Something strange going on with new client's site...
-
Please forgive my stupidity if there is something obvious here which I have missed (I keep assuming that must be the case), but any advice on this would be much appreciated.
We've just acquired a new client. Despite having a site for plenty of time now they did not previously have analytics with their last company (I know, a crime!).
They've been with us for about a month now and we've managed to get them some great rankings already. To be fair, the rankings weren't bad before us either.
Anyway. They have multiple position one rankings for well searched terms both locally and nationally. One would assume therefore that a lot of their traffic would come from Google right?
Not according to their analytics. In fact, very little of it does... instead, 70% of their average 3,000 visits per month comes from just one referring site. A framed version of their site which is through reachlocal, which itself doesn't rank for any of their terms.
I don't get it...
The URL of the site is: www.namgrass.co.uk
(ignore there being a .com too, that's a portal as they cover other countries).
The referring site causing me all this confusion is: http://namgrass.rtrk.co.uk/
(see source code at the bottom for the reachlocal thing).
Now I know reach local certainly isn't sending them all that traffic, so why does GA say it is... and what is this reachlocal thing anyway?? I mean, I know what reachlocal is, but what gives here with regards to it?
Any ideas, please??
-
They're bidding on his brand name... so he's paying them for traffic he would have gotten anyway (as no ad would come up, he'd be the top results instead of the ad... or he could have the ad but run it himself).
I guess other than that it's no problem though... if it's sending him converting traffic. Just annoying I can't do much about the analytics, I can't see the keywords people are arriving with when they arrive through there, and ReachLocal won't share their data.
-
He said they were using someone for PPC, and that someone won't let me link the GA and Adwords accounts... that's all the info I could get on it. I assumed it was just normal PPC with another paranoid data hoarder though, not this stuff.
-
I used reach local at one point. It was all ppc traffic. Your client should know about this. It seems odd that if they are not paying reach local that reach local would continue to send them traffic.
-
The framed page is actually loading content from "namgrass-px.rtrk.co.uk" which could have been a dupe issue, but the are using a meta robots "noindex, nofollow" so I wouldn't be concerned since this should not appear in the search engine index.
Because of the framed referral issue, you should expect a 100% correlation between # of visits to ReachLocal page and # of visits in GA referral reports for that site. So if ReachLocal sends 1000 visits to that page, you'll see about 1000 in GA.
-
Thanks guys, I've just been looking into it and searched reach local on the internal search here... it seems to be as you say, reach local have made framed versions on the site which they use to send PPC traffic which they sell back to you.
Am I right in thinking that, as it's framed there is no possibility of dupe content issues?
Something (apart from the analytics) just seems wrong about it all.
Of the search terms, some are low traffic, but some are relatively high.
-
When the ReachLocal site loads the frame actually holding the site content, it will actually treat the parent window as the referral. If you look at the _utm.gif hit going to the Google Analytics servers, look at the utmr parameter (the referring URL that GA will recognize) it has a value of "http://namgrass.rtrk.co.uk/". Also, the utmz source/medium is set to "namgrass.rtrk.co.uk/referral" which is what you'll see in the Google Analytics reports.
So, what's happening is that the framed ReachLocal site IS getting traffic. It could be organic, email, PPC.... anything but we wouldn't know because the frames are dropping the real attribution and forcing a referral from namgrass.rtrk.co.uk. So, although the site may not be ranked, remember that it could get traffic through other means.
You can use tools like Fiddler or a Firefox extension called FireBug to monitor the Google Analytics _utm.gif hits and see what information is passed to the GA servers.
-
My guess is that a lot of that traffic is paid for by advertising, either online or offline. Reachlocal will do things like frame a site in their system to track incoming traffic from a particular ad or campaign. They'll also use unique phone numbers to track conversions by phone. So if your client has a significant advertising budget this could explain why lots of their traffic arrives this way.
If the keywords they rank for are really low traffic keywords, this would add some more weight to my guess. If not, back to the drawing board? Is there anything else unusual about their setup that may provide clues?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How to detect where Google gets indexed URL's
Google index some kind of way some links that create duplicate content. We doesn't understand how these are created so we would like detect where Google robots find these links. We tried: Moz Crawl Diagnostics but it shows 0 as Internal Link Count for these kind of links. Find some information from Google Analytics, that maybe there is trace (site content - all content) from visitors side. There wan't. We tried to find some information in Webmaster Tools under Internal link and HTML Improvements but didn't find any trace. Tried some search commands. Is there maybe some good one to search. TO search URL's form code with https://search.nerdydata.com.
