Overall site traffic - 3 quick questions
-
3 things :
1. Does Google factor in overall site traffic in rankings? So for 2 sites, all other things being pretty much equal, the one with higher traffic will be listed higher?
2. Does this logically imply that sites with lower traffic overall face an uphill struggle to be ranked highly???
3. As an extension to this, would it be true to say that by increasing site traffic, say with Google Adwords or other online or offiline or whatever advertising, that might help get higher SEO rankings???
Thanks so much for your responses. This forum is great!
-
Well explained. Traffic increasing SEO is definitely an indirect result of the higher activity a site increases - as long as it's quality traffic.
To elaborate on what Ryan said, if you're going to adversite, make sure it's going to be high quality traffic that is going to want to interact with your site. Traffic alone won't help. It has to be suited to your audience so they'll like, share, talk about your site, etc.
That's what is going to help you win the uphill battle.
-
Does Google factor in overall site traffic in rankings?
No. Alexa ranks for traffic. Google ranks are based on over 200 factors including relevance to search, quality of content and community support (i.e. links, social sharing, etc).
Indirectly speaking, sites with higher traffic have their content viewed more. If the content is popular or well presented, then visitors are likely to either link to it or share it in facebook, twitter, etc. Google ranks are affected by those activities.
Does this logically imply that sites with lower traffic overall face an uphill struggle to be ranked highly?
It is always a struggle to rank higher. Good SEO tactics combined with quality web design and great content will help you climb the ranks over time.
By increasing site traffic, say with Google Adwords or other online or offiline or whatever advertising, that might help get higher SEO rankings?
Here is the catch. Let's say you start a new site with great content and a desired product. You use television ads, Adwords, or other means to get a million visitors to your site. What's next?
If those visitors then link to your content, spam their social networks, etc. then those activities will help your rankings. On the other hand, if those visitors don't like what they see and leave your site, then your rankings will remain unchanged.
The summary answer to your questions is: increased activity offers you the OPPORTUNITY to earn better rankings, but does not help you rank higher directly.
-
1. Does Google factor in overall site traffic in rankings? So for 2 sites, all other things being pretty much equal, the one with higher traffic will be listed higher?
I have not heard that google will give you higher positions for having higher traffic. HOWEVER, with personalized search turned on, if a searcher has visited your site before it might receive a higher position in a SERP.
**2. Does this logically imply that sites with lower traffic overall face an uphill struggle to be ranked highly??? **
Holding the high ground is always valuable. If you have a site with a LOT of traffic that is a LOT more people who might link to you, like you, tweet about you, etc. The site with the high traffic has a huge advantage. Some sites receive thousands of likes and tweets, etc every day!
3. As an extension to this, would it be true to say that by increasing site traffic, say with Google Adwords or other online or offiline or whatever advertising, that might help get higher SEO rankings???
I don't think that traffic flowing into your site through these other routes has a direct impact on your rankings. However, as mentioned above it is a higher population of people who might link, like, tweet, etc.
You mention "offline"..... if those people type "yourdomain.com" into the google search box or toolbar then that will signal google that people are "asking for you by name". I think that these domain queries have enormous value. I've never heard anyone from google say that they are kickass or any SEOs saying that they tested, but I would bet that they count for a lot.
-
Hi there,
As far as we can tell traffic doesn't effect the rankings, something to watch for though is the bounce rate- if two sites have the same levels of traffic, but one has a lower bounce rate, generally the site will rank better.
-
I don't think site traffic has a bearing in the algo at all. It would be too easy to spam.
I don't think anyone has found a connection with using Adwords contributing to their SEO in any way.
