Google's Local Search Results for Broad Keywords
-
I have a question regarding Google's local search results for broad keywords. Since Google is changing their algo to reflect local results for broad words, would it be beneficial now to start going after those words as well?
For example: we have a client ranking for 'miami security alarm', but I would like to know if it would be beneficial to start optimizing for 'security alarm' as well.
Also, since Google's keyword research tool reflects searches on a national level, how would I be able to find out how many searches a broad keyword is receiving on a local level?
Thank you in advanced!
-
Hey Alex, personally, I would focus on getting your citations put together well with ideally unique descriptions that include your keywords. Don't worry too much about building links and certainly don't worry too much about anchor text. Go for the easy wins first and we are seeing great results in local search for existing sites with just some local branded links, solid on page optimisation and a sensible site structure, citations and well put together and optimised Google+ Local profile page.
Put together a review strategy and try to get keywords and location in your reviews.
Maybe do a small bit of AAA guest blogging on a relevant site with a relevant blog topic and get a link back. Work in keywords if you really want to but be sparse, varied and sensible.
Links, links, links is not the way to do, do, do things any longer and especially not in local.
Hope that helps!
Marcus -
Thank you for the prompt and thorough response Marcus!
You discussed very helpful techniques for onsite optimization, but how about the offsite SEO and the keywords used in content marketing?
To use your example: would it be beneficial to use keywords in the content and anchor text like "commercial photographer" without also including the location ("in Birmingham"), since Google is localizing the results anyway?
"commercial photographer" will presumably gain more searches than "commercial photographer in Birmingham", even in the local arena.
-
Hey, they should be one and the same.
I am working with a commercial photographer and it is an area that is wide open in local where he operates. But, we are mostly optimising his pages for the broad term + area + brand. Obviously, we carry this through his page name, page title, meta description, breadcrumbs and actual content so we have something like.
So, home page is something like:
URL:
www.url.co.ukTitle:
Matthew Smith - Commercial, Architectural & Fashion Photographer | BirminghamService pages are like this:
URL:
www.url.co.uk/commercial-photographer/Breadcrumb:
Home > Commercial PhotographerTitle:
Commercial Photographer in Birmingham | MatthewSmith.co.ukURL:
www.url.co.uk/architectural-photographer/Breadcrumb:
Home > Architectural PhotographerTitle:
Architectural Photographer in Birmingham | MatthewSmith.co.uk
So, any citations will also at least mention the location, feature his consistent address and his main keywords (without any localisation).
So, I am not sure, if we do this the right way, there needs to be any kind of distinction and I am certainly not going to cram search keywords together like 'commercial photographer birmingham' and miss out general stop words like 'in' to somehow 'optimise' it better. Likewise, I am unlikely to want to build links with 'commercial photographer birmingham' as an anchor as it is probably completely unneeded and unnatural + possibly dangerous.
For most small businesses in the UK local SEO is so easy and so open that just build something that does things the right way
- The right keywords (commercial photographer instead of the bigger volume commercial photography)
- Well optimised landing pages and a solid information architecture
- Good content that matches the intent of the user searching
- Well optimised social platforms
- Lots of well put together citations (quality matters - think of each one as an advert for the biz)
- Unstructured citations on important sites (twitter bio etc)
- Maybe some local links
- Consistent NAP
- A review strategy that builds reviews in a sensible, steady manner (preferably steering the reviewers to include the location and service keyword in the nicest possible way)
This should not be difficult and certainly don't approach it in a spammy or manipulative way & try to build quality into your workflow and increasing visibility locally (in the UK at least) should be easy.
Some further reading that may help:
- http://www.bowlerhat.co.uk/blog/name-address-phone-number/
- http://www.bowlerhat.co.uk/blog/quality-not-quantity-citations-for-seo/
Hope that helps!
Marcusremote
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Does Google’s Algorithm Populate Answer Boxes with Its Own Independent Research?
If you search 'best games to play for youtube' you get an answer box with answers pulled independently from the article at hand. Here's an image: http://imgur.com/a/S0j9B Here are all the games from my article, in the order in which they appear. Google's chosen games for Answer Box are bolded: Battlefield 1 Bloodborne GTA V FiFA 16 TrackMania Turbo Garry’s Mod League of Legends Call of Duty: Black Ops III Tom Clancy’s The Division Overwatch Just Cause 3 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive Brawlhalla Rocket League Dark Souls III Unravel Firewatch GoldenEye 007 (this was put in as a joke, but coded as an H2 nonetheless) Destiny Dead by Daylight Fallout 4 Undertale No Man’s Sky Minecraft As you can see, Google is choosing which games to display to its searchers. My Crazy Egg data shows that these were not picked by click volume (each of these H2s are hyperlinked), which means Google must be using some other popularity metric, such as its own search volume data or external sales data. I wrote this up in a post on my site, for anybody who's curious.
