How to sift "site search" data from Google Analytics for trends
-
I apologize in advance if this has been asked a million times but I'm just not able to find anything on it for some reason. Probably the words "site" and "search" come up a lot in this area... Anyhow, my question:
How do I find trends in "site search" data from Google Analytics?
I set up "site search" a long time ago. I have thousands and thousands of searches people have made on my site logged and squirreled away. The plan was to review them on a weekly basis, find the trends and start writing content to address interests people seem to be having but not finding on our site. Sounded great at the time.
The problem I have, of course, is that among my 10,000 searches (many shown in Google Analytics as "no-results:cats and dogs", etc), there are slight differences that make it difficult to total up search trends. Let's say the list is like this:
Term | Search Count
Cats | 500
Dogs | 500
Cat | 250
Dog | 250
Cat food | 5
Dog food | 5
Birds | 1
Bird | 1
Cats are great | 1
Cats are really great | 1
Dogs are great | 1
I like birds | 1
Seriously, I like Cats | 1
Turtles | 1... 10,000 more entries, every single one only 1 search per term.
OK, so it looks like people like Cats and Dogs a lot, but also Birds and Turtles. But maybe there are snake searches. Maybe there are "cat pajamas" searches and variations on all of the above. Who knows what else is really trending in there??? The review of this data is MIND-NUMBING. Especially when you get into plurality and misspellings, this rabbit hole has no bottom.
Is there a tool people in the SEO jam use to take a big ole CSV dump and have it magically sorted by at least potential trends?
I mean, there's gotta be, right? And I'm silly for not already knowing what it is.
-
Hi Thom,
Like Mike mentioned, I think that culling through this information yourself with Excel will probably be your best bet for analyzing the data you mentioned.
I'll give you a few ideas on how I would start if I was you:
You mentioned that many of the queries were only searched once. I would start by organizing your information into two columns: one with the query, and one with the search volume. Then, I would filter those down to only queries that have been searched more than [a certain threshold]. I think that while queries that have only been searched once can give you valuable information, especially compared to others and analyzed in aggregate, you will be less overwhelmed if you start with the most important (and a smaller set of) queries first.
After you've done that, I would start to filter your data by query. You can sort by queries that contain, begin with, end with, or do not contain a term, or any sort of custom filter. Given your example, I would probably start with filtering by queries that contain the word "cat" or "dog" or "turtle," and then try to find trends within that smaller set of data. They will be much easier and less overwhelming to find when you are not dealing with so much data.
This next step is a little more tedious, but I would also recommend adding another column that you manually populate. You mentioned that there are misspellings; you could account for those by creating another column in which you populate the word "cat" for all queries that contain "cat" and also all queries that contain "cta" or any other misspelling. That way, later, you can easily sort by keywords that were about cats, but didn't necessarily contain the exact word "cat." Or, you could populate the column by grouping all queries that were about one animal, two animals, three animals, etc.
Once you have a ton of information, I would recommend creating pivot tables and charts that help you compare the data.
Ultimately, what I'm recommending is probably very time intensive and tedious, but I really think it will be rewarding once it's completed, because you will very thoroughly understand the trends going on in the data. One of the benefits of doing it yourself, rather than using a tool, is that you will understand the context around these words; you will be able to better interpret trends or make connections than an automated tool would be.
Here is a great article that walks you step by step through some of the steps I mentioned, and it also goes into depth about other ways you can use Excel to analyze this kind of data: http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2015/09/11/4-excel-tips-applied-to-keyword-research/
Hope this helped!
-
Honestly I do it all by hand in excel using conditional formatting to highlight various core terms and change text color/bold/italicize for certain common combinations that accompany core terms. Then I sort by those variations, copy/paste them into new tabs, and break them down further as needed from there.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Page Title "Untitled Document" with mozbar
Hi, I'm working on a big news website (in tourism) and, when checking my homepage with mozbar, I often get: "My Title • Untitled Document" - 69 characters With no apparent reason, If I refresh the page or simply visit it later, it could randomly switch to the "normal" title: "My Title" - 44 characters It looks like completely random to me, like something more is loaded in the first case. I've checked my source code of course, and <title>tag seems to be ok with no other <title> even when I get the "untitled document".</p> <p>I have no idea about that. I don't know if that can be a useful info, but I was trying to understand why the majority of my main keywords searches are only showing other pages (I can rarely find my homepage) even though my home looks correctly indexes and shows as first result for every site: research.<br /><br />Hope everything's is clear....any idea or suggestions?<br /><br />Thank you in advance.</p> <p> </p></title>
Moz Pro | | Daniele_Carollo0 -
@staff When is Moz Analytics coming out?
I want to see a video demo or something for the new Moz Analytics. When is the software going to be available for us subscribers?
Moz Pro | | Francisco_Meza0 -
After I make corrections of my crawl diagnostics report, how can I tell is those corrections "took". Is there a way to immediatly refresh that report. Will it eventually refresh?'
I have made corrections to the crawl diagnostics report. Can I refresh this report? I would like to see if my corrections were correct. Thanks for your anticipated answer!
Moz Pro | | Bob550 -
Issue with Data Updates on Campaign
I'm reviewing a campaign I am running for a client, the Keywords data has not updated yet even though it's supposed to update every monday. The competitive analysis shows a date of August 14, which is odd becuase I'm on a trial account?
Moz Pro | | amerihope0 -
Non search traffic in a report, user data etc
Are there any plans so we could add more data from Google Analytics to the seomoz reports? At the moment the reports are nice but my clients want to know the bigger picture than just the search traffic. They need to know the total traffic, the bounce rate, pages viewed etc - data in Google Analytics. There are other seo type tools which offer this information when you generate reports and if seomoz were to allow it then it would make life so much easier as I would not need to maintain a subscription here for the cool tools on offer and to offer websites at up to $100 a month just to generate client reports.
Moz Pro | | MegaFastMoz0 -
I have a Rel Canonical "notice" in my Crawl Diagnostics report. I'm presuming that means that the spider has detected a rel canonical tag and it is working as opposed to warning about an issue, is this correct?
I know this seems like a really dumb question but the site I'm working on is a BigCommerce one and I've been concerned about canonicalisation issues prior to receiving this report (I'm a SEOmoz pro newbie also!) and I just want to be clear I am reading this notice correctly. I presume this means that the site crawl has detected the rel canonical tag on these pages and it is working correctly. Is this correct?? Any input is much appreciated. Thanks
Moz Pro | | seanpearse0 -
What does the "Internal Links" data in the Keyword Difficulty SERP report represent?
What does the "Internal Links" data in the Keyword Difficulty SERP report represent? Thank you! QocBS
Moz Pro | | richpalpine0 -
How do we use SEOmoz to track Local Searches? Is there a way to set the location from which the campaign tracker is "searching"?
It seems that there is no way to set a parameter for location. In Places, I'm able to define my targeted region. How does SEOmoz mimic that localization? Thank for any help! -- Chris
Moz Pro | | ChrisPalle1