HUGE decrease in links since website redesign
-
We recently added several new pages pages to our website.
These new pages were constructed on a dev site, and then pushed live. Since the new site has gone live I have seen a huge decline in links.
My external followed links have dropped from 3000 to 500 and my total website links have fallen from 35,000 to 4,500.
I have done some research, and I think there is a server side issue. Where multiple versions of my URL may be running. The majority of the links built were pointing to the homepage. That being said I do not have access to our in-house dev person this week, so I am trying to identify the problem myself.
I have used screaming frog to crawl my site and did not see any errors which stand out. I realize I probably need to use 301 redirects to solve this problem, I just need some guidance on how to identify what I need to 301 redirect.
Second question.
If I move a landing page out of the global navigation but it can still be reached through other pages on the website , will this cause issues?
-
Thank you all for the detailed response.
I am going to use the suggested tools, and get to the bottom of this problem. I will report back when I have some more insight.
Once again thank you all for the detailed responses.
-
hey Nick,
I want to say I agree with what you're saying as well I just posted my response which I did not realize was not posted prior it log me out regardless of that
I believe he can do it with the tools Both you and have suggested I've given them above and Considering we are essentially saying the same thing.
it could be anything from somebody not linking the anchor text on the page to leaving the inbound link out altogether. I believe he should use his host if it's a managed hosting company for instance fire host because my site is on Nginx does all the 301 redirects for you many other web hosting companies like iWeb and data pipe will do the same.
However it seems like whoever did the coding was more of a developer/web designer then anyone who is concerned with SEO
I'm not saying that they didn't do their job right please don't think that it just sounds like SEO is not there specialty.
I have listed some methods I think will help I also believe what Nick here is saying is right on the money. Basically, your site even with the same URL when it has been recoded can have everything you think should be there but if it's not in the code the links won't work.
I hope this is been of help, and I want to say I back up what Nick has said.
Sincerely,
Thomas
-
Hi thank you for the praise I appreciate that.
I have come up with a list of tools I think you will benefit from. Primarily I know you will benefit from screaming frog however I believe there's a better method once you have it then screaming frog's own guide that is by a company called Seer it costs nothing for the guide and have given the links below that you want to check out.
I want to share what I believe happened when your site was recoded the on page anchor text for the links that are pointing at your site were either broken or the anchor text/link does not exist anymore on the webpage.
The Seer interactive how to verify back links and in view the anchor text
guide for screaming frog is designed to help people find the links however you're doing it on your own site it doesn't really matter what the purpose behind it was this tool will help you.
I have also added information from Internet marketing ninjas they have some of the best free tools on the market and their web-based I strongly suggest you using their broken link tester right away. Along with their site map generator to look for broken links and you can use the combination of Moz OSE along with majestic and SEO a-ref there built into screaming frog to see what is pointing at you.
In other important factor in this is what are you hosted on is it IIS, Apache, light speed, or Nginx.
The reason being is if I were on a host like one of my favorites for important large sites or really all websites in general it's excellent for FireHost.com
Then I could simply figure out which links are pointing to my site then have the host preferably somebody like I mentioned above that does fully managed hosting would do all the 301 redirects on the server side completely away from coding on your website and making them much faster and stronger.
He's no I recommend this regardless over the host does or not it should be implemented server-side
Please know that you're welcome to contact me I will private message you my cell phone number if you want more information I will happily tell you.
One of the easiest ways to do this would be to hire a person like Dan Shure a top rank SEO as well as a truly helpful and ethical person. You would have to contact him for an exact price.
or
Yoast to do a site analysis is price right now is approximately $1000 however many companies charge a lot more in the is a very well respected authority as a developer
https://yoast.com/hire-us/website-review/
Evolving SEO Dan Shure is a true specialist who has even done whiteboard Fridays here on Moz.com is a truly standup guy as well. Is Dan Shure does some consulting and could be asked for his pricing He has spoken at Mozcation , Distilled NYC MeetUp the list goes on. He can be reached easily at its business evolving SEO
http://www.evolvingseo.com/contact/
http://www.seerinteractive.com/
http://www.internetmarketingninjas.com
and of course myself the tools are below
http://www.blueprintmarketing.com/
http://www.internetmarketingninjas.com/tools/
http://www.internetmarketingninjas.com/broken-links-tool/
http://www.internetmarketingninjas.com/seo-tools/google-sitemap-generator/
http://www.seerinteractive.com/blog/screaming-frog-guide
http://www.seerinteractive.com/blog/screaming-frog-guide#How_to_verify_my_backlink
I hope I have been of help to you,
Thomas
-
This is a good answer that just led me to think about some items that are not necessarily URL related. I'd do what Nick suggests firsts. The wisdom around the water cooler is that the most important content should be placed towards the top of your pages to ensure that spiders reach it and can get a good indication of what a page is all about. What I've seen are "professional recoded pages" by great designers who really aren't great coders or great coders who focus mostly on browser compatibility but not on how spiders might prefer the format.
