Various region phone numbers
-
I have a client who serves multiple regions but does not have physical locations and operates out of only one.
Since he does business this way he only has one Google Places listing with the address hidden. However, he has a phone number on it that is localized to one of the regions.
Will this hurt him for ranking in the other regions? To clarify - he has a cincinnati phone number but also has indianpolis, columbus, dayton, and others listed as areas served.
Would it be best to just get him a 1800 number and put that in there?
-
Hi Mark,
Thanks for contributing to this question. I would recommend that you read and memorize the Google Places Quality Guidelines, which specifically forbid the use of virtual addresses. Here they are for your perusal:
http://support.google.com/places/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=107528
Specifically, the guidelines state:
Do not create a listing or place your pin marker at a location where the business does not physically exist. P.O. Boxes are not considered accurate physical locations. If you operate from a location but receive mail at a mail box there, please list your physical address in Address Line 1, and put your mail box or suite number in Address Line 2.
If you don't conduct face-to-face business at your location, you must select the "Do not show my business address on my Maps listing" option within your dashboard. If you don't hide your address, your listing may be removed from Google Maps.
Hope it helps to read those. It's not fun to get in hot water with Google if you violate their policies!
-
Hi WebFeat,
Yes, it is forbidden by the Google Places Quality Guidelines to use virtual office addresses, so don't to that.
I have had Local SEO clients in a similar situation to the one you've described. To be totally honest, if the client has once office, he should really only have one local area code phone number, but I'm aware of the fact that many service providers have multiple regional numbers, in part for the totally above board reason of saving their clients long distance phone charges. Looks like this might be the case with your clients, as his numbers are in two different states, right?
So, let's say that the client wants to keep his regional phone numbers. I would suggest that he put them on a page of his site, couched within an image to prevent them from being indexed. The one number that he should keep in real text and use as a local hook on his contact page, footer, about page, etc., is the one that matches his physical street address. So, if he's located in Cincinnati, his real text phone number should be the one with the Cincinnati area code.
And, this should be the number used on his Google Place Page and on all of his directory listings and other citations. Consistency in this is critical.
Explain to the client that should Google find and index half a dozen phone numbers for they same business, they are likely to become 'confused' and lose trust in the validity of his business and profile. He definitely does not want that to happen!
Regarding 800 numbers...yes, that might be an alternative to his having the other regional numbers if his goal is to save his clientele long distance charges. But the advice is the same here - put the 800 number in image text, not real text, on the site, and honestly, I don't recommend putting it anywhere on the Google Place Page. Google does offer the option to provide a secondary phone number on the Place Page, but given their history of automated duplicate creation, merging and etc., I think treating the Place Page (and Google) as simply as possible is the best route to go.
Regarding rankings, my advice unchanged because failing to earn Google's trust outweighs and potential (unlikely) rankings the client might earn from publishing regional phone numbers., If the client needs to gain visibility for cities in which he isn't physically located, you have 2 tasks ahead of you.
-
Discern the client's business model to understand how to optimized the Place Page. If the client serves all customers at his brick-and-mortar address, then you simply input his physical address and allow it to be displayed. If the client serves some clients at his brick and mortar business and others at their places of business, you can show the address and also use the service radius tool. However...this is something to be a little careful about. The distance between Columbus, Ohio and Indianapolis, Indiana is apparently 175 miles. I would not recommend using the service radius feature to indicate a distance like that. In fact, I have seen some indication in the past that choosing a service radius greater than 30 miles may have a negative impact on your rankings. What I've noticed about this pre-dates Google's major policy change regarding the use of this feature, so I don't know exactly how circumference of service radius is affecting rankings these days, but it's something to consider carefully. I think if I had to use the radius tool for a client with locations like yours, I'd check out the miles between his Ohio cities (if he's located in Ohio) and see if any of them fit within the 30 mile radius, just to be safe. *I am having to guess about this here, because of the new policy change. I haven't seen any new mentions of possible effects since that change was put in place.