Reporting & Analytics | | raido0 -
How to safely exclude search result pages from Google's index?
Hello everyone,
Reporting & Analytics | | llamb
I'm wondering what's the best way to prevent/block search result pages from being indexed by Google. The way search works on my site is that search form generates URLs like:
/index.php?blah-blah-search-results-blah I wanted to block everything of that sort, but how do I do it without blocking /index.php ? Thanks in advance and have a great day everyone!0 -
Strange Behaviour - Varying rankings across browsers and devices
Hello, I noticed something quite strange over the last week with one of my keywords. I'll explain the lead up to this so it makes more sense. I started SEO work for a client about 3 months ago. One of the keywords I'm trying to increase their ranking for is "auto body calgary". I made a specific landing page for this keyword so it could be better targeted. After I made this landing page I saw their root domain (not the landing page) increase about 10 rankings to number 9 in 2 months. It hung at number 9 for about a month, and then the last month it has decreased to rank 15. For interest sake I searched "auto body calgary" on multiple computers and browsers. On one of the computers I used Safari and my landing page showed up in the number 2 position. On my mobile phone and personal laptop I used Safari and it showed to root domain ranked at 15. I used Google to search every time and wasn't logged in to my Google account on either of the searches. The only thing I've done in the last month is updated some of their directory submissions so they are more consistent. Out of this I have two questions: Why would different browsers show considerably different rankings and pages for a keyword? Since my landing page is more targeted to "auto body calgary" is Google trying to show that page instead of the root domain? (my root domain has considerably more authority than this landing page) Thanks to anyone who can offer insight!
Reporting & Analytics | | reidsteven750 -
Local site rankings have dropped off first page but Universal went up.
My site was performing first page locally on 6 of 20 keywords, and universally on 3 of 20 keywords. We started a link building campaign and optimization about 3 weeks ago. When I looked at the rankings today I was happy to see that 16 of 20 keywords were in the top 20 rankings universally, but not happy to see that only 1 of the 25 words were ranking locally now. I lost my local ranking on 5 very important keywords. I realize that you can not rank first page for both local and organic but its as if I traded my first page local ranking for a universal ranking that appears lower on the page. Maybe someone could point me in the right direction.
Reporting & Analytics | | whmgatx0 -
What is s.ytimg.com in google analytics?
My clients GA reports 273 visits from s.ytimg.com. I go to the site, it doesn't exist. I googled it, there were some code with s.ytimg.com in it, but nothing I could understand. Anybody have an idea where this comes from?
Reporting & Analytics | | endlessrange0 -
How can you tell if your new content has been indexed?
Other than simply doing a search in each case, is there any way I can tell (in Webmaster Tools, for example) if the 500-1000 new pages of content I have added have been indexed and are now appearing in search results? My traffic hasn't risen much, but I know at least a few of them are in there... How can I tell when they're all in?
Reporting & Analytics | | corp08030 -
Google Analytics internal Site Search - Destination pages dispaly Search results
Hi, Im having a bit of an issue with Google Analytics internal site search, I am able to currently track the search terms through my website internal search but when I click onto destination pages I just get the search result page. When clicking destination pages I would expect to get the pages on which the user ended up after the results page, instead I just get the results page which is pretty much useless ?submitsearchXXXXXX hope you can help, look forward to your response. Thanks,
Reporting & Analytics | | Tug-Agency1 -
Unable to use Open Site Explorer
I have repeatedly tried to use Open Site Explorer on a site. I always get the same response: No Data Available for this URL The site is 4 months old. It is listed by Alexa in 1.3 million page category. The site ranks well on numerous key terms for the industry it covers. OSE offers 4 reasons for not having data: 1. Recency of page creation. In the explanation offered 45-60 days is the longest estimate it should take. The site has been live close to 120 days. 2. Deep down in the web. The tool doesn't even have any data for the site's home page. 3. Blocked pages. The site is listed in Google and these pages are not blocked. 4. No links. There are plenty of links. Site url is www.terapvp.com What can I do to fix this issue and get data?
Reporting & Analytics | | RyanKent0