Novice Question - Can Browsers realistically distinguish words within concatenated strings e.g. text55fun or should one use text-55-fun? What about foreign languages especially more obscure ones like Finnish which Google Translate often miss-translates?
-
I am attempting to understand what is realistically possible within Google, Yahoo and Bing as they search websites for KeyWords. Technically my understanding is that they should be able to distinguish common words within concatenated strings, although there can be confusion between word boundaries when ambiguity is involved. So in the simple example of text55fun, do search engines actually distinguish text, 55 and fun separately? There are practical processing, databased and algorithm limitations that might turn a technically possible solution into a unrealistic one at a commercial scale.
What about more ambiguous strings like stringsstrummingstrongly would that be parsed as string s strummings trongly or strings strummings trongly or strings strumming strongly? Does one need to use dashes or underscores to make it unambiguous to the search engine? My guess is that the engine would recognize the dash or space and better understand the word boundaries yet ignore the dash or underscore from an overall concatenated string perspective.
Thanks in advance to whoever can provide any insight to an old coder who is new to this field.
-
Omid,
Thanks very much for the fast response.
Totally agree about about Google AI - my objective is completely white hat, original content-rich website which their AI encompasses - Google is attempting to weed out folks who are avoiding the hard work associated with building these types of websites.
Not everything in business has a brand-building goal - only so many brands can rise to the top. I'm looking from a very different perspective in this case and would be very happy to find my 1,000 to 5,000 specific people or so. From that point, I would then have my work cut out from a business standpoint, nothing to do with SEO or anything related to this field. Just simple blocking and tackling - sales,customer service, marketing, delivery etc.
I'm an old-school guy (sell high-value, high-margin products and services to customers who value you and want to stay with you over long periods of time because of great customer service) and this is an experiment for me using a new-school sales tactic. In my experience it does not take a lot of those types of customers to build a very nice small business. The really hard part is actually creating the organization which genuinely delivers on those commitments consistently over long periods of time and retains those customers.
All the best
Newell
-
Paul,
Thanks very much for the prompt response - I love your part of Canada by the way - and have driven through your town on the way to Jasper a number of time. I think that It's the most majestic part of the Rockies one can see without a plane.
Your response is at the heart of my question - the difference between what is possible and practical, particularly at the speed in which response occur. I wasn't aware of the space issue, very good point!
As a variation, were the concatenated string to become part of a URL for an original content-rich website, it sounds as though both the dashed and un-dashed URL would be required to be safe (because people tend not to type dashes or forget). In that event, would it matter to the search engines which URL is 301 redirected?
Again, thanks very much
Newell
-
take this, for random names and brands, they may not even recognize it proper and find the next best guess to it...
ever try googling a brand new online site / brand that is an abstract name? you get corrections and suggestions?
NOT ADVISED to make text sticktogetherlikethis in ANY language. it's just a best practice. across the board, content and url.
As Paul said, I do not like the whole "goofing" around situation with machine learning and Google's current artificial intel. its not nearly perfect technology and you can be its statistical miss...
-
The problem here,. as I see it, NY60, is that there's no way of knowing for sure. The engines are "supposed" to be able to parse the text strings, but there's no way they're infallible and in fact there's no way of knowing if they're even acceptably good at it under the conditions that are important to you.
For that reason, I always opt to make it as hard as possible for the engines to goof. In this case, that means dividing at word boundaries with a hyphen in strings like URLs and other code. Spaces are problematic because they often get encoded into html entity %20 which can cause yet more havoc - though in straight content like meta-titles, meta-descriptions, alt text and page content they are fine.
There's my $0.02. Whattaya think?
Paul
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
My website is my name. Overnight it went from being the number one google search to not showing up at all when you google my name. Why would this happen?
I built my website via square space. It is my name. If you google my name it was the number one hit. Suddenly 2 weeks ago it doesn't show up AT ALL. I went through square spaces SEO check list, secured my site etc. Still doesn't show up. Why would this happen all of the sudden and What can I do? Thank you!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Jbark0 -
Rel language
This site ranks well in the States and Austraila. Would rel language tags help with search for both states? https://www.dinkleboo.com/ Separating duplicate content. Or how would you go about increasing ranking? The site ranks higher in the states than Austrailia but they want to increase their presence in AU. US Position 4.9k AU Position 1.3
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | AaronRainsSEO0 -
Why do Local "5 pack" results vary between showing Google+, Google+ and website address
I had a client ask me a good question. When they pull up a search result they show up at the top but only with a link to their G+ page. Other competitors show their web address and G+ page. Why are these results different in the same search group? Is there a way to ensure the web address shows up?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Ron_McCabe0 -
Can changing G+ authorship on a well-ranking article drop its search ranking?
We have an article that ranks #1 in Google SERP for the keyword we want it to rank for. We decided to revise the article because although it's performing well, we knew it could be better and more informative for the user. Now that we've revised the content, we're wondering: Should we update the article author (and the G+ authorship markup) to reflect that the revisor authored the content, or keep the original author listed? Can changing G+ authorship on an article impact its search ranking, or is that an issue that's a few Google algorithm updates down the road?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | pasware0 -
Will Google View Using Google Translate As Duplicate?
If I have a page in English, which exist on 100 other websites, we have a case where my website has duplicate content. What if I use Google Translate to translate the page from English to Japanese, as the only website doing this translation will my page get credit for producing original content? Or, will Google view my page as duplicate content, because Google can tell it is translated from an original English page, which runs on 100+ different websites, since Google Translate is Google's own software?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | khi50 -
Anchor text
What will I need to make amormensagens.com.br is in position 1 in Google to the word "mensagens"? Only anchor text will?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | tibtos0 -
Image Links Vs. Text Links, Questions About PR & Anchor Text Value
I am searching for testing results to find out the value of text links versus image links with alt text. Do any of you have testing results that can answer or discuss these questions? If 2 separate pages on the same domain were to have the same Page Authority, same amount of internal and external links and virtually carry the same strength and the location of the image or text link is in the same spot on both pages, in the middle of the body within paragraphs. Would an image link with alt text pass the same amount of Page Authority and PR as a text link? Would an image link with alt text pass the same amount of textual value as a text link? For example, if the alt text on the image on one page said "nike shoes" and the text link on the other page said "nike shoes" would both pass the same value to drive up the rankings of the page for "nike shoes"? Would a link wrapped around an image and text phrase be better than creating 2 links, one around the image and one around the text pointing to the same page? The following questions have to do with when you have an image and text link on a page right next to each other, like when you link a compelling graphic image to a category page and then list a text link underneath it to pass text link value to the linked-to page. If the image link displays before the text link pointing to a page, would first link priority use the alt text and not even apply the anchor text phrase to the linked page? Would it be best to link the image and text phrase together pointing to the product page to decrease the link count on the page, thus allowing for more page rank and page authority to pass to other pages that are being linked to on the page? And would this also pass anchor text value to the link-to page since the link would include an image and text? I know that the questions sound a bit repetitive, so please let me know if you need any further clarification. I'd like to solve these to further look into ways to improve some user experience aspects while optimizing the link strength on each page at the same time. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | abernhardt
Andrew0 -
Site: on Google
Hello, people. I have a quick question regarding search in Google. I use search operator [site:url] to see indexing stauts of my site. Today, I was checking indexing status and I found that Google shows different numbers of indexed pages depends on search setting. 1. At default setting (set as 10 search result shows) > I get about 150 pages indexed by Google. 2. I set 100 results shows per page and tried again. > I get about 52 pages indexed by Google. Of course I used same page URL. I really want to know which data is accurate. Please help people!!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Artience0