Expanding to Other Geo Locations
-
Our company originally started in one city, now it is in multiple and the city we started in is actually now less important to our business than some of the new cities.
We've of course have Google Places for Business listings for all our cities and are listed in the other prominent directories for each City (Bing Places, Manta, Superpages, etc etc)
We have created once city page for each city in our domain. All this has improved our Local SERPs for those cities but they pale in comparison to our dominance in the city we started out in. We did have the first city in our home page title, we took that out.
The obvious problem is from an SEO standpoint your home page is your "strongest" page but how do you make your home page rank top for multiple location intent searches: "{city} {target keyword}" ?
The 3-pack is KEY. For example, for one city we make it into the local 3-pack but we are not in the organic SERPs on page 1 outside of the 3-pack.
As far as I can tell the major factor in 3-pack ranking is of course proximity of business to the user's location or user's location intent. I would say followed by the natural ranking factors (or at least a large subset of them) that Google uses for its normal organic rankings, followed by Google Places reviews. You would think the Google places reviews really make a difference, but not as much as you think.
So how do you dominate local searches in different cities when competing against local-only companies? My only guess is you need to create as much content as possible. You don't want to make micro sites I think as you lose all the link juice going to your main site. But how much content can one make that isn't duplicative. You can describe the same products and services over and over for each city but that's not useful nor wise. I guess you could do some re-writing. But other than a different address, phone, and staff members, if your service is identical for each city it doesn't leave a lot of room for useful content creation to improve local search SERPS.
I guess this begs the overall question, can a multi-city company ever dominate local SERPS when the search has a location intent (city name in the search) it there is even just a couple competing local companies doing some SEO work. it seems it is an extreme uphill battle if not next to impossible. (Never say never.)
-
Hey Searchout,
I've been seeing that too! We get a little blue face next to the review and the words highlighted in blue. This is great for people who write their own reviews and cheat because google is going to start showing customers real words when customers type in what they want. I find fake reviews are always written by the same person and are variations on a theme.
Have you also noticed your GMB listing dynamically serves what you do? When someone types in Root canal we come up as Smileworks 'Endodontist' and when they type in Invisalign we appear as 'Orthodontist' It's because I marked our specialists up as specialists in the schema. I had no idea what It would do but just thought 'well hey, we have specialists so why not tell the world' and google made something of it.
There's going to be more of that coming in the future i'll bet you.
PS: 'm not talking about the crappy services yell and the like try to sell you when you claim your citation. I'm talking about a Whitespark Audit. It's different. They understand - like really understand - the score. And they do a TON of work for a few hundred bucks. Here's my results. Not bad when you think of that uplift as a percentage of 4,000 positions. Best money I ever spent. But I don't know why I bother sometimes. Nobody does it. they think it's a scam or that I'm an affiliate. I don't care about their company and there's also other ones out there who do the same thing. just that these got us a really great result so I tell everyone. - then they ignore me lol!
-
I'm still a firm believer that NAP audit and correction services are primarily hyped as far as their actual effect on rankings. No one gets paper phone books anymore and there's no reason to buy advertising from the likes of Yellowpages, Superpages, etc, so they are desperate to create new revenue streams. Hence when you submit your business on all these sites they automatically show you a list of even more obscure sites you are not on or your NAP doesn't match. Our best performing location has two different NAPs out there about a mile from each other. One was an old mailing address. It's 3-pack 99% of the time for all our target keywords. My determination is that what makes the difference is that the business is listed with one of the main three databases Axciom, Localese, Infogroup. Paying attention to NAP in all the second and third tier directories using a paid service is a complete waste of time and money in my opinion. I've scoured the Internet for any sort of well done study to prove the effect on rankings of NAP consistency. They can't be done as there are too many other ranking factors anyone I've found to publish any sort of article on the subject is in the industry that sells those services. You think you moved the needle making your NAPs more consistent, but most likely the timing was just coincidental. I know I sound jaded, but I've just been around the block too many times and see the money making schemes from a mile away. If you got time and money to waste, it definitely can only help if at all. If you NAP error is in another city or something, then obviously you'll have conversion issues. I'm talking about missing suite number on some or Street versus St. That kind of stuff. But I've gone off on a tangent sort of, sorry.
