On Link Analysis tab I my best pages are 301 and 404 pages.
-
I looked on my redirrect file and found that /* redirects to /v/404.asp.
However if you look below at the link analysis the 404 page is getting a 404 error.
The homepage ecowindchimes.com/ is getting a 301 (but I don't know where it is going to).
The third one is also redirected.1. [No Data] ecowindchimes.com/ ||| 301 ||| 2 ||| 36 2.
2. [No Data] ecowindchimes.com/v/404.asp ||| 404 ||| 2 ||| 34 3. [No Data]
3. ecowindchimes.com/index.html?lang=en-us&target=d2.html ||| 301 ||| 1 ||| 33
So I have 2 questions: 1) should this be fixed? and 2) how?
This is a volusion site and I believe the "catchall" redirect was done by them
-
Answered in order, Stephen:
1. Normally, the fact that ecowindchimes.com/ is getting redirected is a good thing. But in this case, there's a problem with how it's been done. If you want to see where it's redirecting to, just enter that exact address in your browser's address bar and watch what happens to the address. It will change to www.ecowindchimes.com/default.asp. Done correctly, it should redirect to www.ecowindchimes.com (no default.asp extension)
This is called canonicalisation and it's designed to make sure your site's pages only get indexed under 1 URL. As far as the search engines are concerned, ecowindchimes.com/ and www.ecowindchimes.com/ are separate sites, even though the pages themselves are the same. By redirecting one to the other, you remove this problem.
The problem here is that www.ecowindchimes.com/default.asp is yet another way to refer to what is simply the home page of your site. This means that now, instead of www.ecowindchimes.com/ and www.ecowindchimes.com/ being duplicates of each other you have www.ecowindchimes.com and www.ecowindchimes.com**/default.asp** being dupes of each other. This needs to be corrected in your .htaccess file using 301 redirects.
You need to make ecowindchimes.com/ use a proper canonical redirect to www.ecowindchimes.com. This will catch ALL version of your pages that start without the www and redirect them to the correct URL with the www. (You'll need to delete the existing redirect as it's incorrect)
Then you need to 301-redirect www.ecowindchimes.com/default.asp directly to www.ecowindchimes.com/.
2. I've answered your question # 2 as fully as I can on your followup question. in short, your Volusion system is faking that 404 status as a hack to deal with the fact they don't handle 404 errors in the normal way. The page exists fine and that particular error can be ignored.
3. For your last question, this demonstrates why the hacked method for 404s being used is a problem. URLs that should be 404s will show up looking like 301 redirects instead, because of the hack in use.
To test this URL, again just put it in your address bar and watch where it gets redirected to. In this case, it's going to your 404 page (See answer to your followup question as linked above for explanation why this happening)
So, yes you need to try to fix these kinds of errors. It's saying that somewhere, there is a page linking to ecowindchimes.com/index.html?lang=en-us&target=d2.html. That is a URL from your old site before you migrated to the Volusion system. It likely means that there are pages on another web sites still linking to your old page addresses. It's also possible these are outdated links from within your own pages.
By entering that URL in the Wayback Machine I can see that it was for a page for Gracenote windchimes, so you'll want to redirect it to your Gracenotes category page.
If you want to figure out what pages those broken links are coming from, you can use Webmaster Tools 404 error report and SEOmoz's 404 error report as starting points. NOTE! You'll need to actually download the SEOmoz report as a CSV in order to see the Referrer column at the right side of the report.
Hope all that helps, more than confuses? If anything's not clear, be sure to holler.
Paul
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Only few pages (308 pages of 1000 something pages) have been crawled and diagnosed in 4 days, how many days till the entire website is crawled complete?
Setup campaign about 4-5 days ago and yesterday rogerbot said 308 pages were crawled and the diagnostics were provided. This website has over 1000+ pages and would like to know how long it would take for roger to crawl the entire website and provide diagnostics. Thanks!
Moz Pro | | TejaswiNaidu0 -
Why are my external links not showing?
