Hiding Links Under A Tab As Good As Anything Else And More Attractive?
-
I'm working with a site that finds standard linking to spread authority to interior pages ugly. Here's what they don't like:
-
footers
-
tag clouds
-
sidebar lists of links
-
text heavy paragraphs with links
-
a gallery of images with alt text/links
So, I'm looking for other ways to link from their homepage to these less prominent pages inside the site. Here are my two questions:
1. Would something like this work, with the links under the "Specs" tab (p.s., this is just a random example and not my client):
http://www.goincase.com/products/detail/CL57925/
2. Any other ideas for spreading the authority via links from their homepage and other pages on the site to less powerful pages?
Thanks! Best...Mike
-
-
Hey, thanks Sheldon!
-
In my opinion, there's nothing greyhat about those tabs, Mike. The mouseover makes it quite obvious that it's a navigation link, and in reality, you're not even taking the user to another page. I wouldn't hesitate to use it myself.
-
Thanks Ryan!
I think it's a technique that could lend itself to borderline grey hatness, just because it doesn't really seem geared to the user and you could really bury a ton of links. In this particular example, the links don't appear as links until you roll over them. Maybe just a design goof. Thanks!
-
The links are clearly visible in HTML so Google will pick up on them. The links are accessible to visitors. It is basically a different form of a drop down menu. You click the menu button, then the page changes not terribly unlike a frame.
My gut feeling is this is grey hat SEO, but I can't place my finger on where it crosses the line. A webmaster can say "hey, the links are clear and available to anyone who wants to see or use them." and they would be right.
What makes it grey to me is clearly most visitors would never see those links.
Overall, I would be ok with using that technique, but I would give preference to the image idea I shared if that was a reasonable option.
I would be interested to hear feedback from others on the topic.
-
I'm probably not explaining it very well. Sorry.
You go here: http://www.goincase.com/products/detail/CL57925/
You click on the "Specs" tab. You get a new tab which breaks down info by "Compatability, Color, Styles & Sku". Under "Styles" there's a line that reads:
"black, CMJ, convertible, ipad, iPad2, iPad 2, snap, snap case"
Those links.
-
I must be missing something. I do not see any line for Styles.
I did a CTRL+F for Specs and their is only one instance of Specs on the page. I did a search for "styles" and that term is not found on this page.
Here is a link to a screenshot of what I see: http://www.terapvp.com/data/external/specs.jpg
-
Hi Ryan,
Thanks for the message. I only say "hiding" in the sense of making text links less prominent design-wise. So, instead of having columns of text links, to do something more attractive, maybe with images or tabs or something.
On the example under the "Specs" tab, there's a line for "Styles." Those terms are links to other pages.
Do you think those links under "Styles" get picked up by a Google bot and valued as well as any other kind of link?
Thanks! Best...Mike
-
Hi Mike.
Would something like this work, with the links under the "Specs" tab?
I am not clear on what you mean when you refer to links under the Specs tab. I do see the Specs tab on the site you mentioned. I see it in a navigation bar: About, Features, Specs, Reviews. That is a perfectly acceptable way to offer a link. There is nothing hidden about it. Am I missing something?
Any other ideas for spreading the authority via links from their homepage?
The only idea that comes to mind to "hide" links is you can link images to the links. If you have a site similar to the one you mentioned, you can have a line of thumbnail images of various products with each image being a link to a different page within your site.
The moment you say "hiding" alarms go off in my head. As long as the link is clearly visible and usable to visitors, then there is no problem with it. You certainly do not have to call attention to the link, but if you actually hide it, you've crossed the black hat line.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What’s the best tool to visualize internal link structure and relationships between pages on a single site?
I‘d like to review the internal linking structure on my site. Is there a tool that can visualize the relationships between all of the pages within my site?
Web Design | | QBSEO0 -
Is it cloaking/hiding text if textual content is no longer accessible for mobile visitors on responsive webpages?
My company is implementing a responsive design for our website to better serve our mobile customers. However, when I reviewed the wireframes of the work our development company is doing, it became clear to me that, for many of our pages, large parts of the textual content on the page, and most of our sidebar links, would no longer be accessible to a visitor using a mobile device. The content will still be indexable, but hidden from users using media queries. There would be no access point for a user to view much of the content on the page that's making it rank. This is not my understanding of best practices around responsive design. My interpretation of Google's guidelines on responsive design is that all of the content is served to both users and search engines, but displayed in a more accessible way to a user depending on their mobile device. For example, Wikipedia pages have introductory content, but hide most of the detailed info in tabs. All of the information is still there and accessible to a user...but you don't have to scroll through as much to get to what you want. To me, what our development company is proposing fits the definition of cloaking and/or hiding text and links - we'd be making available different content to search engines than users, and it seems to me that there's considerable risk to their interpretation of responsive design. I'm wondering what other people in the Moz community think about this - and whether anyone out there has any experience to share about inaccessable content on responsive webpages, and the SEO impact of this. Thank you!
