Canonical URL Tag Usage
-
I have a large website, almost 1500 pages that each market different keywords for the trucking logistics industry. I don't really understand the new Canonical URL Tag USAGE. They say to use it so the page is not a duplicate but the page that MOZ is call for to have the tag isn't a duplicate. It promotes 1 keyword that no other page directly promotes. Here is the page address, now what tag would I put up in the HEAD so google don't treat it as a duplicate page.
http://www.freightetc.com/c/heavyhaul/heavyhaul.php
1.
Number 1 the actual page address because I want it treated like its own page or do I have to use #2 below?
2.
I don't know why I would use #2 as I want it to be its own page, and get credit and listed and ranked as its own page. Can anyone clarify this stuff to me as I guess i am just new to this whole tag usage.
-
In a roundabout way, yes, that is the general idea.
Decide on the page, create a title that suggests the objective of the page (Learn about Heavy Haulage | Freight Etc Inc).
Google is very good at understanding that Haulage will also mean Haul, Hauliers etc, so try to fill the page with lots of related information. Talk about transporting of abnormal loads, types of trailers, training required, etc. Make the page as informative as possible.
When it comes to finding the keywords to use and research, look for what others talk about that are doing well in Google and then give your own spin on this - although I don't mean spin the content. Spend some time making your content better than the sites above you.
-Andy
-
So probably right now I should take HEAVY HAUL page and Combine with HEAVY HAUL QUOTES. Maybe do ao shared title
Heavy Haul | Heavy Haul Quotes
and then just have 2 sections to the page? Is that kind of what you mean. So I would hope to get listed individually for each phrase still.
-
Google is pretty good at delivering pages for similar terms, so try not to worry about that. They will know that Heavy Haul and Heavy Haulers are one in the same.
My thought in this circumstance would be to have a page Heavy Haul Companies (it it lists other companies) and then rel=canonical all of the others to this one.
However, if they are so similar and only there to try and gain extra traffic, then I would be taking all of the content from each similar / duplicate page, pulling it into one fantastic page and then removing the others.
Without seeing everything, I wouldn't be able to advise if they should be 404 or 301, but it isn't good practice to have so much duplication / similar pages on the site.
-Andy
-
My problem Andy, is yes they are similiar, but they each promote their own keywords.
Heavy Haul
Heavy Haulers
Heavy Haul Companies
Heavy hauling
so I want them all listed in google. What do I do in this case?
-
Rel=canonical is the one thing that can really mess a site up, so please do be careful.
Basically, what is does, is helps you tell Google if you have pages that are similar, are useful to your visitors, but you don't want to remove to avoid duplication.
For example, if you have a page: www.freightetc.com/c/heavyhaul/heavyhaul.php and www.freightetc.com/c/heavyhaul/heavyhaul-trucks.php, and both are similar but www.freightetc.com/c/heavyhaul/heavyhaul.php is the main page you want to appear in Google, you would set the rel=canonical tag on www.freightetc.com/c/heavyhaul/heavyhaul-trucks.php to point back to www.freightetc.com/c/heavyhaul/heavyhaul.php.
Screaming frog will help you make some sense of everything on your site, but the free version stops at 500 pages, so you won't get to see everything.
-Andy
-
Thanks for the offer, but I'm not an SEO-specialist, and it's a big responsibility.
Once you run your website through Screaming Frog you'll get a list of errors with explanations, start with that and address a proper specialist, whom you can trust, or even an agency. To keep the price down, contact any agency in eastern europe and order site audit. They should do it for you for a on-time payment and it's cheaper than what you'll pay in US. Plus there are a lot of really good specialists here.Just a sidenote. If you have a folder in your URL like site.com/c/ it should be accessible and provide information, so whatever purpose it serves make sure that people can use it.
If you have several categories, make a page where you list them, for example: site.com/our-services/ Make it a real page instead of just a lift-off point, list your categories and short descriptions there there, break them into subcategories if necessary.
-
Thank you for your response. So I really like what you had to say. So currently my structure is built around heavy haul for this section. Check this out.
www.freightetc.com/c/heavyhaul/ (c is for category as I have several)
I have 6 or 7 pages for this section targeting big keywords.
Heavy Haul, Heavy Haul Companies, Heavy Haulers, Heavy Hauling, Heavy Haul Quotes, Oversize Hauling and Oversize Haulers. So the difference in what you said above is I use /heavyhaul/ instead of /specialty-trucking-oversize/
So how would I change this? As you can see on the main page I have www.freightetc.com/c/heavyhaul/heavyhaul.php I have it with a related pages bottom right that connects to the rest of the above pages.