Here's an interesting tidbit I recently noticed. Words in the reviews are a ranking factor believe it or not. You will notice on Google 3-pack, sometimes you will see an excerpt of a review with one of your search keywords highlighted. I threw in an obscure word into a search test once where we should never come up in the 3-pack for and we did because the word was in one of our user's reviews. Very interesting.
I also think Google likes schema markup and makes much more of a difference than NAP consistency every will.
-
Good, Ed. I was sure you, specifically, understood this, but was concerned that others might not understand the distinction between being legally named something, and keyword stuffing the GMB business title field.
-
Couldn't agree more. Although we are tiny compared to some sites and still outrank them purely on content and user task accomplishment. Most of the big players have hammy or thin content written by their agencies. Any expert in her niche can do better than this and wipe them out. It does take more time in the map pack though. I can seem to find meaningful correlations between different terms ranking and not ranking. So I figure it must be based on external factors out of my control.
So I just bang on with the best practice and hope for the results some day I would invest in some sort of local citation audit though. You can get them for cheap and they will make 100% sure NAP&W is right as right can be. This moved the needle for us although our starting position was not super strong so it may not move the needle for a company who's been accurate and dilligent with their local and H-local citations from the get go (we weren't)
ALso if you've got anyone with a degree in your business get them to sign up to their university alumni organisations, build relationships and then go for a guestpost in the news section. If it's the University you're new location is in this can be a real gold star local link.
-
Yep That's absolutely right. And also having the name of what you do in there is local spam. But we just have different legal entities (sometimes more than one) for each location. It's better that way for SEO and taxes here in the UK (all legal of course).
Don't worry, I'm ALL OVER Stopcraponthemap and have had companies taken off the Liverpool maps like 'Dermaroller Liverpool' and 'Invisalign Liverpool' - actually a company called 'Pure Dental' was doing that. A dentist? You'd think Dentists wouldn;t try to cheat the system but they were. Even with the hardest of hard evidence and photographs and screenshots from Companies house, it's still really hard to get them taken down and can take weeks.
Being a guide helps. And reading what Joy says also helps. Our first company was called 'Smileworks Liverpool' because there were so many other 'Smileworks' dentists. I actually just wanted to stand out from the rest but it ended up being hugely beneficial for us.
Even two years ago google was saying 'we rank entities' but they still don't. So I want to spell it out for my customers and for google.
-
Hey Searchout!
Some great points from Ed here. I'll add a few thoughts, in case it helps:
-
Yes, local pack rankings are key and you are right that they are not static. Don't over-focus on rankings, because searcher-proximity causes so much variety. While it's nice to see rankings go up, it is far more meaningful to see actual conversions go up (visits, phone calls, bookings, in-store traffic, sales, forms, etc.)
-
If your brand has built enough authority (think Taco Bell) you are likely to find yourself ranking for pretty much everything with very little effort. If you're not Taco Bell yet, then, yes, you need to work on the old combo of content+links and invest whatever effort you can in wise engagement with the ever-growing list of Google Local Knowledge Panel features (reviews, photos, Q&A, posts, bookings, menus including the new service menus, descriptions, etc.) Track and see what is moving the conversion needle. No one thing is going to do it. As you mentioned, review count and star ratings do not move the ranking needle as much as you might expect. You see businesses with fewer or worse reviews outranking those with more and better reviews every day. When you see that phenomenon, it makes you realize that focusing only on reviews would be foolish, but, at the same time, you don't determine from this that reviews can be ignored. They are part of a bigger picture.
-
Basically, what you are shooting for is building the overall authority of your brand while implementing best practices at a location-specific level every step of the way you can. Over time, you are trying to become one of the Taco Bells of your industry, at which point, for reasons we can't fully explain, your "authority" seems to build strength on its own. On your way there, be sure you are complying with all guidelines, making use of all relevant features, investing in creative content, and most importantly, offering the kind of service that makes your customers do much of the work of building your authority.
Hope this helps!
-
-
So great you are sharing your research here, Ed!
One thing I wanted to point out. You mention:
"Also I've got the city names in the names of my business. So there's BusinessTown and BusinessOtherTown as the names of the companies. This is really important. "
Important to clarify that, unless you've legally named each of your branches X+CityA, X+CityB, etc., then it's a violation of Google's guidelines to add city names to your GMB listing business titles. Wanted to be sure this is pointed out, as the keyword stuffing of the GMB title with city names is, perhaps, the #1 form of local spam.
