Large Site - Advice on Subdomaining
-
I have a large news site - over 1 million pages (have already deleted 1.5 million)
Google buries many of our pages, I'm ready to try subdomaining http://bit.ly/dczF5y
There are two types of content - news from our contributors, and press releases.
We have had contracts with the big press release companies going back to 2004/5. They push releases to us by FTP or we pull from their server. These are then processed and published. It has taken me almost 18 months, but I have found and deleted or fixed all the duplicates I can find.
There are now two duplicate checking systems in place. One runs at the time the release comes in and handles most of them. The other one runs every night after midnight and finds a few, which are then handled manually. This helps fine-tune the real-time checker.
Businesses often link to their release on the site because they like us. Sometimes google likes this, sometimes not.
The news we process is reviews by 1,2 or 3 editors before publishing. Some of the stories are 100% unique to us. Some are from contributors who also contribute to other news sites.
Our search traffic is down by 80%. This has almost destroyed us, but I don't give up easily. As I said, I've done a lot of projects to try to fix this. Not one of them has done any good, so there is something google doesn't like and I haven't yet worked it out. A lot of people have looked and given me their ideas, and I've tried them - zero effect.
Here is an interesting and possibly important piece of information:
Most of our pages are "buried" by google. If I dear, even for a headline, even if it is unique to us, quite often the page containing that will not appear in the SERP. The front page may show up, an index page may show up, another strong page pay show up, if that headline is in the top 10 stories for the day, but the page itself may not show up at all - UNTIL I go to the end of the results and redo the search with the "duplicates" included. Then it will usually show up, on the front page, often in position #2 or #3
According to google, there are no manual actions against us. There are also no notices in WMT that say there is a problem that we haven't fixed.
You may tell me just delete all of the PRs - but those are there for business readers, as they always have been. Google supposedly wants us to build websites for readers, which we have always done, What they really mean is - build it the way we want you to do it, because we know best.
What really peeves me is that there are other sites, that they consistently rank above us, that have all the same content as us, and seem to be 100% aggregators, with ads, with nothing really redeeming them as being different, so this is (I think) inconsistent, confusing and it doesn't help me work out what to do next.
Another thing we have is about 7,000+ US military stories, all the way back to 2005. We were one of the few news sites supporting the troops when it wasn't fashionable to do so. They were emailing the stories to us directly, most with photos. We published every one of them, and we still do. I'm not going to throw them under the bus, no matter what happens.
There were some duplicates, some due to screwups because we had multiple editors who didn't see that a story was already published. Also at one time, a system code race condition - entirely my fault, I am the programmer as well as the editor-in-chief. I believe I have fixed them all with redirects.
I haven't sent in a reconsideration for 14 months, since they said "No manual spam actions found" - I don't see any point, unless you know something I don't.
So, having exhausted all of the things I can think of, I'm down to my last two ideas.
1. Split all of the PRs off into subdomains (I'm ready to pull the trigger later this week)
2. Do what the other sites do, that I believe create little value, which is show only a headline and snippet and some related info and link back to the original page on the PR provider website. (I really don't want to do this)
3. Give up on the PRs and delete them all and lose another 50% of the income, which means releasing our remaining staff and upsetting all of the companies and people who linked to us. (Or find them all and rewrite them as stories - tens of thousands of them) and also throw all our alliances under the bus (I really don't want to do this)
There is no guarantee this is the problem, but google won't tell me, the google forums are crap, and nobody else has given me an idea that has helped.
My thought is that splitting them off into subdomains will have a number of effects.
1. Take most of the syndicated content onto subdomains, so its not on the main domain.
2. Shake up the Domain Authority
3. Create a million 301 redirects.
4. Make it obvious to the crawlers what is our news and what is PRs
5. make it easier for Google News to understand
Here is what I plan to do
1. redirect all PRs to their own subdomain.
pn.domain.com for PRNewswire releases
bw.domain.com for Businesswire releases
etc
2. Fix all references so they use the new subdomain
Here are my questions - and I hope you may see something I haven't considered.
1. Do you have any experience of doing this?
2. What was the result
3. Any tips?
4. Should I put PR index pages on the subdomains too? I was originally planning to keep them on the main domain, with the individual page links pointing to the actual release on the subdomain. Obviously, I want them only in one place, but there are two types of these index pages.
a) all of the releases for a particular PR company - these certainly could be on the subdomain and not on the main domain
b) Various category index pages - agriculture, supermarkets, mining etc These would have to stay on the main domain because they are a mixture of different PR providers.
5. Is this a bad idea?
I'm almost out of ideas. Should I add a condensed list of everything I've done already?
If you are still reading, thanks for hanging in.
