Overall site traffic - 3 quick questions
-
3 things :
1. Does Google factor in overall site traffic in rankings? So for 2 sites, all other things being pretty much equal, the one with higher traffic will be listed higher?
2. Does this logically imply that sites with lower traffic overall face an uphill struggle to be ranked highly???
3. As an extension to this, would it be true to say that by increasing site traffic, say with Google Adwords or other online or offiline or whatever advertising, that might help get higher SEO rankings???
Thanks so much for your responses. This forum is great!
-
Well explained. Traffic increasing SEO is definitely an indirect result of the higher activity a site increases - as long as it's quality traffic.
To elaborate on what Ryan said, if you're going to adversite, make sure it's going to be high quality traffic that is going to want to interact with your site. Traffic alone won't help. It has to be suited to your audience so they'll like, share, talk about your site, etc.
That's what is going to help you win the uphill battle.
-
Does Google factor in overall site traffic in rankings?
No. Alexa ranks for traffic. Google ranks are based on over 200 factors including relevance to search, quality of content and community support (i.e. links, social sharing, etc).
Indirectly speaking, sites with higher traffic have their content viewed more. If the content is popular or well presented, then visitors are likely to either link to it or share it in facebook, twitter, etc. Google ranks are affected by those activities.
Does this logically imply that sites with lower traffic overall face an uphill struggle to be ranked highly?
It is always a struggle to rank higher. Good SEO tactics combined with quality web design and great content will help you climb the ranks over time.
By increasing site traffic, say with Google Adwords or other online or offiline or whatever advertising, that might help get higher SEO rankings?
Here is the catch. Let's say you start a new site with great content and a desired product. You use television ads, Adwords, or other means to get a million visitors to your site. What's next?
If those visitors then link to your content, spam their social networks, etc. then those activities will help your rankings. On the other hand, if those visitors don't like what they see and leave your site, then your rankings will remain unchanged.
The summary answer to your questions is: increased activity offers you the OPPORTUNITY to earn better rankings, but does not help you rank higher directly.
-
1. Does Google factor in overall site traffic in rankings? So for 2 sites, all other things being pretty much equal, the one with higher traffic will be listed higher?
I have not heard that google will give you higher positions for having higher traffic. HOWEVER, with personalized search turned on, if a searcher has visited your site before it might receive a higher position in a SERP.
**2. Does this logically imply that sites with lower traffic overall face an uphill struggle to be ranked highly??? **
Holding the high ground is always valuable. If you have a site with a LOT of traffic that is a LOT more people who might link to you, like you, tweet about you, etc. The site with the high traffic has a huge advantage. Some sites receive thousands of likes and tweets, etc every day!
3. As an extension to this, would it be true to say that by increasing site traffic, say with Google Adwords or other online or offiline or whatever advertising, that might help get higher SEO rankings???
I don't think that traffic flowing into your site through these other routes has a direct impact on your rankings. However, as mentioned above it is a higher population of people who might link, like, tweet, etc.
You mention "offline"..... if those people type "yourdomain.com" into the google search box or toolbar then that will signal google that people are "asking for you by name". I think that these domain queries have enormous value. I've never heard anyone from google say that they are kickass or any SEOs saying that they tested, but I would bet that they count for a lot.
-
Hi there,
As far as we can tell traffic doesn't effect the rankings, something to watch for though is the bounce rate- if two sites have the same levels of traffic, but one has a lower bounce rate, generally the site will rank better.
-
I don't think site traffic has a bearing in the algo at all. It would be too easy to spam.
I don't think anyone has found a connection with using Adwords contributing to their SEO in any way.
Of course, if a site has a great backlink profile it's going to rank higher for more terms and GET more traffic...but that's a result of a good quality site and good SEO, not the cause of the good rankings.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Filter Remote Workers Traffic
For the most part in the past our company has worked on location. So filtering internal traffic was as simple as filtering out our company IPs as well as a few remote workers IPS. Now a large number of employees are working from home due to Covid-19. I am seeing an uptick in traffic that is clearly employee-related. I am hoping some of you who work with large remote teams may have some suggestions on how to best filter out traffic from remote working employees. I found a few articles from a couple of years ago where people were using a cookie but not sure we can get that implemented in time as our Dev team is backed up. Any help is much appreciated.
Reporting & Analytics | | RMATVMC0 -
Question on structuring URLs in a Drupal CMS - Adverse SEO or Analytics impacts?