I've had Pro long enough to get at least two weekly crawls and yet no external links are showing (which do absolutely exist). Why would this be?
Moz Pro | | SearchAppeal0 -
"Too many on page links" phantom penalty? What about big sites?
So I am consistently over the recommended "100 links" rule on our site's pages because of our extensive navigation and plentiful footer links (somewhere around 300 links per page). I know that there is no official penalty for this but rather that it affects the "link juice" of each link on there. I guess my question is more about how places like Zappos and Amazon get away with this? They have WAY over 100 links per page... in fact I think that Zappos footer is 100+ links alone. This overage doesn't seem to affect their domain rankings and authority so why does SEO moz place so much emphasis on this error?
Moz Pro | | kida12meyer0 -
How Do I deal with duplicate page titles for pages on eCommerce site
Hi We have an ecommerce site selling physical products. There are a few areas where the products run into two pages. I have used canonical meta tags and next and prev meta tags too. Despite this SEOMOZ reports are still displaying these as warnings for duplicate page titles. An example would be /brand_name/range/ <link rel="next" href="/brand_name/range/?page=2" /> <link rel="<a class="attribute-value">canonical</a>" href="/band_name/range/"/> /brand_name/range/?page=2 <link rel="<a class="attribute-value">prev</a>" href="/brand_name/range/" /> <link rel="<a class="attribute-value">canonical</a>" href="/band_name/range/?page=2"/> Should I be doing something different?
Moz Pro | | wouldBseoKING0 -
Redirect analysis tool
I'm looking for a tool like this: http://www.internetofficer.com/seo-tool/redirect-check/ that can check hundreds/thousands of URLs and give me a report as to which ones have been redirected. Does anyone know of something that can do this?
Moz Pro | | glass010 -
Experencing page authority issues after a 301 redirect
We just completed a build of a new site and used 301 redirects to retain our page authority. In the first week all the interior pages reported a page authority of 1 after 2 or so weeks the page authority began to look more accurate but they were still not as high as the original pages. The strange thing is that when you click on the link to a page the page authority populates correctly but when the page finally finished loading the PA goes back down. Has anyone ever experienced this and if so how did you fix it? Thanks!
Moz Pro | | Jo_vortx.com0 -
Too many links on a page - pull-down menus
SEOMoz is showing too many links on the page (www.ankinlaw.com). There clearly aren't 100 visible links on the page. Is it counting each page found on the (extensive) pull-down menu as a link? If not, where do all the links come from?
Moz Pro | | rarbel0 -
Link Count Per Page Including JavaScript Links - Should We Worry About Them?
With large ecommerce sites, we usually have more than 100 links per page and many times have more than 200 links on each page due to links and images in the header, footer, guided navigation and then the body product grid and content. When I use most on-page link counting tools like SEO x-ray and the SEO Moz Pro crawl report, I notice that every visible link on the page gets counted. This includes and javascript based links that expand the product grid to 30, 60 or view all, javascript sorting links, javascript links to view customer reviews for each product. etc. There was a QA post here http://www.seomoz.org/q/should-i-nofollow-the-main-navigation-on-certain-pages about nofollowing and page rank sculpting and it seems pretty unanimous that most don't think that page rank sculpting is very valuable. So my question is, are the javascript links on pages that don't link to another page viewed differently by search engines? If so, shouldn't there be a way to see on-page link count minus javascript call links that don't actually link to another page? To expand a bit on my question, we also use nofollow attributes on the text links in the left navigation that are meant for refining products just as the javascript links in the product grid are meant to refine the products, sort them, allow for product comparison, allow for viewing customer reviews, etc. So should it be ok to have 300 links on a page if the unimportant ones that you don't want crawled like the left navigation refinements and product grid javascript links all have rel="nofollow" applied to them? I know that would basicly be PageRank sculting, but it seems like the best options for shopping sites that have a lot of navigation links.
Moz Pro | | abernhardt0