What would be considered a bad ratio to determine Index Bloat?
-
I am using Annie Cushing's most excellent site audit checklist from Google Docs. My question concerns Index Bloat because it is mentioned in her "Index" tab.
We have 6,595 indexed pages and only 4,226 of those pages have received 1 or more visits since January 1 2013.
Is this an acceptable ratio? If not, why not and what would be an acceptable ratio? I understand the basic concept that "dissipation of link juice and constrained crawl budget can have a significant impact on SEO traffic." [Thanks to Reid Bandremer http://www.lunametrics.com/blog/2013/04/08/fifteen-minute-seo-health-check/#sr=g&m=o&cp=or&ct=-tmc&st=(opu%20qspwjefe)&ts=1385081787]
If we make this an action item I'd like to have some idea how to prioritize it compared to other things that must be done. Thanks all!
-
Hi EGOL,
Wow, thank you so very much. This is one of the best answers I've ever received, probably the best, here in Q & A. Your thoughtful comments and suggestions are so appreciated. Honestly, you gave me a check list of things that have potential to be pure gold for us if we act on them.
Yes, you are correct, this is the site that had many issues with content being under tabs. It's also got a tremendous amount of duplicate and thin content issues, in addition to orphaned pages. Progress has been coming along, slowly and surely, but having your comments, and having them be so specific, pointed and concise are something I can take to my team and say "Here's an awesome check list of things that we can actually address right now, without re-platforming the site [you know, there are always people who think that the root of all a site's problems is the platform that it's on...pure mythology]."
I hope many others find your check list useful. Combined with Annie's audit spreadsheet in Google docs, I feel like I have the tools I need to go to battle and help this site fulfill its potential. Nearly every point you mentioned struck a chord. Better yet, now that I know my way around the "guts" of this homegrown CMS, I feel like I can actually make the necessary changes.
Egol, I really can't thank you enough.
-
I totally agree Keri. Every word Egol wrote , to me, is worth its weight in gold. I think this may be the best response I have ever received here in Q & A.
-
If only people realized how much good information members drop in Q&A...
Once again, thanks for this EGOL!
-
From my experience, that is a frightening number of pages that have not received a visit. I would definitely be taking some type of action. This hits to me like a site in very bad health. I have lots of little pages on a weak little site that get a lot more traffic than none since January. This would be high on my priority list of things to solve. Solving this could bring major income so this is potential opportunity as much as it is a problem.
To diagnose, I would check.... I know you and suspect that you have looked at all of these but just making a list, just in case.
A) Duplicate content problem? Does this site have lots of pages with very similar other pages on the same site. Does the company have another site that is running the same product descriptions? Does the site run product descriptions that are used from a datafeed supplied to vendors? Are affiliates using the same content? Have other websites stolen the content?
B) Have you been scraped and republished by a strong website? Just one is all it would take. A strong site was once scraping and republishing some of my short content pages and that killed the traffic into a section of my site. As soon as I asked them to stop traffic was back within days. One site can hurt you like that or numerous small sites - even minor sites in Asia can do this.
C) Lots of thin content? Do you have a lot of pages that might only have two or three unique sentences? Google could be disrespecting your entire site because of this.
D) Technical problem? I would be looking at robots.txt and .htaccess, noindex, badly coded links, content management system causing duplicated title tags or other problems? Faulty analyitics that make it look like these pages are not getting traffic when really they are.
E) Content cannibalization? Lots of separate pages for red widgets that are being filtered from the SERPs.
F) Inadequate linkjuice? This is not a huge site but not a small one. Does it have a nice amount of linkjuice coming in?
G) Does this site have pages that are really deeeeep down in the linkstructure? Many clicks down? Fix that either with a new linkstructure or some kickass powerful links that hit nodes deep in the site to force spiders down. I would solve with linkstructure.
H) This isn't the site that had all of the content behind tabs that I remember from a while ago? (My memory is really bad so it might not even be your site.) If you have pages like that I would get rid of those tabs immediately. I have a personal opinion that Google does not treat content hidden behind tabs as well as content that is out in the open.
I) Are there a lot of other sites - strong ones - publlishing very similar pages - like product description pages - competing for the same keywords. If that is the case you could be crowded out of the SERPs and receiving no traffic on these pages.
