How to compete against search terms that use geo-modifiers?
-
I should start by saying we are new to SEO.
We are introducing new “cycling tours” in new destinations and we are looking for a strategy to combat geo-modified keyword searches.
When people search for “cycling tours” they will anchor their search with a geo-modifier such as “cycling tours France” or “cycling tours Italy”.
Based in Australia we are keen to communicate to Australians searching for international cycling tours there are new Australian options that they may wish to consider.
The geo-modifiers required to find our tours (“eyre peninsula” and “carnarvon gorge”) are currently not on the cycling communities radar.
For example to find one of our new tours you need to use “cycling tours eyre peninsula” or “cycling tours carnarvon gorge”.
Currently the only solution we have found to let people know about our new tours is by word of mouth.
Is there an SEO solution?
-
Glad the reply was helpful, Chook1. You're in a tough spot and I wish there was an easier answer to give you, but know that I'm wishing you good luck in this venture. May your as-yet-unknown beautiful places for bike tours become world-class destinations in the future!
-
Thanks Miriam
You have a been a great help. You have understood our circumstances perfectly and your suggestions fall in with our general gut feelings. So there is a lot more networking ahead of us to build the awareness.
-
Hi Chook1!
From reading this thread, I'm understanding a couple of things. Please confirm that this is the scenario you are describing:
-
You offer cycling tours in parts of Australia that no one seems to be looking for.
-
You wish that when people search for something that they are looking for, like "cycling tours Italy", your pages about your tours in Australia would come up in the results.
If my understanding is correct then, in response to the above two points:
-
You have a demand problem rather than an SEO problem. Selling a product/service people aren't yet asking for (cycling tours in Carnarvon Gorge) means your initial focus has to be on creating awareness and a demand for this. It's like you've built a new invention that no one has ever heard of before. In order to turn your invention into a household word, you're likely going to have to advertise it via social media and other channels until the demand becomes real and people are actually searching for what you offer.
-
Google has no incentive to show Australian bike tours when people are looking for Italian bike tours. Anything outside of Italy would be irrelevant to the searcher, so this is not really a goal you should waste time on trying to achieve. Google Maps, mentioned in the ongoing discussion on this thread, will be of no help to you in Italy if your business and your tours are located in Australia. Google Maps is for local search marketing - not International marketing. So, rather, your best strategy is likely to be what I've described in #1 around building awareness/demand for what you offer. If you are trying to get Australians to take bike tours in little-known spots in the country, you will need to advertise in Australia. If you are trying to get travelers from other countries to come to Australia, you will have to advertise wherever those audiences congregate. As far as SEO goes, you'll likely want to try to develop relationships with whatever websites publish the most trusted info on bike tours for your target audience and see what you can do to start getting some press and links from them.
Does this help? If I've in any way misunderstood your scenario, please feel free to provide further details.
-
-
Hi Nigel
Thanks for taking the time to answer my questions the page structure you describe is something we are currently working on.
It is a pity there is not a way to recreate the traditional brochure stand that you find in a Visitors Information Centre where sometimes you discover an experience you would not have thought of asking for before walking in the door.
You mention that maps help the pages rank. Are you talking about Google Places or the general use of a Google map on a page? Currently we use Google maps to display a .KMZ file that shows the route we will be taking. Is this the same?
Thanks again
Mark
-
Hi Mark
If you are trying to get your Cycling Tours Carnarvon Gorge into SERPS for a Cycling Tours Italy search then you are barking up the wrong tree. Of course, they are going to add the place (Geo Modifier) because that is what they want.
I would have a drop-down menu which had a link
Cycling Tours South Australia>
Queensland>
Carnarvon Gorge
Tambourine Mountains
Etc...and all of the other places in Queensland where you run tours. Then build out each page fully with photos and local information.
Don't create pages with links, to links - put them in a logical menu structure otherwise the pages will be too many clicks away & people won't follow them.
You cannot do this so forget it:
“cycling tour Carnarvon Gorge” which is in Australia into the SERP when someone searches for “cycling tour Italy”
MAPS on the tour pages will help them rank.
Regards Nigel
-
Hi Joe and Nigel
I think I must be missing something.
Currently our tour to Carnarvon Gorge is near or at the top of the SERP if someone searches for “cycling tour Carnarvon Gorge”.
The problem we are trying to solve is that we are finding that no matter where a searcher is in the purchasing funnel for a “cycling tour” they seem to be adding a geo-modifier ie “cycling tour New Zealand” or “cycling tour South Australia”.
It would appear that people only search for cycling tours in locations that they have heard others have been to. As a result no one is looking for a cycling tour in Carnarvon Gorge or Australia as this location is nowhere near the usual cycling destinations.
If I understand you both correctly you are suggesting that if I am trying to get our “cycling tour” to “Carnarvon Gorge” into the SERP I should create a page about Queensland which has a link to another page about Carnarvon Gorge which then includes a link to our detailed tour page. Is this correct?
So what I do not understand is how creating the suggested page structure will help us get our “cycling tour Carnarvon Gorge” which is in Australia into the SERP when someone searches for “cycling tour Italy” which is in a completely different country. I do not think this is possible or am I missing something?
How will Google maps help with this?
As I mentioned previously currently the only solution we have found is to use word of mouth to let people know about our new tours. Am I wrong and is there an SEO solution?
Thanks
Mark
-
I would crate SEO locations pages siloed by state > location, take the effort to create unique content for each page. As Nigel Carr highlighted - images & AV will help drive traffic & engagement, Google maps have worked well for me in that past; also.
-
Thanks Nigel
Our issue is that we do not offer tours in the countries where people are looking.
