Skip to content
    Moz logo Menu open Menu close
    • Products
      • Moz Pro
      • Moz Pro Home
      • Moz Local
      • Moz Local Home
      • STAT
      • Moz API
      • Moz API Home
      • Compare SEO Products
      • Moz Data
    • Free SEO Tools
      • Domain Analysis
      • Keyword Explorer
      • Link Explorer
      • Competitive Research
      • MozBar
      • More Free SEO Tools
    • Learn SEO
      • Beginner's Guide to SEO
      • SEO Learning Center
      • Moz Academy
      • MozCon
      • Webinars, Whitepapers, & Guides
    • Blog
    • Why Moz
      • Digital Marketers
      • Agency Solutions
      • Enterprise Solutions
      • Small Business Solutions
      • The Moz Story
      • New Releases
    • Log in
    • Log out
    • Products
      • Moz Pro

        Your all-in-one suite of SEO essentials.

      • Moz Local

        Raise your local SEO visibility with complete local SEO management.

      • STAT

        SERP tracking and analytics for enterprise SEO experts.

      • Moz API

        Power your SEO with our index of over 44 trillion links.

      • Compare SEO Products

        See which Moz SEO solution best meets your business needs.

      • Moz Data

        Power your SEO strategy & AI models with custom data solutions.

      Track AI Overviews in Keyword Research
      Moz Pro

      Track AI Overviews in Keyword Research

      Try it free!
    • Free SEO Tools
      • Domain Analysis

        Get top competitive SEO metrics like DA, top pages and more.

      • Keyword Explorer

        Find traffic-driving keywords with our 1.25 billion+ keyword index.

      • Link Explorer

        Explore over 40 trillion links for powerful backlink data.

      • Competitive Research

        Uncover valuable insights on your organic search competitors.

      • MozBar

        See top SEO metrics for free as you browse the web.

      • More Free SEO Tools

        Explore all the free SEO tools Moz has to offer.

      NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic
      Moz Pro

      NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic

      Learn more
    • Learn SEO
      • Beginner's Guide to SEO

        The #1 most popular introduction to SEO, trusted by millions.

      • SEO Learning Center

        Broaden your knowledge with SEO resources for all skill levels.

      • On-Demand Webinars

        Learn modern SEO best practices from industry experts.

      • How-To Guides

        Step-by-step guides to search success from the authority on SEO.

      • Moz Academy

        Upskill and get certified with on-demand courses & certifications.

      • MozCon

        Save on Early Bird tickets and join us in London or New York City

      Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints
      Moz API

      Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints

      Find your plan
    • Blog
    • Why Moz
      • Digital Marketers

        Simplify SEO tasks to save time and grow your traffic.

      • Small Business Solutions

        Uncover insights to make smarter marketing decisions in less time.

      • Agency Solutions

        Earn & keep valuable clients with unparalleled data & insights.

      • Enterprise Solutions

        Gain a competitive edge in the ever-changing world of search.

      • The Moz Story

        Moz was the first & remains the most trusted SEO company.

      • New Releases

        Get the scoop on the latest and greatest from Moz.

      Surface actionable competitive intel
      New Feature

      Surface actionable competitive intel

      Learn More
    • Log in
      • Moz Pro
      • Moz Local
      • Moz Local Dashboard
      • Moz API
      • Moz API Dashboard
      • Moz Academy
    • Avatar
      • Moz Home
      • Notifications
      • Account & Billing
      • Manage Users
      • Community Profile
      • My Q&A
      • My Videos
      • Log Out

    The Moz Q&A Forum

    • Forum
    • Questions
    • Users
    • Ask the Community

    Welcome to the Q&A Forum

    Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

    1. Home
    2. SEO Tactics
    3. Technical SEO
    4. Using 410 To Remove URLs Starting With Same Word

    Moz Q&A is closed.

    After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.

