Best approach for a client with another site for the same company
-
I have a client who has an old website and company A handles the SEO campaign for this site.
My client wanted us to create a new website with unique content for the same company aiming to double his chances of ranking on the 1st of SERP's and eventually dominating it.
So we created the new site for him and handled it's SEO campaign. So far we are ranking decently on the search engines but we feel like we could do better. The site we are optimizing for him uses the same company, tracking number and a virtual address in the same city.
Do you think Google has a problem with this set up?
We have listed the new site in the citation directories but I'm worried that we are sending google mixed signals. The company has two listing on each directories, one for the old site and another for the new site.
Another thing, Google+ Local for the new site is created and verified but is not showing up in local pack.
What is the best way to approach this mess?
We are looking into ranking for both local & organic results. -
Hi Adam,
Good thinking. Hope it works out well. Situations like these can be layers deep and murky - tough to sort out. Wishing you the best!
-
Thank you Miriam.
You are right, I would need to have a heart to heart talk with my client to sort out these issue.
-
First, if the tracking number that you use for the citations vary from the number listed on the new website, the old website, and/or the old citations this is a problem. Trust me, I am currently handling a client who wanted to rank locally for a city that they did not have a business location at. Without consulting us, they set up an ad for that city with a tracking number BUT it was still associated with the same business name and address. I don’t know if you are aware but these different directories scrape information from each other and as a result new listings are created with inconsistent business information. It's not pretty and not only is this confusing to a potential client looking for your business but you have significantly decreased your chances at appearing in Google’s 7-pack.
Here are a few resources that I refer back to but I would start with Google Places Guidelines---
http://getlisted.org/resources/why-citations-are-important.aspx
http://www.davidmihm.com/local-search-ranking-factors.shtml
- Pay attention to questions 5 & 7
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/40-important-local-search-questions-answered
- This is a follow up to a mozinar that is totally worth watching too.
Hope this helps!
-
Hi Adam,
We need to pedal back here to this:
"The site we are optimizing for him uses the same company, tracking number and a virtual address in the same city. "
and this:
"We have listed the new site in the citation directories...Another thing, Google+ Local for the new site is created and verified but is not showing up in local pack."
You have some root issues going on here. Both virtual offices and call tracking numbers for Local businesses are taboo in Google's local products. For legitimate participation in Google+ Local, your client needs to have:
-
Face-to-face transactions with customers either at the place of business (like a restaurant) or at the customers' locations (like a plumber).
-
A unique, physical street address (not a virtual office, P.O. box or shared address)
-
A unique local area code phone number (not a toll free, call tracking or shared number).
If the client cannot meet all 3 of the above criteria, then he is not suitable for inclusion in Google's local products, and he is not appropriate for a local citation building campaign.
So, this is actually the issue that needs to be sorted out first. Whether your client's failure to show up in the local results is due to a penalty stemming from Google considering the listing to be spam or stems from other issues is sort of moot, here, because the business model you are describing does not sound truly local to me.
For further reading, I recommend that both you and the client study Google's Places Quality Guidelines:
http://support.google.com/places/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=107528
You will see precisely why the business model you are describing is problematic in the above guidelines.
Regarding the call tracking phone number element, read:
http://searchengineland.com/for-local-seo-lack-of-call-tracking-solution-spawns-cloaking-70198
Read that post and all of the links in it, as well, for full information on the history of issues surrounding call tracking numbers in the world of Local SEO.
My feeling is that a wrong estimation of this client's opportunities may have been made here and that Local SEO is being pursued in vain until he can meet those requirements. Having 2 websites now in existence for the client is only going to compound the issues. I never recommend double sites for local business owners, but where there is some reason why they feel they MUST have more than one website, I advise them to make sure that their NAP (name-address-phone) is only published on one of the websites. Everything hangs on NAP in Local and if you're telling Google that both www.johntheplumber.com and www.sandiegoplumber.com are located at 123 First St. San Diego, CA., this will confuse Google and potentially lead to duplicated listings and ranking drops. Total clarity and consistency of data are vital to any Local SEO campaign, but in this case, your first step is going to be to assess the client's actual business model and then determine whether they have a legitimate place in the local index or need to pursue purely organic SEO due to a lack of the elements essential to local inclusion.
Hope this helps!
-
-
Hi Amber,
We use the same address but different location which is a virtual address then a local tracking number for the citations.
Do you think Google could tell if it's a virtual address or not and if they could, is it going to have a negative effect in our rankings?
Also, what I meant by "local pack" is the local map listings that shows up together with the organic search.
As per Google maps, I searched my client's company name and we aren't showing up in there either.
-
Our company also have two websites, we launch the second website for different reasons than your client, We sell power tools and power tool parts in the second website we want focus more in parts.
The phone number and address it's the same in both sites. We also have many products that are available in both sites.
When we decided to launch the second website we thought that having the same address and phone number could be a problem for our rank. Now 4 months later I don't think it cause any problem. The first website that we had for years still ranking well and improving the rank, our new website is also doing well and progressing fast.
We tried to avoid duplicate content so the product descriptions, about us page, and blog entries are different for each website. Also we didn't include the new site in the local directories.
In my humble opinion as long you have different content in each website the phone number and address wont be a problem.
-
Hi Adam,
When you say you have listed the new site in the citation directories are you using the same business name, address and phone number? What is the difference in the business information on these listings?
From my understanding, if these citations have mixed information for the same business you have set yourself up for duplicate listings. Google uses the information from these sources to validate the business name, address, phone number and business details. If Google is seeing two different listings for the same company on these citation sources how will it know which one to trust enough to show in it's local/map results?
