Database driven content producing false duplicate content errors
-
How do I stop the Moz crawler from creating false duplicate content errors. I have yet to submit my website to google crawler because I am waiting to fix all my site optimization issues.
Example: contactus.aspx?propid=200, contactus.aspx?propid=201.... these are the same pages but with some old url parameters stuck on them. How do I get Moz and Google not to consider these duplicates. I have looked at http://moz.com/learn/seo/duplicate-content with respect to
Rel="canonical"
and I think I am just confused.
Nick
-
All of you guys rock! I have never been involved in a community that has had the right answers every time... I used the on all my static pages such as directions, policies, contact, etc... and it removed all the parameters thereby eliminating them from standing out in the MOZ crawl.. I feel like and idiot not knowing about this HTML tag and its importance. My moz crawl now looks so so much better.
When I mean old url parameters, I just meant a few seconds old, meaning the user is on property.aspx?property=1 then when they moved to a static page such as contact, directions, policy we now have another page called contact.aspx?property=1 which if I have 150 properties times 10 static pages I basically just created 150 duplicate content errors just for the contact page alone. Because contact.aspx?property=1 or contact.aspx?property=150 and in between are all the same page... I am sure this has killed my SEO. SO THAT PROBLEM IS NOW FIXED!!
NOW to revisit what zenstorageunits says about URL rewriting which has many different ways to do it using .net, but Miketek I would not have to create subdirectories because it is done in the code... they are more like virtual directories...
zenstorageunits or anyone else for that matter, Is it worth it for me to hire somebody to create a URL rewrite app that can change the following;
http:/www.destinationbigbear.com/property_detail.aspx?propid=202 to
http://www.destinationbigbear.com/big-bear-cabin-rentals/a-true-cabin/details
and
http:/www.destinationbigbear.com/property_photos.aspx?propid=202 to
http://www.destinationbigbear.com/big-bear-cabin-rentals/a-true-cabin/photos
See everyone of my 150 cabins has these pages; info, photos, calendar, video, reviews, rates...and they all have unique cabin names... so it is basically 150 cabins x 6 pages = 900 unique pages with unique content but really only 6 pages dynamically being changed by 150 cabins.
I have been able to dynamically change all the page titles for everyone of these 900 database driven pages such as
Big-Bear-Cabin | A True Cabin Photos or Big-Bear-Cabin | A True Cabin Calendar and so on.
-
Hi Nick,
I think you've gotten some good tips here - I'd agree with Prestashop that the preferred solution would be to find where these parameters are being included in links to this page and remove them.
Failing that, zenstorageunits's advice to use rel="canonical" would be my recommendation - or a 301 redirect from the URLs that include parameters back to the core URL would work.
I wouldn't convert these parameters to subdirectories unless they are integral to the way your site works and pull up unique content - you called them "old parameters" so it sounds like they're not supposed to be there, so probably not a case where you'd want to convert these parameters to subdirectories.
Failing the above, you could utilize the Google Webmaster Tools "URL Parameters" interface to tell Googlebot to ignore these parameters.
Overall, your best course of action is to find and remove the links that include the parameters.
I'd also add that the Moz crawl report is highly sensitive to "duplicate content," and I often find it flags up issues has high/medium priority that are not actually going to have a significant impact on the site. You have to take the crawl report with a grain of salt - while duplicate content can be a serious issue for some sites (ecommerce retailers for example with duplication issues across a wide catalog of products), in most cases it has minimal impact and isn't something I'd hold up your site launch for.
Best of Luck,
Mike -
I agree zenstorageunits about using rel=canonical but one thing I would like to point out is that Moz does not create false errors. It is a simple crawler, not like google. Google will actually try to follow links that people have used before and that show up in your analytics files. moz uses no logic like that, it just jumps from page to page. If it is picking up a page with a query string like that then it is a link on your site. I would find the links and take them off.
-
You have a few options you could do. One thing I would look into is maybe doing some url rewriting to change
contactus.aspx?propid=200
to
contactus/propid/200
look at http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms972974.aspx on how to do that for IIS.