Algorithm Updates | | Edward_Sturm1 -
Why are organic search results vastly different on Bing, Google and Yahoo Search
We searched two words for a client so see how/where their site returned results. Depending on both the browser we used and the search engine, the results were so vastly different we were shocked. The site returned #2 or 3 on Bing and YahooSearch and not until the 3rd page for Google! And it also returned much worse on Chrome than any other browser, a Google product. I know this topic must be covered somewhere, or perhaps someone would be kind enough to chime in and shed some light? We have been working hard to optimize for Google and failing, but doing very well everywhere else. What gives?
Algorithm Updates | | jimmyzig1 -
Ecommerce or E-commerce as a Keyword?
I have done a good bit of research but am not sure which word to focus on. I feel that the trend is moving towards no hyphen but I do not have any data to justify that other than google trends. Here is the research I found: Google Trends says ecommerce is more popular
Algorithm Updates | | Manseo
http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=e-commerce%2C%20ecommerce&cmpt=q Ngram says e-commerce
https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=ecommerce%2Ce-commerce&year_start=1990&year_end=2013&corpus=15&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t1%3B%2Cecommerce%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Ce%20-%20commerce%3B%2Cc0 Google Adwords Keyword tool says e-commerce:
e-commerce has 33,100 monthly search volume
ecommerce has 14,800 monthly search volume What do you think, will ecommerce overtake e-commerce in the future monthly search volumes? Ecommerce or E-commerce?0 -
Google Search CTR % By Position
Hello I am looking for an updated report regarding the CTR % by position for Google search results. I have the compete.com report which Gives the 1st organic position a 53% CTR but I have not be able to duplicate that number with any other report or research. I am just trying to validate this report before I suggest any recommendations to my company regarding our search efforts. Thank you Ben
Algorithm Updates | | bhalverson30 -
Dropped from Universal Result: Local
For quite some time our Google Places listing has been in the Universal Results...(for this keyword there is a 7-pack result). Which was great, we had a PPC ad at the top of the page, we were 3rd in the Universal Results (there was 3 places listings before the natural results)...and we were 6th in the natural results - meaning we were on the first page 3 times...which means a happy boss....and lots of traffic. The old places listing was linked to our new Google+ Page pending the eventual demise of places and the merge. The merge has happened, all information from the places listing has migrated (apart from reviews and photos??) and the places listing has been deleted (URL returns 404 error). Problem is now my Google + Page is not even within the first 2 or 3 pages of places results never mind in the Universal results. So it would appear the rank / authority that the places listing had...hasn't been transferred to the Google+ page. My competitors...who were in 1 + 2 in the universal results above the natural results and who have Google+ Pages with NOTHING on...bar their name, are still there! Why would I be dropped when my Google+ Page, has more info, more followers, more photos, more relevant content (they don't have any content ) than my 2 competitors. It seems I've been penalised....somebody suggested that I had the keyword twice in my "About" and twice in my "Introduction" info and that could be it. I thought the loss of the review might be it too...but neither of the businesses now occupying the first 3 spots..have any reviews at all. Anybody else suffered from this? Anybody any other suggestions to why I might have been dropped so dramatically in the places listings? (My SERP listing is unaffected for this keyword) Keyword being mentioned twice hardly seems like "stuffing"! I'm actually not too concerned about the places ranking....not a great driver of traffic...but appearing in the Universal Results did obviously drive traffic...and to appear in the Universal Results...I've now got about 30 positions to climb...... The whole Google+ Local / Google Places thing has been a nightmare from start to finish.... Thanks in advance for any help or advice!
Algorithm Updates | | MarbellaSurferDude0 -
How did a competitor's brand name get in google's related search list?
When doing a google search for the term "ulster county real estate" the related search list at the bottom of the serp includes 7 obviously related search terms and 1 brand name of a competitor. (see attachment) The competitor doesn't rank for this term organically at all yet he enjoys a link on the first page with those of us that do by being in the related search list? I don't get it. Anyone know how something like this happens? Innhs.png
Algorithm Updates | | jhogan801 -
Google above the fold update
Hi everyone, Ever since the Jan 19th Google 'above the fold update' I have noticed some strange ranking changes in some of my sites. 1. rankings increased dramatically (not in top 50 to page 2) on Jan 19th for about 5 days then dropped out completely from the top 50. 2. our rankings then did the same thing again around Feb 2nd for about 5 -6 days then has bottomed out ever since. We do not have any ads on the site but our pages are dominated by images for most of the 'above the fold' section then followed by the content down the page. Any insight into this would be much appreciated. Cheers, Andrew
Algorithm Updates | | jay.raman0 -
Why am i seeing a "conduit" line for search engine sources in Google Analytics ?
Among Google, Yahoo, Bing etc... One of the line is "Conduit". I never heard about this engine but, accordingly to Google Analytics metrics, it is the engine that bring the best traffic to my site in terms of pages per visit.
Algorithm Updates | | betadvisor0