Of course, if a site has a great backlink profile it's going to rank higher for more terms and GET more traffic...but that's a result of a good quality site and good SEO, not the cause of the good rankings.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Paid traffic or "Paid Search" is not showing in my Google Analytics
Hi, I have two campaigns running in Google Adwords or Google Ads now and I saw in Google Ads account that I had 5 clicks today (09/18/2018) but when I try to search for this clicks in my Google Analytics in ACQUISITION > All Traffic > Channels I don't find nothing about "Paid Search" or something like that. Bellow is a picture of my Google Analytics account to prove it. The accounts are linked and I can find the 2 campaigns in the Analytics. How can I interpret this picture? Where the paid traffic is showing? or not showing there? Thanks Leandro uvAtrsg
Reporting & Analytics | | lmoraes0 -
Direct traffic coming to URLs with /rss_feedIP#
I'm doing a site audit for an organization that has a bunch of really messy old Drupal sites. In looking at their traffic, I see that a majority of it is coming to landing pages that look like this: http://clientsdomain.com/rss_feed173.8.208.97 plus other IP addresses. The bounce rate is 100% and time on site is less than a second. It looks like something that an RSS feed tool might use, but I've never seen something like it before. It creates its own landing page, hits the site, then appears to bounce. This is making their Analytics data look a whole lot worse than the site is actually doing, since the bounce rate is 100% on all that fake traffic. I have some experience with Drupal, but I've never seen anything like this in Drupal or any other CMS. Has anyone out there ever experienced something like this, where direct traffic comes to an rss feed landing page and bounces immediately?
Reporting & Analytics | | newwhy0 -
Moz Crawl shows over 100 times more pages than my site has?
The latest crawl stats are attached. My site has just over 300 pages? Wondering what I have done wrong? RRv3fR0
Reporting & Analytics | | Billboard20120 -
Universal Analytics: Why does Google Organic appear as Direct traffic?
Hi there, When I enter the site via Google Search and follow myself via Real-Time Analytics I appear an organic visitor (which is good). When I browse and visit the site I still am an organic visitor. However, as soon as I fill in the contact form (gravity forms) and land on the "thank you page" I appear as a direct visitor with Google as the source. Since I have the thank you page set-up as a goal, Analytics incorrectly attributes these conversions to the direct medium instead of the organic medium. The tracking code has been installed on all the pages and all conversions are being recorded. What is going on?
Reporting & Analytics | | Robbern0 -
What is click2.scour, and why is it showing up as Referral Traffic in Google Analytics?
I've noticed that a couple of my clients in the insurance industry have been receiving a pretty large boost in Referral Traffic from a source called click2.scour.com and click2.efacts.com. What surprises me most is that the traffic has a low Bounce Rate, a high Avg. Visit Duration, and is made up of 100% New Visits. What is this? Why would they be getting so much traffic from these two sources all of a sudden? Thanks in advance for your help!
Reporting & Analytics | | copyjack0 -
Why would a website rank lower than weaker site?
Hi, Today I noticed that my website is ranking one place lower than a competitor in Google UK ,despite my site having a stronger domain authority and page authority. Is there a plausible reason for this, i'm slightly confused? Thanks,
Reporting & Analytics | | Benjamin3790 -
Google News traffic spike mystery; referring URLs all blank, Omniture tags didn't fire.
Our content is occasionally featured in Google News. We recently have had two episodes where this happened, but (a) nearly all the referring URLs were blank, and (b) our backend logs show 3-4x more requests for the article in question than Omniture does. In other words, hundreds of thousands of visitors requested a URL from our site (as proven by the traffic logs), but don't seem to have come from Google News (because HTTP_REFERER was blank), and didn't execute the onpage javascript tag to notify Omniture of the pageview. Perhaps this has nothing to do with Google News, but it is too strong a coincidence that the two times we were on there recently, the same thing happened: big backend traffic spike that is not seen by Omniture. It is as if Google News causes browsers to pre-fetch our article without executing the javascript on the page. And without sending a referring URL. Has anyone else seen anything like this before? Stats from the recent episode:
Reporting & Analytics | | mcglynn
- 835,000 HTTP requests for the article URL (logged by our servers) - these requests came from 280,000 distinct IP addresses (70% US) - the #1 referring URL is blank. This accounts for 99.4% of requests. Which, in itself, is hard to believe. These people had to come from somewhere. I believe browsers don't pass HTTP_REFERER when you click from an SSL page to a non-SSL page, but I think Google News doesn't bounce users to SSL by default.That said, we do see other content pages with 70-90% blank referring URLs. Rarely 99+% though.0