-
Absolutely right. If it's B2B then there's this thing that nobody ever goes into that will give your pages the edge over the competition. It's a little thing called 'the price'
B2B are often very cagey about prices and that makes people wary. So maybe some location specific price articles will do well. If you don't know the price then just put in a range or use a case study with all the details and put a price tag on it so people can get an idea. Users (so google too) are getting really frustrated that prices for B2B things are not available and I've found my best performing pages are price pages.
Dentists also are cagey about prices. It's very B2B in that respect. You have to come in so we can assess you and talk to you and it's how long is a piece off string etc. but that's not true. If you're honest with yourself you can put basic prices and ranges on there and it will help enormously - if you haven't already.
I agree with the local citations, they seem stupid but NEED to be done. Outsource NAPS to someone who can write and make sure you're on them all.
As for google local star rating. I too was disappointed. We have 250 at 4.9 and some competitors are above us in the maps with 3.9 and 40 reviews. It IRKS ME! lol. But once you get to a magical 150 point, we saw the dial move. Also review diversity is important. So just google reviews is no good, I rotate the girly and guys on the front desk to ask for Facebook, Google, Trustpilot and 'Save Face' a local reviewer each week of the month. Remember to email people at home for reviews. If they're all coming from your IP they'll be discounted. Unless you get a VPN, but I worry that might land me with some sort of penalty.
If you have an alt tag on the page that says Houston and the Schem says NYC. Google will (In my opinion and experience) favour the Alt text. The 'strongest place' if you like for microdata is in the header of the site. That's set in stone and overrules and review widgets or the data highlighter. Problem is you keep needing to go in there and update your number of reviews each wee for the stars to show in the serp. Do you have stars showing in your new city serp results. You can get them instantly organically with a WP plugin called Google reviews Business and you get a really nice slider that breaks up text with your 5 star reviews. Also can you port reviews over from one city to another? That's worth looking into I remember a conversation somewhere about that but don't remember whether it was a yes or a no.
Search your newer city for those little opportunities with the chamber of commerce, the local government, write an article for a local bank or the local newspaper (if you can get in). I am on this 'high growth local bank' membership where they just give you a link from a huge DA (but local) bank for just paying like a £25 subscription fee and going to a few meetings. We speak to our competitors about things we sell that they don't and things that they don't sell that we do and literally write articles and link to one-another. If you need a surgical nose job we send you to a local cosmetic clinic here in the city. They LOVE that and always return our patients to us (because they want the relationship to continue) and they've linked to us and it's had a huge impact on local pack.
You're doing the right things. Get hyper local though and start engaging with the local community (where it will get you links). Also I wrote for the local university. GOLDEN link - one of the strongest we have. And the people at Universities are dying for technical content about SEO and marketing.
Hope this helps. email me if you like (on profile) . I'll send some examples of the "No BS" prices articles you could model your article on them. They are ranking Nationally here Position 1-3.
-
Thanks for such a lengthy reply. Much of it I'm not surprised as I sort of assumed it's a time issue combined with DA which benefits both local and national.
To give more specifics. The business is a B2B service business. The problem is, the service also has a highly popular associated product. So I guess in a way I'm lucky as the thing that segregates people looking for product info versus service info is in most cases a location intent. The product search will never have a location intent. The service search will sometimes NOT have a location intent. That is fine with us as we only have a by appointment only location only in a small subset of cities.
I've been testing and testing too. I've been surprised how little weight Google puts on number of reviews and average review rating. I guess it's because that aspect can be fairly easily 'gamed.' It seems the proximity to user location or intended location and normal organic ranking factors like DA are king. The former being most important obviously for local 3-pack when you have competitors with similar non-map organic rankings.
We also have our original city name in some of the image alt tags etc on our home page. Our business location schema is perfect. I think one factor is some of the other cities have not shown up yet on some of the business directories the original city has - but really, how much weight does Google give Superpages and the like when you virtually never see those domains in the SERPS with a location intent search?
I think the key is time and keep creating good, original content optimized for each city.
