Can appropriate alt text be considered keyword stuffing?
-
Hi all,
I just used the Moz page grader on this page: http://giavan.com/collections/earrings/pearl
for the keyword "pearl earrings". It's grading it a "B" and the most important issue is "Avoid Keyword Stuffing in Document". The keyword appears once in the title, once in the H1 tag, twice in the body and 31 times in alt image text. We've recently been taking the time to add alt text to all product images by simply copying the product name. So if the product name is "Pearl & Crystal Beaded Drop Earrings", that text is copied and pasted as the product image's alt text. This seemed like the best way because it's highly descriptive and obviously, quick to implement. But if search engines see this as keyword stuffing, I guess we should rethink it.
I don't know why Google would have a problem with this - it doesn't negatively affect the user experience and clearly those alt tag are serving a specific purpose. Still, the Moz grader doesn't seem to like it so if anyone knows the best way to handle this (or ignore it?) I'd really appreciate your help. Thanks!
-
I believe (please correct me if I'm wrong) that the page grader looks at the ratio of keywords to other text, not just a simple case of counting the number of times a keyword is used on the page - a 200 word page with 15 instances of the keyword would look stuffed, but a 2000 word page with 15 instances of the keyword (and its variations) would not look over stuffed - so long as you don't start listing keywords for the sake of it (this happens a lot with local optimisation - wood flooring london, wood flooring manchester, wood flooring birmingham, etc etc - yuk!)
Hope this helps explain my suggestion.
-
That's correct, each alt tag takes the product name, so all the images have different alt text. I think my question really comes down to - Why is the Moz page grader considering this keyword stuffing?
Increasing the text to alt tag ratio won't reduce the number of instances of "pearl earrings", so the page grader will still count the instances of this keyword and consider that number too high. At this point, I'm not going to worry about it. But it seems like descriptive image alt text shouldn't count as keyword stuffing because these are the best possible descriptions of the images.
-
To get this clear in my head, are you saying that your alt tags take the product name, not that all alt tags are identical?
If the former, then I think you've done the right thing (though I am keen to be corrected if I am wrong) because the reason alt tags exist is to describe the pictures on the page so that people who are visually impaired can still interpret the page correctly and enjoy a similar experience to those of us that can see them.
If your alt tags are identical to one another then you have got it wrong! Make sure your alt tags describe the content on your image.
If the Moz tool is saying your page is stuffed full of 'pearl earrings' then you may need to increase the text to alt tag ratio (seeing as it's the pearl earrings in alt tags that appear to be the problem). Make sure all your product descriptions are unique, as this can be beneficial.
Hope this helps!
Amelia xx
-
Ok, if you are including the same name on images, they not to do that as image name is also considered as the part of the content.
On your website it might look good but images normally get crawled in Google Images and when you are putting the same name on all images it will be difficult for Google understand what image is for what and it might spam the results in Google images for that key phrases.
Hope I cleared my point.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Import Keywords from 1 campaign to another
Hi There, I've got one campaign set up and just created another in my dashboard. I have roughly 300 keywords added and categorized in campaign 1. I want to export these exact keywords, (and to also remain categorized the same), into campaign 2. How can I do this without having to add each keyword individually and recreating the categories again? Basically, I want to export my keywords/copy/past from one campaign, to another. I don't want to set everything up again. How can I do this? Thanks, Reena.
Moz Pro | | Reena810 -
Can open site explorer miss incoming links?
In open site explorer I only see one linking domain, eventhough I know of at least 1 other. Why is that?
Moz Pro | | ResourceLab0 -
On-Page Optimization Report: How Are Keywords Chosen?
Apologies if this has already been covered 100 times! Last month I set up a new campaign, and so far the On-Page Optimization tool has only crawled and graded three of my pages so far. I assume it takes time for more pages to be covered? But, here's my real question: I see that the tool is giving my pages grades based on certain keywords, but the tool itself seems to be deciding which keyword to use in grading each page. To use a made-up example, my example has a page about leather gloves, a page about wool mittens, and a page about cotton mittens. The last one is supposed to be optimized for the keyword "cotton mittens," but the tool is grading it based on how well it's optimized for "wool mittens." I can go into the drop-down at the top of the page and change the keyword that the page is graded on, and that gives me a new grade, but only for that instance. The next week, the tool is back to giving the page an F for "wool mittens." Is that because the tool decides that "wool mittens" is the keyword for which the page has the best chance of ranking, no matter what my intentions are? is there any way to permanently tell the tool that I want the page to target "wool mittens" as its main keyword? Thanks in advance for your help!
Moz Pro | | ScottShrum0 -
How can i get seomoz to crawl a campaign on demand
hi how can i get seomoz to crawl a campaign on demand instead of on a weekly basis? For example i have corrected some error warnings and on page elements and would like it to re crawl the site sooner to see how the corrections have worked? thanks
Moz Pro | | Bristolweb0 -
Does the keyword tracker take into account google base?
i just wanted to know if the ranking number allows for google products aswell?
Moz Pro | | DaveDawson0 -
Do you track both plural and singular variations of your keywords?
Howdy, In trying to make the most of the keyword tracking slots we get with the SEOmoz tool our discussion turned to the importance of tracking both variations of search terms that could be plural or singular. The example is that we run a local business search database so we target search terms like "chicago pet stores" and "chicago pet store", however the language of our site almost always uses the plural version of the business category. On one hand we want to know exactly how we rank for variations of search terms, but on the other, with the number of categories we have we could be tracking thousands upon thousands if we included every variation ("pet store chicago", "pet stores in chicago", etc.) So what say ye fellow optimizers? Is it worth tracking variations of search terms or do you find that Google is smart enough in coalescing the intent of similar search variants that tracking against the most commonly searched one is enough? Thank you all!
Moz Pro | | qurve0 -
Track keywords of our competitor
Is there a way for us to track the keywords of our competitor and so we can use that to optimize our sites?
Moz Pro | | shebinhassan1 -
Is there a problem with the keyword rankings in the campaign?
It says last updated 19/08 and is updated every Friday but nothing has changed.
Moz Pro | | JasonHegarty0