-
If the client is serving his customers in a variety of cities, utilize copywriting and linkbuilding to build secondary organic visibility for the cities beyond his city of location. He is unlikely to achieve actual local rankings for these other cities if his vertical is at all competitive because Google will typically view his competitors actually located in these other cities as being more relevant results. That being said, you can achieve good organic visibility for the client if you can showcase his work in these secondary cities with creative copywriting and targeted linkbuilding.
Hope I've covered everything you've asked about. Your question is a good one, deserved of a complex answer because there are so many ways to go at this wrongly. It's easy to make a mistake, but with good advice from you and good planning, the client can approach his goals the right way, without risk of penalization. Good luck and thanks for coming to Q&A with your question!
-
-
correct me if i am wrong but isnt it incorrect practice to generate virtual addresses?
-
The local number in that region helps him in that region and hurts him in the other regions. There are several outsourced solutions available for him to generate google places listings with virtual addresses in the other regional areas. Make sure that you get the google places listing before you pay. We have worked with one firm that has helped us with a bunch of new clients.
That strategy is going to allow him to maximize his value in all locations, with an 800#.
Hope this helps. Please lay the thumbs up on me if it helped...
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How to handle large numbers of comments?
First the good news. One site that I've been working on has seen an increase in traffic from 2k/month to 80k! As well as lots of visitors, the site is also getting lots of comments with one page getting more than 70 comments/day and showing no sign of a slow down! Approximately 3000 comments in total and growing! What is the best approach for handling this? I'm not talking about the review/approval/response but just in the way these comments are presented on the website taking both seo and usability into account. Does anyone have any particular recommendations? Options I've considered are: Just show the most recent x comments and ignore the rest. (Nobody is going to read 3000 comments!) Paginate comments (risk of duplicate content? Using Ajax could hide long-tail phrases in comments?) Show all comments (page load speed is suffering and this is likely to be causing problems for mobile visitors) How do active comments on a page contribute to an article's freshness? Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
Technical SEO | | DougRoberts2 -
Limit number of links in a page, how to build the menu?
Hi, One of the first SEOMoz tool recommand to me, is to avoid multiple links on the same page. This is fully true, i've more than 600 internal links placed in a menu on the header.
Technical SEO | | vdgvince
This means that each page contains these 600 links at least. User-experience wise, i need to keep this multi-level menu accessible. What would you suggest me ? => No-follow on the links would be useful and not penalizing (if i still have other do-follow links to these pages) => Javascript menu, so that i can't be crawled by google => Any other suggestion? Thank you in advance!0 -
Will same language different region (US/UK) geotargeting via subdirectory (& GWT) cause dupe content or other issues ?
If a UK hosted site on a .com, needs to target US now too but for keywords that are spelt differently in US is creating duplicate version of uk hosted .com site and putting it on a subdirectory .com/us/ and geotargeting via webmaster tools (to usa) ok ? I take it in this scenario no dupe content issues (or other issues) so long as is geotargeted via GWT ? Or are there ? Comments from anyone with experience doing similar (same language, different region geo-targeting dupe content with kw spelling being only difference, via a subdirectory or other route) much appreciated ? Many Thanks 🙂
Technical SEO | | Dan-Lawrence0 -
Seek help correcting large number of 404 errors generated, 95% traffic halt
