Writing <200 word pieces of content in a 7.5 hour day
-
My employer has a content writer who is currently working on writing unique descriptions for many pages, on the order of around 150-200 words per piece of content. A recurring theme in this content is to write a list of features such as "it does X, X, X, X, X and X", which can sometimes happen a couple of times during the content and takes up a decent chunk of wording.
This content does not require in-depth research over and above reading the about us page of some sites and looking at what services they provide, as well as some quick details like their payment and delivery methods etc.
As well as that the writer also writes the Meta Description and then uploads these to a CMS. There are no other tasks.
Considering the writer is doing this 5 days a week, 7.5 hours a day, and isn't getting paid a poor or trainee-type wage, what would you say would be an acceptable amount to achieve on the average day?
The current average works out to around, or slightly less than 8 of these pieces of content each day.
Thoughts?
-
Thanks Joe,
I would agree that around 30 minutes per article, so around 15/day should be fair, as you say it is fairly straightforward.
I'll see what we can do about using excel and other tools to speed things up. I already worked on something like this to organise keywords and topically relevant phrases so it was quicker to work with when I had input on content, but I'll see how we can optimise and scale up this current project.
-
Thanks for the input EGOL,
Just a bit of feedback;The content is a kind of an overview and is something that makes very little difference to conversions.
The written content is replacing pre-exisiting content that is usually taken from the about-us pages of the sites the content is about, so the purpose of this is to remove duplicated content from the pages, rather than to fill a gap.
From our testing, there appears to be no difference to conversions whether the site's about-us content is used or this unique content is used. Cues and triggers are not generally used apart from stating what benefit the visitor will get from our site, which is a little bit generic (the same benefit is stated using similar wording across all several thousand of these pages).
In essence, this particular content is more of a commodity, at least in its current form.
For personal experience, I have worked with this department but generally focused on writing larger and more extensive guides and blog posts. My content required more depth and research from numerous sources, so obviously took longer to write, but my role wasn't to write multiple pieces of content 5 days of every week, every month.
Based on word count, I could achieve 3-5x this writer's volume, but they are working on multiple topics every day, whereas I might have only worked on one topic maybe once or twice a week.
-
Sit down for three days and try doing the job. Then compare your work with theirs.
It's really easy to think that a writer is not producing when you have no experience doing the same work.
So, get to work. Write 50 of them. It will be good for your soul. More important is that your experience might streamline the process, discover quick and easy methods, learn how to improve quality.
And, is this worker just blathering features or including cues and triggers that stimulate sales? I've spent entire days just tweaking three or four important pages.
We must avoid considering a page of content as a commodity. There are enormous differences between bad, pedestrian, great, and kickass work. One has very little value to your business. Another can MAKE your business.
-
Really hard to know for sure without knowing the industry/vertical, but it sounds like you've started somewhat of a system for scaling this up.
I would estimate a half-hour per article with time to upload to the CMS included in that, so around 15 pieces I would estimate is fair. Again a lot depends on the research and ultimate quality of the content, but it sounds like it's fairly straightforward.
One thing you could do to help is identify what features are being identified over and over, and see if you can help with some Excel spreadsheet magic.
I managed a project like this in the past for golf course descriptions, and since there were about 1,500 of these, using Excel came in clutch.
Yes you want quality content, but if you're listing features over and over, then you should use tools to help speed up the work!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is there a good tool for finding Duplicate Content?
Hi! Are there any recommendation voor Duplicate Content finder tools? Is it offered on MOZ (not the one that belongs to 'seo issues') or a different site?
Content Development | | Marketing-SurpriseFactory1 -
New website content before or after new webdesign launch?
Hi, We are planning a full website redesign and rewriting the content of the key pages. The new contents will be ready sooner than the new website, what is the better solution? 1. Replace the content of the old site with the new (better) contents
Content Development | | Jozsefodor
or
2. Waiting until the new website will be ready (over months) and launch it with it?0 -
Kickass Tool for Content Writers
I have been a writer for a long time. I have done a lot of writing. Many excellent teachers, professors, bosses, colleagues, and editors have helped me. I've responded to a lot of red ink - a lot of red ink. A few days ago, I found a tool that has been extremely helpful. It has significantly improved the clarity of my writing. Using it on a piece of work makes me more confident about it at publication time. It requires a lot of work to use (at least it does for me) but the results are well worth the time. People who are serious about writing well will understand this tool immediately. http://www.hemingwayapp.com/ I don't own this website (I wish I did) and have no affiliation with it. Today they released a desktop version that they are almost giving away. I have not tried it yet but plan to instal it today.
Content Development | | EGOL6 -
What makes high quality content?
Content is becoming more and more important in rankings and I was wondering what exactly Google defines a good content. Any ideas?
Content Development | | EJDekkers0 -
Get duplicate content error in seomoz even after fixed canonical
http://www.webworld.no - We have been getting error Page Duplicate Content Errors. But we have fixed the canonical. Actually, we have list of portfolio and detailed page for each portfolio But We get error all portfolio pages are having duplicate content. But, i made canonical tag to direct to root page. Please help me to overcome this. Also, i see duplicae webworld.no & www.webworld.no. is there anything i need to fix in redirection? in server?
Content Development | | Webworld_Norway0 -
Syndicating content with rel=author tag in it
If I have an article with my rel=author tag attached to it, and then I syndicate that article to another web site, should I keep the rel=author tag in that synbdicated article? Basically, what I'm worried about is that there will be 2 duplicate articles with my author tag on 2 different web sites. (I intend to put a canonical tag in the syndicated article so there is no duplicate content penalty) What is the best practice for this?
Content Development | | greggseo0 -
2,500 Word blog post? What's your advice?
Most of my blog posts end up being 400-600 words, sometimes more, sometimes less. I have written one that is 2,500 words this time. If it were you, would you make one huge post, or split it into two or three? Or would you say it wholly depends on my site and the type of content? As far as link bait goes, one page is better . . . I guess. But would anyone ever read a 2,500 word blog post, even it it's about a subject he/she is interested in? Additionally, what's better for SEO? Just wants some second opinions. Thanks!
Content Development | | UnderRugSwept0 -
Ideas for making a mini-content farm more valuable to end users
I run a mini-content farm so to speak - a nationwide computer repair business. We have screened professionals that are specific to one industry. I was wondering if the SEO community would like to offer ideas on how to make this type of site more interesting to end users. What are some things that could be integrated into the site that are 'location specific' that would be of interest to users. I'd like to be able to offer a list of certified, screen, professionals that is searchable by zip code and town. We are planning on showing the quality control rating, as well as current certifications, and a checkbox showing that they were background checked. Customer testimonials are also in the works. Any other ideas?
Content Development | | ilyaelbert0