What's been the best SERP rank tracker for you?
-
I do a lot of my SERP ranking tracking via Aaron Wall's Rank Checker, but I'm realizing it's taking up too much time. I was looking at Raven's tools and a few others. What's been your favorite thus far?
If you do reply, can you talk about:
- price
- capabilities
- time savings b/c of it
- graphical UI
- other thoughts
I like SEOMoz's UI, but I can only manage 5 domains and I don't have a huge budget yet.
Also, if there's a rank checker out there that incorporates google places results, that would be great too! Maybe too good, eh?
-
im not sure if you are still searching but I have spent the last 3 years experimenting with various options. I initially started with the usual suspects but then found RankWatch. This was great but there were some instances that were not 100% correct - bear in mind that I monitor 800 keywords daily. i then switched to ranktrackr which is really great. HOWEVER, there were some instances when the software was out of snyc and I woke up a few times to a screen showing hundreds of drops which, in fact had not happened. More recently I came across this which so far seems to work well http://serptoday.com/
-
LOL. Exactly.
-
^ And that is why us SEOs are all a little mad!
-
It's an interesting question about tracking many vs. a specific group of key terms.
The main reason for multiple terms, I would say is that we truly don't know what google's doing on the back end (or rather don't know every association they make), and so we may see how one term jumping up may also affect another term. There's so many permutations of each phrase:
dallas seo, seo in dallas, seo dallas, dallas seo firm (+ reverse), dallas seo company (+ reverse), etc.
While I'm not exactly keen on knowing all permutations of every single phrase, it's interesting how google gives us credit for one and not the other, but we won't know unless we're either tracking it or it pulls into our GA account.
With that said, you're probably right about the KPI's, but you might not find a phrase's potential without knowing that you're right on the cusp of bringing it up to page 1 for a client or yourself. If you do know that, you can make the efforts to pull it into the prized 3 positions where there is actually traffic and then see if it does pull traffic for a client.
I don't know if I'm answering or clarifying my stance really on the multiple phrases that well, but the ultimate point is that sometimes being able to see factors on phrases you don't keep close tabs on every day can be interesting in a) learning more about the algo's correlation between phrases and b) whether you're close to getting a phrase somewhere where it might mean something to you in terms of traffic, etc.
Then again, how many people can regularly process thousands of keywords and put the connections together in their head? Right?
-
Tool costs can add up, that's for sure! With even basic tools demanding $1000+ per year you do have to pick and choose carefully.
The only tool I can think of, off the top of my head, that provides unlimited tracking is http://authoritylabs.com . This is the firm who provide the data for raventools tracker. Unfortunately they list costs on their unlimited package as "starting from $450/month", so not a bargain offering!
Thinking on a tangent: How useful is tracking that number of terms anyway? If you don't have a big team how much value could you extract from thousands of terms tracking each month?
If it is for clients it could be worth checking how much attention they pay to it. We started doing that last year and it turns out that most of ours weren't watching the SERP tracking data. Rightly so as well, as it's a red herring most of the time. We simplified our reporting as a result and tried to tie it back to better KPIs than rank movement (this still isn't perfect, and we're trying to do this again at the moment).
Not the answer you were looking for, but worth a thought.
-
Thanks Mat. This last list definitely had a lot of possible rank checkers to look through.
I ended up buying the Rank Checker from Link-Assistant.com today, but a bit disappointed for what you get from $249.00 right now. I really need something to automate this rankings process for my clients, but all the reporting functions require you to upgrade or buy their most expensive package. Plus, they try to get you with other little extras to keep the software current after 6 months. I think I'm going to ask for my money back because they have a 30 day money back guarantee on keeping us happy.
I'm not having any luck with other tools either like cuterank.net and rankerizer.com which weren't on the list. I just need a tool that can do unlimited rank checks, keep track of the rankings over time so I save a good 3 days worth of work. Doing it manually with SEOBook's rank checker can't be an option moving forward.
I've been very attracted by Raven before and actually signed up for a while. However, the 1000 a month might be too little. They have a lot of other great benefits for the $99/mo, but I already have SEOMOz, Majestic SEO and bought SECockpit recently which I'm considering returning because I don't know if I have the time to take advantage of them all per month. Maybe when I build up a team that can start leveraging them, I may invest. Or maybe I'm just being too cheap? If I was rolling in it, it would be a different story. I would be buying tools right and left just to try them out.
Thanks again.
-
In addition to my previous comment, this popped in to my RSS reader this morning and I thought of your question:
http://www.evolvingseo.com/2012/01/24/the-ultimate-list-of-rank-checkers/
(by Dan Shure, who you might know from around these parts). Nice round up there to check back to.
