Website Redesign - Duplicate Content?
-
I hired a company to redesign our website.there are many pages like the example below that we are downsizing content by 80%.(believe me, not my decision)Current page: https://servicechampions.com/air-conditioning/New page (on test server):https://servicechampions.mymwpdesign.com/air-conditioning/My question to you is, that 80% of content that i am losing in the redesign, can i republish it as a blog?I know that google has it indexed. The old page has been live for 5 years, but now 80% of it will no longer be live. so can it be a blog and gain new (keep) seo value?What should i do with the 80% of content i am losing?
-
Hi Camilo,
thanks for the clarification. As this content wil not be available anymore on the "old" pages it will only exist on the newly created blog pages there will be no duplicate content issues. These newly created blog pages with the content removed from "old" pages will start from scratch for ranking. and the "old" pages could loose some ranking because you reduced the onpage ranking.
This is not per se bad as it is part of your strategy to improve on conversions (which should be the most important kpi anyway).
You could help these new blog pages a bit by linking to them from the "old" page.
-
Hello Ramon and James,
Sorry for the confusion.
https://servicechampions.com/air-conditioning/air-conditioning-installation-and-replacement/ --> current site (accessible directly homepage though main navigation)
will also be available on the new site, with the same URL.
The reason why i post this question is, on the new site, i will be reducing the content on this page (and others) by 80%. That 80% worth of content from the current pages in question, will not exists in the new site. It will not be on the new site because all the content on some pages have been considered to be too exhausting for clients to read and convert to a lead. We have created the new website, same urls, with leaner content to drive more conversions. Less overwhelming to site visitors.
For example, on this page: https://servicechampions.com/air-conditioning/
there are two segments under subheadings: What is an air conditioning system? and another called: How an air conditioner works.
Both of these segments will not be in the new website.Well, i want to republish the lost content as new blogs. My question was, since the soon to be lost content is currently indexed in google, if i republish them as a new set of blogs after the new site goes live, so will Google see the new blogs as duplicate content since it already has been indexed by them?
-
Hi Camilo,
now i am really confused, if you want to maintain the 80% pages and you said they will remain the same url when you make them accessible in your blog.
so
https://servicechampions.com/air-conditioning/air-conditioning-installation-and-replacement/ --> current site (accessible directly homepage though main navigation)
https://servicechampions.com/air-conditioning/air-conditioning-installation-and-replacement/ --> new site (accessible through blog)
than why would you need canonical at all and why would you loose rank (besides some lost due to the fact the page is not linked directly from the homepage but from the blog)?
Maybe i am missing something
-
Hi Camilo,
Interesting as google states "Only include critic reviews that have been directly produced by your site..." on https://developers.google.com/search/docs/data-types/reviews#local-business-reviews.
I can only imagine they didn´t realize these reviews were not produced directly by your site because of the way you implemented them in the footer.
-
Thank you Roman for your response.
I forgot to realize that Google will recalculate the rank on the new page. My concern is that the new page rank (although keeping the same URL) will loose some ranking.
If i create a new blog post with the content that is not used in the new page (same page url), and i use a cannonical tag on the new blog post linking to the redesigned page, will the new blog post be indexed and possibly out rank the page i am transferring content from?
-
Hello Ramon,
Interesting that you mention the schema markup. It will be on the new site as well. Just yesterday I guided the redesign company to include such markup. Last week, i did receive a google message though my webmaster tools (console) stating that i had potentially spammy code. So what i did, was i added the reviews (from Yelp, Google, Facebook, BBB) to the footer of my website. They were not on the site prior to last week. Once i added them, i filed a reconsideration request explaining what i did and why i did it, google responded saying they approve and they removed the manual action. So once again, our website displays star ratings on the SERPs. see attached image. They were showing prior to last week manual action. then they were removed on i received the manual action. after i added the reviews to the site's footer, and filed a reconsideration request, the manual action was removed and the ratings re-appeared in the SERPs.