-
I am ready to shout "NO" anytime I see anyone talking about using a subdomain... but you have made me consider it.
I have a site (not nearly as large as yours) that has a lot of press releases given to us by government agencies and industry sites. (These are not SEO press releases, they are from people who have a message to get out.) For a few years these were about 2/3 of the content that we published. They ranked really well - often above the original source and we added a bit of unique commentary to each of them.
In October '11 we took a Panda hit. Fortunately we simply dropped a couple positions on tons of pages - not a huge loss like some people see.
To escape we did noindex / follow to the most popular releases and threw the rest overboard. That cut off search traffic (which hit our income) but kept the content on our site for visitors. Google rankings returned partially a couple months later and then a couple months after that everything was back to normal - but income was down a little.
After reading your post, I am thinking about starting a subdomain for these press releases. Hopefully that will isolate the main site from any damage that the duplicate content might cause and allow them to pull a little traffic from search.
About "index pages".... If I do this I will keep them on my main site because most of my content is there (my own unique content). Since Panda I have become highly selective about which press releases I publish and they are now a minority of new content.
Thanks for the idea.
Good luck with your site.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Rel-nofollow for price comparison site?
I run a price comparison site, so we have TONS of outbound links. Should my outbound links be marked with 'rel=nofollow'?
On-Page Optimization | | lancerpanz0 -
Page Speed Insights for www and non www sites
I'm testing a client site for speed and I'm getting different results when I test www and non www. What's causing this from the same site? Non www scored 37/100 for mobile, very concerning www scored 54/100 for mobile, still problems but not as severe Can anyone shed any light on this please?
On-Page Optimization | | Marketing_Optimist0 -
Best way to get the fastest WordPress site with existing template
I have a WordPress website that I started building for free and eventually paid the $50 bucks for the premium version. My goal right now is to increase the speed. The current speed rating for the site on Google Insights is 60/100 for mobile and 66/100 for desktop. I have used some plugins to help me increase the speed, but the previous number were the best I could do. How can I get this site at least into the 90/100 range? Should I buy another template, or can I hire someone to go through and optimize it. I would like the best option that is as cost effective as possible as this is a hobby site for me. Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | FierceFrame1 -
Your tactics on improving organic search for a site in a struggling industry
We work with a client of ours with organic search initiatives. The problem is: the industry (e.g. the core of the business) is sagging. It has been for a couple of years. And they're finally feeling these sagging losses. Google Trends support this and shows it quite nicely. It pretty much mirrors organic search referrals as well. The industry (e.g. the core phrase that the company and its competitors have historically hit very hard) as well as Google Trends for the client (middle of the pack) and their two big competitors are attached. Wondering if anyone else has had this type of circumstance with their clients and some of their go to tactics that helped them stop the skid (and even make it start going up). Thanks SpztkvF.png LPHGo76.png
On-Page Optimization | | ChristianMKG0 -
What is the most common problem to be solved when optimizing web sites?
ON page - What is the most common problem to be solved when optimizing web sites?
On-Page Optimization | | JordanBrown0 -
Is it worth De-duplicating a large e-commerce website?
Hi all, Most e-commerce websites use the same product description as the manufacturers. We know duplicate content is a huge negative for SEO. We are thinking about de-duplicating ours but our website is so big - it has tens of thousands of products. To de-duplicate it would require a ton of resources. Do you think it's worth it to go ahead de-duplicate our website? Do you have a website where de-duplication was done and did you see any positive result? (if so, did you see a certain percentage increase?) Thank you in advance
On-Page Optimization | | truckguy770 -
Linking within Secondary Site
So we've got a secondary site that has quite a bit of authority & links that used to have all types of info on parasailing. All those pages are gone and homepage is now a salespage (management decision, not mine) Our main site sells a wide range of tours and activities and does have a page for parasailing. The secondary site uses the same template/navigation as our main site (again, not my decision). Do you think that's an effective way to send link juice to our main site? The secondary site has some pretty awesome high authority sites linking to it. I've considered 301'ing the whole site to our main site but it's got a really solid domain name and I'd like to take up 2 SERP listings (main and secondary site) Is there a better way to have double listings but still send a good amount of link juice?
On-Page Optimization | | SoulSurfer80 -
How deep should I go with a directory site?
I am creating a new site which has a directory component. Based on what I have ready I am inclined to keep the site architecture as flat as possible. However, the natural layout that I have come up with in my head has the directory listings 5 or 6 pages deep in the site structure. I saw in another post that someone in a similar situation was suggesting that going deep like this is fine so long as there are many internal links to the deeper pages to indicate that they are important. Should I make a conscious effort to make the site architecture as flat as possible? Are there any specific guides/resources that address this particular issue that I should be aware of? Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | fastestmanalive0