Why are there so few Best Answers?
-
Why do so many great responses in this forum never get labeled as the "Best Answer". Questioners should realize that many experts give them great advice for free and the least they can do is to show some sort of appreciation by giving a thumbs up.
-
I think that your mention of poetry actually touches on another semi-imporant point... people respond well to humor/informality. Professionalism is all well and good, but at the end of the day, someone with a simple question doesn't want to read through a paragraph and a half of SEO jargon and technical advice.
If you can state something simply, do so. And while you're at it, if you can make them smile while reading, do that too.
-
I never realized the behind the scenes efforts you guys put into this forum. Kudos! Another idea to encourage people to close out their questions and leave feedback is to remind them when they login, that they have X amount of questions that aren't closing and awaiting feedback (like eBay). An email would probably be very effective as well. I wouldn't expect a great response from the initial new answer email as our psyche thinks that someone will come along with a better answer and we wait and forget to come back. and close out the question.
-
Per Keri's response, I have been amazed for some time by the staff at SEOmoz and their desire to see all questions answered. They are amazing, provide their own qualified insights, and when necessary seek out the expertise of others.
As to Irving's why do more not respond with thumbs and best's, I would say that there have been times that I actually thought I wrote such an amazing answer the entire world would thumb it up only to have...nothing happen. But, there have been others where I was just answering the question and the next day had 4 or 5 thumbs up and a good answer. Sooo, go figure.
By the way, I did have one occurrence when I was (probably unjustly) given some quality thumbs up in an answer where I included poetry... No S%$!.
So, if all else fails and you've given your best,don't feel downtrodden and for god's sake don't rest!
Pick up that pen and write more advice, when the thumbs up finally come, its cause your smart and your nice.
Cheers.
-
Thanks for your feedback everyone!We really appreciate hearing how you use Q&A and how you'd like to see it improved.
I do go back at times and ask if people have had their question solved or if they're looking for more help. An automatic way to ask the person this after a certain number of days would be a great feature to have, I agree. Our system does notify people when they get a new answer, and suggests to them to mark an answer helpful.
Even though I don't comment on many of the questions, I do read nearly every question and answer that comes into Q&A. I flag questions that have no answers or questionable answers for another Associate to come and review, I give lots of thumbs up (and an occasional thumb down), and endorse good answers (and need to do that more).
One factor in some of this is that if a person came in on a free trial, asked a few questions and took time to implement them, by the time they figured out if their problem was solved or they needed more help their free trail has expired and they can no longer comment on Q&A questions. When I have extra time, I start looking through questions that are still marked as unanswered that are either 7 or 30 days old, and follow up to see if there is an answer to the question and the OP just didn't mark answered, ask if followup is needed, etc.
Please do continue to give your suggestions here, both for the software system and for the administration. We are looking even if we don't comment, and really do find the feedback helpful.
-
I was thinking along those lines as well. SEOmoz needs to encourage questioners to leave feedback and close out their questions by marking Good Answer. I will reach out to Rand and company.
-
Based on your response, I am thinking that SEOmoz needs to follow up with questioners after a select time period to close out their questions by marking Good Answer to any answers they feel were truly helpful.
-
Hear, hear! I have personally spent an hour on a response, solved someones problem pretty much and they did not even bother to thumb up. Sometimes SEOMoz staff are on point but really, more often than not, it's not the case.
Q&A can be fun, it's good to share, but it's nice to get a thumbs up for your effort. After all, I would rather be at home with my kids than answering a strangers question so... it really should be encouraged to say thank you, it's only polite after all.
My own theory is that often, people ask questions, and whilst you give the right answer, it is not what they want to hear so they don't thumb up, or mark as a good answer as it was not the 'right' answer.
Really, the Q&A needs more admins to reward the people who put the effort into help others.
As a suggestion, a 'you need to leave feedback' type system could help educate users on the etiquete required to drive the Q&A.
-
Questioners also probably aren't as interested in the MozPoint system as they are with just getting an answer.
Additionally, inserting yourself into conversations online can be somewhat intimidating to the uninitiated, and it's possible they choose to maintain as low a profile as possible. Thus, they don't post unless absolutely necessary, and refrain from using the "thumbs up/down" or "best answer" post modifiers.
Just my guess.
Edit: Also, if only the person asking the question can mark an answer as "good," what qualifies them to do so? They were the ones with the question to begin with, so unless they act on some advice, they can't be sure whether or not it will work. So, say they act on the advice and it does work... well, they probably aren't as concerned with coming back to SEOmoz just to give some random person +4 points.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Hi guys What the best way to adress duplicate content on photo gallery?
