Duplicate Content even when Canonical is used
-
Hi Everyone,
Our website uses the Magento platform which is notorious for creating duplicate content. I tried to make sure that all the duplicate content it creates should be "canonicalized" to the correct page.
While looking through the moz Page Diagnostics I see that I have 1003(!) pages of duplicate content. When I downloaded the csv I saw that over 95% of them had a canonical url.
Does that mean there is really no issue but moz analytics is still reading it as duplicate content and titles? Is there an issue with them being canonicals as opposed to being redirected?
Thanks!
-
We had a similar problem we thought with duplicates after placing canonical tags on all our pages. Moz took about a week as did Woorank to update and decide the canonicals were in place and showing no duplicate content.
We have a fairly small site with a little under 100 pages but this was a significant amount of work inserting the canonical tags and we were a little worried initially that they continued to show as duplicates for a short time.
Gary
-
I have the exactly same problems like you with Moz ereports. But after some research, I found out that the main problem here is that Moz is talking about the duplicate title tag and description (if you show on category and other pages).
-
Canonicals hint Google about what is the original page location and not really Moz crawler so Moz might still show the duplicate content (As far as I think). The better idea in my opinion is to search Google and see if they have still indexing the pages that you really didn’t want Google to crawl.
There are times (I am facing this one of my client) that Google does not get the canonical signal in that case I think we left with 3 options.
- Update the canonical tag once again and let the Google spider crawl the website again and hope this time it work! (very lame)
- Make the pages unique enough that we didn’t really want to use the canonical tag. (very difficult)
- Redirect 301 the pages to the original content (not possible in all cases)
Hope this clears the picture!
-
Your canonicals are good. You should not worry about that URL and those duplicate pages in specific.
For clarification: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2013/04/5-common-mistakes-with-relcanonical.html
Also you can try to search the caonicalized URL and see if its indexed, in this case it is not.'
For example search:http://www.plasticplace.com/business/trash-bags-for-rollaway-cans?gallon_capacity=368
And your original URL will apepar in SERPs.
-
Hi William,
Thanks for responding.
This is the url for the correct page: http://www.plasticplace.com/business/trash-bags-for-rollaway-cans
Here's a sample of a bunch of urls that are "canonicalized" to that page: (the minor differences on this page are based on the selection that you choose from the left hover, if a user going through the regular navigation chooses something, it doesn't affect the url.)
http://www.plasticplace.com/business/trash-bags-for-rollaway-cans?gallon_capacity=368
http://www.plasticplace.com/business/trash-bags-for-rollaway-cans?gallon_capacity=358
http://www.plasticplace.com/business/trash-bags-for-rollaway-cans?thickness_values=106
http://www.plasticplace.com/business/trash-bags-for-rollaway-cans?thickness_values=54
http://www.plasticplace.com/business/trash-bags-for-rollaway-cans?thickness_values=352
http://www.plasticplace.com/business/trash-bags-for-rollaway-cans?p=2
Thanks!
-
If you have duplicate content, the best practices are typically 301 redirects or canonicals. This would really depend what type of pages they are, whether they are campaigns, parameters, pagination(could use prev/next).
If you have an example we should be able to tell what you should do for that example.
-
Are you sure? I have some pages that have many other urls. Is it better if they are redirected?
-
I'm not 100% but perhaps Moz doesn't crawl duplicate pages and their code. It could be more about title tags, meta data etc.
As long as your canonical tags are in place and pointing to the original source, you should be fine.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Spam Score shows No Contact Info even though I have a Contact Page
Hello, Open Site Explorer give me a Spam Flag for No Contact Info, but I have a Contact page (http://www.localwisejobs.com/contact/) Google has indexed my contact page. So that's not the problem. Any idea why I'm seeing this flag? Thanks!
Moz Pro | | mztobias1 -
Duplicated content generated by keywords
Hello! I am kind of new to SEO and MOZ, so I really need your help to understand why some of my keywords generate duplicated content. Meaning, in my blog posts I use various SEO keywords. It shows up that in my MOZ crawl analysis, I have these keywords listed as duplicates: so two/three different keywords are pointing to the same articles and are considered duplicates? I really don't understand how it is possible. Did it also happen to you? I highly appreciate it. Thank you
Moz Pro | | DianaC0 -
Rel Canonical
Just had my site crawled by Moz Pro for the 2nd time and its flagged up 925 Rel Canonical issues. Most of the pages are similar but with different content. Please can someone tell me what i need to do to sort this issue...? www.indigocarhire.co.uk Thanks
Moz Pro | | RGOnline0 -
Sorting Dupe Content Pages
Hi, I'm no excel pro, and I'm having a bit of a challenge interpreting the Crawl Diagnostics export .csv file. I'd like to see at a glance which of my pages (and I have many) are the worst offenders for dupe content – ie. which have the most "Other URLs" associated with them. Thanks, would appreciate any advice on how other people are using this data, and/or how 'Moz recommends to do it. 🙂
Moz Pro | | ntcma0 -
Duplicate pages with canonical links still show as errors
On our CMS, there are duplicate pages such as /news, /news/, /news?page=1, /news/?page=1. From an SEO perspective, I'm not too worried, because I guess Google is pretty capable of sorting this out, but to be on the safe side, I've added canonical links. /news itself has no link, but all the other variants have links to "/news". (And if you go wild and add a bunch of random meaningless parameters, creating /news/?page=1&jim=jam&foo=bar&this=that, we will laugh at you and generate a canonical link back to "/news". We're clever like that.) So far so good. And everything appears to work fine. But SEOMoz is still flagging up errors about duplicate titles and duplicate content. If you click in, you'll see a "Note" on each error, showing that SEOMoz has found the canonical link. So SEOMoz knows the duplication isn't a problem, as we're using canonical links exactly the way they're supposed to be used, and yet is still flagging it as an error. Is this something I should be concerned about, or is it just a bug in SEOMoz?
Moz Pro | | LockyDotser0 -
Issue: Duplicate Page Content
For pro members: Is there a way to see exactly what "it" is that is duplicate? Also, what % of duplicate content is required to be labeled as dupped. Much thanks, Chenzo
Moz Pro | | Chenzo0 -
Notice rel canonical
Hi, Why does my sites get the crawler notice for rel canonical when using the PRO account crawlers?? The canonical is there and it works, and to me it looks just like any other canonical link, the canonical is only at some links but not everyone, why is that?
Moz Pro | | careeron0 -
Do crawl reports see canonical tags?
Greetings, I just redesigned my site, www.funderstanding.com, and have the old site pointing to the new site via canonical URLs. I had a new crawl test run and it showed a large amount of duplicate content. Does the SEO Moz crawl tool validate canonical urls and adjusts the duplicate content count or is this note considered? FYI, I sent from no duplicate content to having 865 errors since the redesign went up so that seems suspicious. I would think though that assuming the canonical tag were used properly, and I hope it is?, that this would not be a problem?? All help with this is most appreciated. Eric
Moz Pro | | Ericc220