The new site will keep all its urls. They will not change. Just the content on a few core pages. So i am gathering that it is ok to make the content that will be deleted into a blog.
-
Hello James,
I appreciate your two cents, greatly. I too am not a huge fan of the new site, but I am giving it a shot. Our current site is content heavy and ranks well for our terms. The change in design is geared to converting more leads (calls and forms). So I am giving this change a shot which is aimed to a less technical audience. People looking to fix their ac. I just hope that the new site still keeps its rankings. All urls will remain the same.
-
If some page is useful for your users or audience you dont delete that page.
In your case is not your desicion, so you have 2 alternatives,1-Redirect those pages to another page with similar content (it has to be a better content than the orginal)
2-The other option is add a canonical tag, basically you will trasfer the authority of the old page to the new one.But there is one factor that you need to keep in mind, that factor is the URL. If your new page will use the URL of the old page, there is no reason
to keep live the old pages because from the google perspective you would be replaced the old pages.Example
https://servicechampions.com/air-conditioning/ ----> Old Page with old content
https://servicechampions.com/air-conditioning/ ----> New Page with New contentFrom the Google perspective your new page is replacing the old one, so Google need to recalculate the rank of the page (links, content, ux ect).
So no matter, if your republish the content in your blog and then you add some cannonical tags
Example
https://servicechampions.com/blog/air-conditioning/ ----> Old Page with old contentTo Google the constant parameter is the URL if change it change the ecuation. My advices, Dont change the URL structure, keep the same URL structure and add some improvements.
Example
https://servicechampions.com/air-conditioning/ ----> Old Page with old content
https://servicechampions.com/service-air-conditioning/ ----> New Page with New contentAnd then to avoid duplicate content issues add the canonical tag the older page so in that way
you will trasfer the authority from the old to the new pageRead this article will help you a lot
A Step-by-Step Guide to Updating Your Website Without Destroying Your SEO
-
Hi,
As a general rule its fundemental to maintain pages that are relevant for your audience and generate organic traffic so i would say yes its a good idea to republish as a blog. Furthermore because i see that a big part of these pages (though i don´t know exactly which 80% you will loose) are pages that are a perfect fit for a blog, like how to and informational articles.
Would be good to maintain the same url´s to avoid redirects but depending on the cms being used that might proof more difficult. At least maintain meta data and redirects with 301´s.
I also saw you were using third party reviews in schema markup on your current site (but not,yet, on your new site) and this is not a good idea as this is against google´s guidelines (more on this here http://searchengineland.com/google-updates-local-reviews-schema-guidelines-257745)
Success with your new site
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
International SEO and duplicate content: what should I do when hreflangs are not enough?
Hi, A follow up question from another one I had a couple of months ago: It has been almost 2 months now that my hreflangs are in place. Google recognises them well and GSC is cleaned (no hreflang errors). Though I've seen some positive changes, I'm quite far from sorting that duplicate content issue completely and some entire sub-folders remain hidden from the SERP.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | GhillC
I believe it happens for two reasons: 1. Fully mirrored content - as per the link to my previous question above, some parts of the site I'm working on are 100% similar. Quite a "gravity issue" here as there is nothing I can do to fix the site architecture nor to get bespoke content in place. 2. Sub-folders "authority". I'm guessing that Google prefers sub-folders over others due to their legacy traffic/history. Meaning that even with hreflangs in place, the older sub-folder would rank over the right one because Google believes it provides better results to its users. Two questions from these reasons:
1. Is the latter correct? Am I guessing correctly re "sub-folders" authority (if such thing exists) or am I simply wrong? 2. Can I solve this using canonical tags?
Instead of trying to fix and "promote" hidden sub-folders, I'm thinking to actually reinforce the results I'm getting from stronger sub-folders.
I.e: if a user based in belgium is Googling something relating to my site, the site.com/fr/ subfolder shows up instead of the site.com/be/fr/ sub-sub-folder.
