Something strange going on with new client's site...
-
Please forgive my stupidity if there is something obvious here which I have missed (I keep assuming that must be the case), but any advice on this would be much appreciated.
We've just acquired a new client. Despite having a site for plenty of time now they did not previously have analytics with their last company (I know, a crime!).
They've been with us for about a month now and we've managed to get them some great rankings already. To be fair, the rankings weren't bad before us either.
Anyway. They have multiple position one rankings for well searched terms both locally and nationally. One would assume therefore that a lot of their traffic would come from Google right?
Not according to their analytics. In fact, very little of it does... instead, 70% of their average 3,000 visits per month comes from just one referring site. A framed version of their site which is through reachlocal, which itself doesn't rank for any of their terms.
I don't get it...
The URL of the site is: www.namgrass.co.uk
(ignore there being a .com too, that's a portal as they cover other countries).
The referring site causing me all this confusion is: http://namgrass.rtrk.co.uk/
(see source code at the bottom for the reachlocal thing).
Now I know reach local certainly isn't sending them all that traffic, so why does GA say it is... and what is this reachlocal thing anyway?? I mean, I know what reachlocal is, but what gives here with regards to it?
Any ideas, please??
-
They're bidding on his brand name... so he's paying them for traffic he would have gotten anyway (as no ad would come up, he'd be the top results instead of the ad... or he could have the ad but run it himself).
I guess other than that it's no problem though... if it's sending him converting traffic. Just annoying I can't do much about the analytics, I can't see the keywords people are arriving with when they arrive through there, and ReachLocal won't share their data.
-
He said they were using someone for PPC, and that someone won't let me link the GA and Adwords accounts... that's all the info I could get on it. I assumed it was just normal PPC with another paranoid data hoarder though, not this stuff.
-
I used reach local at one point. It was all ppc traffic. Your client should know about this. It seems odd that if they are not paying reach local that reach local would continue to send them traffic.
-
The framed page is actually loading content from "namgrass-px.rtrk.co.uk" which could have been a dupe issue, but the are using a meta robots "noindex, nofollow" so I wouldn't be concerned since this should not appear in the search engine index.
Because of the framed referral issue, you should expect a 100% correlation between # of visits to ReachLocal page and # of visits in GA referral reports for that site. So if ReachLocal sends 1000 visits to that page, you'll see about 1000 in GA.
-
Thanks guys, I've just been looking into it and searched reach local on the internal search here... it seems to be as you say, reach local have made framed versions on the site which they use to send PPC traffic which they sell back to you.
Am I right in thinking that, as it's framed there is no possibility of dupe content issues?
Something (apart from the analytics) just seems wrong about it all.
Of the search terms, some are low traffic, but some are relatively high.
-
When the ReachLocal site loads the frame actually holding the site content, it will actually treat the parent window as the referral. If you look at the _utm.gif hit going to the Google Analytics servers, look at the utmr parameter (the referring URL that GA will recognize) it has a value of "http://namgrass.rtrk.co.uk/". Also, the utmz source/medium is set to "namgrass.rtrk.co.uk/referral" which is what you'll see in the Google Analytics reports.
So, what's happening is that the framed ReachLocal site IS getting traffic. It could be organic, email, PPC.... anything but we wouldn't know because the frames are dropping the real attribution and forcing a referral from namgrass.rtrk.co.uk. So, although the site may not be ranked, remember that it could get traffic through other means.
You can use tools like Fiddler or a Firefox extension called FireBug to monitor the Google Analytics _utm.gif hits and see what information is passed to the GA servers.
-
My guess is that a lot of that traffic is paid for by advertising, either online or offline. Reachlocal will do things like frame a site in their system to track incoming traffic from a particular ad or campaign. They'll also use unique phone numbers to track conversions by phone. So if your client has a significant advertising budget this could explain why lots of their traffic arrives this way.
If the keywords they rank for are really low traffic keywords, this would add some more weight to my guess. If not, back to the drawing board? Is there anything else unusual about their setup that may provide clues?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Site property is verified for new version of search console, but same property is unverified in the old version
Hi all! This is a weird one that I've never encountered before. So basically, an admin granted me search console access as an "owner" to the site in search console, and everything worked fine. I inspected some URL's with the new tool and had access to everything. Then, when I realized I had to remove certain pages from the index it directed me to the old search console, as there's no tool for that yet in the new version. However, the old version doesn't even list the site under the "property" dropdown as either verified or unverified, and if I try to add it it makes me undergo the verification process, which fails (I also have analytics and GTM access, so verification shouldn't fail). Has anyone experienced something similar or have any ideas for a fix? Thanks so much for any help!
