Issues with Moz producing 404 Errors from sitemap.xml files recently.
-
My last campaign crawl produced over 4k 404 errors resulting from Moz not being able to read some of the URLs in our sitemap.xml file. This is the first time we've seen this error and we've been running campaigns for almost 2 months now -- no changes were made to the sitemap.xml file. The file isn't UTF-8 encoded, but rather Content-Type:text/xml; charset=iso-8859-1 (which is what Moveable Type uses). Just wondering if anyone has had a similar issue?
-
Hi Barb,
I am sure Joel will chime in also but just to clarify that it is probably not the utf8 encoding or lack of it that is causing the issue. At least with the sitemap urls it is simply the formatting of the xml that is being produced. As to if the other errors you are seeing are caused by the same kind of thing, if you are seeing references to the same encoded characters (%0A%09%) then the answer is most likely yes.
So the issue is not utf8 encoding related (there are plenty of non utf8 encoded sites on the web still!) but how the moz crawler is reading your links and if other tools/systems will be having the same troubles. Have you looked in google webmaster tools to see if it reports similar 404 errors from the sitemap or elsewhere? If you see similar errors in GWT then the issue is likely not restricted to the moz crawler only.
Beyond that, since for the sitemap at least the fix should be relatively simple and quite possibly the other moz errors you see will also be able to be fixed easily by making small adjustments to the templates and removing the extra line breaks/tabs which are creating the issue then it is worth doing so that these errors are removed and you can concentrate on the 'real' errors without all the noise.
-
Joel,
The latest 404 errors have the same type of issue, and are all over place in terms of referrer (none are the sitemap.xml) that I can see.
My question is, can the fact that we don't use the UTF-8 encoding in our site potentially cause issues with other reporting? This is not something we can change easily and I don't want to waste a great deal of effort sorting through "red herring" issues due to the encoding we use on the site.
thoughts?
barb
-
Thanks Joel,
We're looking into this.
barb
-
Thanks Lynn,
We are looking at that. The 4k 404 errors are gone now, but it's possible they will return.
It's a major change for us to switch to UTF-8, so it's not something that will happen anytime soon. I'll just have to be aware that it might be causing issues.
barb
-
Hey Brice,
I just to add to Lynn's great answer with the reason you're seeing the URLs the way they are and to reinforce that.
You have it formatted as such:
<loc>http://www.cmswire.com/cms/web-cms/david-hillis-10-predictions-for-web-content-management-in-2011-009588.php</loc>The crawler converts everything to URL encoding. So those line feeds and tabs will be converted to percentage tags. The reason your root domain is there is because %0A is not the proper start of a URL so RogerBot assumes it's a relative link to the domain your sitemap is on.
The encoding thing is probably not affecting this.
Cheers,
Joel. -
Hi,
It can be frustrating I know, but if you are methodical you will get to the bottom of all errors and then feel much better
Not sure why the number of 404s would have gone down, but in regards the sitemap itself the moz team might be right that utf-8 encoding could be part of the problem. I think it might be more to do with some non visible formatting/characters being added to your site map during creation. %09 is a url encoded tab and %0A is a url encoded line feed, it looks to me that these are getting into your sitemap even though they are not actually visible.
If you download your site map you will see that many (but not all) the urls look like this:
<loc>http://www.cmswire.com/cms/web-cms/david-hillis-10-predictions-for-web-content-management-in-2011-009588.php</loc>Note the new lines and the indent. Some other urls do not have this format for example:
<loc>http://www.cmswire.com/news/topic/impresspages</loc>
It would be wise to ensure both the file creating the sitemap and the sitemap itself are in utf-8, but also it could be as simple as going into the file creating the sitemap and removing those line breaks. Once that is done wait for the next crawl and see if it brings the error numbers down (it should). As for the rest of the warnings, just be methodical, identify where they are occurring and why and work through them. You will get to few or zero warnings, and you will feel good about it!
-
interesting that a new crawl just completed and now I only have 307 404 Errors and a lot of other different errors and warnings. It's frustrating to see such different things each week.
barb
-
Hi Lynn,
I did download the csv and found all the 404 errors were generate from our sitemap.xml file. Here's what the URLs look like:
referring URL is http://www.cmswire.com/sitemap.xml
You'll notice that there is odd formatting wrapping the URL (%0A%09%09%09) + the extra http://www.cmswire to the front of the URL- which does not exist in the actual sitemap.xml file if I view it separately.