What am I getting at? What is in your sidebar and where is it located in the source code of your page? I've seen two significant changes that might make a difference:
(1) Your sidebar that has lots of secondary and promotional content is appearing at the top of your page and your post content is underneath it.
(2) The page looks great but there is a ton of other junk that loads in your header tags well before your content areas on your pages. You would be incredibly surprised how "professional themes" will have options to make things so convenient for webmasters. Wordpress themes that have special options are notorious for having clickable buttons that suddenly load lots of code in the header tags.
(3) Custom javascript in the header. Typically you can load something common like jQuery and there won't be an issue or everyone would have it. You get into trouble when someone custom codes an awesome thigamajig for you not knowing what else is on your site and which may lead to errors in your header and trouble for spiders.
This is all speculation but I've found these issues crop up in the past. Good luck.
-
If I had a dime for every "professionally recoded" website that was completely hosed from an optimization standpoint...
Not sure why people are throwing out link distribution and other wild-ass-guesses that would have nothing to do with disappearing incoming links. The simplest answer is often the most accurate.
Did your site's domain change? Or did any inner page URLs change? If so, then you'll need to 301 those to their current counterparts. ScreamingFrog is good for finding broken/missing links, but you can also take a look at the Crawl Errors in Google webmaster tools to see if Googlebot is having any problems finding your pages. If no URLs were changed or removed, then it probably doesn't have anything to do with the redesign.Check with majesticseo.com and ahrefs.com to see if the links have been marked as lost or removed recently. Both of those are pretty quick to spot new and removed links.
The sharp drop in number of links could have come from one or more sites removing your link or the page/site just doesn't exist anymore. If one site with 20000 pages disappears and they had a sitewide link to you, that would explain it. Do you happen to know how many linking domains you had, compared to how many you currently have? That would be a better indicator.
And your second question (missed that the first time):
If the page is still accessible from somewhere, it won't be a "problem", but it may not rank as well. That really depends on a whole lot of other things - external links to that page, other internal links to it from and the crawlability of the site in general. But in general, no it won't be a huge problem - I have a few pages on my own site that only have one internal link from the sitemap and no external links, yet they still rank for some things. -
Thank you everyone for answering me back and I would just like to clarify a few points.
Thomas: Even though only a few additional pages were added the entire website was professionally recoded in HTML. Prior to the recode our site was coded in a combination of languages and not efficient. So even though the URL is the same the code has totally been redone.
As far as the link distribution, the links are spread out across our landing pages but slightly more skewed in the direction of the homepage.
As far as screaming frog, I will see if I can get my hands on the paid version today. I currently use the free version.
-
While I'd love to comment (and I know you're hesitant to provide a URL), I don't think that you'll get any truly useful advice that would help since there could be so many reasons why you'd encounter issues after a site design change. The useful advice comes from those who will analyze your site, see what changed and determine what changes (or open items poorly done or overlooked) might be a good indicator of how your rankings dropped. Everything else is speculating in the dark. There is no substitute to taking a good look, IMHO.
-
I can tell you without a doubt if you are in fact did replace your entire website as you state
"Since the new site has gone live I have seen a huge decline in links."
however prior to that you are talking about just adding pages. So if you could tell me yes this is a brand-new website or no I'm just adding pages it would clear up a lot and if you're just adding pages to your website I agree with Chris.
If you are in fact somebody that had their website re built or anything that would have to do with changing servers you or platforms.
Then it is most likely a 301 redirect that you need to concentrate on. If you have not implemented redirects from your old website to the new website you will lose the dramatic amount of links.
If you could tell me what is your site built from HTML and maybe you moved it wordpress or another content management system?
if so you can have these types of issues fixed very easily using cms2cms.com
if you are pointing all your links at your homepage I would try to spread them out as much as you can. Just so we're clear most websites with 35,000 links have them spread all over the place. I would advise that you do the same with yours. As that's a lot of links just to the homepage. Screaming frog is an awesome tool it should be able to actually accomplish what you're looking to do with the paid version do you have the paid version?
If you would kindly update me on this I will respond with a more helpful answer.
Sincerely,
Thomas
-
I don't think the new pages and the drop in back links are related.
