How should I deal with plural, accents and others?
-
We are optimizing a french website. Most of the keywords we are targetting can be (and are used)in a plural form as well. We have noticed that the results for the plural and singular are not strictly the same (yet, very close).
Similarly, one of the most important keywords we use (étudiant: student) is often times spelt without the accent. Again, the results are differnt in Google.
Now, the question is: should we focus only on the "main" form (singular and with accents) and hope that search engines will always do a good job at this or should we care for all the versions, which would be quite weird, as it means we would need to have different pages for each "version" of the same word.
Also, SEOMoz doesn't deal very well with this. We get an A on the singular with accent form for a given page, and a F for that same page and keyword, but without the accent and in plural.
-
You are very welcome! Our product team has already commented and it looks like we will be working on making this change down the line.
-
Thank you Miranda, i subscribe to the feature request.
-
Hey Thibaud,
Thanks for writing in and sorry that you are having some trouble with your on-page reports. I have created a feature request for removing the exact match requirement for accented letters in the on-page reports so that our product team can look into making this change to our tools. Please feel free to add your vote or any other information you think is important to the request here:
https://seomoz.zendesk.com/entries/26292065-Remove-Exact-Match-Requirement-in-On-Page-for-AccentsYou can also subscribe to the post so that you will receive updates from our product team regarding this request. Just make sure you are signed into your Moz account when you visit the page.
I hope this helps. Please let us know if you need any further assistance.
-
This mean the page grade tool is not very helpfull for others language than english.
Ok for plurial as they are different words, but accent should not be on an exact match I believe. For the same word : "theme" or "thème" I will have a A grade then a F grade, the F grade is an error.
French people never put accent when searching on google, but the page title must have the accent for exemple. So this tool is useless for us. All my well ranking pages got a F grades...
Something you should care about.
-
That is a tough one, but I'm no SEO expert - I work on our customer service team. I'd follow the advice of other SEOs here and see if you get more responses. It does sound like building more pages might be the route you want to take if you're not ranking under all four version of a term (singular/accent, singular/no accent, plural/accent, plural/no accent). I'm surprised that these four different queries yield such different results. If you can, I'd also check to see that it's worth spending time on these variations. Sorry I don't know more about this, but hoped this helped explain our tool!
-
So how do you suggest we optimize on keywords? Make sure we optimize all versions? That probably means creating more pages as, for example, we probably can't optimize a given page's title for both the singular and plural forms.
-
Hey Julien! As Alan says, our On-Page tool is an exact match, so just as Google may give you different results for plurals and accents, so will our tool. I've seen plurals and accents be marginally different in SERPs, but I've also seen them be drastically different, which is why we do the exact match thing. I hope that helps explain! Perhaps we can let the user choose exact or partial sometime in the future...
-
Hi
Matt cutts has recently suggested to avoid accent when it's possible, he also mentionned that in general search engines as google can easily deal with accent though. I think you could find additional notes by watching this video
Check this link http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K4TKJwvTu50
-
I've found pluralized versions of a word tend to be searched more than singular versions - at least according to our set in Google Keyword Tools. I look at customer intent. Would a customer search for thai food restaurant in oregon, or thai food restaurant(s) in oregon? If there is a clear winner I would go after that. I'm not absolutely certain if Google will give you a solid ranking for the singular version because it is embedded in the pluralized version. Maybe someone can confirm.
Bonne chance(s)!
-
SEOMoz is not google.
I suspect that SEOMoz is an exact match system, so it will not pick up the nuances that google does, unless they recode that. I have seen the same with a few things I tested too.
You will only get a perfect answer here from someone who has thoroughly tested it - and you have that opeion too.
My view is that you just do one of them and let google do its thing to find relevance.
You can't possibly tie up every keyword by trying to match for them all. If you do try, you will turn your site into a mess that people will look at and wonder what the heck you are trying to do. It will probably be confusing and you will undo any good work you do. Look in your analytics to see what is working for you already. Then reinforce those things. I wouldn't try to go after things that confuse other pages that already do well.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How to deal with auto generated pages on our site that are considered thin content
Hi there, Wondering how to deal w/ about 300+ pages on our site that are autogenerated & considered thin content. Here is an example of those pages: https://app.cobalt.io/ninp0 The pages are auto generated when a new security researcher joins our team & then filled by each researcher with specifics about their personal experience. Additionally, there is a fair amount of dynamic content on these pages that updates with certain activities. These pages are also getting marked as not having a canonical tag on them, however, they are technically different pages just w/ very similar elements. I'm not sure I would want to put a canonical tag on them as some of them have a decent page authority & I think could be contributing to our overall SEO health. Any ideas on how I should deal w/ this group of similar but not identical pages?
Moz Pro | | ChrissyOck0 -
How to deal with fake review posted on ripoffreport.com by a competitor.
