Define: Good Content
-
I am curious to hear what you guys consider to be the characteristics of good content and in which order if you have a preference.
Here are a few I can think of:
- Informative (you can learn something new)
- Substantial (enough of it and thorough)
- Complete (doesn't give half-baked information or ideas)
- Unique (not regurgitated original content)
- Helpful (practical actionable information)
- Visual (content complemented by media)
- Referenced (claims made are substantiated through citations)
- Entertaining (or otherwise emotional, e.g. surprising, sad, shocking, controversial)
- Formatted (easy to read and follow)
- Timely (right content at the right time, applies for news)
- Professional (writing style, grammar, spelling and sentence structure)
Can you add to this list?
-
"quality content = ranks well."
Well that's what Goog keeps telling us. ... so are we talking real world or pixie land?
Honestly, I knew I was stepping into a pile of crap when I put the "Ranks Well" criteria in there. But, it sure makes for a good litmus test. So yes... quality content = ranks well. ...and the vicious circle continues.
-
I guess, as far as SEO goes, all content is written with an action in mind. So whatever increases the action is what I would measure
Bounce rate/time on page is not a good one for me, you could have a great reference piece that people return to over and over but dont stay long or they naturally bounce from it - like the BBC or CNN homepage, continuously checking for news - youd have to be super careful what you measured on that type of site, as you could unintentionally skew what you produce
-
1 part, should be that it grabs you visually straight away - like a glue value, keeps you glued to that page to actually engage with the content - that can be a good headline, or image or typography or any combo
- Actionable!
-
We're working on the duplicate posts. I was able to delete some of them, but not all.
Keri
-
Well, one would assume that quality content = ranks well. It's kind of a loop, isn't it
Demand is a very interesting point!
If there are 200 content pieces on a topic versus only 2 pieces of content and one is really good value would undoubtedly be much higher where there is less such content available.
-
I am surprised that as a bunch of SEOs that no one has said SEO friendly.
So can I add:
- Ranks Well.
- Demand Research (Keyword/demand/competition)
Demand researched content also makes for more engaging content, but any of the current list could be classified as engaging. The difficulty with defining "good content" is that it's an opinion. But you've got a great list going. I wonder how individuals would prioritize that list based on their verticals.
-
Good Content is specific to what ever would get the site book marked, and that is very specific to the topic and purpose of the site. Give the visitor the information they were seeking, and you have great content. It doesn't need to be deep or wide , it just has to tell them what they came to see.
I would be interested in how you all measure great content? Bounce rate? Conversions?
-
I read this post and it reminded me of when this actually clicked with me recently. I have read thousands of words on blogging, writing good content and the list above resonates across the top bloggers that you can read who all beat this drum constantly. I was recently in the process of putting a guest post together for a blogging forum when after a day I realised that I had put more effort into the guest post than any post that I had for my own blog. So I **abandoned **the planned submission and used it on my own blog. I had spent 2-3 hours tweaking, looking for good images, deleting wasted words, working on all the formating and so on.
A lot of us who are email slaves and quick content junkies should revert back to our English High School class where we spent time on our essays for exams and tests. I have even applied this logic to forum replies like this. In the past I would have been much pithier and not as informative (I am being informative I hope !!)
It is worth looking at some of the blogging resources out there Problogger to see that they constantly expound on this topic. Even guys like Matt cutts say it again and a again about making your content STAND OUT like just thereWe
You may say how do I do this for a product like a Blue Widget. At first glance this may seem impossible. But if I am looking to buy a blue widget and am doing research over the web I would like to see
- Product Information in depth
- Reviews
- Some usage of it
- How to use it in different situations.
- A user forum
- Some evidence of good product support
- Some social media juice about it and some fan love
Replace blue widget with website design (my area), cameras, puppy dog collars and so on.
You might say that this sounds like complete overkill but believe me it isn't as the effort will pay off as over time your site will become a rich resource of solid quality information that can't be gotten anywhere else and there will be good payoffs.
There is a well known saying you wont get better by doing the same things every day so work on your blue widget page today then move onto the red widgets and keep going. Then revisit them all and polish again.
-
I use two columns for articles.
Left column is for text with multiple subheadings. (scanable)
Right column is for images, captions, data tables, references, video embeds.
Really important promotions and links to related content on my own site are floated to the left side of the left column or roadblocking it.
This makes for easy scanning and a big stack of images/data/video in the right column gives a rich and substantive look.
-
Well, I guess a well-formatted content does not always mean scannable. Little eye catching elements, bolding of key terms and colour would aid in the process.
