Please help me with your advice
-
Hi all,
Couple years ago I started to build my business based on EMD domain. The intention was to create the source with the rich unique content.
After a year of hard work the site achieved top 10 in Google and started to generate good amount of leads.
Then Google announced the EMD Update and site lost the 90% of traffic (after Pandas updates our SERP was steady )
“ a new filter that tries to ensure that low-quality sites don’t rise high in Google’s search results simply because they have search terms in their domain names. ”
But I don’t consider my site low-quality site, every page, every post is 100% unique and has been created only to share the knowledge with others…
The site has EXCELLENT content from industry point of view....
Since the “ EMD Update “ I read hundreds , hundreds of different articles and opinions related to EMD update and finally I am confused and lost.
What should I do…
• Kill the site and start new one
• Get more links, but what type of links and how I should get them
• Keep hoping and pray....
• Or do something elsePlease help me with your advice
-
Thank you...I will appreciate if you will give me 10 mins of your time....i sent site to your PM
-
I have a post on the subject here - it's very long, because it's a complex subject:
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/duplicate-content-in-a-post-panda-world
We're not saying this is definitely the problem - just that you should be aware of how complicated it can get. Unfortunately, it's hard to tell without really looking at the site. A lot can happen to hurt a site's rankings, and the EMD update was just one piece of the puzzle.
-
But Panda...as far as know looking for duplicate content....and we are very careful with that for all our sites....Content is 100 unique and never been spinned, written by humans....
so i am confused more...
This is the article by M.Cutts I remeber i read it
date 3 october 2012....
after that day our site started to loose the trafic...not in 1 night but slowly..slowly...than
up to mid nov 2012 it lost about 65% ..this is why i have concluded from the begging that it was EMD -
Ah! I was thinking it was end of September because you said you were a casualty of EMD. If this happened mid November then it's definitely not EMD.
There were Panda updates November 5 and November 21. If the drop doesn't coincide with those dates then it is not due to a major algorithm change. (By major I mean Panda/Penguin as Google is constantly tweaking the algorithm.)
-
all top 10 positions were dropped in mid of november 2012.
I said 90 % ...i think the statment has been exaggerated....but 65% for sure -
The thing is that if you lost 90% of your traffic at the end of September (i.e. Sept 27/28) then the issue is very likely either EMD or Panda. If you have a good site with 300 well written unique pages then in my mind EMD is almost impossible. So, I would go investigating Panda issues. Duplicate and thin content are the top culprits but there can be other factors.
There are other possibilities though including a change in urls, DNS problems, hosting problems, malware issues, robots.txt problems, accidentally noindexing, a competitor ramping up their SEO etc. etc.
If the traffic drop was a little later, like October 5 then Penguin is a possibility. Penguin is related to overoptimized anchor text in your backlinks among other things.
Sometimes when a site is affected on a Panda date but doesn't seem to have Panda issues it is possible that sites linking to your site were affected by Panda and as such you have lost some of your link juice. But it is unlikely that 90% of your traffic would go because of this.
-
the site got only unique urls, by pages i meant urls too
-
I will appreciate if you will explain it bit more in details....
-
Keep in mind, too, that a lot of duplicate content is accidental. Google doesn't care about pages, per se - they care about unique URLs. So, if you have 300 unique pages, but something about your CMS translates that into 5,000 crawlable URLs, then you could definitely have problems.
-
I really appreciate your knowledge , but the site has nothing to do with Panda as it got 300 pages with unique and well written content
-
The number of unique pages doesn't really matter when it comes to Panda. You could have 300 unique pages, but if there are also 50 pages of copied content then this can trigger Panda.
But the other question I had was about thin content. An example of thin content would be a page that has say, a product photo, a bunch of template text that is the same from page to page a few ads and then only 1 or 2 lines of text.
Another example of a thin page would be if you had a section of definitions and each one had its own page. They could possibly be considered thin.