Web Design | | mmewdell0 -
Parallax websites - good for SEO?
A client of mine is redesigning their site using a vertical Parallax & upon doing some research I've stumbled across Drew Barrymore's site: http://flowerbeauty.com/ - which also uses Parallax. What I like in particular is that the site changes URLs as you scroll down. If you go direct to one of those URLs you'll notice unique meta data (albeit poorly optimised). All pages are indexed fine in Google (https://www.google.com/#bav=on.2,or.r_cp.r_qf.&fp=f8873f78dfbb8c5e&q=site:flowerbeauty.com) I'm just wondering if this is considered ok as the user experience is good and they're not doing anything manipulative, however, there's duplicate content and a potential case of cloaking at hand. I think this approach may be ok for my client for a product features page or a global office locations page since I can break up the sections nicely and split a really long page featuring a lot of content into separate URLs. Whereas Flower Beauty have done it across the whole site... i.e. one page of HTML = the whole site. What do you guys think?
Web Design | | wojkwasi0 -
Finding a good wordpress web developer for SEO fixes
I have gotten a good audit done of my site now it is time to get the fixes done. I have a developer I worked with for a long time that is good at coding and fixes on my site. However I am not confident in his abilities to execute some of the seo changes that need to be done. Their are some common stuff he can tackle but when it comes to GWT and proper handling of 404's and 301's and other seo tasks I am not sure if he is the right choice.Maybe due to a lack of experience of dealing with the issues I have or is just not his specialty or web devs just don't know seo...lol.... Is obvious a lot of SEO's don't make the changes themselves but leave it up to the devs to handle it their suggestions and fixes. But from my experience devs are not so well versed in seo and you have a hard time knowing if they are doing it correct or can even do it.(of course they will say they can they want your cash and i understand that ). In particular a good amount of wordpress devs claim to know seo but i find that far from the truth.Even when guided to issues some of them will often leave you disappointed. Sorry for my rant! Now to my question , obviously not many SEO's make the actual code changes themselves (how i wish i knew a one that did) are their ones out their that do? If not how do i find a good wordpress dev that can make proper seo changes and knows his stuff....example i need someone who can trouble shoot and track down some serious GWT I have and deal with some hardcore 404 & 301 issues . A lot claim to know but when push comes to shove I have been left disappointed. Thanks in advance for your help and suggestions or recommendations.
Web Design | | chrisyak0 -
Decreasing Page Load Time with Placeholder Images - Good Idea or Bad Idea?
In an effort to decease our page load time, we are looking at making a change so that all product images on any page past page 1 load with a place holder image. When the user clicks to the next page, it then loads all of the images for that page. Right now, all of the product divs are loaded into a Javascript array and loaded in chunks to the page display div. Product-heavy pages significantly increase load time as the browser loads all of the images from the product HTML before the Javascript can rewrite the display div with page-specific product HTML. In order to get around this, we are looking at loading the product HTML with a small placeholder image and then substituting the appropriate product image URLs when each page is output to the display div. From a user experience, this change will be seamless and they won't be able to tell the difference, plus they will benefit from a potentially a short wait on loading the images for the page in question. However, the source of the page will have all of the product images in a given category page all having the same image. How much of a negative impact will this have on SEO?
Web Design | | airnwater0 -
Accordion tab for content?
We have a lot of content we want to add to our pages but want a lot of
Web Design | | BobAnderson
it to be in drop down accordion tabs. We will make sure that they are SEO friendly but I would just like to
know if the weight Google gives to text on screen out of accordions is the same
as behind accordion tabs.1 -
Sub-pages with more links than homepage - bad?
Hi,
Web Design | | rayvensoft
I am working on merging a number of my niche websites into a larger site (301 redirects, phased in over a few months). My question/concern is whether google will penalize the main site when it sees that the homepage has almost no links to it, and that about 10-15 sub-pages have a lot of links back to it. Does anybody have experience with this kind of scenario? Will it create a problem? Theoretically I could spend a year or so building up links to the new main page - building the brand - before doing the 301's. The smaller pages still bring in clients, but it is getting hard to maintain that many micro sites. Thanks in advance for any help.0 -
Google penalty for links opening in new tab?
Our web services provided suggested that Google doesn't like in-text links that open the link in a new tab. Can anyone verify this? We often link to outside credible resources for our audience, though it seems smarter to open in a new tab rather than risk that the person will not navigate back to our site after finding us. Thank you in advance!
Web Design | | jhamlin0