In 2010 we launched a product update (physical product) that was really good for us in sales and we were taking a lot of business from our main competitor. To stop the bleeding they posted a fake ripoffreport (completely made up pretending to be a former employee, we are a family business and employ few people with almost no turn over in the last 10 years). They also posted fake reviews on Google's local product at the time for any store that used to use their product but that had switched to ours. We were able to get google to remove the fake reviews as there was no way one user visited over 100 stores and purchased the same service on the same day in all these locations around the US. But they would do nothing about delisting the report page without a court order. So the fake google reviews went away, but the ripoffreport has become immortal. The reviews were originally posted anonymously and then commented on by another anonymous user. These same two anonymous users then filed ripoffreports against a couple of our mutual customers as well. Since they are anonymous we cannot sue anyone to get them to remove it, since it is passed the statutes of limitations we cannot do a john doe law suit to get a judgment by default. So the report is there to stay. We have worked to get more content up about us, we have great product reviews on facebook and other outlets that have sold and spotlighted our products, and we are partnering with industry specific bloggers and traditional media content sites to get links and reviews (all white hat stuff, great public relations stuff), but we cannot get our interior pages, facebook pages, or the other reviews to rank higher than this report when searching for our brand name and even worse when you search for our "brand name reviews" it is the first result on google. Can anyone help me understand how I can use MOZ to help me identify how to outrank this page with interior pages so that it falls off the front page of google? Sorry if that is a newbie question but I have done a lot of things and it has worked some but not as much as I need it to. And it seems that in the last few weeks the report has become stronger in the rankings again. Any suggestions you could offer would be greatly appreciated.
Moz Pro | | erickcalderon0 -
My index URL was removed from Google, but all others remain in the search engines
HI All, My site was ranking very well and was in 1st page of google for most of my keywords. Couple of weeks back we did some update to the site and moved it to new hosting and from then onwards I dont see my site home page in Google ranking . My Website Name is : royalevents.com.au. It used to be in 1st of Google for keywords like wedding Mandaps, Indian Wedding Mandaps etc, Would be great if some one helps us to figure out whats gone wrong .. I also did Webmaster Fetch as Google but nothing happened. Thanks
Moz Pro | | Verve-Innovation0 -
How can I deal with tag page duplicate issues
The Moz crawler reported some dupliated issues. Many of them have to do with tags.
Moz Pro | | IamKovacs
Each tag has a link, and as some articles are under several tags, these come up as duplicate content. I read Dr Peter's piece on Canonical stuff, but it's not clear to me if any of these are the solution. Perhaps the solution lies somewhere else? Maybe I need to block the robots from these urls (But that seems counter-SEO-productive) Thanks
Kovacs0 -
If I do the discount on mighty deals, does that start after my free trial or in place of my current free trial? Got to figure out budgets on tools for the year.
Question about discounts and how the work in junction with other offers for pro membership.
Moz Pro | | chris.oursbourn0 -
How Do I deal with duplicate page titles for pages on eCommerce site
Hi We have an ecommerce site selling physical products. There are a few areas where the products run into two pages. I have used canonical meta tags and next and prev meta tags too. Despite this SEOMOZ reports are still displaying these as warnings for duplicate page titles. An example would be /brand_name/range/ <link rel="next" href="/brand_name/range/?page=2" /> <link rel="<a class="attribute-value">canonical</a>" href="/band_name/range/"/> /brand_name/range/?page=2 <link rel="<a class="attribute-value">prev</a>" href="/brand_name/range/" /> <link rel="<a class="attribute-value">canonical</a>" href="/band_name/range/?page=2"/> Should I be doing something different?
Moz Pro | | wouldBseoKING0 -
Link Assistant SEO Tool - Any Others?
I have the most boring copier service website, clients cool, concept is really boring; Well I am looking to generate this client some link back juice, cause this guy is struggling for traffic, and I am am struggling to generate a buzz about copier services?? Fortunately, it's only local, so that helps me with testing my localization campaigning. 🙂 Any opinions on this software? http://www.link-assistant.com Do you know of some better "Back Linking Software? I was considering buying it. But once I go to purchase it, I second guess myself; "It just looks shady, and the perpetual up-sale, turns me off.". I really just value the MOZer communities opinions! and I want to see what the community thinks of the above company, and if ya heard anything good, or bad. The Demo seems legit as hell!
Moz Pro | | smstv0 -
Do you track both plural and singular variations of your keywords?
Howdy, In trying to make the most of the keyword tracking slots we get with the SEOmoz tool our discussion turned to the importance of tracking both variations of search terms that could be plural or singular. The example is that we run a local business search database so we target search terms like "chicago pet stores" and "chicago pet store", however the language of our site almost always uses the plural version of the business category. On one hand we want to know exactly how we rank for variations of search terms, but on the other, with the number of categories we have we could be tracking thousands upon thousands if we included every variation ("pet store chicago", "pet stores in chicago", etc.) So what say ye fellow optimizers? Is it worth tracking variations of search terms or do you find that Google is smart enough in coalescing the intent of similar search variants that tracking against the most commonly searched one is enough? Thank you all!
Moz Pro | | qurve0