Google Places optimisation for service franchise, 150 franchisees with no physical addresses?
-
So we have a client who is a plumbing franchise with about 150 franchisees across the country.
Because its a plumbing franchise the businesses don't have street addresses (apart from the franchisee home addresses but we don't want to use those)
We used to have bulk uploaded listings for the franchise locations and used the GPO address is the suburb/city as the address and got away with this fine for years. Google has copped onto this and asked for reverification of the listings by post now. So my question is what's the best way to optimise places for 150+ locations.
As a quick fix, we're going to add a new places location as the master franchise HQ office (address exists). We can then add all the suburbs/areas serviced into this location which may or may not show up for local searches in those areas.
We could potentially verify all listings by mail by using private mailboxes but mail verify on a mass scale like that is likely to be flaky not to mention an admin nightmare.
Does anyone have an experience with this and how they got around it?
-
I work for a language school that has offices in different cities. We're planning on setting up a Google Places page for each of the schools. They all have different addresses but use the same national phone number. Is this going to be a problem?
-
Brendan-
Just worked with a client in a similar situation and this is what we did. We got every single remote franchisee registered with their own google places and then we hid their addresses in google places because they were all their home addresses. We are crushing the competition and we added 1,100 google places listings in less than 12 days.
Your welcome!
-
Hello there- just curious how much would you charge me for 10 local google listing and i do a local phone # and addresses. yellowcab4u@gmail.com
-
Sorry, I was indicating that Google requires every business to have it's own phone number and location address; not that I agree with them. I think that they need to come up with a better solution to deal with small business owners that may not have a store front and they absolutely need to work on other Google places aspects; the main one I have been seeing is their reviews section - a competitor or activist can write some pretty false accusations and there is basically no way of getting that review removed. Hopefully they will find better solutions to their ongoing Google Places problems.
-
Completely disagree - the business is a national plumbing franchise so doesn't have physical offices/locations in every suburb/city they service.
There are a handful of the bigger franchisees within the group who have dedicated offices but most are locally owned businesses, 3-5 staff operating 2-3 vans and trucks and don't have a dedicated office in the location they service. On top of that the company has a 1300 number that goes to a central call centre so again no individual numbers per location. (The franchises are all individually owned companies not owned or run by the master franchisee)
Google Places deals with this scenario very poorly and mobile businesses very poorly in general - right now our new strategy is working well so running with that until Google can come up with a better solution.
-
If the business does not have a physical location (150 different physical locations); then it should not have a google place page. Google is extremely smart when it comes to having a business that has no physical location and is using a po box or a home address. Every location should have its own phone number as well as its own address. You should just tell your client that there is no way getting around it.
-
Thanks for the update! It's always interesting to hear what people ended up doing. If you're interested, consider writing up a post for YOUmoz when all of this is done. Martin is right, it's a post waiting to happen!
-
Thought I'd post an update on this thread - we setup the central listing located at HQ and added all the suburbs/cities the franchise services. Not showing in any searches apart from those where HQ is located which confirmed what I thought would happen.
Right now we're looking at scrapping all listings, starting from scratch and adding each suburb at the franchise owners home address and hiding the listing. Big job to manage but no other way to do it at this stage....costing the company big $$ with these listings out of action, GOOGs really needs to come up with a better way of verifying listings.
-
Hi All,
I thought I'd jump in here. Some good and creative discussion here, and Martin's comment regarding David Mihm's Local Search Ranking Factors is an important one. Definitely, though, a ton has changed since the 2010 study (which I had the fun of participating in) and I can hardly wait to see how the 2011 turns out. The rollout of Place Search last October has really shuffled the deck.
Tbone, I know the hope of your question is to find a workaround for this client whose franchises have no address, and while weaknesses in Maps/Places certainly have created some rather staggering loopholes, I'd like to throw a question into the mix:
Have you explained to your client that his business does not fit Google's definition of Local and that, rather than gaming the system and incurring the potential future wrath of the bots, he may need to do what other business are: changing his business model so that it is an authentic Local fit?
When the phone book was invented, you had to have a phone number to get listed. Local is equivalent, and the requirements are a unique local area code phone number and address. I genuinely believe that the quality of everyone's user experience is dependent upon business owners following these two guidelines, rather than attempting to come across as having a physical location where none exists.
Eric Enge did a great interview with Carter Maslan a while back that dealt, in part, with franchise businesses (http://www.stonetemple.com/articles/interview-carter-maslan-032710.shtml), and while your client cannot legitimately claim a Place Page for his non-physical locations until he changes his business model, he can at least follow the lead of creating a Place Page for his headquarters and city landing pages on his site for his service areas.
In my own work with Local clients, I try to teach them a civic-minded approach to the scenario. When they don't fit Google's definition, I encourage them to follow Local news to see if Google's rules change to include other types of business models than they currently do. I get phone calls every week from people who either don't understand the definition of Local, or do understand it and want to bend the rules, and I see these calls as a great opportunity for educating folks.
Good luck with your client. He's in a tough spot until such time as Google decides to broaden its definition of Local.
-
Haha.
-
"Surprised there's not more about this in discussion forums as would imagine that other franchise businesses face similar issues."
I've noticed this as well.
It appears (though I've no proof) that many SEOs are playing their cards very close to their chest with Places following last October's update -- not least because of the rapidity of changes since, and the struggle to stay abreast of them.
SERPs for local search queries have evolved and local search is a completely different ball game compared to the days of the 7-pack. As such, there's been a rush to take advantage of the opportunities that have presented themselves.
It's a YouMoz post waiting to happen, except that by the time you've written it, Google will have changed something again..!
-
Thanks for the replies guys.
Have done quick a bit of trawling on this and so far no loopholes that I can see any more. Surprised there's not more about this in discussion forums as would imagine that other franchise businesses face similar issues.
