Trying to get on Google page one for keyword "criminal defense attorney san diego". What can I do?
-
I'm trying to help a friend who is an attorney get on page one for the keyword "criminal defense attorney san diego."
So far I've changed his title and description tags since they weren't optimized before. (SERP shows old title tag, however I submitted a XML sitemap through Webmaster tools to get the new title tags updated.) He also had a few duplicate pages, but I took care of that with some 301 redirects.
I also added a h1 tag, alt image tag, and more content. I also spent a few hours building links for him. He currently has a page authority of 52 and domain authority of 44 with a decent amount of links pointing to his site. I'm wondering why he's stuck on page 4, when his competitors that have less impressive numbers seem to show up on page 1.
I did look at his link profile using OSE and I'm worried that his old SEO guy got him spam links.
His website is www.nasserilegal.com, however the page I was focusing on was www.nasserilegal.com/criminal.html
Any advice would be great.
-
Thanks for all the great advice everyone! I have already started to make a few adjustments to his pages. I ran the seomoz on page optimization report again and it went from a grade D to an A.
In terms of Local SEO, I've been working on getting him more citation sources, but he's basically starting from scratch. Most of his competitors that do show up have a ton of Google Reviews and other citation sources such as Insiderpages.com, kudzu, citysearch.com, etc... I'm currently using whitespark to find all the citation sources that his competitors are getting and getting his business profile created. I also registered his business to InfoUSA, Localeze, Yelp, and a few other Legal directories.
One problem I noticed with his Google Places page only shows one category (Attorney). The rest of his categories: Criminal Attorney, DUI Attorney, Criminal Defense Attorney, and Immigration Attorney do not show up anymore. (I do know that once you click on the category, it should expand and show the other categories). I did fill out the change request form provided by Google a few days ago and hope that this will fix the issue. I'm not sure if anyone else has experience with this, but would welcome any feedback.
I will definitely get started on the Hcard for him though! Thanks Miriam!
-
Hi Lucas,
You've gotten some good advice here. I will add a few thoughts.
Read David Mihm's Local Search Ranking Factors 2012 if you haven't already. If your area of expertise is more in the traditional SEO field rather than the Local SEO field, this report will bring you up to speed on the importance of things like citations and reviews, which don't really apply to standard SEO. However, because of the publication date of this year's LSRF report, we didn't have a chance to talk about the rollout of Google+ Local, so that data is 'missing'.
To get a jumpstart on that, here is Mike Blumenthal's step-by-step guide on making the Places-Plus transition:
http://blumenthals.com/blog/2012/06/08/google-for-business-places-forums-wrapup/
Your friend is attempting to break into a very tough market - a major term in a populous locale. To make things more complicated - he offers 2 areas of specialization (Immigration Law and Criminal Law) and these can be broken down into further subcategories of services (theft, assault, etc.). Right now, the site is thin on content to support his work in these areas. The homepage of the site is really lacking in descriptive text. 'Welcome' is a very weak header for the page - he can do much better than this - and the homepage copy makes no mention of his core service keywords nor his geographic location. Homepages are always so important.
I would further recommend that the NAP (name, address, phone number) on his Contact Page and his footer be coded using hCard or Schema. If these are new to you, here are two good resources:
This one is an hCard generator:
http://microformats.org/code/hcard/creator
This one is a Schema generator (be sure to pick Organization>Local Business from the categories):
http://schema-creator.org/organization.php
Robert and TheeDesign have made some important suggestions for you regarding Google+ Local. I will add to this that if you put in major effort and still see your client unable to attain high rankings, you must always consider the possibility of past or current penalties. But, cross that bridge when you come to it. There is a ton your friend can do to improve the presentation of the business, its usefulness to humans and its SEO.
-
I agree with making the content on this page read a little more natural and maybe splitting it up with some h2s.
To rank for local search terms, I would try to obtain links from "local" websites. Example: Attorney Associations in San Diego, San Diego Chamber of Commerce, and some authority local news sites that accept guest posts.
You can write posts that pertain to your industry and include a relevant linkback to your page. Here are some local new site links:
http://www.eastcountymagazine.org/
-
I agree with Robert. I would work on the G+ local page to begin with. It looks like you don't really have anything attached to it, except for an address, phone number, and website.
Remember with local pages, you can attach pictures, videos, and even meta information. This will help you show up better in search. Always remember to fill out profiles, it will help you in the long term.
-
Lucas
You have made a good start with some on page and you might want to ask yourself a question: Why this keyword phrase? Have you looked at criminal attorney/lawyer san diego? They both have many more searches for them. (So, KW research is important for a competitive area like this).
Next, have you worked on the local G+, gotten reviews from former clients?
But, then: Be careful as it appears you are working on elements as opposed to delivering anything that will make me want to engage your attorney.
Your title tag of CDASD | SDCDA is not the way to go. Stuffing Criminal Defense in the content on that page over and over is a killer and reads terribly. (see image)
Before that though, if I were in jail and needed a criminal atty. I would not go to one who was accentuating immigration law. See image on practice areas. (What is most..)
