days.. (They honestly believed we needed an index.htm and index.html page with identical content.. I think they still do even. ugh)
Anyway I FINALLY got them all redirected and we absolutely saw improvement. (Also, going from PR3 to PR4 is a big deal!! I'd throw a party for a PR bump!) We saw improvement in almost every one of our target keywords.
Here's why I think our cases differ: It all depends how the links were built prior. Meaning if you have links built to domain.com and to www.domain.com equally, the juice will be split between them and when that redirect happens your main domain will get a bump. This is what happened in our case and I knew it would going into it as I did a nice long scouring of our link profile prior.
So I'm guessing in your case they had all correctly built/gained links to the same version of the domain keeping it from being split.
Still it is my experience that when you get a link some people go domain.com and some go www.domain.com and in this case if the two are different you will definitely lose out on some great juice.
Nonetheless Dana, you are absolutely right that there is no end-all be-all in this business. (That's why we all love it so much, right?!) And it's also why I tried to stress that this person go through your list as well as heed my advice. Your list is much more thorough and a great launching pad for anyone looking into a similar issue.
Onwards!
-
hi thanks for this. we sorted this out last time with the www. so i take it the person who done the upgrade did not sort it out this time around.
can you let me know the best way to sort this out, should i tell my hosting company or is it something that i can do. i will want to have the www. version. also what is the best way of putting the canonical in place. i was reading about it and it says i should be putting it in the head.
should i put this in my head position of my template, i am using joomla, i have seen there are a number of examples but which one would be right for my site.
would be great to learn how to sort this and thank you for letting me know what the problem is.
-
I agree with Jesse on the duplicate content issue. However, and maybe as a secondary question (that I would love to hear feedback on), does resolving the duplicate content issue from redirecting one version of a domain to another have any real measurable impact on a site's performance?
In my own experience, it doesn't.
Here's why I say this. Of course, I'm long-winded, so it involves a story... I came onboard at my current company in September 2011 as an in-house SEO. There was and still are a lot of technical SEO issues that haven't been resolved. However, some things we have successfully conquered. This "www" versus "non-www" was one of them. We hadn't redirected one to the other. It's always exciting to find something you know is wrong and be able to fix it fairly easily and inexpensively. We fixed it...and? Absolutely nothing changed...Well, that's probably not accurate. After this change and several other technicals SEO fixes (i.e. making our canonical tags absolute instead of relative) our PageRank went from 3 to 4. That's it. Rankings didn't improve. Market share didn't improve. Traffic didn't improve. Conversions didn't improve. In fact, they all went the other way.
The only reason I bring this up is because I think there's this overwhelming desire that all we have to do is find that "one thing" that's dragging our site down, fix it, and boom, everything will be rainbows and unicorns. Should these things be fixed? Absolutely. Just don't expect that any one of them is going to show any kind of significant impact. Make a strategy, come up with tactics to support it, and pursue them with dogged determination. Chances are, your problem is never just one thing, but a whole lotta things that are all working together to drag your site down.
-
Everything that Dana said is awesome. Look into it all. But before you do any of that, fix this huge problem:
Your site is duplicated. Very possible you have a panda problem on your hands if your rankings have tanked as you say.
You need to either pick the www version or the non-www version and redirect one to the other. This is the most vital thing you can do quickly and easily and is an absolute must.
You don't even have a canonical tag in there. (NOTE: You cannot fix this with just a canonical. You need to 301 redirect one to the other.) But right now google sees two separate sites. One at www.in2town.co.uk and the other at http://in2town.co.uk
Do this and then address what Dana handily listed out for you.
P.S. All of those sites outranking you have 301 redirects in place... This is huge you should heed my advice.
-
thanks for the info, very interesting. I am looking at building some smaller sites on a subdomain name so may try this. many thanks for your help
-
Hi Tim,
I understand you frustration and it really could be so many things causing this that it's impossible to say for sure without digging in deeper. Here are some initial things I would say could be factors:
- The very first thing I noticed is that every single one of the competing sites you mentioned has the word "lifestyle" in their URL." Two of them have "lifestyle" AND "magazine" somewhere in their URL. I find that interesting.
- When you redesigned, did you change any or all of your URLs? If so, then it might be worth meticulously working your way through your 301 redirects and make sure they are all functioning properly.
- Even if your 301s are fine (if your URLs changed), or even if you simply re-platformed, but kept your URLs the same, a drop in rankings and traffic after a big change like that is completely normal. I've seen drops of anywhere from 25-75% that lasted for anywhere from a few weeks to 6 months or more before beginning to recover.
- While "fresh content" is most likely an element in Google's algorithm, it is only one of over 200 other elements and none of us know to what extent one element has more weight in effecting rankings than another. If you are competing against established sites, with a lot of social signals (i.e. customer reviews), inbound links, etc. it may not matter that they don't update their content very often. A great piece of content that isn't time-sensitive really doesn't need to (and probably shouldn't) be constantly updated.
- It doesn't sound like you changed your domain when you redesigned the site, but if you did, this could firther complicate matters.
It might be worth an experiment to build a micro site on a domain that contains one or both of your keywords. Maybe target a specific niche or location and see how well it does. If it does great, link it back to your original site, if it bombs, you won't have harmed your existing asset. These are just thoughts.