Going by the rule book and google TOS seems the only way legit way to do is setup the single listing at HQ add the franchise locations in the coverage list areas but my feeling is the rank will be pretty weak compared with other competing local places listings who are highly optimised around that location & location specific terms, although leveraging user reviews over the long term would potentially resolve this.
Waiting on the postal verification so will report back how we go once live and then with a handful of reviews.
-
Wow, I'd say your ideas are pretty good, but they're getting wise to stuff like this. I guess they want the name to actually mean something lol. You could possible use the private mailboxes and have them forwarded to the central location, but I really have no experience with this. Good luck though whatever case!
-
This is a very grey area, but one I feel I am qualified to answer.
I'll be frank: there have been numerous loopholes in the Google Maps (and now Places) system over the past few months. Many of these have now been closed. Even the top local SEOs are struggling to keep up, with all eyes resting on this year's collaborative study from David Mihm for some valuable insights (see 2010's here).
I'm not going to go into too many details, but suffice to say if you managed to exploit them at the time, it's a case of counting yourself lucky: your listings are likely to be intact.
You need two things for a Places listing first and foremost: a unique physical address and a unique phone number. Even if you can get around the phone number issue (which doesn't take too much imagination), it's a much harder premise to get around the physical address issue without using clients' addresses (bad idea!).
G know this, and so they've enforced verification by post only in many (if not all?) instances. I've read that this may be a temporary restriction to prevent certain groups of spammers doing their thing, but I'd be surprised to see wide scale telephone verification in place again.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Copyright Theft and Google Rankings
Here is another tough one we've been dealing with. We publish a niche book. For a decade we kept the information offline (no e-books). However, it was widely scanned and reproduced online. We've filed dozens of DMCA complaints over the years, but have found trying to rid the internet entirely of these infringing pages to be futile. We get 1 closed and find 3 more. Two years ago we decided to put the information online ourselves, to generate an official community for our work it instead of "fighting it". We built a full site with hundreds of pages from the book for readers to use, free. Google indexed us, and we followed basic SEO... But in spite of a prime aged domain and a lot of links, we are literally BURIED in google. There are dozens of complete garbage spam sites that rank way higher than us. I understand ranking takes time, and the niche is competitive. But the low quality landing pages that are ranking above us is just too confusing. We fear our work has been indexed by google so much over the years on other sites they will never connect it to us. We'll always be buried on page 14 as another scrape. What would you do to correct this for a client? Could you?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | RetBit0 -
Google Not Indexing App Content
Hello Mozzers I recently noticed that there has been an increase in crawl errors reported in Google Search console & Google has stopped indexing our app content. Could this be due to the fact that there is a mismatch between the host path name mentioned within the android deeplink (within the alternate tag) and the actual URL of the page. For instance on the following desktop page http://www.example.com.au/page-1 the android deeplink points to http://www.example.com.au/android-app://com.example/http/www.example.com.au/4652374 Please note that the content on both pages (desktop & android) is same.Is this is a correct setup or am I doing something wrong here? Any help would be much appreciated. Thank you so much in advance.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | InMarketingWeTrust0 -
Hiring A Linkbuilding Service
What would be your take on how to hire a link building service. Specifically, but not limited to: Finding one whose methods/links achieved won't later destroy the domain? Define the cost for the service? What is a typical cost for such a service? Reasonable expectations? Any other tips for dealing with same. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | 945011 -
Ranking on google search
Hello Mozzers Moz On page grader shows A grade for the particular URL,but my page was not ranking on top 100 Google search. Any help is appreciated ,Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | sobanadevi0 -
Why do Local "5 pack" results vary between showing Google+, Google+ and website address
I had a client ask me a good question. When they pull up a search result they show up at the top but only with a link to their G+ page. Other competitors show their web address and G+ page. Why are these results different in the same search group? Is there a way to ensure the web address shows up?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Ron_McCabe0 -
Is it a problem that Google's index shows paginated page urls, even with canonical tags in place?
Since Google shows more pages indexed than makes sense, I used Google's API and some other means to get everything Google has in its index for a site I'm working on. The results bring up a couple of oddities. It shows a lot of urls to the same page, but with different tracking code.The url with tracking code always follows a question mark and could look like: http://www.MozExampleURL.com?tracking-example http://www.MozExampleURL.com?another-tracking-examle http://www.MozExampleURL.com?tracking-example-3 etc So, the only thing that distinguishes one url from the next is a tracking url. On these pages, canonical tags are in place as: <link rel="canonical<a class="attribute-value">l</a>" href="http://www.MozExampleURL.com" /> So, why does the index have urls that are only different in terms of tracking urls? I would think it would ignore everything, starting with the question mark. The index also shows paginated pages. I would think it should show the one canonical url and leave it at that. Is this a problem about which something should be done? Best... Darcy
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | 945010 -
Why is my site not getting crawled by google?
Hi Moz Community, I have an escort directory website that is built out of ajax. We basically followed all the recommendations like implementing the escaped fragment code so Google would be able to see the content. Problem is whenever I submit my sitemap on Google webmastertool it always 700 had been submitted and only 12 static pages had been indexed. I did the site query and only a number of pages where indexed. Does it have anything to do with my site being on HTTPS and not on HTTP? My site is under HTTPS and all my content is ajax based. Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | en-gageinc0 -
Google Places & Multiple Listings
Our client used to have a listing in each city, but after updating the addresses they were forever under review. Google said that businesses serving customers at their locations can only list their primary office. Back when this client had multiple city listings, all addresses but one were UPS boxes. If they are to change back to "No, all customers come to the business location," can they once again submit a listing for each city using these addresses? Yes, I realize they are UPS boxes, but they insist on being listed for each city.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | elcrazyhorse0