Seo results are down. Is my "all in one seo pack" to blame?
-
My website www.noobtraveler.com has shown a dip of 40% since Penguin's last update in November. I also transferred hosting at time, but I was wondering if I'm over optimizing with the all in one seo pack.
I would appreciate it if someone could do a quick sweep and share their thoughts.
Thanks!
-
You have a huge amount of high DA links, specifically from boardingarea, hyatt blogs and appsumo. You need to build a better link profile, not focus so much on 3 sites with high DA, and get links more naturally as often as possible. Almost every link on your OSE is a "controlled" link - blog comments, profiles, appsumo pages, etc.
These links are bad by themselves - they're actually good. But because they're such a high percentage of what you have as a whole, it can look to Google like you're not really all that popular except to 3 sites.
You have 1850 links on OSE from 46 domains - about 35 links per domain, a LOT. Also, nearly 100% of your anchor text is branded. That tells me you're controlling it. If I can see you're controlling the anchor text, Google can see it. Again, diversity is best.
202 of your 1850 links are nofollow, 1650 are dofollow. As before, a high ratio of nofollow signals spam or controlled link building. Natural nofollow profiles have 5-10% nofollow ratios, yours is 16% which is a touch high.
So I would start with your actual link profile. It's not likely AIOSEO unless you're doubling up on titles and meta, you should be ok.
Also, when you pin things, don't use the non-www version of your site. Several of your pins have "http://noobtraveler.com" instead of www-noobtraveler.com I would be as consistent as possible on that particular issue.
-
The All in One SEO Pack plugin is pretty good and used quite widely among WordPress-based websites. It focuses on on-site optimization including keywords/density, appropriate linking, canonical URLs, and the like.
Use of this plugin should not cause a 40% drop in traffic (you didn't say what you mean by a "dip", but I assume you mean traffic or search traffic).
Such a significant drop in traffic after the Penguin update is more likely to be related to what Google is perceiving as non-organic backlinks, including paid links or link exchanges. If you engaged in such practices, it would be best to work on removing those backlinks, including the link disavowal tool if you can't have them removed.
-
Hi Geoff,
Id start by doing a website crawl and utilizing SEOmozs excellent toolset: http://www.seomoz.org/tools. Your questions is a rather general: will you do an audit of my site issue. Which many of the people on this board do for livings. You are better off asking specific questions. As people can answer those and best practice recs.
The All-in-one SEO pack has limitations but is overall usually pretty decent for a basic WordPress website with low to medium competition thresholds.
If you believe you were hit by penguin I would recommend checking your backlink profile and disavowing any nefarious links.
-Phil
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Any SEO disadvantages with creating pages under a directory page which doesn't exists?
Hi, Let's say we are going to create pages in the URL path www.website.com/directory/sub-pages/. In case this page www.website.com/directory/ doesn't exists or redirected; will the pages created in this URL path like stated above have any issues in-terms of SEO? We will link these pages from somewhere in the website and planning to redirect the /directory/ to homepage. Suggestions please.
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz1 -
Homepage alone dropped for one "keyword"
Hi Moz community, Our websites has dropped almost 50 positions for main keyword and Okay with other keywords. Other pages are doing consistent for other keywords. We haven't made any changes in website. What could be reason this ideal scenario of homepage dropping for main keyword. And recent unconfirmed algo update have anything do with this? Thnaks
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz0 -
What is the new / current google algorithm update targeting and how to adapt / fix SEO approach accordingly ?
Over the past c. 3 weeks our average Google SERP rankings for a site have been as follows : week 1 : average 3rd in SERP week 2 : average 1st in SERP week 3 : average 7th in SERP Reading on sites including Moz, SEO Roundtable and looking at Moz's mozcast tool it seems there is allot of change going on with Google's algorithm at the moment. Is there a general consensus as to what the new algorithm update is targeting so that we can adapt our site / marketing accordingly ? Or is it too early to adapt ? When Google rolls out an update like this is it common to see fluctuations as they try out things or if we are currently down in the rankings should we take action now. I know there a tools that look at your google analytics data an overlay a list of major google updates such a penguin and panda, but from what ive read this is a generic algorithm change rather than a defined named update.
Algorithm Updates | | jpeg800 -
Case Sensitive URL Redirects for SEO
We want to use a 301 redirect rule to redirect all pages to a lower case url format. A 301 passes along most of the link juice... most. Will we even see a negative impact in PageRank/SERPS when we redirect every single page on our site?
Algorithm Updates | | tcanders0 -
Any benefit to splitting up links from one company to diff pages?
We are the presenting sponsor for this big event in our area (Chasco Fiesta). As part of being their sponsor, their website has linked to us in five different places on their site. But it's all to our homepage. Would there be any benefit to having them link to other pages on our site instead of just our homepage (assuming the other pages are a reasonable expectation for the user, of course)? Thanks, Ruben
Algorithm Updates | | KempRugeLawGroup0 -
How local is local SEO?
If I manage get a client ranked for a localised organic search term on a county level. For example: "keyword - West Midlands" or "keyword - Hertfordshire" How high will the website rank for all the cities and districts within that county? I am going to give this a go but I was wondering if anyone else has had any experience with this?
Algorithm Updates | | Adnan.Hassan.Khan0 -
New visual search results - what is this and how do we optimize for it?
Hi all, This morning as I am doing some keyword research for a new client, I typed in the phrase and Google returned both the listings as well as a vertical photo bar. I've never seen this before. Is this new? Is it common and I've just missed it? I presume this means we need to really have our photo alt tags 'ducks in a row' but I'm also wondering if this points to an increased importance on visual content? Image attached. Thanks, YINd14d
Algorithm Updates | | EricOliver0 -
Video SEO <video:uploader>sitemap optional tag for Google+</video:uploader>
Anyone know the specifics or using the video:uploaderoptional tag for Google+ for rel=”author” attribution. for video sitemap?</video:uploader> Related post has some info, but no specific example. http://www.distilled.net/blog/video/getting-video-results-in-google/ Quote from above link: "Good practice is to ensure that the
Algorithm Updates | | Packetman007
video:uploaderelement links to a Google+ profile or a blog profile
page with rel=”author” attribution. "</video:uploader> This is what it seems it should look like in the video sitemap: <video:uploader info="<a href=" https:="" plus.google.com="" 111123738944093379428"="" target="_blank">https://plus.google.com/111123738944093379428">Bill
Alderson</video:uploader> If you know this works and is worth editing video sitmaps to add the optional tag, let me know your experience. Alternately, my site (and each page, thanks to Yoast SEO for WP) does have the rel="author" linked to Google+ for every page, which may make the sitemap entry moot, but I have not yet seen this work in that manner. If you know it does or does not work, please let me know. Please let me know if you have any better information or specific experience. Also, if I elect to edit my sitemaps (provided by Wistia.com and BitsontheRun) to include this tag, what XML Sitemap Tool might work well to add these tags properly? Seems there is lots of XML Sitemap tools, but few really address Video Sitemap options specifically. Thanks, Bill@apalytics.com www.apalytics.com0