Database driven content producing false duplicate content errors
-
How do I stop the Moz crawler from creating false duplicate content errors. I have yet to submit my website to google crawler because I am waiting to fix all my site optimization issues.
Example: contactus.aspx?propid=200, contactus.aspx?propid=201.... these are the same pages but with some old url parameters stuck on them. How do I get Moz and Google not to consider these duplicates. I have looked at http://moz.com/learn/seo/duplicate-content with respect to
Rel="canonical"
and I think I am just confused.
Nick
-
All of you guys rock! I have never been involved in a community that has had the right answers every time... I used the on all my static pages such as directions, policies, contact, etc... and it removed all the parameters thereby eliminating them from standing out in the MOZ crawl.. I feel like and idiot not knowing about this HTML tag and its importance. My moz crawl now looks so so much better.
When I mean old url parameters, I just meant a few seconds old, meaning the user is on property.aspx?property=1 then when they moved to a static page such as contact, directions, policy we now have another page called contact.aspx?property=1 which if I have 150 properties times 10 static pages I basically just created 150 duplicate content errors just for the contact page alone. Because contact.aspx?property=1 or contact.aspx?property=150 and in between are all the same page... I am sure this has killed my SEO. SO THAT PROBLEM IS NOW FIXED!!
NOW to revisit what zenstorageunits says about URL rewriting which has many different ways to do it using .net, but Miketek I would not have to create subdirectories because it is done in the code... they are more like virtual directories...
zenstorageunits or anyone else for that matter, Is it worth it for me to hire somebody to create a URL rewrite app that can change the following;
http:/www.destinationbigbear.com/property_detail.aspx?propid=202 to
http://www.destinationbigbear.com/big-bear-cabin-rentals/a-true-cabin/details
and
http:/www.destinationbigbear.com/property_photos.aspx?propid=202 to
http://www.destinationbigbear.com/big-bear-cabin-rentals/a-true-cabin/photos
See everyone of my 150 cabins has these pages; info, photos, calendar, video, reviews, rates...and they all have unique cabin names... so it is basically 150 cabins x 6 pages = 900 unique pages with unique content but really only 6 pages dynamically being changed by 150 cabins.
I have been able to dynamically change all the page titles for everyone of these 900 database driven pages such as
Big-Bear-Cabin | A True Cabin Photos or Big-Bear-Cabin | A True Cabin Calendar and so on.
-
Hi Nick,
I think you've gotten some good tips here - I'd agree with Prestashop that the preferred solution would be to find where these parameters are being included in links to this page and remove them.
Failing that, zenstorageunits's advice to use rel="canonical" would be my recommendation - or a 301 redirect from the URLs that include parameters back to the core URL would work.
I wouldn't convert these parameters to subdirectories unless they are integral to the way your site works and pull up unique content - you called them "old parameters" so it sounds like they're not supposed to be there, so probably not a case where you'd want to convert these parameters to subdirectories.
Failing the above, you could utilize the Google Webmaster Tools "URL Parameters" interface to tell Googlebot to ignore these parameters.
Overall, your best course of action is to find and remove the links that include the parameters.
I'd also add that the Moz crawl report is highly sensitive to "duplicate content," and I often find it flags up issues has high/medium priority that are not actually going to have a significant impact on the site. You have to take the crawl report with a grain of salt - while duplicate content can be a serious issue for some sites (ecommerce retailers for example with duplication issues across a wide catalog of products), in most cases it has minimal impact and isn't something I'd hold up your site launch for.
Best of Luck,
Mike -
I agree zenstorageunits about using rel=canonical but one thing I would like to point out is that Moz does not create false errors. It is a simple crawler, not like google. Google will actually try to follow links that people have used before and that show up in your analytics files. moz uses no logic like that, it just jumps from page to page. If it is picking up a page with a query string like that then it is a link on your site. I would find the links and take them off.
-
You have a few options you could do. One thing I would look into is maybe doing some url rewriting to change
contactus.aspx?propid=200
to
contactus/propid/200
look at http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms972974.aspx on how to do that for IIS.
A better option I think if you need to keep the parameters the way they are is to use the rel canocial tag look at moz article
http://moz.com/blog/rel-confused-answers-to-your-rel-canonical-questions
but basicly you would need to add something like this to your contact.aspx page(replace example.com with your website url)
This suggest to the website crawler, like google or moz crawler, that those pages should be assoicated with the contact.aspx page.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
.com and .co.uk duplicate content
hi mozzers I have a client that has just released a .com version of their .co.uk website. They have basically re-skinned the .co.uk version with some US amends so all the content and title tags are the same. What you do recommend? Canonical tag to the .co.uk version? rewrite titles?