A better option I think if you need to keep the parameters the way they are is to use the rel canocial tag look at moz article
http://moz.com/blog/rel-confused-answers-to-your-rel-canonical-questions
but basicly you would need to add something like this to your contact.aspx page(replace example.com with your website url)
This suggest to the website crawler, like google or moz crawler, that those pages should be assoicated with the contact.aspx page.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Best way to fix duplicate content issues
Another question for the Moz Community. One of my clients has 4.5k duplicate content issues. For example: http://www.example.co.uk/blog and http://www.example.co.uk/index.php?route=blog/blog/listblog&year=2017. Most of the issues are coming from product pages. My initial thoughts are to set up 301 redirects in the first instance and if the issue persists, add canonical tags. Is this the best way of tackling this issue?
Technical SEO | | Laura-EMC0 -
How does Google view duplicate photo content?
Now that we can search by image on Google and see every site that is using the same photo, I assume that Google is going to use this as a signal for ranking as well. Is that already happening? I ask because I have sold many photos over the years with first-use only rights, where I retain the copyright. So I have photos on my site that I own the copyright for that are on other sites (and were there first). I am not sure if I should make an effort to remove these photos from my site or if I can wait another couple years.
Technical SEO | | Lina5000 -
Duplicate Content due to CMS
The biggest offender of our website's duplicate content is an event calendar generated by our CMS. It creates a page for every day of every year, up to the year 2100. I am considering some solutions: 1. Include code that stops search engines from indexing any of the calendar pages 2. Keep the calendar but re-route any search engines to a more popular workshops page that contains better info. (The workshop page isn't duplicate content with the calendar page). Are these solutions possible? If so, how do the above affect SEO? Are there other solutions I should consider?
Technical SEO | | ycheung0 -
Duplicate Content Issues
We have some "?src=" tag in some URL's which are treated as duplicate content in the crawl diagnostics errors? For example, xyz.com?src=abc and xyz.com?src=def are considered to be duplicate content url's. My objective is to make my campaign free of these crawl errors. First of all i would like to know why these url's are considered to have duplicate content. And what's the best solution to get rid of this?
Technical SEO | | RodrigoVaca0 -
Tips and duplicate content
Hello, we have a search site that offers tips to help with search/find. These tips are organized on the site in xml format with commas... of course the search parameters are duplicated in the xml so that we have a number of tips for each search parameter. For example if the parameter is "dining room" we might have 35 pieces of advice - all less than a tweet long. My question - will I be penalized for keyword stuffing - how can I avoid this?
Technical SEO | | acraigi0 -
Is Noindex Enough To Solve My Duplicate Content Issue?
Hello SEO Gurus! I have a client who runs 7 web properties. 6 of them are satellite websites, and 7th is his company's main website. For a long while, my company has, among other things, blogged on a hosted blog at www.hismainwebsite.com/blog, and when we were optimizing for one of the other satellite websites, we would simply link to it in the article. Now, however, the client has gone ahead and set up separate blogs on every one of the satellite websites as well, and he has a nifty plug-in set up on the main website's blog that pipes in articles that we write to their corresponding satellite blog as well. My concern is duplicate content. In a sense, this is like autoblogging -- the only thing that doesn't make it heinous is that the client is autoblogging himself. He thinks that it will be a great feature for giving users to his satellite websites some great fresh content to read -- which I agree, as I think the combination of publishing and e-commerce is a thing of the future -- but I really want to avoid the duplicate content issue and a possible SEO/SERP hit. I am thinking that a noindexing of each of the satellite websites' blog pages might suffice. But I'd like to hear from all of you if you think that even this may not be a foolproof solution. Thanks in advance! Kind Regards, Mike
Technical SEO | | RCNOnlineMarketing0 -
Pages with different content and meta description marked as duplicate content
I am running into an issue where I have pages with completely different body and meta description but they are still being marked as having the same content (Duplicate Page Content error). What am I missing here? Examples: http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/what-to-expect-in-the-summer-internship
Technical SEO | | WallStreetOasis.com
and
http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/blog/something-ventured http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/im-in-the-long-run
and
http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/image/jhjpeg0 -
Thin/Duplicate Content
Hi Guys, So here's the deal, my team and I just acquired a new site using some questionable tactics. Only about 5% of the entire site is actually written by humans the rest of the 40k + (and is increasing by 1-2k auto gen pages a day)pages are all autogen + thin content. I'm trying to convince the powers that be that we cannot continue to do this. Now i'm aware of the issue but my question is what is the best way to deal with this. Should I noindex these pages at the directory level? Should I 301 them to the most relevant section where actual valuable content exists. So far it doesn't seem like Google has caught on to this yet and I want to fix the issue while not raising any more red flags in the process. Thanks!
Technical SEO | | DPASeo0