Huge in crease in on page errors
-
Hi guys I’ve just checked my online campaign and I see errors in my crawl diagnostics have almost doubled from the 21<sup>st</sup> of October to the 25<sup>th</sup> of October going from 6708 errors to 11 599. Can anyone tell me what may have caused this?
Also I notice we have a lot of issues with duplicate page titles which seems strange as no new pages have been added, can anyone explain why this might be?
I look forward to hearing from you
-
Just noting that this discussion continues here:
-
Hi Matt,
I hope things are going well. I'm just following up on the duplicate page issue .I have spoken to our web company and they have correct the issue last week and I noted the amount of duplicates dropped significantly. Ive just checked today and i see it's back up (I'm following this up with our web company). Are you able to offer any insights as to why this problem seems to reoccur
I was of the understanding this is a permanent fix so once the change has been made, I cant understand why it then seems to reoccur?. Any insights would be much appreciated.
Regards
Pete
-
Well, it stands to reason that something must've changed is order to cause such a huge increase.
Looking through the list of duplicate URLs, I'm seeing a lot that could be fixed by rel="canonical". There's enough of them that adding a canonical link to each would be a huge undertaking or require some careful coding. I'm wondering if this increase could've been partially caused by someone removing rel="canonical" from a lot of pages.For example, I'm seeing a lot of this:
http://www.health2000.co.nz/shop/aromatherapy/lemongrass-essential-oil/P4494/C56
vs.
http://www.health2000.co.nz/shop/aromatherapy/lemongrass-essential-oil/p4494/c56
The only difference between those URLs is capitalization. The first, capitalized version is the one that appears on your XML sitemap. I'm not 100% sure why both versions would be appearing to Roger—it may be an issue with the CMS—but a rel="canonical" on the former pointing to the latter would solve that problem.
Now, that doesn't look to be the only issue, but it _is _a large one.
Let me know what you find out!
-
That's ok Matt. I've put those two questions to our web company, although I don't think any changes happened then, although I do know that they did work on the 27th of September. I m fairly sure in was rel =canonical in nature. I have asked them to confirm and will let you know in due course. As an aside why do you think the changes you mentioned would be of effect on our web site?
-
Hi Pete,
Sure thing. Sorry it's taken so long!
May I ask what, if any, changes were made on the site between the 21st and 25th of October? In particular, were there any changes made involving rel="canonical"?
-
Hi Matt,
Ive just had a look an I can now see the amount of pages, crawled on our site, is comparable to our competitors, which is great!
However the amount of on page errors is significantly higher. In particularly the amount of duplicate errors is about 10 000 which is the same amount we had, before our web company fixed this issue. Are you able to give me any feed back as to what's happened there?. Thanks again for your help with this!
Pete
-
Hi Matt,
No probs, I look forward to hearing from you
Regards
Pete
-
That's awesome Keri, thanks for following this up : )
-
Hi Pete,
Sorry for the delay! I just wanted to let you know I'm looking into it, and should get back to you shortly.
Matt
-
Hi Pete,
This is going to need a bit more digging than I can do from where I sit. I'm going to ask a colleague of mine to come in and lend you a hand. Thanks for your patience!
Keri
-
Thanks Keri here is our site http://www.health2000.co.nz we have recently asked our IT company to make amendments to offset the duplicates page issue.
The attached graphic shows the problem was in recline but now it seems to have come back. Any idea why that might be? I would have thought 301 redirecting would be an all or nothing solution. Also Ive asked our IT company and they have said this may take a while for google to indexes our page. If that is correct , how long do you think will take?
I’ve set up campaigns for our organisation and four of our competitors and note that on average we have had 6500 pages crawled where as our competitors have over 11000 pages crawled is there any reason why that might be? Thanks again for your help!
Pete
-
If you give him a 301 redirect it should help him, and the search engines, which is the most important part.
If you can touch base with your IT team and see if they changed something and ask them to change it back, that'd be a good place to start. If you can share your URL here, we can look at it and help direct you to the easiest way to fix things (if it is the www and non-www problem), or help identify the source of the problem.
-
Hi Keri,
Thanks for drooping me a line...... How do we make that cheeky little robot unfind one of them? : )
Cheers
Pete
-
Hmmm...my first thought is that if it's sudden duplicate content and doubling of errors is that perhaps Roger found both the www and non-www versions of the site?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Sitemaps and Indexed Pages
Hi guys, I created an XML sitemap and submitted it for my client last month. Now the developer of the site has also been messing around with a few things. I've noticed on my Moz site crawl that indexed pages have dropped significantly. Before I put my foot in it, I need to figure out if submitting the sitemap has caused this.. can a sitemap reduce the pages indexed? Thanks David.