Also: Moz support looked at our campaign and they thought the problem was that our sitemap wasn't UTF-8 encoded.
Any ideas?
-
Hi Brice,
What makes you think the issue is that moz cannot read the urls? In the first instance I would want to make sure that something else is not going wrong by checking the urls moz is flagging as 404s, ensuring they actually do or do not exist and if the latter finding out where the link is coming (be it the sitemap or another page on the site). You may have already done this, but if not you can get all this information by downloading the error report in csv and then filtering in excel to get data for 404 pages only.
If you have done this already then if you give us a sample or two of the urls moz is flagging along with the referring url and your sitemap url we might be able to diagnose the issue better. It would be unusual for the moz crawler to start throwing errors all of a sudden if nothing else has changed. Not saying it is impossible for it to be an error with moz, just saying that the chances are on the side of something else going on.
Hope that helps!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
HTTPS Move and Moz Campaign
We moved our site over to HTTPS this week and I was wondering if I need to create a new Moz campaign? I'm aware you can't change a website address in an existing Moz campaign, however the website listed in the current campaign contains no http//www. and seems to only be entered as example.com. Anyone have a suggestion for this?
Moz Pro | | ilewis0 -
Abnormal crawl issues appearing in my Moz results
I have been asked to look at a site for a friend and was more than surprised to see 16,9k crawl issues appear in the dashboard... of this 6,238 are duplicate page content and 5878 are duplicated page titles. What on earth is going on? I have spoken to the web developer as it appears there is a dev site somewhere and this is his response [Can I stress that Google determines which site was in the index first and then removes other sites it sees as having duplicate content. Our dev sites appearing in the search index would not affect your ranking due to duplicate content as Google would see your site as the first site with the content] As I cannot make contact with him, I am scratching my head, surely a dev site should be no-indexed, it sounds as though he is saying that its ok because Google will take the main site as the first site with the content... Very confused! Help need MOZ community. Manythanks, Sarah
Moz Pro | | Mutatio_Digital0 -
Magento creating odd URL's, no idea why. GWT reporting 404 errors
Hi Mozzes! Problem 1 GWT and Moz, both are reporting approximately one hundred 404 errors for certain URL's. Examples shown below. We have no idea why or how these URL's are being created in Magento. Any hypothesis on the matter would be appreciated. The domain name in question is http://www.artorca.com/ These are valid URL's if /privacy is removed. The first URL is for a product, second for an artist profile and third for a CMS page 1. semi-abstract-landscape/privacy 2. jose-de-la-barra/privacy 3. seller-guide/privacy What may be the source for these URL's? What solution should we implement to fix existing 404's? 301 redirects should be fine? Problem 2 Website pages seem to also be accessible with index.php in the domain name. Example Artorca.com/index.php/URL's. Will this cause a duplicate content issue? Should we implement 301's, canonicals, or just leave as is? Cheers! MozAddict
Moz Pro | | MozAddict0 -
Stupid question: why SEOMOz has become MOZ?
According to their On-Page Report Card the URL should include the main keyword i.e. SEO in their case, so why do they get an F grade If I check their main page www.moz.com for the keyword SEO? Thanks for your comments!
Moz Pro | | mcany0 -
Weird 404 Errors
Hi All, Although my Moz error scans have been pretty clean for a while, a law firm site I manage recently cropped up with 80+ 404 errors since the last scan. I'm a little baffled as the url it shows being returned looks like this: http://www.yoursite.com/ http://www.yoursite.com/resource.html For some reason it seems to be initiating a query to call the root domain twice before the actual resource. I installed ModX Revolution 2.2.6-PL on the site in question, and am hoping a canonical plugin I just started using will take care of these. Has this happened to anyone else? What did you do to solve the issue? Thanks for your time and any tips!
Moz Pro | | G2W0 -
What Does the SEO Moz Crawler Take Into account?
I'm working on a page that has links from some decent pages pointing to it, but a lot of them are low-value blog comments. So I'm pretty sure that its Page Authority is higher than it should be, compared to where it's ranking. Does SEO moz take the type of link into account? i.e. if it's a footer link, blog comment, or forum signature link; this should carry less weight than a link in the content of the page itself, as it does with Google.
Moz Pro | | seanmccauley0