-
OK I can help you with this because it's what I've been working on for the last three years. Testing, testing and then more testing. First of all, are you a brick and mortar business? When you say you've expanded into new cities does this mean that you have a new store or physical address in these new cities? I'm going to assume because you've got GMB for the new cities that you have a physical address. So the things to consider are these:
There are kind of three types of searcher that I look at when solving these types of SEO problems. You've got searchers who are searching 'product+location' these are actually diminishing in number and more people now are just searching 'product' or 'buy product' or 'product near me' and are using voice and maps and expecting google to know where they are and use their location. So you're right, being in the map pack is key. So I have some traffic from the product+location people and they are usually high commercial intent. They want to buy.
Then the people who just type 'product' and who are near my location will have a higher number of searchers but lower searcher intent. Because they may just be looking for information and happen to be in my city. These are also more difficult to optimise for. Over-optimising location keywords is something to watch out for. But do remember to use the location specific anchor text in your internal linking structure. That's helped me lots. I say something natural(ish) like, For Braces visit our main page: _Braces Liverpool. _This seems spammy but google said slightly over-optimising internal links isn't going to hurt you like external ones will.
Then there are the people not in my city who type 'Product' - this is very high volume and very low commercial intent. Because if you are a local business and someone 100 miles away types in 'product' and you show up, they are unlikely to visit your store.
However, I still optimise for all three of these searchers. I have some articles that are for information only and I want them to rank nationally, pick up TONS of traffic and give my site authority and traffic and send nice user signals to google. I'll often also have the featured snippet or national number one position. These articles almost always also rank locally for Product (where searcher is in vacinity) and product+location. So don't just focus on product+location because you don't get enough traffic and google doesn't give you as much authority.
So you should have your location city name in the URL of your new city locations and optimise for local searchers by getting your local citations absolutely perfect. This means Moz Local, maybe spend some money on a Whitespark Citation Audit. This was the best $300 I ever spent and they helped me get from 4% map pack to 11% and that's out of literally thousands of positions. It's a dynamite service and I'd 100% recommend.
Also bear in mind that your new cities are newer and it takes a few months or even years to start really ranking for local searchers. I've taken - in some cases - 18 months of consistent optimisation and testing to get into the local packs where other competitor services have maybe been there for 5 years! You can't just expect to pop up number one in the map pack straight away. You need to build loads of local and hyper local citations and also LINKS from other local businesses and local partners in those new cities. This takes time and tons of effort. You can't expect to dine out on your strong original city. But also don't expect to internally compete with yourself if you're a new address in a new city with a new location in the URL, business name etc. Re-write the articles for that city like you're starting again but model them on your old successful ones. You'll find doing it a second time it's 100% better than the first.
I'll be honest, I don't know whether it's been all my SEO work or just time that's gotten us to the number one spots locally and on the maps and sometimes I actually find it easier to rank nationally than locally. National ranking is easy. You just need the best article, comprehensiveness and and a strong DA / great click through rate in the serp.
Also I've got the city names in the names of my business. So there's BusinessTown and BusinessOtherTown as the names of the companies. This is really important. Google says it no longer matters about having the name of your product or service in the URL and business title but it's less clear about the location and I've found it to be a massive help. Joy Hawkins or rand might disagree here but this is what I've found from testing it out.
Link signals and GMB signals are the key. Plus lots of reviews for your new location on it's GMB profile. Like 150+ is where it seems to start making a big difference. This is still the best article on the subject. From our friends at Moz. Also check out Joy Hawkins who is the oracle of local and I think she's a mod on this very platform although I might be mistaken. She will have a better answer for you than mine and loves helping people. Also I hope EGOL chimes in because they can help too.
But I'm betting your problem is father time. It's frustrating but Google just doesn't trust newer businesses to take up a spot in the three pack unless you're really giving it gangbusters optimisation in ALL of the areas outlined in the article by moz above.