API | | Slumberjac0 -
Sitemaps and Indexed Pages
Hi guys, I created an XML sitemap and submitted it for my client last month. Now the developer of the site has also been messing around with a few things. I've noticed on my Moz site crawl that indexed pages have dropped significantly. Before I put my foot in it, I need to figure out if submitting the sitemap has caused this.. can a sitemap reduce the pages indexed? Thanks David. TInSM
API | | Slumberjac0 -
Error with the MozBar
Hi Mozzers I am geting this very annoying message keeps popping up "Confirm Oops! Something went wrong while trying to get your API Credentials. Please try again or check out the Help Hub if you are still experiencing issues" Issue is I cant even read it on my screen as it gets cut off and there is no scroll so had to copy and past into word to be able to read it. I had the issue for the last sever hours, is this my account or more general. Thanks Andy
API | | Andy-Halliday0 -
API - Internal Links to page and related metrics
Hi dear moz Team! Currently I´m building a Java application accessing your API. But there are some metrics I urgently need which I can´t get out of the API until now: The total number of internal links to a page The total number of internal links to a page with partial anchor text match MozRank passed by all internal links w. part. match anchor text (would be nice) For example, if I try this by your links endpoint, my idea was: http://lsapi.seomoz.com/linkscape/links/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jetztspielen.de%2F?AccessID=..
API | | pollierer
&Expires=..
&Signature=..
&Scope=domain_to_page
&Filter=internal
&Sort=domain_authority
&SourceCols=4 (or any other value)
&SourceDomain=www.jetztspielen.de
&Offset=0
&Limit=50 If I try this, the API says: {"status": "400", "error_message": "Cannot set a source domain when filtering for internal links."} Is there any way to get the data I need by your API endpoints? I´m currently writing my master thesis and it is very important to me to solve this somehow. Thank you very much in advance! Best, Andreas Pollierer1 -
What is Moz's Error.aspx?aspxerrorpath HTTP Status 302 error message?
Hi, I am not sure what this error message is: "Error.aspx?aspxerrorpath". It immediately follows pages that are given at 302 status in Moz's crawl report. The same pages have never had this error before: | http://www.homedestination.com/news/2013/Minneapolis-home-price-appreciation.html | | http://www.homedestination.com/mortgage-worksheet.html | | http://www.homedestination.com/foreclosure-eligibility.html | Each page has a 100% score with WC3. Could you give me more insight as to what Moz may suggest I do to give the page a 200 HTTP status as before? Thanks.
API | | jessential0 -
Moz Analaytics: What does this error mean? analyze_page_issues.crawl_error.name
The new Moz Analytics are terrific. However, I don't know what this error means. Could anyone offer me further insights? Thanks,
API | | jessential0 -
Duplicate description error: one for meta one for og:type
I am getting the duplicate description error from Moz. I use both the og:description and . I am not sure if that is going to get me penalized by the search engines or my pages somehow discounted if I have meta description and og:description on the same page. What does Moz recommend? NOTE: for years I have followed this in the best practices format put out from other sources. Found at: http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/52600/should-i-have-ogdescription-and-meta-description-together-on-every-page Short Answer: Use both! Long Answer: The OG stands for Open Graph which is apart of the Open Graph protocol of which works on platforms such as Facebook. The meta description element is for search engines such as Google, Yahoo and Bing. Since these are two separate tags that kinda do the same thing but they are designed for different types of platforms, one for Facebook and the other for Search Engines. The reasoning behind this is that the Open Graph protocal is more rich in what content can be feed to Facebook without scrapping the full page, think rich snippets. So images, description and more information is feed to Facebook via the Open Graph. Using both is a good idea.
API | | jessential0 -
Top Pages metrics in OSE
Not sure if this is an API question or a feature request, but wondering if other folks had a way to do this: In OSE there is the dashboard for a specific URL that is entered into the search bar, giving you metrics at a glance on it. But I often find myself going to the Top Pages tab to get a sense of the domain as a whole. First off, wouldn't it be nice/is there a way to build my own "dashboard" based on info from that section? Specifically, I'd love to see at a glance the number of "top pages" that exist (many websites are well under the 10,000 page limit for this section, but there's no quick glance metric showing that) One thing that would be very handy for me would be a breakdown of HTTP Status info across the whole domain, as being able to see the raw total of different statuses (and the percentages of each based on the total number of pages) would be really helpful, giving me a sense if I should dig into any issues before exporting the list to CSV. I've found myself needing this type of info for multiple domains at once, so what would be REALLY cool would be a Google Doc where I could paste in different domains in one column, and this info being returned in other columns. I've searched through the Q&A and didn't find anything like this, and I didn't know how easy/hard any of this would be to do, but I was wondering if anyone else had a sense of how to solve this problem and how feasible it would be to tackle it. Thanks!
API | | John-E-Turner0