Technical SEO | | KarlBantleman0 -
Cloud Hosting and Duplicate content
Hi I have an ecommerce client who has all their images cloud hosted (amazon CDN) to speed up site. Somehow it seems maybe because the pinned the images on pinterest but the CDN got indexed and there now seems to be about 50% of the site duplicated (about 2500 pages eg: http://d2rf6flfy1l.cloudfront.net..) Is this a problem with duplicate content? How come Moz doesnt show it up as crawl errors? Why is thisnot a problem that loads of people have?I only found a couple of mentions of such a prob when I googled it.. any suggestion will be grateful!
Technical SEO | | henya0 -
Duplicate Content - Reverse Phone Directory
Hi, Until a few months ago, my client's site had about 600 pages. He decided to implement what is essentially a reverse phone directory/lookup tool. There are now about 10,000 reverse directory/lookup pages (.html), all with short and duplicate content except for the phone number and the caller name. Needless to say, I'm getting thousands of duplicate content errors. Are there tricks of the trade to deal with this? In nosing around, I've discovered that the pages are showing up in Google search results (when searching for a specific phone number), usually in the first or second position. Ideally, each page would have unique content, but that's next to impossible with 10,000 pages. One potential solution I've come up with is incorporating user-generated content into each page (maybe via Disqus?), which over time would make each page unique. I've also thought about suggesting that he move those pages onto a different domain. I'd appreciate any advice/suggestions, as well as any insights into the long-term repercussions of having so many dupes on the ranking of the 600 solidly unique pages on the site. Thanks in advance for your help!
Technical SEO | | sally580 -
Duplicate Page Content
I've got several pages of similar products that google has listed as duplicate content. I have them all set up with rel="prev" and rel="next tags telling google that they are part of a group but they've still got them listed as duplicates. Is there something else I should do for these pages or is that just a short falling of googles webmaster tools? One of the pages: http://www.jaaronwoodcountertops.com/wood-countertop-gallery/walnut-countertop-9.html
Technical SEO | | JAARON0 -
Duplicate Content Issue
Hello, We have many pages in our crawler report that are showing duplicate content. However, the content is not duplicateon the pages. It is somewhat close, but different. I am not sure how to fix the problem so it leaves our report. Here is an example. It is showing these as duplicate content to each other. www.soccerstop.com/c-119-womens.aspx www.soccerstop.com/c-120-youth.aspx www.soccerstop.com/c-124-adult.aspx Any help you could provide would be most appreciated. I am going through our crawler report and resolving issues, and this seems to be big one for us with lots in the report, but not sure what to do about it. Thanks
Technical SEO | | SoccerStop
James0 -
Duplicate Content Caused By Blog Filters
We are getting some duplicate content warnings based on our blog. Canonical URL's can work for some of the pages, but most of the duplicate content is caused by blog posts appearing on more than 1 URL. What is the best way to fix this?
Technical SEO | | Marketpath0 -
Complex duplicate content question
We run a network of three local web sites covering three places in close proximity. Each sitehas a lot of unique content (mainly news) but there is a business directory that is shared across all three sites. My plan is that the search engines only index the business in the directory that are actually located in the place the each site is focused on. i.e. Listing pages for business in Alderley Edge are only indexed on alderleyedge.com and businesses in Prestbury only get indexed on prestbury.com - but all business have a listing page on each site. What would be the most effective way to do this? I have been using rel canonical but Google does not always seem to honour this. Will using meta noindex tags where appropriate be the way to go? or would be changing the urls structure to have the place name in and using robots.txt be a better option. As an aside my current url structure is along the lines of: http://dev.alderleyedge.com/directory/listing/138/the-grill-on-the-edge Would changing this have any SEO benefit? Thanks Martin
Technical SEO | | mreeves0 -
Up to my you-know-what in duplicate content
Working on a forum site that has multiple versions of the URL indexed. The WWW version is a top 3 and 5 contender in the google results for the domain keyword. All versions of the forum have the same PR, but but the non-WWW version has 3,400 pages indexed in google, and the WWW has 2,100. Even worse yet, there's a completely seperate domain (PR4) that has the forum as a subdomain with 2,700 pages indexed in google. The dupe content gets completely overwhelming to think about when it comes to the PR4 domain, so I'll just ask what you think I should do with the forum. Get rid of the subdomain version, and sometimes link between two obviously related sites or get rid of the highly targeted keyword domain? Also what's better, having the targeted keyword on the front of Google with only 2,100 indexed pages or having lower rankings with 3,400 indexed pages? Thanks.
Technical SEO | | Hondaspeder0