inside my moz report for duplicate contentit says that the photo gallery has duplicate content. let me post and example. is saying this site->http://www.yoursite.com//photogallery/name-of-the-page site photogallery category page name its being duplicated to all these other urls : http://www.yoursite.com//photogallery/name-of-the-page-categoryone http://www.yoursite.com//photogallery/name-of-the-page-categorytwo http://www.yoursite.com//photogallery/name-of-the-page-categorythree http://www.yoursite.com//photogallery/name-of-the-page-categoryfour and so on! each one has it own canonical tag to its own individual page. the site structure is this: http://www.yoursite.com//photogallery/ in here there are all the links pointing to the right categorypage ie: http://www.yoursite.com//photogallery/ >>>> http://www.yoursite.com//photogallery/categoryone pic 1 pic 2 pic 3 http://www.yoursite.com//photogallery/categorytwo pic 1 pic 2 pic 3 http://www.yoursite.com//photogallery/categorythree pic 1 pic 2 pic 3 http://www.yoursite.com//photogallery/categoryfour pic 1 pic 2 pic 3 So i don't know how to interpret Moz diagnose. how could i interpret moz reports to find out what to fix and how to fix it? Sorry for the long post! ;
Moz Pro | | surgeonsadvisor0 -
Best way to analyze keyword difficulty for 10,000+ keywords?
I've done quite a bit of searching, but can't seem to find a time efficient way to accurately analyze keyword difficulty for large sets of keywords. All of the keyword difficulty tools out there that I've tried are either 1) not accurate 2) slow (like seomoz's kw difficulty tool only allows 5 entries at a time). Can anyone recommend any shortcuts / tools / processes to analyze kw difficulty for large sets of keywords?
Moz Pro | | nicole.healthline1 -
Best Keyword Difficulty Tool?
Hi All, I'm a bit frustrated with the fact that I can only enter 5 words at a time into SEOmoz's keyword difficulty tool. Does anyone know of a better way (or tool) to analyze keyword difficulty for hundreds of keywords?
Moz Pro | | nicole.healthline0 -
Why my competitor have a Page Authority lower then mine, but still in the best position?
Hello Guys, my situation is: I have more Page Autority More Backlinks More Root Autority But my competitor still in a better position then mine! How it´s possible? Tks
Moz Pro | | MarcioMoura0 -
Best Way to Include Social Media in Website?
Hi, how are you doing? I am new to MOZ, totally love it. I recently developed the social media for my page (www.aceromart.com) in Facebook, Google + and Twitter. (I am from Mexico, so the website is in Spanish) I am no expert in SEO whatsoever, but i like to engage my customers with great content both in my page and social media. My question is: **What the best way to include your social media links or icons on my page. Is there a program or a way to include the links. I want the people that visit ** **Should you include them in every page?, in a footer?, with icons or links. ** Thanks in advance for your advices, they are greatly appreciated. Best Regards, Jesus D
Moz Pro | | JesusD0 -
What's the best practice for tracking broad match traffic?
We use the Pro Web App for our keyword/ranking reporting. First, am I correct in assuming that this uses exact match to report the traffic? That being the case, is there a way in Moz (beyond entering endless permutations of our targeted keywords) to track traffic we're getting out of broad match searches? For example, say we optimized for and are tracking the keyword "lambada dancing llamas" for a company called Llarry's Llamas. Let's say that Moz reports little to no traffic for that keyword, but GoogleAnalytics indicates that we've gotten traffic from "larrys dancing llamas", "dancing llamas", "llarry llamas" and so on. So, obviously we're getting broad match traffic out of the lambada llamas, just not a lot of exact match, which is all that the Moz app shows. How do other people track this kind of traffic?
Moz Pro | | MackenzieFogelson0 -
Where is the best SEO Glossary of Terms?
Where do you feel the best existing Glossary of SEO / SEM Terms explained currently resides. (and is there a better way to ask this question?) 🙂
Moz Pro | | iansears0 -
Idea for the Best Method of getting REAL Keyword Search Data
I've been using googles keyword tools to get keyword search data, but I'm pretty sceptical of some of the results it throws out on number of searches. On a number of keywords - particularly when you get to longtail, I've seen results which cannot possibly be right. So - I am trying to find out a way of getting REAL data I can trust. Here are my thoughts on a possible method of getting this key data:
Moz Pro | | James77
1/. Firstly I am taking on the assumption that the adwords campaign monitoring statistics are more reliable and accurate than the keyword research tools - correct me if I am wrong! 2/. Then take a load of keywords you wish to monitor and create didfferent ads for them based of EXACT match. 3/. Make sure non of your adverts conflict with each other, so you may have to turn off any other campaigns you have running. 4/. Put you bids and available spend as high as possible, so that ideally you will your ads will always be shown for every search match, and ideally always come in No1 spot on the ads. IE your aim is to create a neutral environment where your ads are shown for every search match and appear in the exact same position for each search match. Run the campaign for a period of time long enough to be confident that you have enough search data. From this you should have the vital data on keyword searches done on your exact match keywords. 5/. Repeat the test, but this time use phrase matches and again make sure there are no conflicts. 6/. Repeat again with broad match - this would require very careful implimentation not to have any conflicts and you would likely need to make heavy use of the "Not Include" keywords. What are your thoughts on the above process? - Any flaws, or other better solutions? Obviously one key thing with doing this is you need to have to be prepared to have a decent budget to get this data - but it won't be wasted as you will also be getting the adwords traffic. Thanks0