Extrapolating Google volumes from the Bing volumes
-
What would you give someone as a general rule for extrapolating Google search volumes from the Bing volumes? I'm looking at the Moz keyword analysis tools and only Bing search volumes are listed so I'm wondering how I could those figures to estimate Google search volumes.
-
Practically speaking, in my experience the difference ranges from a 1:1 relationship to a 1:8 relationship, which is a huge spread.
A lot of SEOs I know, including our tools developers here at Moz, have shown an interest in Grep Words. Might be worth checking out if you were interested.
-
In order to do this with any degree of accuracy you'd need to have a deep understanding of who is searching for the particular query. Once you've got that demographic (nationality, market segment etc) nailed, you'd then need to establish the number of these type of users who use bing vs google and then multiply the volume to get something close to the Google volume.
BUT It's not something you really need to do and I certainly wouldn't suggest trying. What you're looking at when you're comparing keywords is the relative volumes between the different keywords you're researching as you look for that holy grail of high volume / low competition.
To get the Google keyword volumes you're going to have to use the Keyword Planner in Adwords I'm afraid - and even then the keyword volumes are bucketed.
I tend to have already established a list of potential target keywords/topics before I start my research using the keyword difficulty tool to determine whether they are realistic to chase and whether they should be short term or long term goals.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
New Limits to Adwords Search Volume Data..Oh my!
Has anyone experienced the recent limiting of data in the Google Adwords keyword tools -- Monthly average search volume? The average monthly search volume data used to be nuanced and precise. When searching for the average monthly volume for a keyword like "Chicago Heating and Colling Companies"now results in the vague 1K-10K . Does anyone know what it will take to get more specific ranges? I am new to AdWords and creating my first campaign. Thanks!
Keyword Research | | HectorCortes1 -
Which "search volume" stats should I choose? Moz or Google Keyword Planner?
Hi there Hoping someone can shed some light... The same keywords give different Search Volume results in Moz and Google Keyword Planner. Why is this and which one should I "trust"/use? Thank you!
Keyword Research | | Jana_Joubert0 -
Google Product Listing Ads and SEO
Would using the same product descriptions that are on an e-commerce website for it PLA campaign count as duplicate content? Ideally, would we want to alter the product description?
Keyword Research | | S.S.N0 -
Google+ Listings - Strange
I was doing keyword research, and for some of my keywords I was seeing Google+ listings last week. they were gone earlier this week, but now they are back. We weren't in them anyway (new project) but can anyone explain this? Same computer, Same IP,
Keyword Research | | CsmBill0 -
Can i get some insight as to why this is #1 on google?
So... our results keep slipping little by little. I am trying to understand the rhyme and reason to it all (aren't we all?)
Keyword Research | | CassisGroup
Since Penguin, one website seems to have strongly benefited from the update. And I can't seem to understand why except maybe for the lack of seo efforts which resulted in no bad efforts.
Search for "chaussures grandes tailles" in google.FR, you will find what I am talking about. This is what I seemed to have gathered. The #1 result has the KW in both their title and description is using blatant keyword stuffing (ie just astring of keyword with no phrase structure), has done little with links or optimization, does have 300 facebook fans (but they seem to have been bought according to the last 3 months activity). Text is very limited on their site. They have a lower authority than other websites.They are also a newcomer as far as the market goes. It is important to note, that they also rank #1 on many of the related field keyword or top 3. So according to google this is a "winning" website as of now.and that is why it grabbed my attention. The #2 results, is a big website, equivalent to zappos or the like, seems to have redone their optimization following penguin and to me seems to do a pretty good job at writing "natural" content for the user, not for google, as much as possible without killing their seo chances. Their authority should be good, and tons of people are linking to them. They also do use a lot of PR blog/article.(legit ones though I am not sure about before). They invest heavily in adwords and ads altogether (tv/radio/etc..). They are the big guy but are not specialized on this keyword. The lower results, are not as representative, a mish mash of good and bad but all are specialized stores in this market including mine. They all get some ranking on some of the major keywords but not nearly as much as that #1 website which is killing it all (see semrush for more on it). So I thought I would focus on these 2 top (neither of which are mine) to start a conversation.Though feel free to comment if you have any hindsight on any of them. Can anyone explain to me why the #1 can possibly be #1? I would love to hear everyone's opinion on the matter.
I fully understand that in the long run that #1 might not be #1 forever, but then again it has been several months now at least and the longer that last, the more likely they are to gain new (possibly repeat) customers...0 -
Is there an ideal ratio of keyword difficulty to search volume?
I used the keyword research tool to pull data on potential keywords, the report returns a percentage to represent the competition and difficulty of a keyword. Is there an ideal ratio of percent difficulty to search volume
Keyword Research | | AdviceElle0 -
IPhone Klingelton - SEO Onpage - www.google.de
Hello Guys, I want to focus in one keyword for google.de: "iphone klingelton" keyword competitive seomoz: 35% We want to pick a domain name exact match: www.iphone-klingelton.de And focus ON-PAGE SEO. U guys have any advice for me to how to improve this page? We have this 2 similar pages: http://www.mediavideoconverter.de/iphone-ringtone-maker.html http://www.mediavideoconverter.de/iphone-ringtone-maker-for-mac.html Thanks in advance.
Keyword Research | | augustos0 -
Discrepancies between SEOMOZ's Google api exact match search volume results and google's keyword tool, why?
I'm finding major discrepancies between SEOMOZ's google api exact match search volumes and Google's own keyword tool, why? For example, 'bridge loans' gets 1300 searchs according to Google's keyword tool, but SEOMOZ says it only gets 210 (both on exact match). So which one do I believe? I know one is the average over 12 months and the other is for last month alone but still that's a huge difference.
Keyword Research | | Gmorgan0