-
If this is really related to the EMD update, then I'd agree with Charles - starting over is a bad idea. My best guess is that the EMD update wasn't a penalty, per se - it was more like Google lowered the volume on EMDs. In other words, having one isn't bad now - it's just that it's not as good as it used to be. There's no way to fix that really (you can't turn the volume back up), but the risks of switching domains would probably far outweigh the benefits.
To back up Marie, though, a lot happened right around the EMD update, and it's really tough to diagnose. I'd definitely look at Panda factors, like "thin" content. Try to look at the site from Google's POV - what you view as unique doesn't matter, frankly. You could be spinning out URL-based duplicates, for example, and not realize it - that's more of a technical SEO issue (you're not doing anything devious, but the site may still be giving Google problems).
The other issue to consider is whether your EMD has caused you to really pile on exact-match anchor text, especially keyword-loaded anchor text. This could trigger Penguin or similar problems. This is often correlated with EMDs, even though it wouldn't necessarily be a result of the EMD update.
If they've really just turned down the "volume", then you have to get other ranking factors in play - build more relevant, authoritative links, increase your social signals, etc. In other words, focus on aspects of SEO beyond simple on-page ranking factors.
-
Hi Maire, thanks for your answer site got over 300 unique pages...
-
When EMD hit on September 28, I asked for people to send me domains that had been affected so that I could see if there were any patterns. I had over 100 domains sent to me and the vast majority of them actually had Panda issues. Then, a few days after EMD, Google announced that they had also done a Panda refresh on September 27.
In all of the domains that I analyzed I would say that one of them was likely a true EMD candidate. This was a one page site with very little content and several affiliate links. It previously was ranking well for a competitive niche. The only reason it was ranking well was because of its domain name. EMD was designed to take the ranking benefit away from sites that ONLY ranked because they had keywords in their domain name. It doesn't punish a site simply because there are keywords in the domain name.
You've mentioned that your pages are 100% unique. Do you have thin pages? If you have a section of your site that has pages with very little content on the page then this can cause Panda to affect you. But there are other possible reasons as well.
-
Thanks Charles for your time...
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Probably basic, but how to use image Title and Alt Text - and confusing advice from Moz!
I've been doing SEO on my business's site for years and have got good results. I've always used image Titles and Alt Text text. Our blog posts are image-intensive, often with 100-200 pictures (not surprising since we're photographers). For any given blog post, I've tended to have a uniform image Title for each image and then a more specialised Alt Text tag giving a description. A typical image on one of our blog posts would be like this: Image filename: wedding-photography-at-so-and-so-venue-001.jpg .... 002, 003 etc Image Title Attribute: Wedding Photography at So-And-So-Venue by Our-Company-Name - this would be the same for every image in the blog post. Alternative Text: Bride and groom exchanging vows during wedding ceremony at so-and-so-venue - this would be tailed for each image. So my question is - is this right? The Moz help page for image SEO is actually incorrect in one aspect: https://moz.com/ugc/10-tips-for-optimizing-your-images-for-search "Alt text (short for “alternative text”) is used to highlight the identity of an image when you hover over it with your mouse cursor. It also shows as text to all users when there are problems rendering the image." This is not the case. Hovering over the image in Firefox, Chrome, Edge and Opera ALL display the Image Title, NOT Alt Text. Thoughts?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | robandsarahgillespie0 -
Please Help me! I need advice for my website
I have 2 Domains with the same name vps nine and vpsn ine with same content. How to solve that problem? Do I need to change the content from my main website. My Hosting is having different plans, but with the same features. So many pages were having the same content, and it is not possible to change the content, what is the solution for that? Please let me know how to solve that issue?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Alexa.Hill0 -
Can adding "noindex" help with quality penalizations?
