Will links to www and none www result in penalty?
-
Hello all,
Normally i redirect my www to none www to avoid the potential of duplicate content and as its typically something that is done in SEO.
I don't have access to the site of the company I am working for at the moment as everything related to the sites code goes through the web developer.
At the moment the site lives at www and none www and one does not redirect to the other. I have been building links (organically as we engage on a few forums and blogs) to the www as that is how it is linked internally already and how links from the job boards we post on link.
We do however have some natural none www links and my concern is that since the site isn't redirected that it is being penalised or could become penalised because of this.
I imagine that it isn't a serious penalty if one at all but I would rather know so I can try and get it sorted as fast as possible.
Thanks.
-
Thanks for the reply. The WWW has the most links and the http has very few. I was mainly worried about the vulnerability of this structure and the risk the website faces from negative seo.
It should be sorted in the coming weeks but for now I'm stuck with it on both.
Thanks
-
i am glad it helped :}
cheers
-
Hi Luke,
You are not going to face penalty from search engine for these issue. I have the same issue with my client but I have Google webmaster access of each site. I download all duplicate html then forward to client to aware them of this issue. Most of the client provide me access after checking too many duplication errors. But if I don't get access, I check backlink profile of both version and continue my seo effort on version which has more backlink.
Hope this help you out....
-
Thanks for the reply and the clarification. I know that as mentioned it should use one or the other but your input has helped me with determining my stance on the issue.I'm guessing that there's no solid facts on this in regards to a penalty.
-
Hello Luke,
I don't believe there would be anytype of penalty for such an issue, but yes you should finalize which domain should you use www or non www and put a 301 redirect on it.
It will prevent duplicated content issue in google and will also flow the incoming link juice to that one domain name instead of the current division of two as i see.
Hope this helps.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Avoid too many internal links
My site is being flagged in Page Optimization Score for "Avoid too many internal links", but the warning doe snot tell me how many internal links are on a page. How can I find this?
Technical SEO | | Zambezikid0 -
Some results disappeares after a while
Hi every body i have a strange issue with my search results in google. i noticed some of my results are disappeared after a while! there are no notifications or messages in webmaster tools just my results get lost! for example when my URL (zomorodgasht.com) take a good place with a keyword's result for some days (page 2 or 3) but after a while that will gone for good in all pages! there is no results anymore in any pages! can you help me please what's the problem with google? i'm so stressed about this results. PS 1: my google webmaster is totally clean and every thing is fine. and of course my "search analytics" positioned the missing keywords in page 2 or 3 but i can't find them! google is showing wrong analytics results!!! some my results are totally gone. PS 2: all of my url's are truly submitted and showing in google there is no removed pages or results. just some keywords are gone after a while. best regards
Technical SEO | | ZomorodGasht0 -
Www to non www on a .com/blog url
hi guys, I have had to reset my site from www to non-www. via htacces and this worked out just fine.However, the /blog WordPress section will not redirect to the non-www. I have changed the config.php to non-www. However, the /blog WordPress section will not redirect to the non-www. I have changed the config.php to non-www. Does anyone have an idea as to what I need to do to force the non-www in a folder installed blog http://5starweddingdirectory.com/ http://www.5starweddingdirectory.com/blog/ Regards T
Technical SEO | | Taiger0 -
Crawl depth and www
I've run a crawl on a popular amphibian based tool, just wanted to confirm... should http://www.homepage be at crawl depth 0 or 1? The audit shows http://homepage at level 0 and http://www.homepage at level 1 through a redirect. Thanks
Technical SEO | | Focus-Online-Management0 -
Should we rel=nofollow these links ?
On our website, we have a section of free to low-cost tools that could help small business increase their productivity without spending big bucks. For example, this is the page for online collaboration tools: http://www.bdc.ca/EN/solutions/smart_tech/tech_advice/free_low_cost_applications/Pages/online_collaboration_tools.aspx None of the company pay anything to be on these list. We actually do quite a lot of research to chose which should be listed there and which should not. Recently, one of the company in our lists asked us to add rel=nofollow to the link to their website because they add been targeted by a manual action on Google and want their link profile to be as clean as possible (probably too clean). My question is : Should we add rel=nofollow to all these links ? Thanks, Jean-François Monfette
Technical SEO | | jfmonfette0 -
Toxic Link Removal
Greetings Moz Community: Recently I received an site audit from a MOZ certified SEO firm. The audit concluded that technically the site did not have major problems (unique content, good architecture). But the audit identified a high number of toxic links. Out of 1,300 links approximately 40% were classified as suspicious, 55% as toxic and 5% as healthy. After identifying the specific toxic links, the SEO firm wants to make a Google disavow request, then manually request that the links be removed, and then make final disavow request of Google for the removal of remaining bad links. They believe that they can get about 60% of the bad links removed. Only after the removal process is complete do they think it would be appropriate to start building new links. Is there a risk that this strategy will result in a drop of traffic with so many links removed (even if they are bad)? For me (and I am a novice) it would seem more prudent to build links at the same time that toxic links are being removed. According to the SEO firm, the value of the new links in the eyes of Google would be reduced if there were many toxic links to the site; that this approach would be a waste of resources. While I want to move forward efficiently I absolutely want to avoid a risk of a drop of traffic. I might add that I have not received any messages from Google regarding bad links. But my firm did engage in link building in several instances and our traffic did drop after the Penguin update of April 2012. Also, is there value in having a professional SEO firm remove the links and build new ones? Or is this something I can do on my own? I like the idea of having a pro take care of this, but the costs (Audit, coding, design, content strategy, local SEO, link removal, link building, copywriting) are really adding up. Any thoughts??? THANKS,
Technical SEO | | Kingalan1
Alan0 -
Site links show spam
Hi folks, I'm working on a website that runs on WordPress and was not updated by the owner, this has resulted in a malware injection and now when you search the companies name in Google, the site links appear with words like Viagra, et al. I've seen this a number of times, so I went through the code and have removed all the malware. I presume I now have to wait for Google to recrawl the website and update the site links? Is there anything else I should be doing to speed up the process? Thank you 🙂
Technical SEO | | ChristopherM0 -
Duplicate Homepage: www.mysite.com/ and www.mysite.com/default.aspx
Hi, I have a question regarding our client's site, http://www.outsolve-hr.com/ on ASP.net. Google has indexed both www.outsolve-hr.com/ and www.outsolve-hr.com/default.aspx creating a duplicate content issue. We have added
Technical SEO | | flarson
to the default.aspx page. Now, because www.outsolve-hr.com/ and www.outsolve-hr.com/default.aspx are the same page on the actual backend the code is on the http://www.outsolve-hr.com/ when I view the code from the page loaded in a brower. Is this a problem? Will Google penalize the site for having the rel=canonical on the actual homepage...the canonical url. We cannot do a 301 redirect from www.outsolve-hr.com/default.aspx to www.outsolve-hr.com/ because this causes an infinite loop because on the backend they are the same page. So my question is two-fold: Will Google penalize the site for having the rel=canonical on the actual homepage...the canonical url. Is the rel="canonical" the best solution to fix the duplicate homepage issue on ASP. And lastly, if Google has not indexed duplicate pages, such as https://www.outsolve-hr.com/DEFAULT.aspx, is it a problem that they exist? Thanks in advance for your knowledge and assistance. Amy0