Inbound Spam Links
-
We've held Local listings at "A" for over a year.
2 weeks ago we dropped down to below the fold.
I ran several reports and our backlink report shows roughly over 10,000
and it's growing every day along with new domain referrals with
inbound spam links all using the same core anchor text term.
One domain is responsible for over 2,000. These sites
have Nothing to do with our industry and several in foreign
languages.
All these links are "NoFollow".
My question is. Although "nofollow" is known to protect you, I'm wondering with over 10,000 of them coming from 345 sites, ALL using our one core term as an anchor text has red flagged us? If so,I'm planning on using Google disavow at the "domain" level.
We are a local resort and until this happened we only had around 15 referral sites that are industry related. Hotels.com type sites and local tourist related sites.
These new inbound spam links are so blatant and yes they're "nofollow", but I'm starting to wonder IF this off the wall inbound spam link pattern IS indeed affecting us?
Any thoughts?
-
My gut reaction is the same as Marie's - it doesn't sound like a typical negative SEO approach. It seems more likely that a past SEO attempt by a 3rd party went farther then you thought or got spread/duplicated somehow. Unfortunately, there's virtually no way to tell who created a link (let alone why).
If many of these are coming from just a few domains, I'd also recommend using the disavow tool. I do agree with James that these links could potentially harm you, even no-followed.
I'd look for any common clues as to who might be leaving these comments, though. I'd just want to make absolutely sure it's not someone operating on your behalf. I've seen that way too many times in the past.
-
Hmmm. I don't know. Hopefully someone else can figure out why you would have so many nofollowed links from iffy domains. I'll be watching this thread.
-
I've been looking around the web and a couple of places it says that when google
disavows they apply a "nofollow". If indeed this is the case, we're already "nofollowed" up the yen yang.
Do they apply a "nofollow"?
-
Back in 08 or 09 I purchased 2 link wheels, a couple of months apart, but how would that keep producing forever backlinks? They're not backlink generators. The were for anchor text links.
I got reports back for each assignment and they were all English websites
with an article post for us with our anchor textI've been aware of backlink generators for years, but didn't go there.
So to answer your question build X number of links for $$...Nope
-
Listening to Matt Cutts, I would approach this by putting together a disavow file:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=HWJUU-g5U_I#!
You can also reach out to the Google Webmaster team:
https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/spamreport?hl=en
But, I wouldn't draw their attention if some of the spam links were self inflicted.
-
Thanks for sending me the url and the links. I don't have an answer as to what is going on, but I have a couple of theories.
I looked at a few of the spammy pages linking to you and they all seem to be nofollowed comment links. They are hidden by css. And they are there along with hundreds of other sites who have anchor texted links.
Are you absolutely sure you never purchased a "build x number of links for $100" type of package? That could populate links like that.
I wondered if it was some type of a malware thing where hackers place a script on your site and then link to it several times, but your site is clean according to sucuri and I don't see any strange script. Plus, it doesn't make sense that the hacker would link to you with anchor text. I see links for a couple of anchor texted terms.
If I were you I would disavow these links. I would use the domain: operator and hopefully you can get the majority of them. I personally wouldn't file for reconsideration given that you haven't been dealt a manual penalty. If you have suffered algorithmically because of the number of anchor texted links (which would surprise me because they are nofollowed) then this will resolve itself without you filing for reconsideration. It's not Penguin because you would have seen a dramatic drop October 5.
If the drop is indeed because of the links, then over the next couple of weeks as Google disavows them you should see a rise again. I'll be interested to hear if that happens.
-
I sent PM.
Looks like Google slowly started "discovering" these in Nov and started to peak in Dec
-
According to the report, these links started slowly this past Nov.
No problems with Panda or Penguin. We dropped 2 weeks ago.
Links aren't coming from directories, they'll all websites.
The only thing I've done as far as backlinks go was back in
2007 or 8 I published some articles and a couple of press releases and
yes it did use our core term as the anchor text
No email warning from Google in WMT, but from what I understand the only time
you get one is when the site is manually reviewed by a human as to an automatic algorithm adjustment. Don't know if this is actually true or not.
-
I'm curious about these links. Can you p.m. me your url? I'd love to have a look.
-
I'm going to respectfully disagree about this being a negative SEO campaign. If someone was going to go to the trouble to negative SEO you, why would they build 10,000 nofollow links?