    Using 410 To Remove URLs Starting With Same Word

    Technical SEO
    3
    5
    1254
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as question
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with question management privileges can see it.
    • vikasnwu
      vikasnwu last edited by

      We had a spam injection a few months ago.  We successfully cleaned up the site and resubmitted to google.  I recently received a notification showing a spike in 404 errors.

      All of the URLS have a common word at the beginning injected via the spam:

      sitename.com/mono
      sitename.com/mono.php?buy-good-essays
      sitename.com/mono.php?professional-paper-writer

      There's about 100 total URLS with the same syntax with the word "mono" in them.  Based on my research, it seems that it would be best to serve a 410.  I wanted to know what the line of HTACCESS code would be to do that in bulk for any URL that has the word "mono" after the sitename.com/

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • vikasnwu
        vikasnwu @Martijn_Scheijbeler last edited by

        Martijn -

        Thanks for your reply.  I tried the code you provided, however it still provided a 404 error.   I was able to get the following to work properly - any drawbacks to doing it this way?

        RewriteRule ^mono(.*)$ - [NC,R=410,L]

        The browser now shows the following anytime there is the word "mono" immediately after "sitename.com/"

        The requested resource
        /mono.php
        is no longer available on this server and there is no forwarding address. Please remove all references to this resource.

        Additionally, a 410 Gone error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • vikasnwu
          vikasnwu @effectdigital last edited by

          Thanks for the detailed response.  Yes, there are some negative-SEO backlinks to some of the URLs created during the spam injection.  I've seen a few backlinks from other forum sites to our site to one of the spam created URLs which has hurt our rankings such as the following URL created on our site:

          sitename.com/mono.php?best-resume-writing-service-for-it-professionals

          I was confused by the following in your response:  "If you can serve the 410s on a custom 410 page which also gives the Meta no-index directive, that will be a very strong signal to Google indeed that those aren't proper pages or fit for indexation"

          • Is that all done view the htaccess file?  Code? Or is the meta no-index directive done in the robots.txt?- custom 410 page?  I've seen some 404 pages, but not custom 410 pages.  Would that be similar to a new 404 page?

          Thanks for your response.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • effectdigital
            effectdigital last edited by

            There are so many ways to deal with this. If these were indeed spam URLs, someone may have attached negative-SEO links to them (to water down your site's ranking power). As such, redirecting these URLs back to their parents could pull spam metrics 'onto' your site which would be really bad. I can see why you are thinking about using 410 (gone)

            Using Canonical tags to stop Google from indexing those bad parameter-based URLs could also be helpful. If you 'canonicalled' those addresses to their non-parameter based parents, Google would stop crawling those pages. When a URL 'canonicals' to another, different page - it cites itself as non-canonical, and thus gets de-indexed (usually, although this is only a directive). Again though, canonical tags interrelate pages. If those spam URLs were backed by negative SEO attacks, the usage of canonical tags would (again) be highly inadvisable (leaving your 410 suggestion as a better method).

            Google listens for wildcard rules in your robots.txt file, though it runs very simplified regex (in fact I think only the "*" wildcard is supported). In your robots.txt you could do something like:

            User-agent: *
            Disallow: /mono.php?*

            That would cull Google's crawling of most of those URLs, but not necessarily the indexation. This would be something to do after Google has swallowed most of the 410s and 'got the message'. You shouldn't start out with this, as if Google can't crawl those URLs - it won't see your 410s! Just remember this, so that when the issue is resolved you can smack this down and stop the attack from occurring again (or at least, it will be preemptively nullified)

            Finally you have Meta "No-Index" tags. They don't stop Google from crawling a URL, but they will remove those URLs from Google's index. If you can serve the 410s on a custom 410 page which also gives the Meta no-index directive, that will be a very strong signal to Google indeed that those aren't proper pages or fit for indexation

            So now we have a bit of an action plan:

            • 410 the bad URLs alongside a Meta no-index directive served from the same URL
            • Once Google has swallowed all that (may be some weeks or just over 1 month), back-plate it with robots.txt wildcards

            With regards to your oriignal question (sorry I took so long to get here) I'd use something like:

            Redirect 410 /mono.php?*

            I think .htaccess swallows proper regex (I think). The back slashes say "whatever character follows me, treat that character as a value and do not apply its general regex function". It's the regex escape character (usually). This would go in the .htaccess file at the root of your site, not in a subdir .htaccess file

            Please sandbox text my recommendation first. I'm really more of a technical data analyst than a developer!

