Lots of city pages - How do I ensure we don't get penalized
-
We are planning on having a job posting page for each city that we are looking to hire new CFO partners in. But, the problem is, we have LOTS of locations. I was wondering what would be the best way to have similar content on each page (since the job description and requirements are the same for each job posting) without being hit by Google for having duplicate content? One of the main reasons we have decided to have location based pages is that we have noticed visitors to our site are searching for "cfo job in [location] but we notice that most of these visitors then leave. We believe it to be because the pages they land on make no mention of the location that they were looking for and is a little incongruent with what they were expecting.
We are looking to use the following URLs and TItle/Description as an example:
|
http://careers.b2bcfo.com/cfo-jobs/Alabama/Birmingham
| CFO Careers in Birmingham, AL |
| Are you looking for a CFO Career in Birmingham, Alabama ? We're looking for partners there. Apply today! |
|
Any advice you have for this would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
-
We would have the job description on each page mentioning the locations, then we would also have the job capture form.
You are right in that these descriptions do have unique data on them. I am thinking we are just going to have to take the time to write as much unique content as possible.
Thanks for the feedback.
-
Hey, the last sentence was based around other ways to bring in this inbound traffic but scratch that for now.
So, have you examined how these other, well ranking sites are doing what they do? Are they living off the fact they are big domains? Is the content on these pages unique as I just Googled:
CFO Careers in Birmingham, AL
And it appears they are job listings specific to that location so I am guessing that content is fairly unique and the listings is the content.
These pages that you would create, what content would they have on them? Would they all be different?
My initial understanding was that this would just be a data capture form but if we actually have unique job listings like on indeed.com, simplyhired, jobs2careers etc then these pages should be unique enough to rank.
Or am I missing something? (it is late in the day here 7pm, hitting my 12th hour of work so the old synapses may be failing me somewhat).
-
Marcus,
I am not sure I understand the last line of your post. But I have looked at the Keyword difficulty tool and these are fairly competitive phrases.
The problem we have is that we are competing against the likes of Indeed.com, Monster.com and sites such as that. While we do use these sites, they don't quite provide the flexibility we are looking for.
We used to rank quite highly for these types of phrases, but I have noticed a recent trend in Google for them to rank the job search sites ahead of us. The hope is that if we provide similar content, then Google would start pushing us up the rankings again.
-
A lot of this depends on the competitiveness of the search query and would need some testing to better determine your approach.
You can use the keyword difficulty tool here but also just google the terms and see what comes up. If the results are weak, you could try this as a stage 1 approach and see how you get on.
Maybe there is another way to think about it, what about the job listings themselves or does it not work that way?
-
I think these need to be indexed as it is through organic search that people have been getting to our site using terms such as "cfo jobs in [location]"
I have been thinking about adding new content for each city, but you are right, that is a LOT of work. I wonder if it might be worth having one page with unique, location based content for the main city in an area and just have a list of nearby cities on the page that we are also hiring in.
-
Hey Danny
A few suggestions:
1. Make each location page unique enough that you can safely have it on the site without worrying about duplication (lots of work).
2. If people are only searching or browsing to these pages internally then don't index them (robots.txt / meta noindex)
3. You could do this dynamically and use a canonical to your main enquiry page on these pages.
4. You could just create all the variations and add a canonical to your main enquiry page and they may, if it is not mega competitive rank (bit risky but easy to fix if it causes issues).
I would always try to look at this from the perspective of your users and if you don't really care about having these as organic search landing pages then simply noindexing them would seem an ideal solution.
Hope that helps!