Reporting & Analytics | | TukTown1 -
Losing referrer data on http link that redirects to an https site when on an https site. Is this typical or is something else going on here?
I am trying to resolve a referral data issue. Our client noticed that their referrals from one of their sites to another had dropped to almost nothing from being their top referrer. The referring site SiteA which is an HTTPs site, held a link to SiteB, which is also an HTTPs site, so there should be no loss, however the link to SiteB on SiteA had the HTTP protocol. When we changed the link to the HTTPs protocol, the referrals started flowing in. Is this typical? If the 301 redirect is properly in place for SiteB, why would we lose the referral data?
Reporting & Analytics | | Velir0 -
Organic reports showing a URL that isn't in Search Ask Question
In the image I've attached you can see that I have pulled a source/medium > google organic report. I've also made "landing page" my secondary dimension. The first landing page that is showing up is /v3/?slug=fnl, that is this page (https://orders.freshnlean.com/v3/?slug=fnl). You can see that the page has 230 sessions from Sep 3 - 9 and 17 transactions during that same time frame. The only thing is, that landing page is nowhere to be found in the SERPs. So how is it showing up in this report as having received google organic visitors that converted if it's not even in search? 05OclDp
Reporting & Analytics | | tdastru0 -
GA Internal Site Search Correct Query Parameter?
Hi Guys, Recently added GA internal site search to a sub-folder: http://tinyurl.com/jhm9cyl Just want to confirm would the query parameter be: /search/ Or different because it's a sub-folder? Cheers.
Reporting & Analytics | | jayoliverwright0 -
Verifying Site Ownership & Setting Up Webmaster tools for clients who use Hubspot
We are a Hubspot partner agency. I'm trying to find the best route for managing Google's tools as an extra resource for insight, not the primary basis for marketing effort. I also want to explore adwords in more depth. Finding a lot of our clients don't have one or the other or both Analytics/Webmaster tools in place. Can I verify site ownership to set up webmaster tools simply by having admin access to their analytics account or will that require ownership of the analytics account? With Google merging things together these days I'm not sure of the best approach to take. Usually clients have their site hosted somewhere and built on some platform and ADD a Hubspot blog and the landing pages/cta's, Hubspot tools on a subdomain hosted by Hubspot. Hubspot has tools in it's website settings for adding google analytics (actually it's just a field to add code to the header area). If a client has universal analytics on their primary domain do I still need to go and add a separate analytics property for the subdomain and go through Hubspot's tools to install it on the subdomain? Or just use the same code from their primary domain and add it to the Hubspot header? What is the best route? Any additional thoughts on this subject are welcome - with so much updating and changing coming from Google (and Hubspot as we implement 3.0 - COS) I'm trying to avoid wasted effort, outdated methods, etc. Thanks!
Reporting & Analytics | | rhgraves651 -
Local site rankings have dropped off first page but Universal went up.
My site was performing first page locally on 6 of 20 keywords, and universally on 3 of 20 keywords. We started a link building campaign and optimization about 3 weeks ago. When I looked at the rankings today I was happy to see that 16 of 20 keywords were in the top 20 rankings universally, but not happy to see that only 1 of the 25 words were ranking locally now. I lost my local ranking on 5 very important keywords. I realize that you can not rank first page for both local and organic but its as if I traded my first page local ranking for a universal ranking that appears lower on the page. Maybe someone could point me in the right direction.
Reporting & Analytics | | whmgatx0 -
What is s.ytimg.com in google analytics?
My clients GA reports 273 visits from s.ytimg.com. I go to the site, it doesn't exist. I googled it, there were some code with s.ytimg.com in it, but nothing I could understand. Anybody have an idea where this comes from?
Reporting & Analytics | | endlessrange0 -
What's the difference between landing pages and entrance pages on Google Analytics?
I'm confused about the difference between entrance pages and landing pages on Google Analytics. If I compare our search traffic to entrance pages with search traffic to landing pages it seems very similar -- but not identical. But this is probably because all of our GA analytics is sampled (we're a huge site). Can anyone help?
Reporting & Analytics | | CecilyP0