Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Less Tags better for SEO?
-
I am currently reviewing my strategy when it comes to categories and tags on my site. Having been no-indexed for some time, and having many tags with just one entry I am thinking that this is not optimal for SEO purposes.
This is what I am planning:
- Categories - Change these to Index, but only after adding a hundred words or so by way of introduction (see this example - https://www.besthostnews.com/news/hosting/a-small-orange-news/). With the categories I am thinking of highlighting key articles as well to improve link juice distribution to older articles that are important.
- Tags - About half my tags have only 1 entry, with a few more just having 2 entries. I am thinking of deleting all tags with just one entry, and trying to merge those with just two or 3 entries where it makes sense to do so. I will keep these as no-index, but I think this will mean more optimal distribution of link juice within the site.
I would appreciate your thoughts \ suggestions on the best practices here.
-
I have added an update here: http://moz.com/community/q/reviewing-category-tag-policy-update
-
Thank you. The example page i linked is actually a resource that helps with conversions. . The content at the top will highlight the better posts rather than some of the fluff posts that I rel canonical or no-index (i.e. old offers etc). The problem is that if I do more than 100 words, it would end up fluff. I think it adds value by linking to some external resources and key posts, so I will work towards building that up over time.
But thank you for your indepth reply. You are saying alot of what I was thinking, but not convinced enough to make the drastic changes I probably need to do.
I am tempted to remove tags. I don't think anyone ever visits them.
Update: I have now removed the tags. I can always create one or two new categories if I need to in the future, but for now I think I have made the best decision for my site. 160 pages that were never visited and diluted link juice have just been deleted.
-
I am currently reviewing my strategy when it comes to categories and tags on my site.
Everyone should do this. I do it once every year or so.
Having been no-indexed for some time, and having many tags with just one entry I am thinking that this is not optimal for SEO purposes.
I agree. I don't use tag pages.
Categories - Change these to Index, but only after adding a hundred words or so by way of introduction (see this example).
Where I have used categories, I wait until I have a substantive amount of material to appear on the category page. I visited your sample page and can't tell if the hundred words or so at the top is yada yada yada content or real beef. If it is real beef then go with it. If it is yada yada yada then wait until you have a large enough number of posts that your page is of substantive length.
Also, I run periodic traffic assessments on my category pages. If some of them are not bringing in the traffic or at least showing traffic growth then I delete them (301 redirect to the blog homepage). My philosophy is that a compact site competes better for difficult, high-traffic terms if it does not have a lot of useless pages.
I am thinking of deleting all tags with just one entry,
Yes, these never should have been created.
and trying to merge those with just two or 3 entries where it makes sense
If this is going to create pages that compete with category pages then just delete them.
I will keep these as no-index, but I think this will mean more optimal distribution of link juice within the site.
In my opinion, tag pages are dangerous if they have snippets of the same content that appears on category pages and on the main blog page and its paginations. Also, tag pages that are same topic as category pages are a bad idea in my opinion.
If you are not indexing pages they will pull zero traffic from search. If you have links to them then you linkjuice is being scattered into potentially low-value pages. I am all about internal linking but keep my philosophy that compact sites compete more strongly for the difficult queries where the big traffic is earned.
-
Neither have been indexed due to that very reason... duplicate content, poor quality \ thin content.
-
Have both the categories as tags been indexed by Google? Usually you leave one of them out of the indexes of Google to make sure you don't get in trouble with creating a lot of duplicate content and not unique pages.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is using a H1 tag in a logo image bad for SEO?
We have brand logos on certain pages that have H1 tags in them - the H1 text being the brand's name, as this is what we'd want the title of the page to be. The logos are at the top of the page instead of a written title. But is this the best option for SEO? Do search engines value H1 tags in images as highly as a standard H1 tag?Would it be better for SEO to add an alt tag to the logo and add a separate H1 tag on the page that's also the name of the brand?
On-Page Optimization | | DVLighting0 -
Product Descriptions (SEO)
So I would like a few opinions. How long should a product description be? Enough to get the point across? 100 words? 800 words? Over detailed? Any advice would be appreciated.
On-Page Optimization | | mattl990 -
URL Path. What is better for SEO
Hello Moz people, Is it better for SEO to have a URL path like this: flowersite.com/anniversary_flowers/dozen_roses OR flowersite.com/dozen_roses Is it better to have the full trail of pages in the URL?
On-Page Optimization | | CKerr0 -
How Much Does Punctuation of a Word Effect SEO?
I have a page on a site that is targeted for "mens hair cut" and I have received a F for the grade. The content on the page uses "men's" throughout the content. (proper punctuation) When I re-graded the page with "men's hair cut" the page received a B grade. My question is, does mens v.s men's make a different for on-page SEO? Should my targeted keywords include "men's" rather than "mens"?
On-Page Optimization | | Kdruckenbrod0 -
Fewer keywords in title tag?
Hello, I have a title tag that includes three keywords and has a total of 59 characters. The third keyword is not very important. If I eliminated the third keyword, leaving the first two (for a total of 48 characters), would the ranking value of the first two keywords increase? Does including the third keyword dilute the value of the first two? Thank you!
On-Page Optimization | | nyc-seo0 -
SEO for luxury brands!?
Hi all, It is widely known fact that you will be a bit in trouble if you will need to do SEO for luxury brand that is not willing to sacrifice design, layout etc. for SEO purposes. So basically - there is no content to optimize and there is almost no keywords to rank! 😉 Just wondering - how would be the best to approach such kind of terrible situation? Regards, Jungle
On-Page Optimization | | Jungles0 -
Are Amazon meta tags efficient?
We are probably all familiar with general and Google guidelines for writing title and description tags. But Amazon. com often create another structure where they put in a) amazon.com, b) product name or description and c) the Amazon category the product is featured in, like this: | Amazon.com: Mac Motion Chairs Model 2-Piece Recliner with Matching Ottoman Mocha Microfiber with Walnut Frame: Home & Garden Is this a well developed description tag? |
On-Page Optimization | | KnutDSvendsen
|0 -
Best SEO structure for blog
What is the best SEO page/link structure for a blog with, say 100 posts that grows at a rate of 4 per month? Each post is 500+ words with charts/graphics; they're not simple one paragraph postings. Rather than use a CMS I have a hand crafted HTML/CSS blog (for tighter integration with the parent site, some dynamic data effects, and in general to have total control). I have a sidebar with headlines from all prior posts, and my blog home page is a 1 line summary of each article. I feel that after 100 articles the sidebar and home page have too many links on them. What is the optimal way to split them up? They are all covering the same niche topic that my site is about. I thought of making the side bar and home page only have the most recent 25 postings, and then create an archive directory for older posts. But categorizing by time doesn't really help someone looking for a specific topic. I could tag each entry with 2-3 keywords and then make the sidebar a sorted list of tags. Clicking on a tag would then show an intermediate index of all articles that have that tag, and then you could click on an article title to read the whole article. Or is there some other strategy that is optimal for SEO and the indexing robots? Is it bad to have a blog that is too heirarchical (where articles are 3 levels down from the root domain) or too flat (if there are 100s of entries)? Thanks for any thoughts or pointers.
On-Page Optimization | | scanlin0