Last, in your meta description you are still repeating the KW phrase. It has zero effect on ranking, this is where you get someone to click because you wrote something that drove them to your site. "Get out of jail now, before something bad happens." Attorney XXX is here to save your day!
Think about it.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Are "appliance repair" and "appliance repair los angeles" consider the same keyword?
Hello, I know that you can't optimize two pages for 1 keyword because Google will get confused and will rather prefer my competitor. But I can't get if it will consider "appliance repair" and "appliance repair los angeles" same keywords? The homepage of my website, https://www.ifixappliancesla.com, is optimized for "appliance repair", one of the inner pages is optimized for "appliance repair los angeles". None of them shows on the first page in local SERPs for any of those quires. I am wondering if this is because Google sees it as both pages are optimized for "appliance repair"?
Technical SEO | | VELV0 -
Over 40+ pages have been removed from the indexed and this page has been selected as the google preferred canonical.
Over 40+ pages have been removed from the indexed and this page has been selected as the google preferred canonical. https://studyplaces.com/about-us/ The pages affected by this include: https://studyplaces.com/50-best-college-party-songs-of-all-time-and-why-we-love-them/ https://studyplaces.com/15-best-minors-for-business-majors/ As you can see the content on these pages is totally unrelated to the content on the about-us page. Any ideas why this is happening and how to resolve.
Technical SEO | | pnoddy0 -
Google page speed testing failures
When running our domain through google's page speed insights I'm getting the error message 'An error occurred while fetching or analyzing the page' at around 65% load. I'm concerned it's affecting our organic rankings. The domain is https://www.scottscastles.com/ When testing in https://testmysite.withgoogle.com/ it is also failing at around 70% with the message 'It's taking longer than expected. You can leave this tab open and check back in a little while. We'll have your results soon.' but the results never come. I've tried testing on a few different speed testing sites without failures (https://tools.pingdom.com, https://gtmetrix.com, https://www.webpagetest.org and a few others). We’re stumped as everything appears correct and was working but now isn't. Is this Google or us, or a combination of the two? Any help greatly appreciated!
Technical SEO | | imaterus0 -
How to explain "No Return Tags" Error from non-existing page?
In the Search Console of our Google Webmaster account we see 3 "no return tags" errors. The attached screenshot shows the detail of one of these errors. I know that annotations must be confirmed from the pages they are pointing to. If page A links to page B, page B must link back to page A, otherwise the annotations may not be interpreted correctly. However, the originating URL (/#!/public/tutorial/website/joomla) doesn't exist anymore. How could these errors still show up? Screenshot%202016-07-11%2017.36.27.png?dl=0
Technical SEO | | Maximuxxx0 -
Choosing the right page for rel="canonical"
I am wondering how you would choose which page to use as a canonical ? All our articles sit in an article section and they are called in the url when linked from a particular category. Since some articles are in many categories, we may have several links for the same page. My first idea was to put the one in the article category as the canonical, but I wonder if Google will lose the context of the page for it's ranking because it will not be in the proper category. For exemple, this page in the article section : http://www.bdc.ca/en/advice_centre/articles/Pages/exporting_entering.aspx Same page in the Expand Your Sales > Going Global section : http://www.bdc.ca/EN/advice_centre/expand_your_sales/going_global_or_international_markets/Pages/RelatedArticles.aspx?PATH=/EN/advice_centre/articles/Pages/exporting_entering.aspx The second one has much more context related to it, like the breadcrumb is showing the path and the left menu is open at the right place. For this example, I would choose te second one, but some articles may be found in 2 or 3 categories. If you could share your lights on this it would be very appreciated ! Thanks
Technical SEO | | jfmonfette0 -
Is a Rel="cacnonical" page bad for a google xml sitemap
Back in March 2011 this conversation happened. Rand: You don't want rel=canonicals. Duane: Only end state URL. That's the only thing I want in a sitemap.xml. We have a very tight threshold on how clean your sitemap needs to be. When people are learning about how to build sitemaps, it's really critical that they understand that this isn't something that you do once and forget about. This is an ongoing maintenance item, and it has a big impact on how Bing views your website. What we want is end state URLs and we want hyper-clean. We want only a couple of percentage points of error. Is this the same with Google?
Technical SEO | | DoRM0 -
How can I optimise for Google Products?
Has anyone got experience of optimising Google Products (Google Base) feeds? I've noticed that, although my site doesn't often appear on page one in the standard results, we occasionally appear right at the top because of the "universal" shopping results. My question is: how can we make this happen more often? There seems to be a lot less competition (presumably because our competitors haven't worked out how to provide the feed to Google yet!), so I imagine it should be easier and quicker to reach the top this way than any other way. Thanks! Alex
Technical SEO | | reddogmusic0 -
Can Search Engines Read "incorrect" urls?
I know that ideally a url should be something of the nature domain.com/topic, but if the url contains additional characters, for example, domain.com/topic?keyword, can the search engines still understand the complete words in the domain? Even though there are additional "incorrect" characters? Or do they stop "reading" once they find odd characters? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | nicole.healthline0