Competitor doing very well through reciprocal linking. Should I adopt it?
-
I've always heard that reciprocal linking is dead but my main competitor who is at number one for both my primary keywords has a link profile built up of mainly reciprocal links. Should I adopt this practice? I've only valued one way links up to now.
-
Samuel,
We have found other avenues to build links that are time better spent. We do not do reciprocal linking at all and get great results for our clients. Spend your time on other things like link baiting. The quality of your links will be better and you will eventually overtake your competitor.
-
Samuel,
Everyday (OK, at least some days, but it feels like everyday) in SEO I look at some competitor (typically of a client of ours) and one how in the h3ll they got ahead of our guy/gal. I peruse, I read content, I compare PA/DA, I look at links (quantity, quality, matching c blocks, etc.). I can see that obviously we have the better of them in 75% of the important areas. I scratch my head, curse (mildly), wonder, and complain. But, then it hits me. What's the point?
First, I cannot draw a conclusion from one set of data. You are trying to do that. If you are willing to give up a keyword and the two urls, you might be surprised at what a few mozzers can teach one another. For you, speaking solely of links, have you looked at internal vs. external, anchor text and anchor text distribution, C blocks, over use of internal links, too many unnatural links, absence of nofollows, etc, etc, etc. (That was purely off the top of my head after being up an hour and a half (0530 now). So, there is more than just the reciprocity factor in the links.
For me, one thing I have learned from mozzers I have come to respect on this Q & A is what I will call SEOP. Search Engine Optimization Perspective: You cannot point to my PR, PA, DA, Link profile is better, I should outrank. You cannot even do a thorough analysis and believe that you couldn't be missing some one small thing. On a forum like this for SEO the majority of those visiting regularly are in the top 30% of SEO conservatively (Yes, IMO). When we look out at those who claim to be gurus and originators and friends of Sergey and Larry, we are all struck by the wonderment of how they can pull it off. I literally am in an argument with someone around local search at a much larger firm than ours (national), that they cannot use same address of a business, same phone, different URL, and have it in Places, et. al. - they are a Local search firm..... So, it gives me a sense of being a bit too bright some times. I think if they are so stupid then I must be.... WOW!
So, what I do today is this: When I am truly perplexed at how we are being outranked by an inferior :0 and I have researched it as best I can I realize that maybe, today I am not the brightest guy in the room and I come over here to realize how smart others are and learn. I also realize that there are factors I cannot see: for that term, on that page, is there something they have done that is getting them an amazing CTR? Remember, what we do is much prettier, catchier, nuanced, etc. than the other guy....to us. Maybe show the page to two or three others and let them tell you what they see.
No, this is not likely the answer you wanted. So, for me, I will do an occasional reciprocal link if it makes sense with my content and my audience. No, I will not go to the wall with relationships like that as there is no end point that works, again, IMO.
So, I hope you work it out. I would look at content. I would really look at CTR (compare meta descriptions and ask yourself this question: Does yours answer the query better than any other meta description out there?) Then ask this, when they get to your page, will the page reflect the meta description and make them want to hang out? If all things are equal in SEO from one page to another, look there.
Best
-
Hi Samuel,
I will tell you the same thing as for a lot of clients when we have similar discussions.
First thing: don't try to "play the game" of a competitor. Instead try to come up with something new and better.
Second: Reciprocal links are less important nowadays. I look at websites as they would be real-life persons. And links they are votes they point out to each other on the anchor text niche :-). (Wow, Reading this sentanse even confused me But I still hope you get the idea)
So when two websites start to point to each other on a very similar anchor you get confused. (Think about Schwarzenegger and Stallone sitting at the same table telling people that the other one is the better action movie "star" of the '90s... )
So finally the idea is: try to deliver something new for your audience, try out new things in link building for your website and focus more on diversity, and you will win!
Gr.,
Istvan
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Ran a backlink competitor analysis and found that the competitor has their links coming from various linkedin and youtube posts but my client does the same thing and im not seeing any links coming from those sources for them?
Ran a backlink competitor analysis and found that the competitor has their links coming from various linkedin and youtube posts but my client does the same thing and im not seeing any links coming from those sources for them?
Link Building | | Stongex0 -
Unnatural Links To Your Site — Impacts Links warning, Should I do something?
Hi, I got: "Unnatural Links To Your Site — Impacts Links Google has detected a pattern of unnatural artificial, deceptive, or manipulative links pointing to pages on this site. Some links may be outside of the webmaster’s control, so for this incident we are taking targeted action on the unnatural links instead of on the site’s ranking as a whole. " I don't see any dropping at rankings, could the best solution here to be, just to leave everything as it is and be more careful with the link building in the future? Or is there a danger that Google gives further penalties if I don't act on this one do something? I am little afraid that if I start removing links, my rankings will drop, even though they have remained same if don't do anything? Any help is appreciated.
Link Building | | pok3rplay3r0 -
Spammy links
Hi I was reviewing a clients link profile and found a lot of the links they have pointed at their domain have the anchor text "Buy Viagra" or "buy viagra online" and similar. Now the website has absolutely nothing to do with this kind of business so no doubt these links are spammy. To my knowledge the website has not been penalised by Google so far. Is it best to disavow or just leave alone? Kind Regards
Link Building | | TheZenAgency0 -
Will short linking to my site affect SERPs attribution of inbound link?
Some brand partners are using their short links to link back to our site (like bit.ly but they have their own). They have a high domain authority and trust so we want that link back to be read by Google. When I downloaded all inbound links from Moz, this brand's site was not listed, making me worried that the inbound link isn't being seen or considered! Haven't been able to find any info on this...
Link Building | | PAC31350 -
Why my twitter handle link is not getting counted in links, though for other sites it is counting!
My twitter handle page link is not getting counted, though it is getting counted for other sites
Link Building | | EG0CENTRIX0 -
Link Targets
What do you think of getting links from... high quality sites, with many non spammy high trusted links to them....but their traffic has been majorly hit by panda. I suspect perhaps for having too many thin pages. Is persuing links on these sites a good idea or not? I'd welcome opinions.
Link Building | | PeterM220 -
Inbound links vs. internal links
Which scenario does more to help SEO - A) An inbound link from a low traffic/low page rank site to my site B) An internal link where one page of my site links to another page on my site
Link Building | | DVanSchepen0 -
Free link on a Paid Link Blog
Hi there, I have been doing some outreaching, and managed to have a blog post accepted on a authority blog. They included links to my website, and I was very pleased with the placement. However, having browsed through the site, I was worried to see that they openly admit they allow 'reviews' of websites, with backlinks included, for $50 per review. I am worried I might be penalised without actually doing anything wrong. I did not pay for my link, but the link has been placed on a site which openly admits they accept payment for links. Should I be worried? Should I ask them to take it down? To date I have been told countless times by bloggers I am outreaching that if I pay $10, $50, $100 etc I can write a blog post. I have never accepted because of the risk of penalization. Now, unwittingly, I am linked to from a paid link site with a blog post that would look like I have paid for it because of the placement and style of back link. What do you think? Thanks,
Link Building | | giveacar0