Google Analytics Connection Failing
-
Hi there,
I am trying to use MOZ Analytics but it keeps saying our Google Analytics has lost connection, if I then reconnect it says it is successful and then when I go to a new page it says it has no connection again.
Has anyone experienced this? Does anyone have a fix?
Thanks
Peter
-
Hi.
Got the same problem right now.
Received email today about successfull crawl, clicked on the link, found this on the dashboard (see image).
Have reconnected account multiple times.
-
Hi Peter,
Thanks for reaching out!
There was a bug with the GA connection in Moz, but we just deployed an update that should hopefully resolve this. All you need to do is head into the campaign settings, disconnect and then reconnect your GA account. After that, you should start seeing traffic data within a couple hours. Let us know if you have any other questions and hope you have a great day!
Best,
Sam
Moz Helpster
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Re-connect Goggle Analytics to Moz
I lost the GA account connection to my moz campaign account. I am re-connecting now but on the traffic settings, when I am about to disconnect, I get a warning that I will lose the historical data, what is the impact of loosing this data for the campaign? Thank you
Moz Bar | | RaquelSaiz0 -
KW Explorer is Working to Disambiguate Keywords Google Merges Together
Hey gang, Russ Jones from Moz has been doing a ton of heavy lifting work to try to get around the new problem posed by Google AdWords recent change to merged-keyword volume data. But, we're fighting back against this obfuscation in Keyword Explorer. I'm sharing two emails (slightly edited) from Russ about what we're doing here: Introduction to the Problem: Google Adwords Keyword Planner is the primary source for keyword search volume (how often a keyword is searched monthly on Google) for much of the search marketing industry. While Google has grouped together highly-similar terms for a while (especially misspellings), in June of 2016 they dramatically increased this keyword-grouping. This means similar phrases like "keyword rank", "keyword ranking" and "keyword rankings" would all be reported as having the same, combined search volume, rather than their individual search volumes. If you were to take Google's numbers at face value, you might think there are 3,000 searches per month for these 3 terms, when in reality there is only 1,000, divided amongst the 3 terms. How we are addressing it: Moz's Keyword Explorer uses a blend of data sources, not just Keyword Planner, to build our volume metrics. This gives us a distinct advantage in that we can adjust the volume of words that deviate dramatically in one data set verses another. Take for example the phrases "keyword rank", "keyword ranking", and "keyword rankings". While Google Keyword Planner might report all of these as having 1,000 searches per month, Moz Keyword Explorer can detect that these numbers are significantly higher than what our models would predict given our other data sets. We can then adjust the volume accordingly. Moreover, given our huge keyword data set, we can also identify grouped phrases (like these 3) and divide the volume proportionally to what we see in our other data sets. Thus, we address the grouping problem from multiple directions. Here's email #2 from Russ, detailing more of how we're attacking this: I have been working pretty much non-stop on this keyword volume disambiguation problem (finding the real search volume of individual keywords when Google clumps several together). I think I have settled on a pretty good solution and am working on getting it all in. For example... Google Keyword Volume for the phrases "briefcase for women" and "briefcases for women" are both at 3600 because they have been lumped together. My disambiguation script says the singular (briefcase for women) should be 2731 and the plural should be 869. Google Trends roughly agrees with this, showing that the singular is searched more than 2x the plural: https://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=briefcase%20for%20women%2C%20briefcases%20for%20women&cmpt=q&tz=Etc%2FGMT%2B4 Basically, Keyword Explorer should already be providing some more accurate/segmented numbers than AdWords, and in the future, we'll get even better thanks to our clickstream data and our evolving models. Any questions, let us know!
Moz Bar | | randfish15 -
On-Page Grader fails?
I have optimized the following page for the norwegian word "Dusjkabinett": https://www.vvskupp.no/Produkter/Baderom/Dusjkabinett The On-Page grader gives the URL an F-grade. BUT as you can see it seems like the tool fails in giving a correct report. See attachment. Can anybody help me understand? pCyEYaWd3
Moz Bar | | moggiew0 -
Tracking Across 3 Sub-directories on the Same Domain in Google Analytics
Hello everyone, I'm trying to track 3 sub-directories on the same domain. http://domain.com/1/http://domain.com/2/
Moz Bar | | vndflkvnlkzdfnv
http://domain.com/3/ Could someone help confirm this is the correct code for GA? var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-12345-1"); pageTracker.**_setCookiePath**("/1/"); pageTracker._trackPageview(); pageTracker.**_cookiePathCopy**("/2/"); pageTracker._trackPageview(); pageTracker.**_cookiePathCopy**("/3/"); Thanks in advance.0 -
MoZ vs Alexa & Moz vs Google
My colleague is continuously arguing with me why i went for Moz and why not for Alexa, He also says when Google is there then why Moz. I tried on my part to convince him but he has his own learning. Can anybody help me make him understand otherwise my job will become hard if he remains doubtful about Moz? Looking for down to earth and an honest feedback. Thanks Tanveer
Moz Bar | | Sequelmed0 -
MOZ Onpage grade and Google ranking.
I have found for years that there is not necessarily any connection between the onpage given by Moz and the SEO ranking. "F" page can be #1 in Google for long periods of time, and "A" pages can be unranked. I do not see the consistency, so I am unsure how much time to spend optimizing as suggested. I know there are many factors in rankings, but I just wanted to point out that this lack of consistency makes me hesitate to make changes to well-ranking pages -- especially with algorithm changes happening all the time. It seems that everything is considered over-optimization of late, even if it is all natural language. It is hard to NOT use words or synonyms sometimes on pages, for example... Thank you for your great product. I just want to know how my time to spend on this matter or turn my attention to off-page factors where the inconsistency is hard to figure out.
Moz Bar | | gheh20130 -
Moz and Google Analytics Trouble?
Is anyone else having trouble connecting their MOZ Pro account to Google Analytics?
Moz Bar | | PhiladelphiaWebsiteSolutions0 -
Keyword Tool using Bing instead of Google
I'm trying to analyze some keywords, and I've selected 'Google' and 'United States' - but when the ranking comes back, it is showing up as the rankings for Bing. Any idea why this continues to happen? Thanks!
Moz Bar | | Marketing-Maven0