            This document seems to suggest that a .htaccess file will properly swallow "" as the escape character:

            https://premium.wpmudev.org/forums/topic/htaccess-redirects-with-special-characters

            Hope this helps!

            vikasnwu 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • Martijn_Scheijbeler
              Martijn_Scheijbeler last edited by

              Hi,

              Have you also excluded these pages from the robots.txt file so you can make sure that they're also not being crawled?
              The code for the redirect looks something like this:

              RewriteEngine on
              RewriteRule ^/mono* - [G,NC]

              Martijn.

              vikasnwu 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
              • 1 / 1
              • First post
                Last post

              Got a burning SEO question?

              Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.


              Start my free trial


              Browse Questions

              Explore more categories

              • Moz Tools

                Chat with the community about the Moz tools.

              • SEO Tactics

                Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers

              • Community

                Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!

              • Digital Marketing

                Chat about tactics outside of SEO

              • Research & Trends

                Dive into research and trends in the search industry.

              • Support

                Connect on product support and feature requests.

              • See all categories

              Related Questions

              • RosemaryB

                Old URLs Appearing in SERPs

                Thirteen months ago we removed a large number of non-corporate URLs from our web server.  We created 301 redirects and in some cases, we simply removed the content as there was no place to redirect to. Unfortunately, all these pages still appear in Google's SERPs (not Bings) for both the 301'd pages and the pages we removed without redirecting.  When you click on the pages in the SERPs that have been redirected - you do get redirected - so we have ruled out any problems with the 301s. We have already resubmitted our XML sitemap and when we run a crawl using Screaming Frog we do not see any of these old pages being linked to at our domain. We have a few different approaches we're considering to get Google to remove these pages from the SERPs and would welcome your input. Remove the 301 redirect entirely so that visits to those pages return a 404 (much easier) or a 410 (would require some setup/configuration via Wordpress).  This of course means that anyone visiting those URLs won't be forwarded along, but Google may not drop those redirects from the SERPs otherwise. Request that Google temporarily block those pages (done via GWMT), which lasts for 90 days. Update robots.txt to block access to the redirecting directories. Thank you. Rosemary One year ago I removed a whole lot of junk that was on my web server but it is still appearing in the SERPs.

                Technical SEO | | RosemaryB
                3
              • BT2009

                How do I deindex url parameters

                Google indexed a bunch of our URL  parameters. I'm worried about duplicate content. I used the URL parameter tool in webmaster to set it so future parameters don't get indexed. What can I do to remove the ones that have already been indexed? For example, Site.com/products and site.com/products?campaign=email have both been indexed as separate pages even though they are the same page. If I use a no index I'm worried about de indexing the product page. What can I do to just deindexed the URL parameter version? Thank you!

                Technical SEO | | BT2009
                0
              • Vacatia_SEO

                Url folder structure

                I work for a travel site and we have pages for properties in destinations and am trying to decide how best to organize the URLs basically we have our main domain, resort pages and we'll also have articles about each resort so the URL structure will actually get longer:
                A. domain.com/main-keyword/state/city-region/resort-name
                _    domain.com/family-condo-for-rent/orlando-florida/liki-tiki-village_ _   domain.com/main-keyword-in-state-city/resort-name-feature    _
                _   domain.com/family-condo-for-rent/orlando-florida/liki-tiki-village/kid-friend-pool_ B. Another way to structure would be to remove the location and keyword folders and combine. Note that some of the resort names are long and spaces are being replaced dynamically with dashes. 
                ex. domain.com/main-keyword-in-state-city/resort-name
                _      domain.com/family-condo-for-rent-in-orlando-florida/liki-tiki-village_ _      domain.com/main-keyword-in-state-city/resort-name-feature_
                _      domain.com/family-condo-for-rent-in-orlando-florida/liki-tiki-village-kid-friend-pool_ Question: is that too many folders or should i combine or break up? What would you do with this? Trying to avoid too many dashes.

