Moz Crawler URL paramaters & duplicate content
-
Hi all, this is my first post on Moz Q&A
Questions:
- Does the Moz Crawler take into account rel="canonical" for search results pages with sorting / filtering URL parameters?
- How much time does it take for an issue to disappear from the issues list after it's been corrected? Does it come op in the next weekly report?
I'm asking because the crawler is reporting 50k+ pages crawled, when in reality, this number should be closer to 1000. All pages with query parameters have the correct canonical tag pointing to the root URL, so I'm wondering whether I need to noindex the other pages for the crawler to report correct data?:
Original (canonical URL): DOMAIN.COM/charters/search/mx/BS?search_location=cabo-san-lucas
Filter active URL: DOMAIN.COM/charters/search/mx/BS?search_location=cabo-san-lucas&booking_date=&booking_days=1&booking_persons=1&priceFilter%5B%5D=0%2C500&includedPriceFilter%5B%5D=drinks-soft
Also, if noindex is the only solution, will it impact the ranking of the pages involved?
Note: Google and Bing are semi-successful in reporting index page count, each reporting around 2.5k result pages when using the site:DOMAIN.com query. The rel canonical tag was missing for a short period of time about 4 weeks ago, but since fixing the issue these pages still haven't been deindexed.
Appreciate any suggestions regarding Moz Crawler & Google / Bing index count!
-
Happy to help!
We crawled roughly 49k pages because there were that many links on the site that we could find. 50k is also the new standard crawl limit for campaigns in Standard and Medium subscriptions. Adding a rel=canonical to a page doesn't mean it won't get crawled by our campaign crawler, only that the crawler is to refer to the canonicalized link for reporting purposes.
Without going into too specific of URL details, these pages are considered duplicates because their canonical tags point to different URLs. For example,
is considered a duplicate of
DOMAIN.COM/charters/search/mx/QR?booking_date=&booking_days=&booking_persons=limit%252525253D20
because the canonical tag for the first page is
DOMAIN.COM/charters/search/mx/QR?offset=20
while the canonical for the second URL is
DOMAIN.COM/charters/search/mx/QR
Since the canonical tags point to different pages it is assumed that DOMAIN.COM/charters/search/mx/QR?offset=20 and DOMAIN.COM/charters/search/mx/QR are likely to be duplicates themselves.
Here is how our system interprets duplicate content vs. rel=canonical:
Assuming A, B, C, and D are all duplicates,
If A references B as the canonical, then they are not considered duplicates
If A and B both reference C as canonical, A and B are not considered duplicates of each other
If A references C as a canonical, A and B are considered duplicated
If A references C as canonical, B references D, then A and B are considered duplicatesThe above example from your campaign actually falls into the fourth example I've listed above. Hope this helps clear things up
-
Thanks Sam!
I've read the post and checked my canonical tags but still can't seem to find what's causing the canonicalized pages to be indexed by RogerBot. The same page shows up in Moz's crawl test 100 times with slightly different parameters.
I'll keep investigating but some specific feedback from Moz staff would be appreciated
-
Hi!
I'm going to leave the strategy discussion open to the community but from a technical standpoint, we will count rel=canonical on dynamic urls as long as they are implemented correctly. Dr. Pete has a great post where he talks about canonicals that might be helpful as well. Updates to campaigns happen on a weekly basis depending on when the campaign was created. So if it was created on a Tuesday, you'll see updated campaign data every Tuesday after. You can run a crawl test (accessible from Research Tools) to get 3k page crawls in between your updates though. Hope this helps!
-
Thanks for the info searchbuzz. So if I understand correctly, new pages are crawled and kept in the index (up to the campaign limit), but issues on indexed pages are reported separately.
My issue is that due to the dynamic URLs used in search filters on my site I actually have 49k issues detected (over 95% are duplicate content and long URL issues because the crawler is indexing the same page many times for each URL parameter combination). The crawl test can't index the entire site because it generates a huge amount of pages.
It's a travel-related website with listings in 233 cities and multiple filter functionality, so each unique 'page' of results is indexed more than 100 times, even though there's a rel="canonical" tag pointing to the non-parametrized URL of that page.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How do can the crawler not access my robots.txt file but have 0 crawler issues?
