From #2 TO Not Found in top 100 Results, WTF?
-
So my website was #2 for a targeted keyword on google.
(6 months ago: # (3 months ago: #6) (1 week ago: #2).
As you can see, it was moving up nicely, now it's not found on the top 100 search results.
Only appears #2/(B) in the local search section.
Could that be the reason? Websites that appear on the local search no longer appears in the SERP?
-
I agree with this. Seems like a penalty.
-
Hi Jorge, In answer to your question - yes - if your site has not achieved a high blended/local rank (you say you are in the B position) for its core term, it is very common for it to lose its organic rankings. Since around the time of the Venice update, it has become quite rare for a business to have multiple spots on page 1.
Prior to this, it was common for dominant businesses to have a local pack-style ranking as well as 1 or 2 organic spots, all on page one. Now, examples of this are few an far between, though they do exist. There has been some interesting chat about this going around the local sphere. On the one hand, heatmap studies have shown that those blended local results draw eyes to them.
See this great article by our Dr. Pete, here at SEOmoz: www.seomoz.org/blog/eyetracking-google-serps
On the other hand, since Google's removal of the 5 star rating and replacement of it with the Zagat rating, PPC on the side of many SERPs has those gold stars, so heatmaps might look a bit different today than they did in 2011. I have heard tell of several reports of loss impressions/actions for business owners in your position who went from a high organic rank to their organic ranking being subsumed into the local pack. And the whole stars vs. Zagat issue is becoming increasingly noted. Here is an excellent video and article from Matthew Hunt of Small Business Online Coach on this issue that I recommend you check out:
http://www.smallbusinessonlinecoach.com/blog/proof-google-places-zagat-review-lowers-actions/
Now, the truth is that it is still really important to achieve a high blended/local ranking. Most businesses are dying to get into the local pack, so you can feel good about what you've achieved with this. However, the ideal achievement would be to attain one of those rather rare accomplishments of getting both a high local ranking and a high organic one. This is not a well-documented process. Here's a piece from Adam Steele giving some tips about it, but it can be difficult to achieve:
http://www.nightlitemedia.com/2012/05/organic-and-google-places-ranking-on-page-1/
I know one Local SEO who actually offers training on this if you sign up for her complete program and that is Linda Buquet of CatalysteMarketing, so if you discover that getting a double rank on page one is vital to your phones ringing, you might want to consider hiring Linda for training.
Hope this response is helpful!
-
That can't be the reason. Sounds like a site or keyword over-optimization penalty.
-
Hard to say without knowing the domain or the keyword.
Fredrik
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google search operator "site:" show different result.
Search operator "site:" show incomplete information. When I search with just domain name it show only 3 link that got crawl in past week, this is the link https://www.google.com/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=mLr3VfrhN4_BuATQuYugBg&gws_rd=cr&fg=1#q=site:sierralivingconcepts.com&safe=off&tbs=qdr: but when i look a specific link it show them in any time (search tools), https://www.google.com/search?q=site:http://www.sierralivingconcepts.com/p-6300-white-silver-regence-louis-xiv-mango-wood-ornate-hall-console-table.aspx&safe=off&biw=1600&bih=775&noj=1&tbas=0&source=lnt&sa=X&ved=0CBUQpwVqFQoTCJ-4iOLK-McCFQFwjgod43gI9A But when i look in cached page it says "appeared on 11 Sep 2015" I am total confused why google not showing all the new link that it crawl from my site.
Search Behavior | | Sierra-Living-Concepts0 -
Direct 100+ URLs to our sister site?
Hi, We have two websites www.eurekasolutions.co.uk and www.eurekaaddons.co.uk - currently the eurekasolutions site has eureka addon products on it - we are thinking of re-directing these to www.eurekaaddons.co.uk instead (there are 100+ pages which are being ranked and picked up by google) Would it be foolish to re-direct these from eurekasolutions straight to eurekaaddons after them being on eurekasolutions for many many years? if so what is the best way to go about it and would this have a direct negative effect on our SEO? Both sites are serving for similar terms. Thanks,
Search Behavior | | EurekaSolutions0 -
Image ranking in Google but not in Bing and Yahoo search results
Hello, I have one image from my blog post which is ranking well (ranking in first page for all related keywords) in Google web search as well as image search. Getting pretty good visits from the image result itself for past few days. But this image doesn't appear/rank anywhere in Bing and Yahoo search results. Can anyone tell any specific reason for the same? Any methods to follow? Any solution? Please guide me.
Search Behavior | | zco_seo0 -
Has anyone found a best practice for ranking a client who has one central office location, but a large, regional service area that they want to rank for?
All the most recent local search ranking is based upon physical addresses, but what happens when someone provides services and has staff 100 miles from that central office location, but no physical address to work with?
Search Behavior | | BehrDesign0 -
Would you instinctively mistrust a company that has the top 5 or more search listings?
I have seen a few "lucky"(?) companies dominate spots 1-5 of search results. When I see that, I generally go to #6, 7, or even 10 before clicking. My gut reaction is that the company with 1-5 has manipulated content just to pull me in - much like the guys on the streets of NYC or Vegas shoving handbills at you. Is there any evidence/research/poll about the consumer/user reaction when this occurs?
Search Behavior | | AMSVansSEOTeam0 -
Safari Has Top Browser in Google Analytics?
I find this hard to believe but it looks to me as though Safari has jumped ahead as our top browser in the month of January. At first glance I would think it was combining mobile safari with desktop safari numbers but then on the 5th spot I see Safari(in-app) which after looking into could be multiple things from safari mobile, bookmarked pages, or Chrome for ios. Just looking for thoughts on this, are others seeing a large uptick in Safari traffic for desktops?
Search Behavior | | sknott0 -
2 gallerys showing the same images on the one website
Hi, I was Just looking through some of our website and noticed that we have a slide show gallery and when you click on the image it loads onto a light box gallery. would this act a duplicate content as it shows in two different types of displays in the one place. Thanks again
Search Behavior | | Feily0