Why are my paid vendors not showing on our links?
-
We pay a hefty amount to site that claim to bring in leads. ie... Cars.com, Edmunds.com, Cargurus, and I also have my dCard (digital business cards) with links to our URL. Why aren't they showing on our PA or DA? Could it be our web host? We have on;y 2 options for web hosts per Acura (a compliance thing) Please help with any thoughts or answers to this. I see many other dealers with strong links who use the same companies. Our site is http://findlayacura.com and thank you for any help. We appreciate it greatly.
-
The main reason I personally don't like these sites is there claims to get impressions. I caught them advertising of Facebook with my cars!! When I asked if this was part of there 94k impression my store got last month they couldn't come up with a straight answer. You can definitely monetize your site as long as you properly address what makes your site different then these big corp sites that are charging you a huge sum then turn to your competitor and get them to pay more to put banner ads across my cars. I am always open to trying out a pilot program if you're interested.
-
Cody has a good answer here. We don't have the server farms (or server barges?) that Google has, so we can't crawl as much of the web as they do, and can't always crawl all of the links. Do also check in Google and Bing webmaster tools to see if the links are showing there.
-
I don't have access to the webmaster tools we pay a company as I'm sure you know to do this for us. I only can submit a ticket to our support team and see what the come up with. With the help of MOZ I am able to uncover a lot of things that our SEO and website team don't pick up on or even look at. This is why I posted the question to begin with. you are absolutely right when I ask me Rep if they can provide links back to our site I get let me check with tech support then about a month goes by and next visit I get oh yeah they weren't able to figure out what I asked them.
It's the normal automotive rep bs.
Thanks again for responding I am going to now open a ticket at the next window lol while forwarding this over to my internet team. -
I know what you mean. I work with pretty much all the vendors, and I can say that you should just be happy you don't have a Ford Direct site, which requires you to pay a "SEO Fee" to just change title tags.
Anyway, if you install the "Redirect Path" plugin on Chrome, which shows when you get redirected on a site, and what kind of redirect it is, you will see that the link to your dealership page from one of your VDPs on Cars.com is actually a 301 redirect. Basically, they are doing their best to keep any authority from going to that page that would help the link back to your site. They also link to the www. version of your website, which then gets 301'd to the non www. version of your website. If, and how much, authority is lost with redirects is highly debated, but I usually go with a 10% loss of authority. Basically, any authority that the link might provide is greatly decreased by these redirects.
This is just Cars.com, but I would guess the others are similar. Do these links register in your Webmaster tools?
-
Cody Jerry
I really appreciate you taking the time to respond to this question. I am a Sales Manager here who also is running our internet department. I am trying to think outside the box in the auto biz. As you know most of the SEO and website host are cookie cutter to put it blunt. I can't stand the fact that we pay companies like cars .com or autotrader, it's our inventory, it's our product, without us they wouldn't be here. You're right on the fact that they would never give up any info on analytics so no sense working that angle. Why if there PA is so high and I compared us to another dealer who uses them am I not getting any results in the link Analysis? Thanks for the help.
-
I actually specialize in automotive seo, but haven't really thought about it. Anyway, I took a look at your cars.com link, and it registers as a PA of 1, which means it has very little authority being passed into it. The reason why you aren't seeing these links is because the pages in which they reside have such little authority that the Moz spider does not locate them. I've also never seen one of these links in Google Webmaster tools, so I would guess that they don't consider them very authoritative links either.
Consider this, though. You are paying for that service, so those links are Paid Links. It's also possible that search engines ignore them because they know this fact, and don't bother indexing them. The only way to really get an idea of how important search engines feel those pages are would be to look at server level crawl stats. Unfortunately, Cars.com would never share that data with you, and your rep would probably just give you a blank look if you asked.
If you have any questions about your dealerships SEO you can PM me.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Via this intermediate link?