-
I wanted to emphasize the scannable aspect in terms of bullet points etc. But, yes, I guess it's the same
-
Give Google content it strives/loves to deliver to it's users - the thing that is the core of their whole ethos: RELEVANT content - without that Google users go elsewhere to find it and you miss the opportunity to promote your product or service.
-
Ah, good point which goes well with "Formatted (easy to read and follow)".
-
I agree on that. That's a very important step. Reassurance that they are in the right place before they hit 'back'.
-
When the visitor arrives on your content the first goal is to let him know that he is in the right place with a very clear title and then let him know that he is in an interesting place with an interesting graphic above the fold.
Even before he determines if your content is gold or crap the appearance must pull him in. Then as with a good book you need a "hook" and after that the real quality of the content and the presentation style will have to take over.
Then... if you want the link or the tweet or the like, the impact must be there. This can be quality of content, substantiveness, engagement, impressiveness.
Bottom line... I think that you must have both academic quality along with aesthetic presentation - without stinking it up with too many ads and side-promotions. Its a fine balance and hard to know when you have it.
-
- scannable (aid people in natural scanning proces)
-
I consider user driven metrics as a big part of what Google uses to judge quality (citations, links, social buzz). Other stuff would have to be with their understanding of the content itself. I wonder how much of it they are able to figure out?
And when it comes to user motivation to spread and engage I am curious what the elements are and attempt to dissect and analyse what makes up a good piece of content.
-
I think of this question in terms of the effect that it will have on the visitor.... Will it motivate the visitor to link, tweet, like, share, email, bookmark.
If it doesn't do that then it isn't very good.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How much do I have to differentiate syndicated content, exactly?
We have about 15-20 articles we'll repurpose on a partner domain (think: media outlet). To avoid duplicate content suspicion, how much exactly do we need to differentiate the content on the second domain? Yea, this is assuming we can't obtain a canonical for whatever reason. I've found some good advice here, but am looking for some quantification. Like: "A sentence/paragraph of introduction at the top of the piece, plus a link back to the original at the end of said introduction ought to do it." Any help is appreciated. Thanks! Tim
Content Development | | Jen_Floyd0 -
Why is content getting longer?
I find it odd that with the way life is today -- the gotta-have-it-now, instant gratification, can't hold someone's attention span for longer than 3 seconds -- why Google is wanting content to be REALLY long?? I've read articles saying content should be as long as 2,000 words per page. This just seems nuts to me. No one wants to read anymore. Look at how short Twitter posts are and how videos are so prevalent now. Any thoughts?
Content Development | | SEOhughesm0 -
Blog Content if Google has stated it doesn't like your blog?
Hi guys, In the new 'mobile usability' tab in Webmaster Tools, Google has stated that our blog isn't offering a good experience for users. Something we already knew and I want to change, but I can't get the budget approved to complete the work. I was just wondering if you think Google isn't going to hold my content very high as a result. I want to produce more content on our blog around our valuable keywords in hope to improve our rankings, but if Google isn't holding our site in high regard I'm thinking there may not be much point in it. Any thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks Brian
Content Development | | brianmadden0 -
Video content sites
In addition to you tube are there any other video sites worth uploading content to? Such as Vimeo? Are these any good or is you tube the only place worth publishing
Content Development | | Hardley1110 -
Content Writing Service Recommendations
I am looking to hire a content writer for our sites. Anyone familiar with a service where the manage the content on your site? Basically, come up with topics & content ideas, then writing the content. Please give me an idea of the pricing if possible. Greatly appreciate any help.
Content Development | | inhouseseo0 -
Are Microsites a good idea
I am a plastic surgeon with a website and active blog which has done well over the past 7 years. I use my blog to feature specific procedures such as Breast Augmentation or Tummy Tuck. Should I continue to just use my blog to generate traffic or consider a microsite specific to a procedure? My concern is that google may consider the microsite a black hat technique.
Content Development | | wianno1680 -
What are the best content writer sites?
Hi, I'm doing some work on a new blog and wondered if anyone could recommend some low cost content writers? I have only justed started researching this service, so any advice the SEOmoz community could give would be grately appreciated. Thanks in advance.
Content Development | | RBH0 -
Who gets credit for content
Does it really matter if somebody takes your content changes it slightly and republishes it? This is my original article on history of house paints which was also published on ezine in Feb. and from google alerts I discovered this page http://www.franklinpainting.com/blog/home/a-brief-history-of-house-painting/ a minimally modified version. It is not easy to create content so these folks just copied and made a blog post. Their are now many versions of this on the web..who wins?
Content Development | | johnshearer0