Duplicate Content even when Canonical is used
-
Hi Everyone,
Our website uses the Magento platform which is notorious for creating duplicate content. I tried to make sure that all the duplicate content it creates should be "canonicalized" to the correct page.
While looking through the moz Page Diagnostics I see that I have 1003(!) pages of duplicate content. When I downloaded the csv I saw that over 95% of them had a canonical url.
Does that mean there is really no issue but moz analytics is still reading it as duplicate content and titles? Is there an issue with them being canonicals as opposed to being redirected?
Thanks!
-
We had a similar problem we thought with duplicates after placing canonical tags on all our pages. Moz took about a week as did Woorank to update and decide the canonicals were in place and showing no duplicate content.
We have a fairly small site with a little under 100 pages but this was a significant amount of work inserting the canonical tags and we were a little worried initially that they continued to show as duplicates for a short time.
Gary
-
I have the exactly same problems like you with Moz ereports. But after some research, I found out that the main problem here is that Moz is talking about the duplicate title tag and description (if you show on category and other pages).
-
Canonicals hint Google about what is the original page location and not really Moz crawler so Moz might still show the duplicate content (As far as I think). The better idea in my opinion is to search Google and see if they have still indexing the pages that you really didn’t want Google to crawl.
There are times (I am facing this one of my client) that Google does not get the canonical signal in that case I think we left with 3 options.
- Update the canonical tag once again and let the Google spider crawl the website again and hope this time it work! (very lame)
- Make the pages unique enough that we didn’t really want to use the canonical tag. (very difficult)
- Redirect 301 the pages to the original content (not possible in all cases)
Hope this clears the picture!
-
Your canonicals are good. You should not worry about that URL and those duplicate pages in specific.
For clarification: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2013/04/5-common-mistakes-with-relcanonical.html
Also you can try to search the caonicalized URL and see if its indexed, in this case it is not.'
For example search:http://www.plasticplace.com/business/trash-bags-for-rollaway-cans?gallon_capacity=368
And your original URL will apepar in SERPs.
-
Hi William,
Thanks for responding.
This is the url for the correct page: http://www.plasticplace.com/business/trash-bags-for-rollaway-cans
Here's a sample of a bunch of urls that are "canonicalized" to that page: (the minor differences on this page are based on the selection that you choose from the left hover, if a user going through the regular navigation chooses something, it doesn't affect the url.)
http://www.plasticplace.com/business/trash-bags-for-rollaway-cans?gallon_capacity=368
http://www.plasticplace.com/business/trash-bags-for-rollaway-cans?gallon_capacity=358
http://www.plasticplace.com/business/trash-bags-for-rollaway-cans?thickness_values=106
http://www.plasticplace.com/business/trash-bags-for-rollaway-cans?thickness_values=54
http://www.plasticplace.com/business/trash-bags-for-rollaway-cans?thickness_values=352
http://www.plasticplace.com/business/trash-bags-for-rollaway-cans?p=2
Thanks!
-
If you have duplicate content, the best practices are typically 301 redirects or canonicals. This would really depend what type of pages they are, whether they are campaigns, parameters, pagination(could use prev/next).
If you have an example we should be able to tell what you should do for that example.
-
Are you sure? I have some pages that have many other urls. Is it better if they are redirected?
-
I'm not 100% but perhaps Moz doesn't crawl duplicate pages and their code. It could be more about title tags, meta data etc.
As long as your canonical tags are in place and pointing to the original source, you should be fine.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How to deal with auto generated pages on our site that are considered thin content
Hi there, Wondering how to deal w/ about 300+ pages on our site that are autogenerated & considered thin content. Here is an example of those pages: https://app.cobalt.io/ninp0 The pages are auto generated when a new security researcher joins our team & then filled by each researcher with specifics about their personal experience. Additionally, there is a fair amount of dynamic content on these pages that updates with certain activities. These pages are also getting marked as not having a canonical tag on them, however, they are technically different pages just w/ very similar elements. I'm not sure I would want to put a canonical tag on them as some of them have a decent page authority & I think could be contributing to our overall SEO health. Any ideas on how I should deal w/ this group of similar but not identical pages?