You might also want to consider revisiting your keyword research and seeing if there are any opportunities that your competitors aren't leveraging. I bet there are some nuggets you'd get out of that exercise. Sorry, no definitive answers here, but hopefully some things to think about to help you strategize a solution. Cheers!
Dana
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Site redesign makes Moz Site Crawl go haywire
I work for an agency. Recently, one of our clients decided to do a complete site redesign without giving us notice. Shortly after this happened, Moz Site Crawl reported a massive spike of issues, including but not limited to 4xx errors. However, in the weeks that followed, it seemed these 4xx errors would disappear and then a large number of new ones would appear afterward, which makes me think they're phantom errors (and looking at the referring URLs, I suspect as much because I can't find the offending URLs). Is there any reason why this would happen? Like, something wrong with the sitemap or robots.txt?
Technical SEO | | YYSeanBrady1 -
What would cause a major drop in ranking for (images) on both desk top and mobile? Web rankings are holding OK?
Sometime between Nov 8th and Nov 11th are rankings on Google for images dropped substantially. Our web rankings are holding OK. any idea!
Technical SEO | | OCFurniture0 -
Adding academic content for a school in a sub folder, sub domain, or different site?
I manage the website for a school and we are planning to put our academic policies/student handbook online. I’m curious if there is any SEO value to including this content in our main website? This isn’t stuff that anyone is going to link to externally (student orientation procedures, how to enroll/drop credits, academic warning policies etc) and there would be limited internal linking as well (someone looking for course information doesn’t want to see this type of stuff). I’m not interested in SERPs for this content, but I’m wondering if the additional content could help the site’s SEO overall? It is naturally rich with ‘academic’ keywords and the only websites that use this type of content are universities. On a similar note, I need to put up student profiles for potential employers to view. Like the policies, this is not priority content for someone visiting our website, but it is still keyword-rich content, which would add to the overall 'size' of the site. Should this stuff go in a folder, a subdomain, or in a different location altogether?
Technical SEO | | AISFM0 -
Duplicate Content Vs No Content
Hello! A question that has been throw around a lot at our company has been "Is duplicate content better than no content?". We operate a range of online flash game sites, most of which pull their games from a feed, which includes the game description. We have unique content written on the home page of the website, but aside from that, the game descriptions are the only text content on the website. We have been hit by both Panda and Penguin, and are in the process of trying to recover from both. In this effort we are trying to decide whether to remove or keep the game descriptions. I figured the best way to settle the issue would be to ask here. I understand the best solution would be to replace the descriptions with unique content, however, that is a massive task when you've got thousands of games. So if you have to choose between duplicate or no content, which is better for SEO? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | Ryan_Phillips0 -
Trying to get google to know my site is a magazine site is this wrong
Hi, i have put a line to describe what my site is at the top of my site and i want to know if this is wrong or not. We have dropped frok being number one in google for lifestyle magazine to now number seven. Before we had to redo our site we were number one and then we dropepd to around number four when we finished the site and now we are number seven and i need to try and get back up there. To help google know we are a lifestyle magazine i have put a line at the top of the site and i want to know if this looks out of place and if i should take it down. i need advice on how to get google to know we are a lifestyle magazine and get back in the top five of google my site is www.in2town.co.uk any help would be great
Technical SEO | | ClaireH-1848860 -
Interesting Dilemma: Making A (Good) Content Scrapper Rank
Greetings Moz'ers! I'm in the process of optimizing a non-profit's website that has an interesting dilemma: They lack the resources to create their own content so they search the web for videos, quotes, blogs, pictures, etc. to post on their website. As the "good guys" their cause is just but because they are essentially scrapping content from other sites they are considered "bad guys" in Google's eyes and are getting hit with duplicate content penalties. What they are doing isn't much different than what the major news sites do - they just want to be a good resource center. The content that they are using is relevant to the cause and they give credit on everything they post by linking to where the content came from. Any recommendations on how I can help them? Thanks, Jason
Technical SEO | | DragonSearch0 -
Syndication partner ranking in Google News for our content
Our blog is part of Google News and is syndicated for use by several of our partners such as Chicago Tribune. Lately, we see the syndicator version of the post appearing in Google News instead of our original version. Ours generally ranks in the regular index. ChiTrib does have canonical URL tags and syndication-source tags pointing to our original. They are meta tags, not link tags. We do have a News-specific sitemap that is being reported in WMT as error-free. However, it shows no urls indexed in the News module -- even when I can find those specific URLs (our version) in the News. For an example: Here is a ChiTrib post currently ranking in Google News
Technical SEO | | CarsProduction
http://www.chicagotribune.com/classified/automotive/sns-school-carpool-lanes-are-a-danger-zone-20120301,0,3514283.story The original version is here:
http://blogs.cars.com/kickingtires/2012/03/school-carpool-lanes-are-a-danger-zone.html The News sitemap URL is
http://blogs.cars.com/kickingtires/kickingtires_newsmap.xml One of our front-end producers is speculating that the Facebook sharing code on ChiTrib is having an effect. Given that FB is FB and Google is Google, that sounds wrong to me when we're talking about specifically Google News. Any suggestions? Thanks.0 -
Duplicate Content
Many of the pages on my site are similar in structure/content but not exactly the same. What amount of content should be unique for Google to not consider it duplicate? If it is something like 50% unique would it be preferable to choose one page as the canonical instead of keeping them both as separate pages?
Technical SEO | | theLotter0