                Technical SEO | | Vacatia_SEO
                0
              • BarcelonaExperience

                Is it Detrimental to Repeat a Word in Our URL?

                Hey guys! We run a tour company in Barcelona. Our company name is Barcelona Experience. We're customizing our URL's to include keywords which can be found in all the important areas on the page (title tage, meta descp., etc).
                We want to change "www.barcelonaexperience.com/bike-tours" to "www.barcelonaexperience.com/barcelona-bike-tours"
                We're worried the repetition of "barcelona" could be a bad thing. True, or not true? Thanks!

                Technical SEO | | BarcelonaExperience
                0
              • emasaa

                Removing Media from Wordpress

                I've run the seomoz on page report and found an interesting issue. I'm using wordpress and it seems that every picture I add to my articles seem to be added as separate pages to the site. I'm having to go to each and every picture and creating a meta tag and description to it. I still get duplicate content issues with the same. On my Disqus system, I get the same pictures added just as a page or article would look like. What can I do to avoid this?

                Technical SEO | | emasaa
                0
              • elytical

                Using a non-visible H1

                I have a developer that wants to use style="text-indent:-9999px" to make the H1 non-visible to the user.  Being the conservative person I am, I've never tried this before and worry that Search Engines may think this is a form of cloaking.  Am I worrying about nothing?  And apologies if it's already been covered here.  I couldn't find it.  Thanks in advance!!!!

                Technical SEO | | elytical
                0
              • AmericanOutlets

                Singular vs plural in urls

                In keyword research for an ecommerce site, I've found that widget, singular gets a lot more searches than widgets, plural AND is much less competitive. Is it better for SEO purposes to have the URLs (and matching title tags) in the catalog as /brass-widget.html, /steel-widget.html, etc., or /brass-widgets.html, etc.? I'm worried that a) searches for widgets will pass by the singular urls but not vice versa, and b) the singular form will strike visitors as bad grammar. Any advice?

                Technical SEO | | AmericanOutlets
                0
              • brightonseorob

                Someone is redirecting their url to mine

                Hello, I have just discovered that a company in Poland www.realpilot.pl is directing their domain to ours www.transair.co.uk. We have not authorised this, neither do we want this. I have contacted the company and the webmaster to get it removed. If you search for the domain name www.realpilot.pl we (www.transair.co.uk) come up top. My biggest worry is that we will get penalised by Google for this re-direct as it appears to be done using some kind of frame. Does anyone know anything about this kind of thing? Many Thanks Rob Martin

                Technical SEO | | brightonseorob
                0

              Get started with Moz Pro!

              Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

              Start my free trial
              Products
              • Moz Pro
              • Moz Local
              • Moz API
              • Moz Data
              • STAT
              • Product Updates
              Moz Solutions
              • SMB Solutions
              • Agency Solutions
              • Enterprise Solutions
              • Digital Marketers
              Free SEO Tools
              • Domain Authority Checker
              • Link Explorer
              • Keyword Explorer
              • Competitive Research
              • Brand Authority Checker
              • Local Citation Checker
              • MozBar Extension
              • MozCast
              Resources
              • Blog
              • SEO Learning Center
              • Help Hub
              • Beginner's Guide to SEO
              • How-to Guides
              • Moz Academy
              • API Docs
              About Moz
              • About
              • Team
              • Careers
              • Contact
              Why Moz
              • Case Studies
              • Testimonials
              Get Involved
              • Become an Affiliate
              • MozCon
              • Webinars
              • Practical Marketer Series
              • MozPod
              Connect with us

              Contact the Help team

              Join our newsletter
              Moz logo
              © 2021 - 2025 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
              • Accessibility
              • Terms of Use
              • Privacy

              Looks like your connection to Moz was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.