When you disavow a link, what Google essentially does is add a nofollow to it in their algorithm.
Unnatural links issues and Penguin issues happen to sites that have built links in order to manipulate pagerank. That's not going to happen with nofollowed links.
But hey, you did lose rankings, so perhaps I could be wrong? Did your rankings start to drop on a Penguin day (last one was Oct 5)? Did you have a manual warning of unnatural links in WMT? If not, then I really guess that this is not any sort of negative SEO campaign.
So why do you have so many anchor texted links pointing to you? Have you ever used a backlinking service? Sometimes these can keep populating links. Have you ever used an auto directory submitter?
There's no harm in using the disavow tool on these new links just to be sure, but my guess is that it won't make a huge difference.
-
Don't think that - that thought hasn't cross my mind, but the "nofollow" doesn't make sense for negative SEO, useless, if this IS the case, they didn't get what they paid for to really crush us with "follow" links.
This started this past Dec and caught up to us 2 weeks ago.
I"m amazed we're not banished with this off the wall link/domain/anchor text ratio. Maybe the "nofollow" is saving us so far.
As mentioned, my plan is to do a Google disavow at the domain level.
We got 6 New domains since yesterday, so this is going to be an ongoing task, since it started 2 1/2 months ago, I don't see it stopping anytime soon
Forgot to mention. When I go to these links I can't find us ANYWHERE. Not for our term that's listed in report nor our domain
-
I think it may be hurting you b/c even though the links aren't passing link juice they are likely still messing up your anchor text distribution. This sounds like a case of negative SEO by a competitor.
What is your plan of action?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Should I ask sites that link to me to update links that redirect?
I have found some links to my site that go through a single 301 redirect to get to my site. Should I contact these websites to ask them to update the link, or is that not worth the time?
Link Building | | RCF0 -
Removing spam back links (Using GWM and SEOMOZ)
Hi, I have noticed that I have got some unwanted spammy back-links. I want to get rid of them. From what I read on Internet, there are two ways to doing it. Using disavow tool in GWM. Contacting individual webmaster and asking them to remove the mentions or links. I have already added the links in the disavow tool and Google has accepted the request. Is it necessary to ask those webmasters to remove the link as well?
Link Building | | tradestreet0 -
Bearshare links?
I am doing competitor link research and so far 4 of the 4 have had links from search.bearshare.net What kind of site is this? I am sure it isn't valuable but I can't figure out how it is getting crawled.
Link Building | | EcommerceSite0 -
Linking to sites that link to porn or casinos, my site getting penalized?
I have some link exchanges with some sites to get web traffic but when i ran the bad neighborhood link checker, i found that one site links to some casinos and another site has one link to a porn site. Is this getting me penalized? should i remove the links to these sites? Thanks, Ron
Link Building | | Ron100 -
Reciprocal links
I've heard that reciprocal links don't count anymore. If i stop linking to a person that links to me, will that link to my website start counting? Do reciprocal links count at all in google? Anchor text? anything? Thanks in advance! Ron
Link Building | | Ron100 -
Old links
I am looking to remove some old directory links that now look spammy. Some years ago the site was redesigned. The links are all to the old pages url, which is 301 redirected to the new. If we remove the 301 and let the page 404, will that suffice in Googles eyes?
Link Building | | cottamg0 -
Do inbound links to download .exe files improve SEO?
The site, (http://www.bartenderbarcodesoftware.com/) sells barcode software. They also provide free printer drivers on their site. During a recent domain change (before I started helping them), they began looking at their inbound links and found quite a few external sites linking to these download files. However, when someone clicks on the link on one of these sites (i.e. http://vvs-motor.com.ua/barcode-printer-drivers) it immediately begins downloading the file (i.e. http://www.seagullscientific.com/downloads/drivers/archive/7.2/7.2.4/Unimark_7.2.4.exe) without taking the visitor to the site. The owner would greatly prefer this traffic to engage with the site and is considering 301 redirecting those download links to an actual webpage. Question: Would this look suspicious to Google? Would this have a positive or negative effect on SEO? The last factor to consider is that many of these sites will likely just recreate the list based on the new links at some future point. Thanks for any help!
Link Building | | motosantiago0 -
Inbound links vs. internal links
Which scenario does more to help SEO - A) An inbound link from a low traffic/low page rank site to my site B) An internal link where one page of my site links to another page on my site
Link Building | | DVanSchepen0