Hope this helps some. Give us some more specifics to go on and let's get right into it. I love this stuff
PS: There was a very interesting case recently of a Zero Day Exploit where a genius hacker found a way to steal DA from another website - Check it out here it gives us an insight into the fact that google does indeed transfer DA across cities, states and even countries - so give it time (but don't do what this guy did! It's black hat and dangerous stuff. Just an interesting story not a suggestion.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Geo-location by state/store
Hi there, We are a Grocery co-operative retailer and have chain of stores owned by different people. We are building a new website, where we would geo-locate the closest store to the customer and direct them to a particular store (selected based on cookie and geo location). All our stores have a consistent range of products + Variation in 25% range. I have few questions How to build a site-map. Since it will be mandatory for a store to be selected and same flow for the bot and user, should have all products across all stores in the sitemap? we are allowing users to find any products across all stores if they search by product identifier. But, they will be able to see products available in a particular store if go through the hierarchical journey of the website. Will the bot crawl all pages across all the stores or since it will be geolocated to only one store, the content belonging to only one store will be indexed? We are also allowing customers to search for older products which they might have bought few years and that are not part of out catalogue any more. these products will not appear on the online hierarchical journey but, customers will be able to search and find the products . Will this affect our SEO ranking? Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks - Costa
Local Website Optimization | | Hanuman881 -
Is it deceptive to attempt to rank for a city you're located just outside of?
I live in Greenville, SC (who has a large "Greater Greenville" reach). I work for an agency with many clients who are located just outside of the city in smaller towns, sometimes technically in counties other than Greenville. Often, they provide services in the city of Greenville and aim to grow business there, so we'll use "Greenville, SC" throughout site copy, in titles, and in meta descriptions. Are there any negative implications to this? Any chance search engines think these clients are being deceptive? And is it possible these clients are hurting their ranking in their actual location by trying to appear to be a Greenville-based company? Thank you for any thoughts!
Local Website Optimization | | engeniusbrent1 -
Rank Tracking URLs from specific locations
Hi, i'm trying to report on the ranks of my local landing page URLs within my website. What is the best way of seeing this data from certain locations around the UK? For example - I have a landing page that is targeting London. How can I see how that ranks in the SERPs from various locations within the Greater London area? Can this be done accurately on MOZ or SEMrush? I would like to see how other people track their local pages for ranking locally. Thanks
Local Website Optimization | | SeoSheikh0 -
Passing Juice through Multiple Locations
Hey Gang, Thank you in advance for taking some time out of your day to read/comment on this. I really am thankful for this awesome community. SO, I just took over a locksmith client with over 20 different locations all up and down the west coast. They have some of their Google My Businesses ranking in the snap three. But most of them are not even close. The SEO that they had done was very 2012 and very messy. They have the name of the cities in their GMB profiles which is against google policy (although we haven't got taken down) Example: Instead of Locksmith plus they have Locksmith Plus Portland or Locksmith Plus Seattle. So their Citations are all over the place. Some locations have a bunch, and some locations I haven't even been able to put them on Yelp or Super pages (because they do not accommodate well at all for multi location business it's kind of been a nightmare) And Besides mediocre citations their websites are all over the place to. None of them are Linked to each other they each look like a separate brand. So here's my question(s) 1. I have a pretty good PBN network of my own real websites for clients that I have ranked to page one. I want to start Backlinking to just our one Main locksmith site (that ranks for no city) an have that juice flow into all the other sites but I am afraid I wont interlink them correctly and the juice will get wasted. Should I have like all the links to every cities website on the front page and point all my pbn at the front page? How to I link these bad boys correctly? Or should I... (next question) 2. Ok I know the Google my business does not care about how many citations we have but rather the quality of those citations. I already know we are having a brand crisis. We need to change all these listings to the same brand name but I am afraid google will spank us once we change and take down our number ones (so be it?) But My question is how much should I focus on back linking some of these page listings. Like should I be posting the naked Yelp URL on some of my web 2.0s (that link back to my main website)? Or what if i just had the main citations on the cities website so they could get some juice too? Confusing! Overall I know that Google wants clean consistent branding and that what we want to do.I just want to make sure everything is hooked up right so when I do make some Bad a** big content that every location can benefit from it. Guys thank you again. Much Loves and I hope every body had a great new year. Here's to a strong 2016
Local Website Optimization | | Meier0 -
How to approach SEO for a national website that has multiple chapter/location websites all under different URLs
We are currently working with a client who has one national site - let's call it CompanyName.net, and multiple, independent chapter sites listed under different URLs that are structured, for example, as CompanyNamechicago.org, and sometimes specific to neighborhoods, as in CompanyNamechicago.org/lakeview.org. The national umbrella site is .net, while all others are .orgs. These are not subdomains or subfolders, as far as we can tell. You can use a search function on the .net site to find a location near you and click to that specific local website. They are looking for help optimizing and increasing traffic to certain landing pages on the .net site...but similar landing pages also exist on a local level, which appear to be competing with the national site. (Example: there is a landing page on the national .net umbrella site for a "dog safety" campaign they are doing, but also that campaign has led to a landing page created independently on the local CompanyNameChicago.org website, which seems to get higher ranking due to a user looking for this info while located in Chicago.) We are wondering if our hands are tied here since they appear to be competing for traffic with all their localized sites, or if there are best practices to handle a situation like this. Thanks!