Hello Moz Community, We're building out a health system (think a bunch of hospitals and clinics etc.) website on Drupal for the first time. Nebraskamed.com is our domain. Because we're using nodes instead of pages, our URL structure can pretty much be whatever we think makes sense. Our proposal is to drop /blog/ and related terms from the URL structure, because it doesn't really mean anything to the user. Instead, we'd use the service line "cancer" for example, followed by the name of the blog post or document. Example: nebraskamed.com/cancer/10-bone-cancer-myths Do you see any red flags (perhaps with SEO or Analytics for example) to what I'm proposing? domain name/service line/blog-post-name If so, do you have a URL structure you advise?
Reporting & Analytics | | Patrick_at_Nebraska_Medicine1 -
Longterm wordpress blog not providing seo benefit to main site - help needed please
Hi I have a bigcommerce ecommerce store, with a Wordpress blog on a subdomain. The store and blog have been active for four years, the blog is regularly updated with original content, has many links to the store, is promoted regularly via my brand's social media channels and mailing list, and has the simplest SEO basics covered via a Yoast SEO plugin. But the store sees very little, if any, SEO benefit from the blog. My question is: based on this information, and the details below, is there an issue with the connection between the blog and main site in SEO terms? And if there is, how can I start fixing it? Further info: 1 In my Moz dashboard for the store site, the blog does not show at all as providing any inbound links or linking domains 2 Google Analytics also shows zero referral traffic to the store site from the blog since April 2015 3 Moz crawl issues is flagging ‘duplicate page content issues’ for pretty much every page of the blog, and the analysis provided suggests this may be related to tags but I have only basic SEO knowledge and am fast getting out of my depth here. 4 I have today altered the settings within the Yoast plugin on the blog to ‘noindex’ for Tags, Meta Robots, based on advice I have found in this section but am already well over my head and unsure even this is correct. An agency have been running SEO for the store since 2012 but since uncovering how little they have done in this time for the money paid, I am now taking matters back into my own hands. However I am on a very steep learning curve and this one is beyond me right now - please does anyone have any suggestions where I can start looking to uncover the root issue? Any guidance or advice would be greatly appreciated Thanks very much and hope to hear from someone!
Reporting & Analytics | | Warren_331 -
Drop in direct traffic
Hi, I help look after two websites and have been tracking traffic sources for a couple of years. I have noticed that both sites have seen a drop in direct traffic over 2 years. Has anyone else noticed this and do you have a hypothesis as to the reason? Overall, on both sites traffic has increased. Thanks, Amelia
Reporting & Analytics | | CommT0 -
Google Web Master Tools show that my site has been crawled, but search results show old title tags, ect.
Does the index report reflect what will be displayed on Google results? Google seems to be indexing my site every Sunday...
Reporting & Analytics | | 928shopper0 -
Referral Traffic Issue
I'm working on a site that has low traffic volumes due to its niche. That's fine but we are daily getting referral traffic from unrelated domains without a link. These visits are always 100% bounce which is impacting the overall click.through rate. The domains are not the same and different ones come through all the time, so it is difficult to keep on top of. Any ideas what could be going on here and an effective way of dealing with this?
Reporting & Analytics | | MickEdwards0 -
Local site rankings have dropped off first page but Universal went up.
My site was performing first page locally on 6 of 20 keywords, and universally on 3 of 20 keywords. We started a link building campaign and optimization about 3 weeks ago. When I looked at the rankings today I was happy to see that 16 of 20 keywords were in the top 20 rankings universally, but not happy to see that only 1 of the 25 words were ranking locally now. I lost my local ranking on 5 very important keywords. I realize that you can not rank first page for both local and organic but its as if I traded my first page local ranking for a universal ranking that appears lower on the page. Maybe someone could point me in the right direction.
Reporting & Analytics | | whmgatx0 -
Should we add the city to our keywords for a site that is only local?
This is one of those things I have done for a long time and all of a sudden asked myself was it necessary: For our local clients, we add the city name (Houston, KC, Birmingham) after each keyword. An example would be TestSite.com/big-tester-houston A Title Tag might be Big Tester Houston | Test Site, etc. Where appropriate we do the same with H1 or H2's and occasionally in the content we will use the city name. The thought being that since the site is only for a given city, it will be deemed more relevant than a site from outside.( I understand there are other factors in SEO; this is a specific question around adding the city). Yes, we also optimize with local directories/citation sites. Is this overkill, is it even worthwhile? Is there any evidence one way or another? I would love some strong opinions backed up with something other than anecdotal evidence where possible.
Reporting & Analytics | | RobertFisher0