J) Does this site have a bad history? Does it have something that might be causing a penalty or filtering?
After doing all of that you might have something that is really worth fixing. If you can't identify the problem I would be slashing, hatcheting those pages from the site right away.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
De-indexing and SSL question
Few days ago Google indexed hundreds of my directories by mistake (error with plugins/host), my traffic dropped as a consequence. Anyway I fixed that and submitted a URL removal request. Now just waiting things to go back to normality. Meantime I was supposed to move my website to HTTPS this week. Question: Should I wait until this indexing error has been fixed or I may as well go ahead with the SSL move?
Technical SEO | | fabx0 -
Indexed, but not shown in search result
Hi all We face this problem for www.residentiebosrand.be, which is well programmed, added to Google Search Console and indexed. Web pages are shown in Google for site:www.residentiebosrand.be. Website has been online for 7 weeks, but still no search results. Could you guys look at the update below? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | conversal0 -
Follow no-index
I have a question about the right way to not index pages: With a canonical or follow no-index. First we have a blog page: **Blogpage **
Technical SEO | | Happy-SEO
URL: /blog/
index follow Page 2 blog:
URL: /blog?=p2
index follow
rel="prev" /blog/
el="next" ?=p3 Nothing strange here i guess. But we also have other pages with chance on duplicate content: /SEO-category/
/SEO-category/view-more/ Because i don't want the "view-more" items to be indexed i want to set it on: follow no-index (follow to reach pages). But now the "view-more" also have pagination. What is the best way? Option 1:
/SEO-category/view-more/
Follow no-index /SEO-category/view-more?=p2
Follow no-index
rel="prev" /view-more/
el="next" ?=p3 Option 2: /SEO-category/view-more/
Canonical: /SEO-category/ /SEO-category/view-more?=p2
rel="prev" /view-more/
el="next" ?=p3 Option 3: Other suggests? Thanks!0 -
Need to de-index certain pages fast
I need to de-index certain pages as fast as possible. These pages are already indexed. What is the fastest way to do this? I have added the noindex meta tag and run a few of the pages through Search Console/Webmaster tools (fetch as google) earlier today, however nothing has changed yet. The 'fetch as google' services do see the noindex tag, but it haven't changed the SERPs yet. I now I should be patient, but if there is a faster way to get Google to de-index these pages, I want to try that. I am considering the removal tool also, but I'm unsure if that is risky to do. And even if it's not, I can understand it's not a permanent solution anyway. What to do?
Technical SEO | | WebGain0 -
No Index PDFs
Our products have about 4 PDFs a piece, which really inflates our indexed pages. I was wondering if I could add REL=No Index to the PDF's URL? All of the files are on a file server, so they are embedded with links on our product pages. I know I could add a No Follow attribute, but I was wondering if any one knew if the No Index would work the same or if that is even possible. Thanks!
Technical SEO | | MonicaOConnor0 -
Do Sitespect links get indexed?
I put a link on one of my websites using sitespect because the next release is not for a few weeks. The reason for the link is to pass domain authority (SEO Juice) to the linked site. In my next release I will add the link in the actual code, but am hoping that from now till then google will crawl and index this link. So the question is, will google crawl and index links adding to webpages via sitespect? Here is the code: | * [http://www.](<a class=)yourdomain.com" class="" >YourDomain |
Technical SEO | | AlyssaN
| | | Link to Sitespect: http://www.sitespect.com/0 -
Pages removed from Google index?
Hi All, I had around 2,300 pages in the google index until a week ago. The index removed a load and left me with 152 submitted, 152 indexed? I have just re-submitted my sitemap and will wait to see what happens. Any idea why it has done this? I have seen a drop in my rankings since. Thanks
Technical SEO | | TomLondon0 -
Link Indexing Thoughts
We have have several promotional Articles put out for a few client sites, (posted on sites - not article directories) That was in Sept, it looks like they have not yet been indexed - any ideas on best to get them indexed? Not just these, but a lot of external links indexed quickly -Google seem to be slowing getting to them (big web after all....)
Technical SEO | | OnlineAssetPartners0