PS Errors? Can you give me a few examples? I am downloading screaming frog as I write this. Your feedback is very valuable. Possibly consult me on some stuff occasionally for a fee because I can do most of the ground work myself just need guidance. Look forward to your response for all of the above.
-
You should work on your structure and you won't have to worry about it. Let me show you an example on your website with this URL of yours.
Your URL:
1. https://www.www.freightetc.com**/c/heavyhaul/heavyhaul.php - shows info about heavy haul.
2.** https://www.www.freightetc.com/c/heavyhaul/ - not set up properly
3. https://www.www.freightetc.com********/c/ - not set up property********Then you also have this thing: http://i.imgur.com/BmwLfeD.jpg
SPECIALTY TRUCKING - OVERSIZE – this should be your category. and your URL should look like this:
www.freightetc.com**/specialty-trucking-oversize/heavyhaul/** www.freightetc.com/specialty-trucking-oversize/machinery/
www.freightetc.com/specialty-trucking-oversize/equipment/Now you have a category (specialty trucking oversize) you can set it as canonical for your heavy haulers and machinery if content on those pages is similar.
Your category will be indexed which is better. So when I search for "heavy haulers" I will end up on your category page (specialty trucking oversize) where I can pick what I need, a hauler or equipment. It's also easier to rank with a category page.Your website is actually full of errors. the basic ones. I would hire a specialist or if you can fix all of that stuff, run your website through some seo-audit soft like Screaming Frog or Netpeak Spider. It will show you the mistakes on your website that you should fix.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Product Tag Value on SEO
Do product tags for ecommerce sites have any benefit to SEO? Or are they redundant? i.e. thespacecollective.com/astronaut-moldavite-pendant (tags appear below the product name on the right)
On-Page Optimization | | moon-boots0 -
Rel-canonical
Hi, I am a bit confused. A potential clients website has three versions: http://www. http:// http://dev. In each version they have used the rel=canonical back to each base version. So http://www." http://" http://dev." I would have expected duplicate content but I see only one version of the content when I check using "....." in Google. Using the site: tool I see that all three versions are indexed. When moving through the navigation on them, they all redirect to the one home page - the www version. Any idea what is going on and what should be recommended?Redirecting all versions to the www. version? Is it a problem?
On-Page Optimization | | AL123al0 -
Wordpress category url problem.
I have set up wordpress categories but the permalinks are showing as www.mydomain.com/?cat=12 as opposed to the category name. The child categories though work fine and show as www.mydomain.com/category/chidcatgegory I've obviously got my permalink settings wrong somewhere. How do I fix this?
On-Page Optimization | | SamCUK0 -
Noindex tags in WordPress
I'm receiving 4 duplicate content warnings from Roger.They are all "www.mysite/tag/tag-name". I'm using WordPress and have Yoast WordPress SEO installed. Should I set the tags to "noindex" in the plugin settings?
On-Page Optimization | | brandzz0 -
URL best practices, use folders or not ?
Hi I have a question about URLs. Client have all URL written after domain and have only one / slash in all URLs. Is this best practice or i need to use categories,folders? Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | 77Agency0 -
Page URL Hiearchy
So I have read on here that page URL Hiearchy is important. My question is from a search engine standpoint which of the following methods would be the best to use (or another if not listed) COMPACT and naturally hierarchical MountainBiking.com MountainBiking.com/adventures ( a list of the pages below ) MountainBiking.com/adventures/in whistler (for each page) MountainBiking.com/adventures/in utah OR VERBOSE but reptetive MountainBiking.com MountainBiking.com/Mountain Biking adventures ( intro + a list of the pages below ) MountainBiking.com/Mountain Biking Adventures/Mounting Biking adventures in whistler MountainBiking.com/Mountain Biking Adventures/Mountain Biking Adventures in Utah It seemed like the blog I read suggested the compact form, but it seems to me that the verbose (though admittedly a bit clunky) seems better so far as exact keyword match etc. Experience and or advice on this?
On-Page Optimization | | bThere0 -
Title tag - shorter = better?
Is it true that the shorter the Title tag is the more powerful the keywords in it are?
On-Page Optimization | | echo1
I know that the main keywords have to be at the beginning of the title but, having more words in your Title could dilute the effectiveness of your main keywords? Ex: Dallas limo service | Private car by SelectLimousine. Could the fact that I have a second part of my title affect the first part by diluting its value? I would like to rank first for Dallas car service but also for Dallas car service and Dallas limousine service. Is this good practice?0 -
Product sorting and dynamic urls
On our weekly SEOmoz crawls, we get thousands of warnings about overly dynamic URLs as a result of our product sorting options at the top of our category pages. It seems like the ability to sort products by price, name, etc., is nice for the customer. For SEO is this really a problem or can we ignore these warnings?
On-Page Optimization | | teatable0