Regarding Google places (and in fact other universal results), I cannot believe that no-one is (publicly) offering this. It's a huge need (Take note seomoz brigade!)
-
I like the tracker in seoMoz, but I monitor too many sites for it to be viable as my primary tool.
For me it is RavenTools. The cost of the tracker is effectively free for me, as I wouldn't live without Raven because of other features it offers anyway. However even if it was a standalone tracker I would probably go with Raven simply because:
- It works
- The packages work out very cost effective for me
Price
$99/month gives you unlimed websites and tracking on up to 1000 keyword rankings. As a tracker that isn't bad, but I suspect it isn't the best deal if you are not using their other toosl as well. If you factor in the social monitoring and link manager that becomes far easier to justify.
Capabilities
Check the site. It's a long list and seems to be growing.
In terms of the SERP tracker it'll check weekly, graph past performance, allow tracking of multiple engines (and geographic variants), allows tagging etc.
Time Savings
For me, immesurable. It would simply not be possible for us to do what we do without Raven or something similar.
UI
Raven does look dated compared to some and, despite daily use, I still struggle with their UI at times. There isn't a great deal wrong with it (and they are REALLY responsive if you do point out shortcomings), but it just doesn't sing.
Other Thoughts
Raven is an all rounder. If I only have access to one tool it would be Raven (sorry Moz!). Some of the tools they have seem to be "labs" style bolt ons, but the core tools are very good.
Hope that is some help.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What's more valuable: new content or optimizing old content
We are a niche legacy print publication that's been around for close to 20 years. Recently, we combined several old sites in one new responsive site. We have over 7,000 articles -many of which are evergreen and can be repurposed when needed. Most of the old pieces although published, have not been optimized for SEO. However, as we create new pieces, we optimize them for search and social and they tend to get more organic traffic. Where we're torn is on how much we should balance our limited editorial resources between cleaning up and optimizing our extensive archive to improve our organic reach, vs. pumping out new original pieces each week. I realize that without a lot of data the answers will be varied - I guess I'm looking for a best practices approach for content publishers. If it helps at all, our main conversion goal is selling subscriptions to our print and digital publications. We know that organic traffic tends to be more engaged than our social referrals. Unfortunately, due to the nature of the magazine fulfilment business, it's tough to know which channels convert better. Thanks!
Moz Pro | | RicardoSalcedo0 -
I have double-checked the rel canonical is properly employed on our page but the On Page Grader says it's not working?
I have double-checked the rel canonical is properly employed on our page but the On Page Grader says it's not working Here is the URL - http://www.solidconcepts.com/industries/aerospace-parts-manufacturing/ What is wrong with how we are doing things?
Moz Pro | | StratasysDirectManufacturing0 -
Keyword rankings tool is not working properly
My website http://www.logobite.com/ is in 29th position for the keyword "logo inspiration" but your keyword rankings tool is not showing up 😞 why?
Moz Pro | | logobite0 -
Rankings Different in Serps from Report
My site shows up on page one for many search queries, but I'm "not in the top 50" for those same terms according to the rankings report. Having troubleshooted the problem, it may be a canonical issue. I did not include www when I originally set up my reports and it seems that my site shows up in search results with www. However; if you type in the url without the www, it will automatically forward to the page with www. I did this intentionally in order not to get penalized for duplicate content pages. So here's my question: If I've got one page redirected to the other, shouldn't the rankings report also follow that redirect? If so, then it should show the correct results, right? Thanks, Dino
Moz Pro | | Dino640 -
Keyword Ranking weekly update didn't happen
A new campaign of mine is supposed to update its keyword rankings on Wednesdays but as of Thursday morning it didn't happen. I've got the original stats from the first few keywords I added when the campaign was set up, but nothing for the keywords that were added in the next day. Previous experience with this tool was pretty reliable so I'm just wondering if anyone is experiencing the same thing.
Moz Pro | | ninjaprecision0 -
Freaked out over domain authority ranking drop.
Should I be freaked out that website's domain authority dropped 4 points? Is it normal for websites to fluctuate a couple of points or have I really screwed something up?
Moz Pro | | bewoldt0 -
Best place to start link building
I am new to SEO and want to start doing some link building using SEO moz to help. I am looking for pointers on where to start. Our business is www.hairbowcenter.com and we sell ribbon and hairbow supplies. We are lacking a lot of good links and I wanted to start focusing getting more. What tools should I use and where do I begin. I noticed our Pagerank is only 1 for our site and I want to get that up as well.
Moz Pro | | tbanwart1 -
What's name of SEOmoz and Open Site Explorer robots?!
I would like to exclude in robots.txt SEOmoz and Open Site Explorer bots to don't let them index my sites… what's their names?
Moz Pro | | cezarylech0