Hello Moz fellows, I have another question about content quality and Panda related penalization. I was wondering this: If I have an entire section of my site that has been penalized due to thin content, can adding "noindex,follow" to all pages belonging to that section help de-penalizing the rest of the site in the short term, while we work to improve those penalized pages, which is going to take a long time? Can that be considered a "short term solution" to improve the overall site scoring on Google index while we work to improve those penalized pages, and, once ready, we remove the "noindex" tag? I am eager to know your thoughts on this possible strategy. Thank you in advance to everyone!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | fablau0 -
Looking for SEO advice on Negative SEO attack. Technical SEO
please see this link https://www.dropbox.com/s/thgy57zmmwzodcp/Screenshot 2016-05-31 13.25.23.png?dl=0 you can see my domain is getting tons of chinese spam. I have 410'd the page but it still keeps coming.. 7tnawRV
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | mattguitar990 -
Manual Penalty Reconsideration Request Help
Hi All, I'm currently in the process of creating a reconsideration request for an 'Impact Links' manual penalty. So far I have downloaded all LIVE backlinks from multiple sources and audited them into groups; Domains that I'm keeping (good quality, natural links). Domains that I'm changing to No Follow (relevant good quality links that are good for the user but may be affiliated with my company, therefore changing the links to no follow rather than removing). Domains that I'm getting rid of. (poor quality sites with optimised anchor text, directories, articles sites etc.). One of my next steps is to review every historical back link to my website that is NO LONGER LIVE. To be thorough, I have planned to go through every domain (even if its no longer linking to my site) that has previously linked and straight up disavow the domain (if its poor quality).But I want to first check whether this is completely necessary for a successful reconsideration request? My concerns are that its extremely time consuming (as I'm going through the domains to avoid disavowing a good quality domain that might link back to me in future and also because the historical list is the largest list of them all!) and there is also some risk involved as some good domains might get caught in the disavowing crossfire, therefore I only really want to carry this out if its completely necessary for the success of the reconsideration request. Obviously I understand that reconsideration requests are meant to be time consuming as I'm repenting against previous SEO sin (and believe me I've already spent weeks getting to the stage I'm at right now)... But as an in house Digital Marketer with many other digital avenues to look after for my company too, I can't justify spending such a long time on something if its not 100% necessary. So overall - with a manual penalty request, would you bother sifting through domains that either don't exist anymore or no longer link to your site and disavow them for a thorough reconsideration request? Is this a necessary requirement to revoke the penalty or is Google only interested in links that are currently or recently live? All responses, thoughts and ideas are appreciated 🙂 Kind Regards Sam
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Sandicliffe0 -
Advice on URL structure for competing against EMDs of a hot keyword
Here is the question, illustrated with an example: A law client focuses on personal injury. Their domain is nondescript. The question comes into the URL structure for an article section of the site (I think I know what most people here will say, but want to raise this anyway). This section will have several hundred 'personal injury' articles at launch, with 100+ added each month by writers. Most articles do not mention 'personal injury' in the titles or in the content, but focus on the many areas in which people can hurt themselves :-). Spreading a single keyword emphasis across many pages/posts is considered poor form by many, but the counter-argument is that hundreds of articles, all with 'personal injury' in the URL, could increase the overall authority of the site for that term (and may compete more strongly with EMD competitors). For instance, let's say Competitor A has this article: www.acmepersonalinjury.com/articles/tips-if-in-car-accident And we had the following options: Option A: www.baddomain.com/articles/tips-if-in-car-accident Option B: www.baddomain.com/personal-injury-articles/tips-if-in-car-accident Of course, for the term "car accident", Option A seems on equal footing with the ACME competitor. But, what about the overall performance of the "personal injury" keyword (a HOT keyword in this space)? Would ACME always have an advantage (however slight) due to its domain? Would Option B help in this regard? The downside of course is that this pushes "car accident" further down in the URL string, making all articles perhaps less competitive on their individual keywords.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | warpsmith0 -
How a press release can help with Google serp?
Hi, After publishing a press release, if that press release is on top position on Google News for the keyword, how will it effect the SERP for that website?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | purplar0 -
Please I need some optimism for this (not provided)
Does anyone see this getting any better. It is getting absolutely ridiculous and almost to the point where it looks like soon analytics will be pointless! Can Rand pull some connects and tell Google - Hey Camon! This is ridiculous, we need to see at least a little bit more of these! notprovided.jpg
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | imageworks-2612900