Perspectives or not...
-
Hello,
3 months passed since we start to make Seo at an accessories shop for Smartphones. On page seo is ok, having moz help. Links are ok, not too many, not few. But results is not coming ....
Something we miss, that is for sure. But what.
Meanwhile the web grows up from Facebook ads and Google Adwords. When i said grow up i make referral at number of visitors that come and visit web and make some conversions. You know? Here is an proverb: "What you take from selling apples you spend on buying pears". I mean: we take money from conversions, pay products, and the difference at last complete the cost of web campaigns.
We got in a point there where if you try to double the conversions you can`t, cause the costs grows up too much.
**Competitors vs us: **
If you take moz tools, and compare you will see our pages better than competitors but still not growing in positions.Social interactions (how much there count?) I have pages with +300 likes on facebook / 50 shares on facebook / 10 google plus / 10 twitters ....
Google cares ? (my answer is: No, ofc not. But i wait yours.)Page Authority and Domain Authority vs Google PageRank update There will be a new PageRank update? I have on many keywords with their pages the PA and DA much better than competitors and still a bad position into google. Does an PageRank update change the situation?
Seo vs Sem .... nothing will help you at beginning. They both win, you lose. That is my conclusion. Maybe after a while, after the brand will be more visible, after we will got 30k+ fans on facebook, maybe the situation will change.
If you are wondering about web, here is the web: http://wo-men.ro
If you want to see how we present most of products i give you here some examples of the products with most conversions:
1. http://wo-men.ro/femei/husa-vintage-piele-ipad-neagra.html
2. http://wo-men.ro/femei/husa-samsung-galaxy-note-2-nillkin-green.html
3. http://wo-men.ro/femei/husa-ipad-mini-multi-heart.html (you will love that)
4. http://wo-men.ro/femei/husa-ipad-mini-nillkin-green.html
As you see we invest a lot of work into products (we are working to do at all products). We made 360 view only at 30% of products cause it take a lot of time, and we are doing like 10% per month.
What ever.... wait you with some suggestions ... thank you in advance.
-
This infographic is really nice. Ty for it. And i try not losing hope.
-
Hey there Shanaki,
First of all the page looks nice good job with the design.
SEO is a service that takes time to give you fruitful changes.
I take it that the site is fairly new. As far as i know and I admit I am not the best out there SEO takes usually about 6 months of work. You can see small changes within few days but for the real deal you have to wait.
Social Media interaction that you said. I am certainly that not only Google but all search engines care a lot.
Now about the Pagerank you talked about. Yeah I believe it counts a lot. Here is a helpful infographic about it.
http://www.searchenginejournal.com/infographic-googles-200-ranking-factors/64316/
Domain authority will grow in time just keep up with your SEO and don't lose hope.
Hope everything turns out good!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Next scheduled update?
Hello my new website is showing everything at minimum like domain and page rating and backlinks, when will the next update will be?
Algorithm Updates | | raffaelegurrieri0 -
International Homepage Advice
Hello, colleagues! We have a conundrum. A client website has a good subdirectory strategy for localized/translated content for its various international markets, but nothing currently "lives" at the root. In my mind, this presents a challenge to search engines (note that we have had some trouble getting proper visibility overall, which is why I'm asking this question). I'm looking for any links or just plain old good advice on why it's important to have a global homepage. Should that global homepage be in English? Most enterprise sites I've worked with do have a homepage that's in English, with the ability to select a country from a drop down in a nav across the site. Any advice, best practices, etc. about why a global homepage is important and what language it could/should be in would be really helpful. Hreflang tags would make sense, I guess, but each country has slightly different offerings so I'm not sure that it makes complete sense. In other words, one country's homepage may have completely different content than another's. Thank you!
Algorithm Updates | | SimpleSearch0 -
Mobile Usability Issues after Mobile Frist
Hi All A couple months ago we got an email from google, telling us - Mobile-first indexing enabled for https://www.impactsigns.com/ Ran the test on MOZ, Mobile usability shows 100% Last week got an email from google - New Mobile usability issues detected for impactsigns.com Top new issues found, ordered by number of affected pages: Content wider than screen Clickable elements too close together I can not seem to figure out what those issues are, as all content is visible. How important are these 2 issues? Since we are now on the mobile first side?