I'm doing some work on an ecommerce site for an electronics distributor and I've been seeing these "Via this intermediate link" notations from GWT under our "Links To Your Site" section. I understand how and why these notations would normally be displayed, however, these links are mainly coming from our direct competitors. Fearing that we might be a victim of a negative SEO attack, I looked into the situation and noticed that all of the links are from PDF's (technical data sheets) provided by the manufacturer that both we and our competitors use on our product detail pages. This still seems odd to me because, we download these pdf's and host them on our own site on our own servers under a completely different name (as I'm assuming our competitors do as well), yet, there still seems to be a connection between our sites through these PDF's. I've included a screenshot of some examples. Since we have thousands of SKU's on our site - with technical PDF's for nearly all of them - we're seeing a lot of links from competitors sites. I'm not sure if this is good or bad, I'm just trying to understand the situation more clearly. Has anyone had any similar experiences or some information from Google that might explain what I'm seeing here? fpWvB5T
Competitive Research | | GalcoIndustrial0 -
Are aboutus.org links good?
Greetings Mozzers, I've posted several clients on aboutus.org sometime ago and it doesn't look like it is showing up on OSE. Its been well over 5 weeks. I have looked on their profile and none of the links are rel="nofollow" is there another thing I can check that would take all the juice away from them? Or does someone know if this is a good place to use? Thanks for any advice and clarification!
Competitive Research | | MonsterWeb280 -
What is your best technique of getting .Gov and .Edu links?
I'm looking for some great techniques to get .Gov and .Edu links. Please do not comment "Great content" because I know that. I'm looking for something beyond creating great linkworthy content.
Competitive Research | | TylerReardon0 -
How does OSE count Total Links?
I'm trying out Market Samurai & OSE for gauging SEO competition. When I try both the tools for giving backlink count for a specific page then I'm seeing remarkable difference. Hence I need to know how OSE calculates "Total Links" for a page & how can we be sure that it is true?
Competitive Research | | Notsy0 -
Certainty or Uncertainty of SEO / Link Building
Hey there I'm new to both SEO and Seomoz. I have this personal site I've been working on SEO wise (slowly since I started learning from 0) and I have reached a point where the only missing thing for me to do is build links. However, the competitors for my site have thousands of links. From all I've read on the web regarding SEO&LinkBuilding, including articles in this site...the old method of spamming links wherever/whenever possible is now being penalized while the practice of manual/hand-built links of higher quality and lesser quantity is rewarded. So I went ahead and approached several linkbuilding companies and one thing that struck me was the level of uncertainty regarding the chances of getting a site to get to the first page. I understand there's factors you cannot predict or control, such as what your competitors are doing on the SEO front...but ultimately, I'm curious as to how do you effectively gauge the possibility of getting to the top page of any keyword combination? Especially when dealing with clients... since apparently whoever 'guarantees' you anything is a fraud or uses blackhat techniques...how do you pitch the 'uncertainty' to the client? Likewise...how do you know if you can make it to the top page or viceversa? Cheers
Competitive Research | | Sotkra0 -
SEOmoz total links fluxuations
I'm analyzing my clients and competitor back links and are noticing alot of up and down fluxuations. For example last month we had 1400 back links, last week 1350 back links, and today 1450 back links. Also, one competitor went from 25,000 to 2,700 in the space of a few weeks. My question is how can I explain to the client that their back links are going down when they are paying for a back link building service (100 back links per month). Thank you for your time.
Competitive Research | | SharpKiwi0 -
Blog Comment Links
Hi everyone! Using the Open Site Explorer tool I can see many of my competitors leave blog comments which (according to the tool) are providing link value to their sites. This seems like something that can easily be used in a black hat sort of way. My question is this - Is leaving comments on blogs an effective way of generating positive links to my site? Adrian
Competitive Research | | adrianaldous0 -
Question regarding back link analysis and anchor text
Hello, I am looking at my competitors back link analysis and comparing a range of link based metrics from the top 10 SERPS. I am then putting this data into excel and comparing our back link profiles. When looking at the anchor text distribution i am not sure whether to look at exact match anchor or phrase match anchor. For example, one of the companies I am looking at holds positions 3 and 4 in the SERPS. Looking at their linking profile I can see that only 1.7% of their links use the exact match anchor 'widget'. Looking at their phrase match anchor is an entirely different story, 93.5% of anchor links contain 'widget' somewhere. i.e. 'cheap widgets', 'widget sale', 'buy widgets at www.examplewidget.co.uk' etc. Obviously their exact match and phrase match anchor distribution tell a completely different story. THIS IS TRUE FOR MANY OF THE TOP 10 SERPS. Therefore, should I be looking at phrase match anchors instead of exact? Side note: would people recommend targeting anchors with 'brandname widget' based on predictions of Google giving weighted anchor more weight. Robert.
Competitive Research | | 87ROB0