Or if someone is based in Belgium using Dutch, he would get site.com/nl/ results instead of the site.com/be/nl/ sub-sub-folder. Therefore, I could canonicalise /be/fr/ to /fr/ and do something similar for that second one. I'd prefer traffic coming to the right part of the site for tracking and analytic reasons. However, instead of trying to move mountain by changing Google's behaviour (if ever I could do this?), I'm thinking to encourage the current flow (also because it's not completely wrong as it brings traffic to pages featuring the correct language no matter what). That second question is the main reason why I'm looking out for MoZ's community advice: am I going to damage the site badly by using canonical tags that way? Thank you so much!
G0 -
Please help - Duplicate Content
Hi, I am really struggling to understand why my site has a lot of duplicate content issues. It's flagging up as ridiculously high and I have no idea how to fix this, can anyone help me, please? Website is www.firstcapitol.co.uk
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Alix_SEO1 -
Duplicate content. Competing for rank.
Scenario: An automotive dealer lists cars for sale on their website. The descriptions are very good and in depth at 1,200 words per car. However chunks of the copy are copied from car review websites and weaved into their original copy. Q1: This is flagged in copyscape - how much of an issue is this for Google? Q2: The same stock with the same copy is fed into a popular car listing website - the dealer's website and the classifieds website often rank in the top two positions (sometimes the dealer on top other times the classifieds site). Is this a good or a bad thing? Are you risking being seen as duplicating/scraping content? Thank you.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Bee1590 -
Duplicate content created by website Calendar - A Penalty?
A colleague of mine asked me a question about duplicate content coming from their event calendar. I don't think this will affect them negatively, but I would love some feedback and thoughts. ThanksOne of my clients, LifeTech Academy, is using my RavenTools software. Raventools has reported a HUGE amount of duplicate content (4.4K instances).The duplicate content all revolves around their calendar and repeating events (http://lifetechacademy.org/events/)The question is this - will this impact their SEO efforts in a negative way?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Bill_K0 -
Two websites (Domains) with same content for more than 4 years which one to choose now?
Hi, I need help with this decision, thanks in advance. My client has 2 websites but they have the same content: one has 4 years http://radiocolombia.com.co/ and the the other one 7 years: http://radiocolombiainternacional.com/web/ This content has been duplicated for years, how do I know which website is more relevant for google? we have to pick one. Please any advice? Thanks, David
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seoweb330 -
Consolidating two different domains to point at same site, duplicate content penalty?
I have two websites that are extremely similar and want to consolidate them into one website by pointing both domain names at one website. is this going to cause any duplicate content penalties by having two different domain names pointing at the same site? Both domains get traffic so i don't want to just discontinue one of the domains.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Ron100 -
Duplicate Content www vs. non-www and best practices
I have a customer who had prior help on his website and I noticed a 301 redirect in his .htaccess Rule for duplicate content removal : www.domain.com vs domain.com RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^MY-CUSTOMER-SITE.com [NC]
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | EnvoyWeb
RewriteRule (.*) http://www.MY-CUSTOMER-SITE.com/$1 [R=301,L,NC] The result of this rule is that i type MY-CUSTOMER-SITE.com in the browser and it redirects to www.MY-CUSTOMER-SITE.com I wonder if this is causing issues in SERPS. If I have some inbound links pointing to www.MY-CUSTOMER-SITE.com and some pointing to MY-CUSTOMER-SITE.com, I would think that this rewrite isn't necessary as it would seem that Googlebot is smart enough to know that these aren't two sites. -----Can you comment on whether this is a best practice for all domains?
-----I've run a report for backlinks. If my thought is true that there are some pointing to www.www.MY-CUSTOMER-SITE.com and some to the www.MY-CUSTOMER-SITE.com, is there any value in addressing this?0 -
Duplicate Content Issue
Why do URL with .html or index.php at the end are annoying to the search engine? I heard it can create some duplicate content but I have no idea why? Could someone explain me why is that so? Thank you
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Ideas-Money-Art0