Rather we are trying to open up new touring routes where both Australians and international travellers do not traditionally look. So our problem is that when people anchor their search with a geo-modifier such as "cycling tours England" we do not get a look in.
We run local tours in our home town and in this instance a local page as you describe including the geo-modifier works perfectly.
The down side of geo-modified searching stops people from finding options they had never thought of and serendipitously finding our new offerings.
Regards
Mark
-
Hi Chook1
I would set up 'City pages' or in your case 'Country Pages' which target the different places you offer cycling tours.
For example:
websiteurl/italy-cycling-tours
Then fill the page with highly detailed content and alt texted photos & maybe videos of the tours you offer in that country.
Make them local specific and you will see traffic. It works like a dream.
Simple to implement and highly effective.
Regards Nigel
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Use of "/" and using fractions in titles
We are a company that sells pipe and fittings. An example of a part that someone will search for is : 3/4" PVC Socket I am not sure how best to represent the fraction in the title of the page that has such a product. I am concerned that if I use the forward slash it will be misinterpreted by search engines (although it will be interpreted properly by users). A lot of folk search for the product by the fraction size and so it would be good to be able to represent it in the title, but I don't want to get "punished" by confusing search engines. I could replace the forward slash with a hyphen or pipe symbol, but then may look a bit weird to our users... Any recommendations? Bob
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BobBawden11 -
Wrong pages ranking for key terms
Hi, I have a website that was rebuilt and redesigned earlier this year, and it's struggling to rank. The problem is that the wrong pages are ranking for the key terms. For example, there is a page for 'Loft Conversions Essex' but the page that's ranking is actually the FAQ page (which doesn't mention the word 'Essex' at all). I have been through all of the usual items, and none of them seem to apply: The landing pages have been properly optimised (not overly so), while the pages that rank only contain the terms within the menu (the link that goes to the actual landing page) We thought it may be a redirect issue since the site was a bit of a mess before the rebuild, so we removed all of the redirects and resubmitted the htaccess file but that hasn't helped Internal anchor text is relevant There aren't a huge number of external links to the old site pages, and many of these pages didn't exist at all so I don't think that's an issue Most of the pages were built at the same time so there's no real reason why one would have more authority than another There are no canonicals interfering with these pages I can't really canonical these since we do want the pages to rank, it's just that they're all ranking for the wrong thing (so the SERPs are a lot lower than they should be). Most of these pages are pretty new, as I said, so while we have tried smaller content changes I don't think a full refresh will really help. To make it even weirder, the pages that rank for each term change regularly but it's never the right page. Help! EDIT: Thanks for the responses everyone!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | innermedia10 -
Zero search count and still they are earning good. How??????
Here is one website - listdose.com Alexa rank - 28,665 They have around 1000 pages, But 80% keywords used by them have 0 search count. They target only one keyword per page. So how are they earning good money and how are they ranking well in alexa without having any good search count kewyords ? Is this good idea to target 0 search count keywords to create a blog.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ross254sidney0 -
Am I turning a non geo-keyword into a geographic one?
Our client has a high powered site with tons of authority. They dominate in the eastern united states for multiple keyterms that relate to their service based company. However their closest competitor, a site with literally HALF of their authority, ranks ahead of them all over the world in markets outside of NYC. The client is using the terms "NYC and New York" all over their site, is it possible that they are giving themselves a local limitation by doing so when their competitors dont? The keyword itself doesn't necessarily lend itself to a local geo-based search result, but are we artificially CREATING that situation ourselves?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Fueled0 -
To index or not to index search pages - (Panda related)
Hi Mozzers I have a WordPress site with Relevanssi the search engine plugin, free version. Questions: Should I let Google index my site's SERPS? I am scared the page quality is to thin, and then Panda bear will get angry. This plugin (or my previous search engine plugin) created many of these "no-results" uris: /?s=no-results%3Ano-results%3Ano-results%3Ano-results%3Ano-results%3Ano-results%3Ano-results%3Akids+wall&cat=no-results&pg=6 I have added a robots.txt rule to disallow these pages and did a GWT URL removal request. But links to these pages are still being displayed in Google's SERPS under "repeat the search with the omitted results included" results. So will this affect me negatively or are these results harmless? What exactly is an omitted result? As I understand it is that Google found a link to a page they but can't display it because I block GoogleBot. Thanx in advance guys.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ClassifiedsKing0 -
How do I link a profile picture to my search results?
How do you get an icon which links to a google profile to display in google search results? Link this.... https://skitch.com/edwardrobertshaw/f12f8/central.ly-google-search
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ed1234560 -
Do any of you regularly use expired domains?
I know there has been discussion on using expired domains in the past. This is not so much a question as to how to do it or whether it works, but rather I would love to see how many of you use this in your backlink strategy. I have a domain in a low to moderately competitive niche that ranks really well, mostly on the power of a couple of expired domains. I bought the domains, created a quick wordpress site and pointed some anchor texted links to the site. It took some time for the expired domains to regain their PR, but when they did, the benefit was great. I'm considering whether I want to do this with another domain of mine. On one hand, it's a relatively inexpensive way to get some good quality anchor texted links. But, on the other hand, something in it feels "immoral" or "sneaky" to me. What do you think?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MarieHaynes0 -
HTML5 and using multiple H1 tags
Hi All, Our dev team have just asked me a very interesting question........ Within the context of an HTML5 page, where it is supported and encouraged to use multiple H1 tags, will the use of multiple H1 tags be detrimental to SEO? or does Google fully understand how HTML5 works and therefore not penalise a website for using multiple H1 tags? I have an opinion on this that if it helps usability and user experience then it is likely that it will be good for SEO. It would be really good to hear views of people who have tried this or have decided against it! Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | A_Q0