As far as the second question, it could have an impact on its rankings. For example, if the page was liked to from the home page and subsequent to the change, there isn't a link from the home page, it could lose rankings because of it.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Permalink structure of an excising website
Hey everyone, We have a website - a business directory. It is a large directory with lots of B2B listings. So currently our URL structure for the categories look like this: dispensarystack.com/category/professional-services/ **We want to rank for the KW "dispensary professional services". ** Is it enough that we have the word dispensary in our brand name and in this way in the URL structure or is it better to make the slug: **dispensarystack.com/category/**dispensary-professional-services/ Or even closer to the root of the website: **dispensarystack.com/**dispensary-professional-services/ Thank you for your time and answers!
Technical SEO | | Nobody16154975014230 -
Can redirect URL website also shown on the google ranking? and higher than the original website?
can redirect URL website also shown on the google ranking? and higher than the original website? For example, I create URL B which redirect to website A, and do good SEO on URL B, can URL B rank higher than my original website A?
Technical SEO | | HealthmateForever0 -
Website not ranking but the blog is!
I am hoping someone might be able to help me, I am doing some work on a website. A new version of the site was recently launched and since then rankings have plummeted and the new blog pages are ranking better! When the new version of the site went live, the domain changed to the non-www version, plus an incorrect robots.txt file and we have never really been able to fully recover (both of these things were beyond my control!). The robots.txt file was corrected and some of the external links links changed to the non-www but there is a 301 redirect in place so changing to the non-www shouldn't have been the reason to drop the site out completely. Before the launch of the new website, the site was ranking on the front page of Google for a lot of relevant keywords such as outdoor blinds, outdoor blinds Perth, cafe blinds, patio blinds, etc. The quality of the links is pretty bad and I am attempting to remove them before doing a disavow of all the really bad quality links but unless we were really unlucky I don't think it's the links right now that are causing the problem. I have ran the site through numerous crawl tests, checked the robots.txt, there are no messages in GWMT, the pages are indexed but I have a feeling there is something wrong with the site that is stopping this site from ranking well. If anyone could give me any insights I would be really grateful. I know the site could be better structured from a keyword/ structure perspective but the site was ranking fine!
Technical SEO | | Karen_Dauncey0 -
Links in a Flash document
How do I tell if a link in a Flash document is follow or nofollow? Or doesn't it matter? (I just found out that my company placed an advertorial in a Flash publication and I want to make sure it doesn't wind up as a paid, followed link.) Thank you!
Technical SEO | | Linda-Vassily0 -
Removing indexed website
I had a .in TLD version of my .com website floated for about 15 days, which was a duplicate copy of .com website. I did not wish to use the .in further for SEO duplication reasons and had let the .in domain expire on 26th April. But still now when I search from my website the .in version also shows up in results and even in google webmaster it shows the the website with maximum (190) number of links to my .com website. I am sure this is hurting the ranking of my .com website. How can the .in website be removed from googles indexing and search results. Given that is has expired also. thanks
Technical SEO | | geekwik0 -
404's in WMT are old pages and referrer links no longer linking to them.
Within the last 6 days, Google Webmaster Tools has shown a jump in 404's - around 7000. The 404 pages are from our old browse from an old platform, we no longer use them or link to them. I don't know how Google is finding these pages, when I check the referrer links, they are either 404's themselves or the page exists but the link to the 404 in question is not on the page or in the source code. The sitemap is also often referenced as a referrer but these links are definitely not in our sitemap and haven't been for some time. So it looks to me like the referrer data is outdated. Is that possible? But somehow these pages are still being found, any ideas on how I can diagnose the problem and find out how google is finding them?
Technical SEO | | rock220 -
Link juice and max number of links clarification
I understand roughly that "Link Juice" is passed by dividing PR by the number of links on a page. I also understand the juice available is reduced by some portion on each iteration. 50 PR page 10 links on page 5 * .9 = 4.5 PR goes to each link. Correct? If so and knowing Google stops counting links somewhere around 100, how would it impact the flow to have over 100 links? IE 50 PR page 150 links on the page .33 *.9 = .29PR to each link BUT only for 100 of them. After that, the juice is just lost? Also, I assume Google, to the best of its ability, organizes the links in order of importance such that content links are counted before footer links etc.
Technical SEO | | sprynewmedia0 -
.Nofollow and link count
If i use nofollow on links ( internal or external ), will it reduce the link count as regard to Google. If there are 50 external links, and i nofollow 20 of them, will Google count this as 30 external links.
Technical SEO | | seoug_20050