In the end I think your ranking power is going to be (or is being) divided greatly for Local.
Also, when you say the G+Local listing that you created for the new site is not showing up in the local pack- what are you considering the "local pack" or are you saying that the listing is not even appearing when you search for it in Maps?
Best,
Amber
-
Hi Adam,
This is my first time hearing about this approach. In my opinion, it seems like your client is trying to game the search engine by creating 2 sites and hoping one of them will rank better. I believe search engines will not like it since your client is trying to game the system. I don't think search engines will favor anyone gaming the system.
Why don't your client spend the time and money creating and ranking the new site on the old site?
They can use those time and money to build more quality links and producing more contents then they will definitely rank higher instead of start a new website and doing everything from scratch.
my 2 cents. Hope this helps.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Beta Site Removal best practices
Hi everyone.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | bgvsiteadmin
We are doing a CMS migration and site redesign with some structural changes. Our temporarily Beta site (one of the staging environments and the only one that is not behind firewall) started appearing in search. Site got indexed before we added robots.txt due to dev error (at that time all pages were index,follow due to nature of beta site, it is a final stage that mirrors live site) As an remedy, we implemented robots.txt for beta version as : User-Agent: *
Disallow: / Removed beta form search for 90 days. Also, changed all pages to no index/no follow . Those blockers will be changed once code for beta get pushed into production. However, We already have all links redirected (301) from old site to new one. this will go in effect once migration starts (we will go live with completely redesigned site that is now in beta, in few days). After that, beta will be deleted completely and become 404 or 410. So the question is, should we delete beta site and simple make 404/410 without any redirects (site as is existed for only few days ). What is best thing to do, we don't want to hurt our SEO equity. Please let me know if you need more clarification. Thank you!0 -
SEO - is it site or page
Hi When we're talking about SEO does the search engine only look at the whole site in general or do they look at the individual page when we're talking about SERP? So if you have a keyword "my search term" Does the search engine look at the site first or the page with the term on then rank you or is it the page then the site.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Cocoonfxmedia0 -
Merging Niche Site
I posted a question about this a while ago, but still haven't pulled the trigger. I have a main site (bobsclothing.com). I also have a EM niche site (i.e shirtsmall.com). It would be more efficient for me to merge these site, because: I would have to manage content, promos, etc. on a single site. In other words, I can focus efforts on 1 site. If I am writing content, I don't have to split the work. I don't have to worry about duplicate content. Right now, if I enter a product URL into copyscape, the other sites is returned for many products. What makes me apprehensive are: The niche site actually ranks for more keywords than the main site, although it has lower revenue. Slightly lower PA, and DA. Niche site ranks top 20 for a profitable keyword that has about 1300 exact match searches. If you include the longer tail versions of the keyword it would be more. If I merge these sites, and do proper 301s (product to product, category to category) how likely is it that main site will still rank for that keyword? Am I likely to end up with a site that has stronger DA? Am I better off keeping the niche site and just focusing content efforts on the few keywords that it can rank well for? I appreciate any advice. If someone has done this, please share your experience. TIA
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | inhouseseo0 -
My client wants to rebrand their company including URL...
Hi all! An easy one for probably most of you. I have a client who wants to re-brand their business name and also match their URL to the new name. Their current domain name URL has been out there for over 5 years, and the site is performing quite well in search. Switching to a new URL will obviously be a very bad thing, but what are the options? newname.com redirect to the aged oldname.com, but when they are on the site, or when they find them in search, the oldname.com has nothing to do with the new brand. Or should we 301 every page of the oldname.com site to the newname.com be good enough? What is recommended? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BBuck0 -
Best Practice for setting up expert author contributing to Multiple Sites?
If a single author contributes to multiple sites, should each site have its own author page (tying to the same single gg+ account)? Ex. One author > one gg+ account > multiple author pages (one per site) Or, should all sites publishing his content link to a single author page/bio on a single, main site? Ex. One author > one gg+ account > a single author page on one site (all other sites link to this author page) In this event, where would the 'contributor to' link point for the additional sites he is contributing to, the homepage? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seagreen0 -
Because Goolge chose this link to my site?
I'm better ranked in Google for that link (http://www.vipgoldrj.com/paginas/ensaios.html) and not in (http://www.vipgoldrj.com/), you know you explain why? In all keywords, except that (luxury escorts in Rio de Janeiro) Sorry my english, I'm from Brazil and I'm using Google translator.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | WebMaster0210 -
Is This 301 Use Best Practice??
I know its effective practice cuz we're getting our arse kicked. I'm curious if its best practice (white, gray or black hat). I'm checking a competitors link profile on its landing page that is hitting the top of page 1 for several keywords. This competitor (national chain) has a strong domain authority (69). The particular landing page I'm checking in OSE has two 301 redirects from its own site among some other directory links to the page. The page shows 15 external links and half of them are very strong including it's own 301's. Aren't they essentially sending their own juice to the landing page to bolster page/domain authority to rank higher in the SERPS for those keywords? Is this a common practice using the 301's to a landing page? Is it white, gray or black hat? They are appearing suddenly appearing on the first page for several category keywords, so we're doing some snooping. Thanks.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | AWCthreads0 -
On-Site Optimization Tips for Job site?
I am working on a job site that only ranks well for the homepage with very low ranking internal pages. My job pages do not rank what so ever and are database driven and often times turn to 404 pages after the job has been filled. The job pages have to no content either. Anybody have any technical on-site recommendations for a job site I am working on especially regarding my internal pages? (Cross Country Allied.com)
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Melia0