Moz Pro | | ChrissyOck0 -
Competitor Ranks Highly Despite LOTS of Duplication
One of my Moz campaigns tracks my main competitor. I can't get over the fact that this competitor continues to rank well despite having thousands of duplication issues while I currently have less than 10. Our websites are similar both structurally and product-wise. The two images attached include OSE comparisons for the keyword "kraft envelopes". My competitor ranks #2 for the term, while I rank #9. I don't get why! And again, looking from a top-level perspective, MOZ shows that my competitor's website is full of duplication issues and other problems while my site is healthy as a horse. All responses are greatly appreciated. QmSlfET.jpg 9CDny60.jpg
Moz Pro | | jampaper0 -
Using Seomoz for Site Evaluation am I up to par ?
Just wanted to see how people using the seomoz bar would rate a four month old site with Domain-Homepage Authority of 27 Mozrank of 5.08 and Moztrust of 5.65 . I've read up on all the factors but just wanted to know if Im up to par on building a great site thats search engine friendly. Inner pagers are on a PA of 20 and around the same mozrank and moztrust levels of +- 5.
Moz Pro | | NikolasNikolaou0 -
Issue Using MozScape wtih SEOGadet's Link Excel Extension
Howdy Everyone! Since i've seen the MozCon presentation by Richard Baxter at SEOGadget, i've been completely amazed by the links extension for Excel. I tried this morning to give it a try. Unfortunately, I cannot get it working, and was hoping that someone here could help me out. I know it's out of the usual "realm" of questions, but I figure it's worth a try 🙂 I successfully installed the addon and entered my Access id (as "member-xxxxxxxxxx" member is in my id) and the secret key. I then downloaded the "OSE" excel spreadsheet" just to make sure I get all the calls right (as I know the doc works) Once I do this, and enter anything in, I get the "an error occured: the remote server returend an error: 401 unauthorized. I then went into the config file (as the setup doc suggests) and disabled run time caching (or at least set "SEOMOZ_API_use_cache_YN":"N") and the SEOMOZ_API_timeout to 100000 from 60000. I have also tried uninstalling and reinstalling the addin, along with regenerating the MozScape API Key Anyway, i'm not an excel wiz, and would appreciate any help that I could get on this. I'm also about to experiment with SEO Tools For Excel if anywone wants to check that out. Thanks in advance Zach Russell
Moz Pro | | Zachary_Russell0 -
Using the On-Page optimization Report Card
I am curious if there is a way to get the on page optimization report card to not show a grade of "F" for a page that I'm not targeting a particular keyword for? For example my home page has a lot of grade "F's" for keywords that are targeted on different pages.
Moz Pro | | kadesmith0 -
How do I find the corresponding duplicate content pages from my SEOmoz report?
Once I have run my report and the duplicate content pages come up, is there a way to find out which pages have the duplicate content on them? I have one URL but where can I find the duplicate content that corresponds to it? Thanks Barry
Moz Pro | | MrBarrytg0 -
Using the 'Organic Traffic Data ' feature.
I don't have access to the clients Google Analytics Password. Can you set it up without being redirected to Google webmasters? Is there a way to insert a simple code into the website and then have SEOmoz double check the code? Thanks so much
Moz Pro | | Robin_Jennings0 -
We were unable to grade that page. We received a response code of 301\. URL content not parseable
I am using seomoz webapp tool for my SEO on my site. I have run into this issue. Please see the attached file as it has the screen scrape of the error. I am running an on page scan from seomoz for the following url: http://www.racquetsource.com/squash-racquets-s/95.htm When I run the scan I receive the following error: We were unable to grade that page. We received a response code of 301. URL content not parseable. This page had worked previously. I have tried to verify my 301 redirects and am unable to resolve this error. I can perform other on page scans and they work fine. Is this a known problem with this tool? I have verified ensuring I don't have it defined. Any help would be appreciated.
Moz Pro | | GeoffBatterham0