Hi, The following GWT screen tells a bit of the story: site: http://bit.ly/mrgdD0 http://www.diigo.com/item/image/1dbpl/wrbp On about Feb 8 I decided to fix a large number of 'duplicate title' warnings being reported in GWT "HTML Suggestions" -- these were for URLs which differed only in parameter case, and which had Canonical tags, but were still reported as dups in GWT. My traffic had been steady at about 1000 clicks/day. At midnight on 2/10, google traffic completely halted, down to 11 clicks/day. I submitted a recon request and was told 'no manual penalty' Also, the 'sitemap' indexes in GWT showed 'pending' for 24x7 starting then. By about the 18th, the 'duplicate titles' count dropped to about 600 or so... the next day traffic hopped right back to about 800 clicks/day - for a week - then stopped again, down to 10/day, a week later, on the 26th. I then noticed that GWT was reporting 20K page-not found errors - this has now grown to 35K such errors! I realized that bogus internal links were being generated as I failed to disable the PHP warning messages.... so I disabled PHP warnings and fixed what I thought was the source of the errors. However, the not-found count continues to climb -- and I don't know where these bad internal links are coming from, because the GWT report lists these link sources as 'unavailable'. I'v been through a similar problem last year and it took months (4) for google to digest all the bogus pages ad recover. If I have to wait that long again I will lose much $$. Assuming that the large number of 404 internal errors is the reason for the sudden shutoff... How can I a) verify the source of these internal links, given that google says the source pages are 'unavailable'.. Most critically, how can I do a 'RESET" and have google re-spider my site -- or block the signature of these URLs in order to get rid of these errors ASAP?? thanks
Technical SEO | | mantucket0 -
Is the number at the top of google wrong
If I search a term, any term, Google states at the top 922,000 results (as an example). However, if you click the "O" in google at the bottom you can get the 2nd and 3rd and 4th page of results. Those numbers don't match. The result of my searches would show anywhere from 120-140 results, but the number at the top is in the tens of thousands if not millions. Am I missing something here? Shouldn't these numbers be the same?
Technical SEO | | StreetwiseReports0 -
Webmaster tools lists a large number (hundreds)of different domains linking to my website, but only a few are reported on SEOMoz. Please explain what's going on?
Google's webmaster tools lists hundreds of links to my site, but SEOMoz only reports a few of them. I don't understand why that would be. Can anybody explain it to me? Is there someplace to I can go to alert SEOMoz to this issue?
Technical SEO | | dnfealkoff0 -
Including spatial location in URL structure. Does subfolder number and keyword order actually matter?
The SEOMoz On-Page report for my site brings up one warning (among others) that I find interesting: Minimal Subfolders in the URL My site deals with trails and courses for both races and general running. The structure for a trail is, for example: /trails/Canada/British-Columbia/Greater-Vancouver-Regional-District/Baden--Powell-Trail/trail/2 The structure for courses is: /course/28 In both cases, the id at the end is used for a database lookup. I'm considering an URL structure that would be: /trail/Baden-Powell-Trail/ca-bc-vancouver This would use the country code (CA) and sub-country code (BC) along with the short name for the region. This could be good because: it puts the main keyword first the URL is much shorter there are only 3 levels in the URL structure However, there is evidence, from Google's Matt Cutts, that the keyword order and URL structure don't matter in that way: See this post: http://www.seomoz.org/q/all-page-files-in-root-or-to-use-directories If Matt Cutts says they aren't so important then why are they listed in the SEOMoz On-Page Report? I'd prefer to use /trail/ca-bc-vancouver/Baden-Powell-Trail. I'll probably do a similar thing for courses. Is this a good idea? Thoughts? Many thanks, in advance, for your help. Cheers, Edward watch?v=l_A1iRY6XTM watch?v=gRzMhlFZz9I
Technical SEO | | esarge0 -
Optimum Number of Links on Any Given Page
One of the guidelines you provide stipulates: "You should avoid having too many (roughly defined as more than 100) hyperlinks on any given page. When search engine spiders crawl the Internet they are limited by technology resources and are only able to crawl a certain number of links per webpage. In addition, search engine algorithms divide the value of some popularity metrics by the amount of links on a given page. This means that each of the pages being linked to from a given page are also affected by the number of links on the linking page. For these reasons, we recommend you include less than 100 links per page to ensure that they are all crawled, though if your pages have a high page authority, search engines will usually follow more links." As far as these 100 links are concerned, is this in reference to ALL links including outbound, internal, etc? Or is this referring to only outbound links to other sites?
Technical SEO | | johncmmc0