Marcus
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Why isn't our complete meta title showing up in the Google SERPS? (cut off half way)
We carry a product line, cutless bearings (for use on boats). For instance, we have one, called the Able, that has the following meta title (and searched by View Page Source to confirm): BOOT 1-3/8" x 2-3/8" x 5-1/2" Johnson Cutless Bearing | BOOT Cutlass However, if I search for it on on Google by part number or name (boot cutless bearing, boot cutlass bearing), the meta title comes back with whole first part chopped off, only showing this : "x 5-1/2" Johnson Cutless Bearing | BOOT Cutlass - Citimarine ..." Any idea why? Here's the url if it will hopefully help: https://citimarinestore.com/en/metallic-inches/156-boot-johnson-cutless-bearing-870352103.html All the products in the category are doing the same. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Citimarine0 -
Category Page as Shopping Aggregator Page
Hi, I have been reviewing the info from Google on structured data for products and started to ponder.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Alexcox6
https://developers.google.com/search/docs/data-types/products Here is the scenario.
You have a Category Page and it lists 8 products, each products shows an image, price and review rating. As the individual products pages are already marked up they display Rich Snippets in the serps.
I wonder how do we get the rich snippets for the category page. Now Google suggest a markup for shopping aggregator pages that lists a single product, along with information about different sellers offering that product but nothing for categories. My ponder is this, Can we use the shopping aggregator markup for category pages to achieve the coveted rich results (from and to price, average reviews)? Keen to hear from anyone who has had any thoughts on the matter or had already tried this.0 -
I'm noticing that URL that were once indexed by Google are suddenly getting dropped without any error messages in Webmasters Tools, has anyone seen issues like this before?
I'm noticing that URLs that were once indexed by Google are suddenly getting dropped without any error messages in Webmasters Tools, has anyone seen issues like this before? Here's an example:
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | nystromandy
http://www.thefader.com/2017/01/11/the-carter-documentary-lil-wayne-black-lives-matter0 -
What is the impact of an off-topic page to other pages on the site?
We are working with a client who has one irrelevant, off-topic post ranking incredibly well and driving a lot of traffic. However, none of the other pages on the site, that are relevant to this client's business, are ranking. Links are good and in-line with competitors for the various terms. Oddly, very few external links reference this off-topic post, most are to the home page. Local profile is also in-line with competitors, including reviews, categorization, geo-targeting, pictures, etc. No spam issues exist and no warnings in Google Search Console. The only thing that seems weird is this off-topic post but that could affect rankings on other pages of the site? Would removing that off-topic post potentially help increase traffic and rankings for the other more relevant pages of the site? Appreciate any and all help or ideas of where to go from here. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Matthew_Edgar0 -
OSE Confusion on 'External' Links
Hello All, I am still very new to this but am starting to get a grasp of things in the SEO world, but there are still a few things that I just don't get yet. For example, I've been trying to find out a great strategy for Link Building, what better way than looking at already existing SEO companies? So I did a quick search on a website (http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/links?site=www.springer-marketing.co.uk) and tried to look at all of the External incoming links. So I did a filter of Followed+301, Only External and all subdomains. But about 20 of the links for this site are coming from itself. Now, i'm not an expert, but presumably you can't just give yourself strong links? Is this some kind of trick, how or why would somebody do this? Mind Blows Paul
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Paul_Tovey0 -
301 - should I redirect entire domain or page for page?
Hi, We recently enabled a 301 on our domain from our old website to our new website. On the advice of fellow mozzer's we copied the old site exactly to the new domain, then did the 301 so that the sites are identical. Question is, should we be doing the 301 as a whole domain redirect, i.e. www.oldsite.com is now > www.newsite.com, or individually setting each page, i.e. www.oldsite.com/page1 is now www.newsite.com/page1 etc for each page in our site? Remembering that both old and new sites (for now) are identical copies. Also we set the 301 about 5 days ago and have verified its working but haven't seen a single change in rank either from the old site or new - is this because Google hasn't likely re-indexed yet? Thanks, Anthony
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Grenadi0 -
Do sites with a small number of content pages get penalized by Google?
If my site has just five content pages, instead of 25 or 50, then will it get penalized by Google for a given moderately competitive keyword?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | RightDirection0