Algorithm Updates | | samoos0 -
On page vs Off page vs Technical SEO: Priority, easy to handle, easy to measure.
Hi community, I am just trying to figure out which can be priority in on page, off page and technical SEO. Which one you prefer to go first? Which one is easy to handle? Which one is easy to measure? Your opinions and suggestions please. Expecting more realistic answers rather than usual check list. Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz0 -
What does it mean to build a 'good' website.
Hi guys. I've heard a lot of SEO professionals, Google, (and Rand in a couple of whiteboard Friday's) say it's really important to build a 'good' website if you want to rank well. What does this mean in more practical terms? (Context... I've found some sites rank much better than they 'should' do based on the competition. However, when I built my own site (well-optimised (on-page) based on thorough keyword research) it was nowhere to be found (not even top 50 after I'd 'matched' the backlink profile of others on page 1). I can only put this down to there being 'good quality website' signals lacking in the latter example. I'm not a web developer so the website was the pretty basic WordPress site.)
Algorithm Updates | | isaac6630 -
Is anyone else's ranking jumping?
Rankings have been jumping across 3 of our websites since about 24 October. Is anyone seeing similar? For example ... jumps from position 5 to 20 on one day, then back to 5 for 3 days and then back to 20 for a day I'm trying to figure out if it's algorithm based or if my rank checker has gone mad. I can't replicate the same results if I search incognito or in a new browser, everything always looks stable in the SERPs if I do the search myself
Algorithm Updates | | Marketing_Today0 -
I'm Pulling Hairs! - Duplicate Content Issue on 3 Sites
Hi, I'm an SEO intern trying to solve a duplicate content issue on three wine retailer sites. I have read up on the Moz Blog Posts and other helpful articles that were flooded with information on how to fix duplicate content. However, I have tried using canonical tags for duplicates and redirects for expiring pages on these sites and it hasn't fixed the duplicate content problem. My Moz report indicated that we have 1000s of duplicates content pages. I understand that it's a common problem among other e-commerce sites and the way we create landing pages and apply dynamic search results pages kind of conflicts with our SEO progress. Sometimes we'll create landing pages with the same URLs as an older landing page that expired. Unfortunately, I can't go around this problem since this is how customer marketing and recruitment manage their offers and landing pages. Would it be best to nofollow these expired pages or redirect them? Also I tried to use self-referencing canonical tags and canonical tags that point to the higher authority on search results pages and even though it worked for some pages on the site, it didn't work for a lot of the other search result pages. Is there something that we can do to these search result pages that will let google understand that these search results pages on our site are original pages? There are a lot of factors that I can't change and I'm kind of concerned that the three sites won't rank as well and also drive traffic that won't convert on the site. I understand that Google won't penalize your sites with duplicate content unless it's spammy. So If I can't fix these errors -- since the company I work conducts business where we won't ever run out of duplicate content -- Is it worth going on to other priorities in SEO like Keyword research, On/Off page optimization? Or should we really concentrate on fixing these technical issues before doing anything else? I'm curious to know what you think. Thanks!
Algorithm Updates | | drewstorys0 -
Is it bad from an SEO perspective that cached AMP pages are hosted on domains other than the original publisher's?
Hello Moz, I am thinking about starting to utilize AMP for some of my website. I've been researching this AMP situation for the better part of a year and I am still unclear on a few things. What I am primarily concerned with in terms of AMP and SEO is whether or not the original publisher gets credit for the traffic to a cached AMP page that is hosted elsewhere. I can see the possible issues with this from an SEO perspective and I am pretty sure I have read about how SEOs are unhappy about this particular aspect of AMP in other places. On the AMP project FAQ page you can find this, but there is very little explanation: "Do publishers receive credit for the traffic from a measurement perspective?
Algorithm Updates | | Brian_Dowd
Yes, an AMP file is the same as the rest of your site – this space is the publisher’s canvas." So, let's say you have an AMP page on your website example.com:
example.com/amp_document.html And a cached copy is served with a URL format similar to this: https://google.com/amp/example.com/amp_document.html Then how does the original publisher get the credit for the traffic? Is it because there is a canonical tag from the AMP version to the original HTML version? Also, while I am at it, how does an AMP page actually get into Google's AMP Cache (or any other cache)? Does Google crawl the original HTML page, find the AMP version and then just decide to cache it from there? Are there any other issues with this that I should be aware of? Thanks0