Local Website Optimization | | timfrick0 -
Schema for same location on multiple sites - can this be done?
I'm looking to find more information on location/local schema. Are you able to implement schema for one location on multiple different sites? (i.e. - Multiple brands/websites (same parent company) - the brands share the same location and address). Also, is schema still important for local SEO? Thank you in advance for your help!
Local Website Optimization | | EvolveCreative0 -
Location Pages and Duplicate Content and Doorway Pages, Oh My!
Google has this page on location pages. It's very useful but it doesn't say anything about handling the duplicate content a location page might have. Seeing as the loctions may have very similar services. Lets say they have example.com/location/boston, example.com/location/chicago, or maybe boston.example.com or chicago.example.com etc. They are landing pages for each location, housing that locations contact information as well as serving as a landing page for that location. Showing the same services/products as every other location. This information may also live on the main domains homepage or services page as well. My initial reaction agrees with this article: http://moz.com/blog/local-landing-pages-guide - but I'm really asking what does Google expect? Does this location pages guide from Google tell us we don't really have to make sure each of those location pages are unique? Sometimes creating "unique" location pages feels like you're creating **doorway pages - **"Multiple pages on your site with similar content designed to rank for specific queries like city or state names". In a nutshell, Google's Guidelines seem to have a conflict on this topic: Location Pages: "Have each location's or branch's information accessible on separate webpages"
Local Website Optimization | | eyeflow
Doorway Pages: "Multiple pages on your site with similar content designed to rank for specific queries like city or state names"
Duplicate Content: "If you have many pages that are similar, consider expanding each page or consolidating the pages into one." Now you could avoid making it a doorway page or a duplicate content page if you just put the location information on a page. Each page would then have a unique address, phone number, email, contact name, etc. But then the page would technically be in violation of this page: Thin Pages: "One of the most important steps in improving your site's ranking in Google search results is to ensure that it contains plenty of rich information that includes relevant keywords, used appropriately, that indicate the subject matter of your content." ...starting to feel like I'm in a Google Guidelines Paradox! Do you think this guide from Google means that duplicate content on these pages is acceptable as long as you use that markup? Or do you have another opinion?0 -
Multi Location business - Should I 301 redirect duplicate location pages or alternatively No Follow tag them ?
Hello All, I have a eCommerce site and we operate out of mulitple locations. We currently have individual location pages for these locations against each of our many categories. However on the flip slide , this create alot of duplicate content. All of our location pages whether unique or duplicated have a unique title Tag, H1, H2 tag , NAP and they all bring in the City Name . The content on the duplicated content also brings in the City name as well. We have been going through our categories and writing unique content for our most popular locations to help rank on local search. Currently I've been setting up 301 redirects for the locations in the categories with the duplicated content pointing back to the category page. I am wondering whether the increase in number of 301's will do more harm than having many duplicate location pages ?.. I am sure my site is affected by the panda algorithm penalty(on the duplicated content issues) as a couple of years ago , this didn't matter and we ranked top 3 for pretty much for every location but now we are ranking between 8 - 20th depending on keyword. An Alternative I thought, may be to instead of 301 those locations pages with duplicate content, is to put No Follow tags on them instead ?... What do you think ?. It's not economically viable to write unique content for every location on every category and these would not only take years but would cost us far to much money. Our Site is currently approx 10,000 pages Any thoughts on this greatly appreciated ? thanks Pete
Local Website Optimization | | PeteC120