So I'm getting this errorOur crawler was not able to access the robots.txt file on your site. This often occurs because of a server error from the robots.txt. Although this may have been caused by a temporary outage, we recommend making sure your robots.txt file is accessible and that your network and server are working correctly. Typically errors like this should be investigated and fixed by the site webmaster.https://www.evernote.com/l/ADOmJ5AG3A1OPZZ2wr_ETiU2dDrejywnZ8kHowever, Moz is saying I have 0 Crawler issues. Have I hit an edge case? What can I do to rectify this situation? I'm looking at my robots.txt file here: http://www.dateideas.net/robots.txt however, I don't see anything that woudl specifically get in the way.I'm trying to build a helpful resource from this domain, and getting zero organic traffic, and I have a sinking suspicion this might be the main culprit.I appreciate your help!Thanks! 🙂
Moz Bar | | will_l0 -
Many Duplicate Content Flags
Not sure about you all, but I’m loving the new Moz Site Crawler. However, I was noticing that it is identifying a huge amount of pages as duplicate content. There are about 30,000 pages in this website, with that said we’ve had to make many templates to make the site scalable. Additionally a url rule was lost which caused a significant amount of duplicate pages to be created. I am working through using the moz crawl tool to identify duplicate pages but noticing many pages under “Affected Pages,” are actually unique content pages with initial content that is duplicate. I read that Moz flags any pages with 90% or more content overlapping content or code. My theory for this is that some templates that are too similar, to the point that Moz reads them as duplicative. Has this happened for anyone else? In addition, if Moz is flagging these similar pages as duplicate content, do we surmise that Google bots are having the same issue? We have seen issues with rankings as it pertains to the actual duplicate pages but hadn't experienced issues across the unique pages, they are hyperlocal pages so we are able to see rankings quite easily.
Moz Bar | | HZseo0 -
Sorry, but that URL is inaccessible.
am using moz panel in there is an option on page grader where i use my portal name www.bookmyticket.com and keyword is flight ticket booking but getting error Sorry, but that URL is inaccessible. how i can fix this ??
Moz Bar | | tejaschudasama0 -
Location specific MOZ Ranking changes - How to track them
Hi All, I have asked this question before here but haven't got any convincing answers. And now I am starting to see this in couple of my other projects . I'm not sure how many facing similar issue like mine but its bit tricky. Our company is based in Melbourne,Australia and we set MOZ campaign setting to google.com.au . The weekly moz ranking for one of the client keyword showed as Position Rank#29. But when I Checked Manually it is Ranking #3. So why does the moz show as 29 ? **Keyword: **car exhaust Website: www.professionalexhaust.com.au To Replicate, I set the google search to google.com.au and on Search Tools I changed location as **Australia ( by default its set to Melbourne ). **When I did search now my result came in Page 3 - No.29 rank. Note: By default the Google browser picks the location as Melbourne and gives localized result which is not tracked by MOZ. Now how do I track this in Moz to show localized ranking results which my customer see. I cant report this ranking to client, else I have to do a manual report which is time consuming . Note : This is Tested in InCognito mode with all cache cleared.
Moz Bar | | emarketexperts0 -
Moz Crawl Test Trying to Crawl Contact Form Submit Button Location?
Moz Crawl Test for some reason is trying to Crawl a contact form Widget Submit Location. My obvious guess is that obviously the crawl cannot submit to the required fields…..I believe this because they're only kicking back these errors on the pages I have a contact form widget on. http://crawfordspest.com/pest-control/crawfords@crawfordspest.com 1412553693 404 : Received 404 (Not Found) error response for page. Error attempting to request page; see title for details. 404
Moz Bar | | Funk-Creative-Media
http://crawfordspest.com/tree-services/crawfords@crawfordspest.com 1412553693 404 : Received 404 (Not Found) error response for page. Error attempting to request page; see title for details. 404
http://crawfordspest.com/lawn-care/crawfords@crawfordspest.com 1412553693 404 : Received 404 (Not Found) error response for page. Error attempting to request page; see title for details. 404
http://crawfordspest.com/specialty-services/crawfords@crawfordspest.com 1412553693 404 : Received 404 (Not Found) error response for page. Error attempting to request page; see title for details. 404 Can you shed any insight to this? I'm a bit worried that I'll have to complete gut the contact form which was one of the major requests my client requested. Or in a worse scenario make all fields not required. It would let so much spam in. I have never seem anything like this at all. But I've learned a lot from Moz, and with major errors like 404 damage Domain Authority greatly. I've fixed 404 issues with newly acquired clients existing sites and tracked through Moz and the domain authority flies up once these errors are fixed. Along with fixing what Webmaster Tools through Google reports back. ..... Let me know if you have any expertise on this matter.0 -
Moz ranking report shows massive loss in Bing SERP's. But it is not the case?
My weekly ranking report shows massive loss of SERP's on Bing. For most keywords I was no longer in the top 50 which where first top 5. But when I checked it out for myself, I'm still ranked top 5 for these keywords. I then used the Moz Rank Tracker and there it also says I'm still ranking top 5 for these keywords. What should I believe now?
Moz Bar | | wellnesswooz0 -
Moz On-page is not working
My on-page is not working....I do have 3 keywords in the 1º position of Google.pt and the Moz is not reporting nothing....bug?
Moz Bar | | Popbox0